• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
@ Sabratha

IMO in your post 96 which you have now submitted, you should add some command lines in the actions where only stability modifications are included. You could give a neutral command such as
Code:
command = { }

if you don't like the VPs.

In the way they are now, if stability is at -3 or +3, those actions will be ignored by FTG engine and won't be visible. AI chance for remaining actions will be reworked by the engine accordingly.

EDIT: there are also several DP changes. Are they really needed? Have you checked how they possibly unbalance ENG historical DP settings?
 
Last edited:
@ Sabratha

IMO in your post 96 which you have now submitted, you should add some command lines in the actions where only stability modifications are included. You could give a neutral command such as
Code:
command = { }

Quite right.


there are also several DP changes. Are they really needed? Have you checked how they possibly unbalance ENG historical DP settings?

Well, they add some tension during Henry VIII's reign, BUT if you pick all historical options, then the net result is the same as the old "Act of Supremacy" event. The innovativeness slider is evend out if you pick all the hitorical options.

Bottomn line: If you pick all the historical options, the bottomn line result in DP will be the same as it was in Vanilla at the end of Henry VIII's reign.

Now, I did make a lot of room for ahistorical "option b-d" variants, as IMHO Henry's reign was a historical crossroad for England and things may have gone in various directions. But that is solely under the gesture of a human player if he is playing England.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes Scotland is ahistorical annexed by England even before 1603 when the event about the union of the crowns should fire.

We could tweak event ENG_164047 to have it fire with Scotland already annexed but I don't think we should have an independence by event, at least until SCO_276006, about the National Covenant, or SCO_3079 and SCO_3080 fire.

Of course these SCO events should be ENG events too, in case SCO isn't any longer independent.

Then we have ENG_164050, about a second event on the union of the crowns, to fine tune, humm...

Any suggestions?
 
Sometimes Scotland is ahistorical annexed by England even before 1603 when the event about the union of the crowns should fire.

We could tweak event ENG_164047 to have it fire with Scotland already annexed but I don't think we should have an independence by event, at least until SCO_276006, about the National Covenant, or SCO_3079 and SCO_3080 fire.

Of course these SCO events should be ENG events too, in case SCO isn't any longer independent.

Then we have ENG_164050, about a second event on the union of the crowns, to fine tune, humm...

Any suggestions?

Sure.
IF we want to have an ENG event in case of an early ahistorical conquest of Scotland then it should have to grant independance to Scotland as the a option.
It´s the King of Scotland that ascends to the throne of England too and while his scottish lands may have been conquered by his now english lands he is the only legal connection as ruler in personal union. Not to grant independance to SCO should result in revolts in the provinces of Scotland as he obviously prefers his english throne over his original throne.
 
Sure.
IF we want to have an ENG event in case of an early ahistorical conquest of Scotland then it should have to grant independance to Scotland as the a option.
It´s the King of Scotland that ascends to the throne of England too and while his scottish lands may have been conquered by his now english lands he is the only legal connection as ruler in personal union. Not to grant independance to SCO should result in revolts in the provinces of Scotland as he obviously prefers his english throne over his original throne.
with option a you mean ENG_164047, don't you? So, what should we have in the trigger in case SCO doesn't exist, that ENG owns at least one or two SCO provinces? In case should we provide a third action or just merge tne new commands in action a?

Here is the concerned event:

Code:
#(1603-1625) The Union of the Crowns
#by Bordic - modified by mandead
event = {
	id = 164047
	trigger = {
		monarch = 046013 #James I
		exists = SCO
		NOT = {
			event = 276021 #SCO: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
			vassal = { country = SCO country = ENG }
			alliance = { country = SCO country = ENG }
			war = { country = SCO country = ENG }
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME164047" #The Union of the Crowns
	desc = "EVENTHIST164047"
	#-#Elizabeth I fell ill in February 1603, suffering from frailty and insomnia. After a period of distressing reflection, on 24 March she died. The will of Henry VIII declared that his daughter Elizabeth was to be succeeded by the descendants of his younger sister, Mary Tudor, Duchess of Suffolk, rather than by the Scottish descendants of his elder sister, Margaret Tudor. However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England. There were other male alternative heirs but none of them pressed their claims. Still being in Scotland at that time, James VI was proclaimed King of England as James I a few hours after Elizabeth's death by a Council of Accession.

	date = { day = 24 month = march year = 1603 }
	offset = 90
	deathdate = { day = 27 month = march year = 1625 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047A" #United countries of a Great Britain
		command = { type = flagname which = "Union" }
		command = { type = vassal which = SCO }
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = SCO value = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = SCO value = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = SCO value = 238 } #Strathclyde
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = SCO value = 239 } #Lothian
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 2 }
		command = { type = relation which = SCO value = 200 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 164112 } #ENG: The plan for a united Britain
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 276021 } #SCO: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047B" #Rule them independently
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
		command = { type = relation which = SCO value = 300 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = SCO }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 276021 } #SCO: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
	}
}

I can't remember the original meaning of this sentence:

However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England.
if it was
However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England.
or
However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England.
 
with option a you mean ENG_164047, don't you? So, what should we have in the trigger in case SCO doesn't exist, that ENG owns at least one or two SCO provinces? In case should we provide a third action or just merge tne new commands in action a?
...

How about removing the exists = SCO trigger from the trigger and
adding an independance command for SCO in action a?

Because if James is king of England the event should trigger even if SCO has been annexed - probably even if someone else had SCO annexed as James is heir to both SCO and ENG and has the claim even if not the provinces.
 
How about removing the exists = SCO trigger from the trigger and
adding an independance command for SCO in action a?

Because if James is king of England the event should trigger even if SCO has been annexed - probably even if someone else had SCO annexed as James is heir to both SCO and ENG and has the claim even if not the provinces.

What about this?

Moving the trigger in actions a and b and adding a new action c with its trigger checking the monarch and the SCO event and if SCO doesn't exist. The action c will provide cores on Scotland. Probably national.

However we need to look at the other ENG and SCO events if they are to be fine tuned accordingly.
 
What about this?

Moving the trigger in actions a and b and adding a new action c with its trigger checking the monarch and the SCO event and if SCO doesn't exist. The action c will provide cores on Scotland. Probably national.

However we need to look at the other ENG and SCO events if they are to be fine tuned accordingly.

Checking in action C if SCO doesn´t exist only makes sense if the trigger exists = SCO is removed from the events trigger.
Neither of the actions should grant national cores on Scotland as England at that time did not rule Scotland. It was a personal union. Gaining national cores in 1700 with the act of union is early enough.
 
Checking in action C if SCO doesn´t exist only makes sense if the trigger exists = SCO is removed from the events trigger.
That's what I tried to say when I wrote "Moving the trigger in actions a and b..."

Neither of the actions should grant national cores on Scotland as England at that time did not rule Scotland. It was a personal union. Gaining national cores in 1700 with the act of union is early enough.
I have understood you were suggesting it by saying:

Because if James is king of England the event should trigger even if SCO has been annexed - probably even if someone else had SCO annexed as James is heir to both SCO and ENG and has the claim even if not the provinces.

Otherwise how should we get Scotland back? claim_cores maybe?
 
That's what I tried to say when I wrote "Moving the trigger in actions a and b..."

I have understood you were suggesting it by saying:

Because if James is king of England the event should trigger even if SCO has been annexed - probably even if someone else had SCO annexed as James is heir to both SCO and ENG and has the claim even if not the provinces.

Otherwise how should we get Scotland back? claim_cores maybe?

What I meant was that the event about the union should fire that even if someone else would have annexed Scotland. James *as a person* was the king of both Scotland and England. But England should not receive national cores until the 1700 event. Remember that some people complained a while ago that conquereing SCO as ENG ahistorically early would already be too easy?

Claimcores would be an optin - James being King of SCO but the provinces of SCO still resenting that english troops were liberating them. However only if SCO does not exist and ENG does not own scottish provinces to prevent a player to be rewarded for ahistorically early annexing SCO.
 
What about this?
Code:
#(1587-1603) The Crown of England
#edited by Count Six
event = {
	id = 3078
	trigger = {
		monarch = 0119515 #James VI
		exists = ENG
		NOT = { war = { country = SCO country = ENG } }
	}
	random = no
	country = SCO
	name = "EVENTNAME3078" #The Crown of England
	desc = "EVENTHIST3078"
	#-#

	date = { day = 8 month = february year = 1587 }
	offset = 25
	deathdate = { day = 8 month = march year = 1603 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3078A" #Close policy with England
		[COLOR=Yellow]ai_chance = 99[/COLOR]
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = -1 }
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = 200 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = SPA value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = BUR value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -100 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = ENG }
		command = { type = breakdynastic which = FRA }
		command = { type = breakdynastic which = SPA }
		command = { type = breakdynastic which = BUR }
		command = { type = breakdynastic which = PAP }
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = breakvassal which = FRA }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = SPA }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = BUR }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = DAN }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = SWE }[/COLOR] 
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { 
			trigger = {
				NOT = {
					vassal = { country = ENG country = SCO }
				}
			}
			type = breakvassal which = -1 
		}[/COLOR] 
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 21133 } #ENG: James VI and the English throne
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3078B" #Fuzzy Friendliness
		[COLOR=Yellow]ai_chance = 1[/COLOR]
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 3 }
		command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = -3 }
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = 100 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = ENG }
	}
	action_c = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3078C" #Furious Outrage
		[COLOR=Yellow]ai_chance = 0[/COLOR]
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 3 }
		command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = -3 }
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = -100 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = ENG }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 } #Formerly 1
	}
}
Being of Tudor blood on his mothers side, King James VI inherited his mother's claim on the English throne when she was executed by Elizabeth I. Keeping good relations towards the English, even though they had executed his mother, would put him within reach of the English crown, while an outcry for revenge would probably have earned him respect among many of his noblemen it would possibly have squandered any opportunity to gain the English crown peacefully.
Code:
#(1587) James VI and the English Throne
#Created by Count Six
event = {
	id = 21133 #triggered by SCO_3078 A
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME21133" #James VI and the English throne
	desc = "EVENTHIST21133"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21133A" #Ratify the Alliance
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = breakvassal which = FRA }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = SPA }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = BUR }[/COLOR] 
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { 
			trigger = {
				NOT = {
					vassal = { country = SCO country = ENG }
				}
			}
			type = breakvassal which = -1 
		}[/COLOR] 
		command = { type = stability value = 2 }
		command = { type = alliance which = SCO }
		command = { type = relation which = SCO value = 200 }
		command = { type = vp value = 5 }
	}
}
By the later 1580s, with the execution of Mary Stuart and James' twenty-first birthday, it was increasingly evident that James would succeed Elizabeth to the English throne, and a formal alliance between the countries seemed an appropriate first step. The alliance was actually concluded a year before Mary's execution, but having passed that crisis it grew steadily stronger and led ultimately to James' accession in 1603.
Code:
#(1603-1625) The Union of the Crowns
#by Bordic - modified by mandead
event = {
	id = 164047
	trigger = {
		monarch = 046013 #James I
		[COLOR=Red]exists = SCO[/COLOR]
		NOT = {
			event = 276021 #SCO: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
			vassal = { country = SCO country = ENG }
			alliance = { country = SCO country = ENG }
			war = { country = SCO country = ENG }
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME164047" #The Union of the Crowns
	desc = "EVENTHIST164047"
	#-#

	date = { day = 24 month = march year = 1603 }
	offset = 90
	deathdate = { day = 27 month = march year = 1625 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047A" #United countries of a Great Britain
		[COLOR=Yellow]trigger = {
			OR = {
				exists = SCO
				AND = {	
					NOT = { exists = SCO }
					OR = {
				   		owned = { province = 236 data = -1 } #Highlands
						owned = { province = 237 data = -1 } #Grampians
						owned = { province = 238 data = -1 } #Lothian
						owned = { province = 239 data = -1 } #Strathclyde
					}
				}
			}
		}[/COLOR]
		command = { type = flagname which = "Union" }
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = vassal which = SCO }[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { 
			trigger = {
				NOT = {
					vassal = { country = SCO country = ENG }
				}
			}
			type = vassal which = SCO 
		}[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = independence which = SCO } #same monarch, two kingdoms[/COLOR]
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 238 } #Lothian
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 239 } #Strathclyde
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 2 }
		command = { type = relation which = SCO value = 200 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = sleepevent which = 276021 } #SCO: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)[/COLOR]
		command = { type = trigger which = 164112 } #ENG: The plan for a united Britain
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = sleepevent which = 276021 } #SCO: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)[/COLOR]
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047B" #Rule them independently
		[COLOR=Yellow]trigger = {
			OR = {
				exists = SCO
				AND = {	
					NOT = { exists = SCO }
					OR = {
				   		owned = { province = 236 data = -1 } #Highlands
						owned = { province = 237 data = -1 } #Grampians
						owned = { province = 238 data = -1 } #Lothian
						owned = { province = 239 data = -1 } #Strathclyde
					}
				}
			}
		}[/COLOR]
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = independence which = SCO } #same monarch, two kingdoms
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 238 } #Lothian
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 239 } #Strathclyde[/COLOR]
		command = { type = relation which = SCO value = 300 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = SCO }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 276021 } #SCO: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = trigger which = 276005 } #SCO: The Union of the Crowns[/COLOR]
	}
	[COLOR=Yellow]action_c = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047C" #Scotland belongs to the Stuarts
		trigger = {
			NOT = {
				exists = SCO
				owned = { province = 236 data = -1 } #Highlands
				owned = { province = 237 data = -1 } #Grampians
				owned = { province = 238 data = -1 } #Lothian
				owned = { province = 239 data = -1 } #Strathclyde
			}
		}
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 238 } #Lothian
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 239 } #Strathclyde
	}[/COLOR]
}

some text fixing:


Elizabeth I fell ill in February 1603, suffering from frailty and insomnia. After a period of distressing reflection, on 24 March she died. The will of Henry VIII declared that his daughter Elizabeth was to be succeeded by the descendants of his younger sister, Mary Tudor, Duchess of Suffolk, rather than by the Scottish descendants of his elder sister, Margaret Tudor. However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England. T, there were other male alternative heirs but none of them pressed their claims. Still being in Scotland at that time, James VI was proclaimed King of England as James I a few hours after Elizabeth's death by a Council of Accession.


and a NEW event.text line:

ACTIONNAME164047C;Scotland belongs to the Stuarts;x


Here we have the event unmodified:
Code:
#(1603-1625) The plan for a united Britain
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 164112 #triggered by ENG_164047
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME164112" #The plan for a united Britain
	desc = "EVENTHIST164112"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "OK"
		command = { type = alliance which = SCO }
		command = { type = trigger which = 276005 } #SCO: The Union of the Crowns
	}
}
Many Scots viewed the Union of the Crowns in 1603 as a disaster. It created the problem of one King ruling over two Parliaments. To King James, now holding court in London, the English Parliament was by far the more important of the two houses. At the time, his plan for a Union of Great Britain proved to be unpopular on all sides and it was quietly abandoned.

Here some tweaks in references and description:
Code:
#(1603-1625) The Union of the Crowns
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 276005 #triggered by ENG_164112 [COLOR=Yellow]or by ENG_164047 B[/COLOR]
	random = no
	country = SCO
	name = "EVENTNAME164047" #The Union of the Crowns
	desc = "EVENTHIST276005"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME276005A" #England won't be our liege
		command = { type = breakvassal which = ENG }
		command = { type = stability value = 2 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 2 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = ENG }
	}
}
Elizabeth I fell ill in February 1603, suffering from frailty and insomnia. After a period of distressing reflection, on 24 March she died. The will of Henry VIII declared that his daughter Elizabeth was to be succeeded by the descendants of his younger sister, Mary Tudor, Duchess of Suffolk, rather than by the Scottish descendants of his elder sister, Margaret Tudor. However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England. T, there were other male alternative heirs but none of them pressed their claims. Still being in Scotland at that time, James VI was proclaimed King of England as James I a few hours after Elizabeth's death by a Council of Accession. Many Scots viewed the Union of the Crowns in 1603 as a disaster. It created the problem of one King ruling over two Parliaments. To King James, now holding court in London, the English Parliament was by far the more important of the two houses. At the time, his plan for a Union of Great Britain proved to be unpopular on all sides and it was quietly abandoned.


also here the description:
Code:
#(1603-1625) The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 276021
	trigger = {
		exists = ENG
		vassal = { country = SCO country = ENG }
		NOT = {
			event = 164047 #ENG: The Union of the Crowns
			alliance = { country = SCO country = ENG }
			war = { country = SCO country = ENG }
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = SCO
	name = "EVENTNAME164047" #The Union of the Crowns
	desc = "EVENTHIST276021"
	#-#

	date = { day = 24 month = march year = 1603 }
	offset = 90
	deathdate = { day = 27 month = march year = 1625 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047A" #United countries of a Great Britain
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = alliance which = ENG }
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = 200 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 2 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 164047 } #ENG: The Union of the Crowns
		command = { type = trigger which = 164115 } #ENG: The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047B" #Rule them independently
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = 300 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = ENG }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 164047 } #ENG: The Union of the Crowns
	}
}

Queen Elizabeth I of England fell ill in February 1603, suffering from frailty and insomnia. After a period of distressing reflection, on 24 March she died. The will of Henry VIII declared that his daughter Elizabeth was to be succeeded by the descendants of his younger sister, Mary Tudor, Duchess of Suffolk, rather than by the Scottish descendants of his elder sister, Margaret Tudor. However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England. T, there were other male alternative heirs but none of them pressed their claims. Still being in Scotland at that time, James VI was proclaimed King of England as James I a few hours after Elizabeth's death by a Council of Accession. Many Englishmen viewed the Union of the Crowns in 1603 as a disaster. It created the problem of one King ruling over two Parliaments. To King James, now holding court in London, the Scottish Parliament was by far the more important of the two houses. At the time, his plan for a Union of Great Britain proved to be unpopular on all sides and it was quietly abandoned.

here with the new ftg commands:
Code:
#(1603-1625) The Union of the Crowns (ENG vassal to SCO)
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 164115 #triggered by SCO_276021
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME164047" #The Union of the Crowns
	desc = "EVENTHIST276021"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164115A" #Scotland won't be our liege
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 238 } [COLOR="#FFFF00"]#Lothian[/COLOR]
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SCO value = 239 } [COLOR="#FFFF00"]#Strathclyde[/COLOR]
		command = { type = breakvassal which = SCO }
		command = { type = stability value = 2 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 2 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = SCO }
	}
}
Queen Elizabeth I of England fell ill in February 1603, suffering from frailty and insomnia. After a period of distressing reflection, on 24 March she died. The will of Henry VIII declared that his daughter Elizabeth was to be succeeded by the descendants of his younger sister, Mary Tudor, Duchess of Suffolk, rather than by the Scottish descendants of his elder sister, Margaret Tudor. However, if the rules of male primogeniture were upheld and the successor James VI, King of Scots, would become the legitimate successor on the throne of England. T, there were other male alternative heirs but none of them pressed their claims. Still being in Scotland at that time, James VI was proclaimed King of England as James I a few hours after Elizabeth's death by a Council of Accession. Many Englishmen viewed the Union of the Crowns in 1603 as a disaster. It created the problem of one King ruling over two Parliaments. To King James, now holding court in London, the Scottish Parliament was by far the more important of the two houses. At the time, his plan for a Union of Great Britain proved to be unpopular on all sides and it was quietly abandoned.




The claim cores will be removed in ENG_154050, but I need to fine tune other events before posting the final suggestion.


EDIT: fixed a bug in triggers and province names as per Therion's suggestion in PV British Isles thread.
 
Last edited:
the claim cores will be removed as per this event. This event should probably test the Scottish situation too.
Code:
#(1649-1685) The Union of Great Britain [COLOR=Yellow](if the Royalists were chosen - ECW choice B)[/COLOR]
event = {
	id = 164050
	trigger = {
		[COLOR=Red]exists = SCO[/COLOR]
		event = 3771 #ENG: King Charles and the New Monarchy
		OR = {
			monarch = 046014 #Charles I
			monarch = 046015 #Charles II
		}
		NOT = {
			event = 276022 #SCO: The Union of Great Britain (ENG vassal to SCO)
			alliance = { country = SCO country = ENG }
			vassal = { country = SCO country = ENG }
			war = { country = SCO country = ENG }
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME164050" #The Union of Great Britain
	desc = "EVENTHIST164050"
	#-#

	date = { day = 5 month = february year = 1649 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 5 month = february year = 1685 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164050A" #Let's bind the destinies of our two countries
		[COLOR=Yellow]trigger = {
			OR = {
				exists = SCO
				AND = {	
					NOT = { exists = SCO }
					OR = {
				   		owned = { province = 236 data = -1 } #Highlands
						owned = { province = 237 data = -1 } #Grampians
						owned = { province = 238 data = -1 } #Lothian
						owned = { province = 239 data = -1 } #Strathclyde
					}
				}
			}
		}[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = vassal which = SCO }[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { 
			trigger = {
				NOT = {
					vassal = { country = SCO country = ENG }
				}
			}
			type = vassal which = SCO 
		}[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = independence which = SCO } #same monarch, two kingdoms[/COLOR]
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 238 } #Lothian
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = SCO value = 239 } #Strathclyde
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = removecore_national which = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 238 } #Lothian
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 239 } #Strathclyde[/COLOR]
		command = { type = DIP which = 2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = ADM which = 2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = MIL which = 2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 276022 } #SCO: The Union of Great Britain
		command = { type = trigger which = 164113 } #ENG: The formation of Great Britain
	}
	[COLOR=Yellow]action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164047C" #Scotland belongs to the Stuarts
		trigger = {
			NOT = {
				exists = SCO
				owned = { province = 236 data = -1 } #Highlands
				owned = { province = 237 data = -1 } #Grampians
				owned = { province = 238 data = -1 } #Lothian
				owned = { province = 239 data = -1 } #Strathclyde
			}
		}
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 236 } #Highlands
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 237 } #Grampians
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 238 } #Lothian
		command = { type = addcore_claim which = 239 } #Strathclyde
	}[/COLOR]
}
James I's plan for a Union of Great Britain was continued by his successors, Charles I and Charles II. Expecially Charles I, who saw himself as the 'Godly Prince' and sought to bring the Church of Scotland into conformity with England, made the first important steps towards the political union of Britain.


In case of historical path, ie the Puritans got the power, we have ENG_3028 action A to remove national cores.

EDIT: fixed a bug in triggers and province names as per Therion's suggestion in PV British Isles thread.
 
Last edited:

In ENG 164047: I remember that in EU2 it never worked if a country was granted independance AND provinces being ceded to that country in the same event.
If that has not changed then the cede commands should be repeated (not moved) in the triggered event.
Then if SCO was annexed by ENG they would grant it independace and in the next event cede the provinces.
IF SCO existed they cede the provinces right away.

I agree with the other changes.
 
In ENG 164047: I remember that in EU2 it never worked if a country was granted independance AND provinces being ceded to that country in the same event.
If that has not changed then the cede commands should be repeated (not moved) in the triggered event.
Then if SCO was annexed by ENG they would grant it independace and in the next event cede the provinces.
IF SCO existed they cede the provinces right away.

I agree with the other changes.
Yes, you are right as far as the provinces given to Scotland aren't national core provinces for Scotland.

According to revolt.txt:

Code:
SCO = { #Scotland
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 236 237 238 239 }
	extra = { }
	capital = 238
	group = latin
	#ai = "scotland.ai"
	ai = "SmallTrade1.ai"
}

in this case the command independence will give Scotland all national core provinces held by England and have Scotland as vassal.

I have also included the cedeprovince and vassal commands in case Scotland exists.

That's why I have added those "cerebral" action triggers... ;-)
 
So, what about suggestions in posts #84 and #85? They are more bugfixes I think.
...

When the lieutenency of Ireland event (1447 - 1449) is slept by keeping York in France in option b of the lieutenency of France event - then what happens to the parliament of Drogheda event that can only happen with York in Ireland in the lieutenancy of Ireland? Should not the lieutenancy of Ireland event happen anyway and just the option to send York to Ireland be disabled when he has been ahistorically sent to France and so is unavailable for Ireland?
 
Last edited:
When the lieutenency of Ireland event (1447 - 1449) is slept by keeping York in France in option b of the lieutenency of France event - then what happens to the parliament of Drogheda event that can only happen with York in Ireland in the lieutenancy of Ireland? Should not the lieutenancy of Ireland event happen anyway and just the option to send York to Ireland be disabled when he has been ahistorically sent to France and so is unavailable for Ireland?
Sorry I don't understand! Can you make some suggestions in event coding?
 
Sorry I don't understand! Can you make some suggestions in event coding?

Similar to the events about the pope you modified.

Your current suggestion to sleep 164058 (Lieutenancy of Ireland) in option b of the Lieutenancy of France (164237) means that event 164070 (Parliament of Drogheda) too can´t trigger as 164058 is a condition for that event. That would be consequent as the related event 164236 does just the same.

The Lieutenancy of Ireland event has two choices: a is send York to Ireland or b don´t send him and suffer some negative results.

When York stays in France noone is sent to Ireland as the lieutenancy of Ireland event is slept and it´s following event happens neither.

IMO if York stays in France then the Ireland lieutenancy should not be slept at all - just the a option to send York who stays in France.

Code:
#(1447-1449) The Lieutenancy of Ireland
event = {
	id = 164058
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			vassal = { country = ENG country = CON }
			vassal = { country = ENG country = LEI }
			vassal = { country = ENG country = MST }
			vassal = { country = ENG country = ULS }
			owned = { province = 231 data = -1 } #Connaught
			owned = { province = 232 data = -1 } #Ulster
			owned = { province = 233 data = -1 } #Meath
			owned = { province = 235 data = -1 } #Munster
			owned = { province = 234 data = -1 } #Leinster
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME164058" #The Lieutenancy of Ireland
	desc = "EVENTHIST164058"
	#-#Henry II had been the first English King to invade Ireland. The resulting Treaty of Windsor had established Henry II as Overlord of the island. Subsequently, a small but steady influx of English 'conquerors' carved out an area of land along Ireland's shoreline which would would later be called 'the Pale'. King John I was granted the Lordship when he was a boy, beginning a traditition that continued for centuries. Although John invaded Ireland and improved the administration and infrustructure of his English possessions, there was little he could do about the assimilation of English settlers into Irish culture. Moreover, his reforms had aggravated both the Irish and the Anglo-Irish. The scenario was not helped during Edward I's reign, as his warmongering had drained the Irish purse. Subsequently, during Edward II's reign, the Crown was forced to cancel the withdrawal of Irish funds for English expediture. Furthermore, the Scottish King Robert I's brother, Edward, invaded Ireland and proceeded to pillage the English lands there. Roger Mortimer, a wealthy English magnate with lands in the Welsh marches, was sent to Ireland as Edward II's response. Mortimer reconquered the English lands on the island, crushing Edward Bruce in the battle at Faughart in Ulster. Mortimer took Edward's lands and created Earldom of Ulster. By this time, however, Ireland was bankrupt and facing widespread famine. The various Irish Lordships possessed by English nobles were held by men who lived in England, and who rarely, if ever, visited their estates in Ireland. Attempts were made in 1297 and 1388 to coerce these absentee landlords into moving to Ireland permanently, through penalty and fine for those who would not. However, this merely served to convince many to sell their estates to Irish Kings, resulting in a further deterioration of English authority in Ireland. During Edward III's reign, his son, Lionel of Antwerp, Duke of Clarence invaded Ireland, but the sheer minority of English settlers all but rendered his efforts useless. Clarence recognized that the assimilation of English migrants into the Irish culture was undermining the Crown's authority, and so he issued the infamous Statutes of Kilkenny. The Statute was designed to segregate Englishmen from Irishmen with respect to law, language and custom. In practice, the Statutes were uninforcible and so they were widely ignored. The King's Justiciar remained largely powerless once the Royals left for England. The pattern of invasion and retreat repeated itself as Richard II and Henry IV both subscribed to a traditionally limited role in Ireland. When Henry VI issud a Royal patent creating York lieutenant of Ireland, he understood that York would be well-received there. Although the assignment was a blatant attempt to politically isolate him, York's efforts in Ireland would prove to be effective. Once York established himself in Meath, he received the submission of forty-two Irish leaders, and restored a fair degree of stability.

	date = { day = 1 month = september year = 1447 }
	offset = 200
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1449 }

	action[color=red]_a[/color] = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164058A" #Secure York's indenture, name him King's Lieutenant of Ireland
                [color=yellow]trigger = {
                leader = 46309 # Sommerset has been wakened in the Lieutenancy of France event so York can be sent to Eire
                 }[/color]
		command = { type = treasury value = -25 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 36 value = 2 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 231 value = 1 } #Connaught
		command = { type = provincetax which = 232 value = 1 } #Ulster
		command = { type = provincetax which = 233 value = 1 } #Meath
		command = { type = provincetax which = 234 value = 1 } #Leinster
		command = { type = provincetax which = 235 value = 1 } #Munster
		command = { type = relation which = CON value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = LEI value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = MST value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = ULS value = 50 }
	}
	action[color=red]_b[/color] = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME164058B" #Let him stew on his own estates
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 60 value = 1 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 164070 } #ENG: The Drogheda Parliament
	}
}
 
If I have correctly understood we could:

- add the command "setflag [York_in_Eire]" in ENG_164236 action A and ENG_164237 action A;
- add the "flag [York_in_Eire]" as a trigger in ENG_164058 action A;
- add the command "clrflag [York_in_Eire]" in ENG_164236 action A;
- remove the command "sleepevent 164058" from ENG 164236 action B.

Leaders shouldn't be used as triggers as they can die before the events testing their presence in game.
 
If I have correctly understood we could:

- add the command "setflag [York_in_Eire]" in ENG_164236 action A and ENG_164237 action A;
- add the "flag [York_in_Eire]" as a trigger in ENG_164058 action A;
- add the command "clrflag [York_in_Eire]" in ENG_164236 action A;
- remove the command "sleepevent 164058" from ENG 164236 action B.

Leaders shouldn't be used as triggers as they can die before the events testing their presence in game.


Right, with the leader trigger we have the rare problem that option a has been chosen and Somerset been killed in battle in the two years between the Lieutenancy of France and that of Ireland.

But you agree principally that the Lieutenancy of Ireland should not be slept entirely if York stays in France?