red: issues being debated.
yellow: debate closed, but issue not yet implemented.
green: debate closed, issue implemented into mod.
white: miscellaneous notes.
Let's discuss. As things are discussed/decided I will summarize them here (see my AGC: Russia thread for a preview of what I intend to do).
Not sure who was in charge of EEP: Russia before the merger, but I am happy to share management with them or even cede it depending on which one of us has more time to facilitate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SETUP ISSUES:
yellow: debate closed, but issue not yet implemented.
green: debate closed, issue implemented into mod.
white: miscellaneous notes.
Let's discuss. As things are discussed/decided I will summarize them here (see my AGC: Russia thread for a preview of what I intend to do).
Not sure who was in charge of EEP: Russia before the merger, but I am happy to share management with them or even cede it depending on which one of us has more time to facilitate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SETUP ISSUES:
[*]Should Suzdal exist in 1419? Who should own Vladimir? Should Perm replace Suzdal? Suzdal will be eliminated, both to free up a tag for use elsewhere, and to help Muscovy grow historically.
[*]Should Arkhangelsk be Orthodox or Pagan? Should there be natives in Arkhangelsk, Olonets, Karelia, and/or Kola? Arkhangelsk will be pagan. Karelia, and Kola will have pagan natives.
[*]Should the Russian principalities all be 'Ruthenian' culture? No, Russia keeps Russian culture and does not get Ruthenian.
[*]Should there be trans-Ural TPs/colonies owned by Novgorod? We agreed that this needs to be tested.
[*]Should there be trans-Ural paths between provinces; should these be implemented even if trans-Ural TPs/colonies for Novgorod are ultimately decided against? We will also test this to see how the AI behaves.
[*]Should Arkhangelsk province have a port?
[*]Should Russia get Tatar culture and, if so, when?
Last edited: