• Crusader Kings III Available Now!

    The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.


    Real Strategy Requires Cunning

Mad King James

Buzzkill Extraordinaire
61 Badges
Jan 18, 2002
7.148
298
39
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Deus Vult
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • 500k Club
I want events that fire from more than just a date, but circumstances that foster that event's existence. I believe there should be numerous events for every major event, for each probable outcome in a situation.

For instance, Vlad the Impaler should only occur if Wallachia is a vassal of the Ottoman Empire, and relations are below 0. If those conditions aren't met what should Vlad do instead? Likely nothing, as there would be far less threat to his principality, but that's just an example. Another would be Charles the Bold. He shouldn't actually die unless he actually DIED ie the leader isn't in existance during the time of his reign. Then when he dies naturally the player decides whether he had an heir or not. etc.

This is just my opinion, what are your thoughts as to the philosophy of the events?
 
Mar 27, 2002
2.756
0
Visit site
I pretty much share this viewpoint. Perhaps we should start things fresh as you suggested in another thread. What I would like to suggest, is that we have some sort of guidelines which determine what will go into the AGC, versus what wouldn't.

For example, we could have guidelines such as these:

1.) Events must have more than one choice.

2.) The first choice must be the historical one.

3.) The event must be free of spelling and grammatical errors. (They should be reviewed before being included, so we don't have the problem the EEP does of poor Grammar and spelling).

4.) Events should only trigger when the historical circumstances surrounding the event are in place (just as MKJ has just posted).

These are just my ideas.... Would be nice to have something like this in place, to ensure only high quality events are included. Since the EEP focuses on quantity over quality, perhaps we should do the opposite.
 

unmerged(7398)

Lt. General
Jan 21, 2002
1.613
0
mozart.atpnet.com
Originally posted by Captain Krunch
1.) Events must have more than one choice.
I find it difficult to agree here, especially combined with MKJ's focus on more complex triggers and alternate versions of events (with which I am in complete agreement). In some cases, all but the
For example, Paradox' event 3895 for Pommern - the choices are to split Pommern between Sweden and Brandenburg, let Brandenburg inherit everything, or stay independent. If Brandenburg doesn't exist (fairly likely) and Sweden doesn't exist (fairly unlikely), only the third choice makes sense.
3.) The event must be free of spelling and grammatical errors. (They should be reviewed before being included, so we don't have the problem the EEP does of poor Grammar and spelling).
Absolutely.
These are just my ideas.... Would be nice to have something like this in place, to ensure only high quality events are included. Since the EEP focuses on quantity over quality, perhaps we should do the opposite.
Quality should be paramount, but quantity has its place. I don't think we need to go through and rewrite all of our events (or worse, all of Paradox', too!) just for the sake of having rewritten them, or we'll never have a scenario to distribute. Furthermore, the prospect of getting a significant number of events regardless of whether I'm playing France or Cambodia was one of the EEP's major attractions to me.

I'll suggest a couple more guidelines:

A) Event text should be completely original; if not, it must be credited.

B) All event choices should have at least some chance of being chosen by a human. (I can't find it right now, but I saw an event earlier today that went A: (generally positive stuff); B: 2 years of +3 revolt risk; C: -1 stab, 2 years of +3 revolt risk.)
 
Last edited:

Mad King James

Buzzkill Extraordinaire
61 Badges
Jan 18, 2002
7.148
298
39
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Deus Vult
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • 500k Club
Isn't assigning a value judgement to a project somewhat nonsensical? Our projects has mature people, immature people, young people, old people. Generalizations such as these aren't a good idea to just toss around.
 

unmerged(1057)

Disinherited Knight
Feb 22, 2001
4.275
0
theclubis.mine.nu
Originally posted by Mad King James
Isn't assigning a value judgement to a project somewhat nonsensical? Our projects has mature people, immature people, young people, old people. Generalizations such as these aren't a good idea to just toss around.
I agree with you on that..on the topic I agree with Korath, credit guys who makes original work and always leaves the human player a choice..:)
 

unmerged(8606)

Civis Barcinonensis
Apr 8, 2002
2.814
0
perso.wanadoo.fr
Originally posted by Korath
B) All event choices should have at least some chance of being chosen by a human. (I can't find it right now, but I saw an event earlier today that went A: (generally positive stuff); B: 2 years of +3 revolt risk; C: -1 stab, 2 years of +3 revolt risk.)
Absolutely. This is, IMHO, very important. There are some events that, regardless its historicity, the option to choose for a human player is absolutely easy, because the other 1 or 2 options are absolutely negative. All options should have a positive(s) outcome and a negative(s) one, in order to make harder for a human player to choose and to think about the consequences. The example Korath has posted is very clear: who would choose B or C ???

3.) The event must be free of spelling and grammatical errors. (They should be reviewed before being included, so we don't have the problem the EEP does of poor Grammar and spelling).
Absolutely.

1.) Events must have more than one choice.
But what about historical events like, say, an historically recorded epidemy, absolutely out of human control?
 

unmerged(5822)

Moved on
Sep 20, 2001
7.672
0
Except, perhaps, different reactions to a plague "just for fun"... the plague will occur no matter what is done, but things could vary depending on how one reacts.

Suppose that a plague comes around and is taken as a sign that you're doing something wrong rather than "just" accepting it - you could perhaps try to counter future plague outbreaks by trying to please God (+narrowmindedness) or try to analyse what went wrong from a scientific viewpoint (+innovativeness).

The plague would happen either way, but the effects on society could vary - perhaps a king would take the opportunity to relieve the taxes on peasants but instead increase them for the nobles (-aristocracy, -serfdom).
 

Johnny Canuck

Field Marshal
48 Badges
Feb 5, 2001
7.766
0
  • Cities in Motion
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Divine Wind
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Hearts of Iron II: Beta
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
Originally posted by Mad King James
Isn't assigning a value judgement to a project somewhat nonsensical? Our projects has mature people, immature people, young people, old people. Generalizations such as these aren't a good idea to just toss around.
I think what Crook meant (or what I would like to think Crook meant) is that the EEP has been around for 9 months or so already, & as such has gone through a lot of evolutions & changes & has become more developed & refined (mature in the sense of not being young & inexperienced). That's not to imply that the AGC is not mature or will not be - just that it is new & in the early stages.
 
Feb 27, 2001
3.428
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Mad King James
Isn't assigning a value judgement to a project somewhat nonsensical? Our projects has mature people, immature people, young people, old people. Generalizations such as these aren't a good idea to just toss around.
What generalizations? EEP went through beta and pretty much 2 releases (at least), AGC is just starting. Who said anything about people?
 

AlanC9

Field Marshal
16 Badges
Mar 15, 2001
5.063
310
Visit site
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Stellaris
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Divine Wind
  • For the Motherland
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Majesty 2 Collection
  • Semper Fi
  • Magicka 2
Originally posted by Korath


B) All event choices should have at least some chance of being chosen by a human. (I can't find it right now, but I saw an event earlier today that went A: (generally positive stuff); B: 2 years of +3 revolt risk; C: -1 stab, 2 years of +3 revolt risk.)
Let's not make this one completely mandatory. I can think of a few events where the possible results weren't exactly choices, just the playing out of some historical probabilities. If this means that a human-played country is always a bit lucky, that's just the way it goes.

Anyway, I can't see how you could make something like Norway's "End of the Kalmar Union" event balanced. No matter how bad the B choice is, it still beats immediately losing the game.;)
 

unmerged(7398)

Lt. General
Jan 21, 2002
1.613
0
mozart.atpnet.com
Originally posted by AlanC9
Let's not make this one completely mandatory.
Well, no - none of these should be completely mandatory. That's why they're labelled guidelines, not rules. There's nothing wrong with not following a guideline, provided you understand why it's there, and that you violate it for a reason.

(To be clear, the example I was trying to make wasn't A: good stuff, B: bad stuff, C: bad stuff; it was B: bad stuff, C: exactly the same bad stuff as B, but with an additional stability hit.)
 

unmerged(10997)

Second Lieutenant
Sep 12, 2002
125
0
Visit site
One thing that I would like to see included is in the description state what this choice could possibly lead to in the future (i.e., if it will eventually lead Frace to be friends with Austria or enemies with Austria, etc...), as well as state what the historic choice actually was. Some people may take historic hits to follow or veer from following a historic eventual downfall (i.e., take a immediate hit to avoid a prolonged or later suffering). Basically, a lot of events could be based around thinking of the present vs. thinking of the future.
 

unmerged(1047)

Commander, US Pacific Fleet
Feb 21, 2001
5.167
1
Generally the A choice is the historical path, because the AI countries pick A somewhere in excess of 85% of the time (how much depends on who you ask and how many options there are).
 

unmerged(5822)

Moved on
Sep 20, 2001
7.672
0
Has anything been decided on the scale of the events?

Should it be on a scale where only country-changing events are included, or should we delve into each time Potemkin enjoyed (the "company" of) his nieces?