• Crusader Kings II Expansion Subscription

    Subscribe to the CK II Expansion and enjoy unlimited access to 13 major expansions and more!


  • Paradox Midsummer Sale has arrived! Up to 75% off!

    Enjoy some sun and song this Midsummer, but when the sun goes down, the fun doesn't have to stop! Paradox has a festive sale on plenty of games to keep your summer nights going!


    June 18th - June 30th
  • Crusader Kings III Available Now!

    The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.


    Real Strategy Requires Cunning
Nov 28, 2004
621
0
Isaac Brock said:
We do need to make this work better, and I agree that for now the best would be to simply remove the events for now. I'd suggest that they simply be commented out for now as place holders - something needs to be done about Milan in the early 16th century.

And the situation is not as simple as you claim. Sure in 1499 Louis XII invaded Milan based on his being the only legitimate decendent of Bernabo Visconti, Duke of Milan. This event is already handled in the mod. So 1500 is the wrong date. However, the Spanish and Austrians did participate in the Holy League of 1510 that drove the French out of Milan and put Massimiliano Sforza on the throne. And in 1525 it was Charles V who deposed Francesco Sforza and took possesion of Milan through his rights as Emperor (and obviously because his army was in possesion :)). Francesco became Duke of Milan in 1529 only because he had no heirs and the duchy would therefore revert to Austria/Spain when he died.

It is planty complicated, but the fact is that the Sforzas died out. When that happened there were only two possible dynastic results - the Orleanist claim of France might be upheld, or the fief could revert to the Emperor. Legally France clearly had the stronger case (as it did originally in 1447) but that's beside the point. I suppose hypothetically Sforza could have adopted another heir...

The vanilla way of handling this is not so bad really. Something needs to happen to Milan at this time, and it ought to end up Austrian or Spanish.


question?

is the HEI tag being used? IF so Milano should go to whoever is HEI and not necessarily Spain or Austria. Sure this is going to be a real bear in the butt if neither is HEI at the time.... but that is the problem inherent to all historic games, the player alters the choices made and thus the entire flow of history. Scripting any event that was specific to the emperor assuming that it is going to be anyone in particular is going to bite you in the butt if that party is not emperor. And that can happen in the game.

As much as possible HEI events should be scripted nation neutral to in part force the Spanish and Austrian players to take a historic path. If they are not it is now possible for the player to take ashistoric paths and still get historic benefits. As an example, in this case if at the time the HEI is not Austrian they would still get MLO and not the nation that is HEI. And if BAY was the HEI at the time I really could not see that happening while there was still breath in there body. Nor could I see it happening if FRA were emperor (not likely but could happen).

At present there is no impetus for the HAB or SPA player to even attempt to follow the same path to power that was historic since they are going to get the bennies anyway. Therefore they are now free to pursue a path that maximizes on that free empire they are going to be given.

After all this is the Alternate game is it not? And don't take that the wrong way. I am just trying to stress that I have seen a lot of concentration on getting a variation on the vanilla that stresses dynamic alternate outcomes and alterations of history..concentrating on making itself a super vanilla.

Which makes sense to a degree don't get me wrong! One first has to have firm ground on which to walk. And making as accurate a vanilla as possible does that. So, since I am new here I probably missed the post that had that as part of the overall plan.

Still ties in to part of my overall point, and that is that after the super vanilla is built and battle tested it is assumed that alternate paths are going to be built in so that the players actions actually have some major impacts on relative history. And as such, the events are going to have to be rescripted to be nation neutral for the HEI anyway.... so why not save some work down the road and start doing it now so you don't have a snake nest to untangle?

And in keeping with that basic premise...

The Burgundian marriage should be rendered somewhat neutral as well. Now given the AI, the heaviest weight is given to the historic choice. As such, the likeliest outcome is going to usually lead you to how things really played out(not guarenteed as some of the hands off game posts I have read indicate), speaking in a broad generalization. So rendering it nation neutral which I will get into a bit later, should still have the historic outcome. Now how to go about doing that? I am not sure but I was wondering if the event could query two or three random choices for who Mary should marry based on some parameters?

The parameters would be the same kind of political calculus that was done by the family historically; powerful neighbours that they have either friendly relations with or need to cement relations with to protect the estates. Now I am not certain on that since that period of history and the family involved are not areas of expertise for me. But in general the parameters work in almost any feudal family, if there are other circumstances that were involved that deviate from those that can be queried add/include them as well. But using for the sake of argument the above parameters, in a game that has England dow France HARD and achieves final victory, they would be a more logical choice then IIRC Charles of France and as such should be chosen. Not that it would be horribly practical, since I can think of noway that the game could dynamically alter the monarch and leader files to reflect this alternate but more "historic" in an ahistoric world choice.

Alternate choices lead to alternate outcomes. And as long as the AI has a small chance of taking an ahistoric path in an event, you are going to have some weird outcomes! And it only gets worse when you have real people making the choices!

One of the things that this game can do is be used as an educational tool for how dynamic history truly IS. The thread that we all know as our common global history is so very fragile. A different choice here, an alteration in timing there, and the world that you know is gone, relegated to the pages of some science fiction writer in this new world.

Not that the game can truly be that variably dynamic, well not really sure on that one. Maybe with some really clever and tight scripting it can give the illusion of it.

Sorry getting a bit tangental... should wrap this up before I go any further off the deep end
 

Sikker

General
16 Badges
Jan 3, 2002
1.800
71
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris Sign-up
This is probably not the right thread, but I couldn't find the one for Bohemia/Hussites.

I can't seem to find the event files for the Hussites, and I was wondering if there is an event like 'We've won the war' for the Hussites ... I have all of Bohemia (as SIL) - and some of Poland - and I thought it would be nive if there was some sort of a reaction (also from my neighbours) to my victory ...
 
Jul 11, 2001
636
0
www.tar.hu
HAB playable in MP?

Currently the hard core of the Hungarian Clan is planning an MP game (LAN)with AGCEEP (we have played so far only with vanilla EU II but always the latest beta patches).

The start-up for human players would be the following: ENG, DAU, CAS, TUR, MUS, HAB.

After some initail testing on game balance, some of us have experineced that HAB is totally lightweight for almost a century in AGCEEP compared to other major powers (but especially to TUR, FRA and SPA). We would be greatful for any comments, opinion or even recommended strategy concerning the Habsburg Empire. :rolleyes:
 

Twoflower

Vile treacherous Judas
82 Badges
Nov 7, 2001
3.914
2.250
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II
  • For The Glory
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Sengoku
  • Victoria 2
Doing the monarch files for Germany, I noticed that the Ascanian Saxony existing in 1419 needs monarchs and possibly other stuff for the case of it picking the C option in the Extinction of the Ascanians in Wittenberg event in 1422, i.e. choosing to stay independent instead of getting inherited by Saxony or Brandenburg. The option is supposed to represent the electorate passing to one of the Ascanian branches that still existed.
Since Saxony is selectable in the scenario and should as such be interesting to play, the additional monarchs resulting from deciding not to be inherited should finally be created.
We've got two Ascanian branches to choose from, Sachsen-Lauenburg and Anhalt-Dessau. The Ascanians in Sachsen-Lauenburg were much more closely related to Sachsen-Wittenberg than those in Anhalt, would thus perhaps be the more "realistic" option, however the more interesting choice is definitely Anhalt-Dessau, since this line produced the by far most prominent Ascanian, Leopold of Anhalt-Dessau and there would be some potential for events and leaders for this branch. Besides, another problem with Sachsen-Lauenburg is that this branch became extinct in 1689, which means that the monarch succession would not cover the entire EU2 period. Therefore I like Anhalt-Dessau a lot better. I got sufficient information for doing the monarchs for both branches. Unless anybody is very opposed to using them, I'll just go ahead and script Anhalt-Dessau monarchs for Saxony awaken by the C option in the 1422 event.