• Crusader Kings II Expansion Subscription

    Subscribe to the CK II Expansion and enjoy unlimited access to 13 major expansions and more!


  • Crusader Kings III Available Now!

    The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.


    Real Strategy Requires Cunning

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
2
Same remark as for the proposed event between Spain and Netherlands: what if Russia and Poland are allied or Poland vassal of Russia?

And what about very good relations as Third Angel wrote for the Spanish event?
 

Toio

Field Marshal
6 Badges
Jun 18, 2003
7.699
0
Visit site
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • For The Glory
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • 500k Club
Same remark as for the proposed event between Spain and Netherlands: what if Russia and Poland are allied or Poland vassal of Russia?

And what about very good relations as Third Angel wrote for the Spanish event?

i agree we can add a trigger on how relations are ( i asked if zero is ok) , but ...........a vassal is hard to swallow. IMO being a vassal is a servant of a superior nation, most times unwanted by the inferior state but needed to stay alive.

Allied situation should not be required, sometimes allies joined for necessity against a superior common enemy ie, FRA, ENG and HOL against SPA in the 17th century
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
2
I don't see why Russia would DoW Poland if Poland is already vassal of Russia (and could be annexed this way). We never know... Maybe timespan of the event (1632-1638) could be extended then.

Ok, condition for an alliance can be useless.

We could have relations below 75 as condition (instead of 0 only).


EDIT: with (NOT ("vassal" AND "relations > 25") AND "relations <= 75"), even Poland as vassal with low relations could be targeted.
 
Last edited:

Toio

Field Marshal
6 Badges
Jun 18, 2003
7.699
0
Visit site
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • For The Glory
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • 500k Club
I don't see why Russia would DoW Poland if Poland is already vassal of Russia (and could be annexed this way). We never know... Maybe timespan of the event (1632-1638) could be extended then.

Ok, condition for an alliance can be useless.

We could have relations below 75 as condition (instead of 0 only).


EDIT: with (NOT ("vassal" AND "relations > 25") AND "relations <= 75"), even Poland as vassal with low relations could be targeted.

Ok, with the trigger of not to fire if POL is a vassal of RUS, since this is a RUS event

hmm on your EDIT...........an angry RUS demanding one of its core lands seems justified
 

Third Angel

Mad Medievalist
48 Badges
Feb 8, 2005
2.369
15
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • For The Glory
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Deus Vult
Looks like no conclusion was reached. Could we then agree about that: the event should not fire if POL and RUS are allied or if POL is a vassal of RUS.

It could fire if RUS is a vassal of POL with low relations, say 50 or 0 (that could be discussed), or if RUS and POL (not vassals) have relations below 75 or 100, not sure about the value here either.

This could go for the SPA-HOL situation in the other thread, as it is basically the same event. This would look like this:
Code:
NOT = {
	alliance = { country = RUS country = POL }
	vassal = { country = RUS country = POL }
	AND = {
		relation = { country = POL data = 50 }
		OR = {
			vassal = { country = POL country = RUS }
			relation = { country = POL data = 100 }
		}
	}
}
There should also be a breakvassal command so that RUS breaks its vassalization to POL. Also, why is there no option B?
 

Toio

Field Marshal
6 Badges
Jun 18, 2003
7.699
0
Visit site
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • For The Glory
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • 500k Club
Looks like no conclusion was reached. Could we then agree about that: the event should not fire if POL and RUS are allied or if POL is a vassal of RUS.

i agree

It could fire if RUS is a vassal of POL with low relations, say 50 or 0 (that could be discussed), or if RUS and POL (not vassals) have relations below 75 or 100, not sure about the value here either.

yes to .........if RUS is a vassal of POL .....and
I agree on no criteria (relations) if RUS and POL and no alliance or vassal of each other

This could go for the SPA-HOL situation in the other thread, as it is basically the same event. This would look like this:
NOT = {
alliance = { country = RUS country = POL }
vassal = { country = RUS country = POL }
AND = {
relation = { country = POL data = 50 }
OR = {
vassal = { country = POL country = RUS }
relation = { country = POL data = 100 }
}
}
}
my change in red

There should also be a breakvassal command so that RUS breaks its vassalization to POL. Also, why is there no option B?

not required IMO as there is no need, the area is a core of RUS , what do you expect RUS to do

As for the HOL-SPA event, SPA only recognized the dutch republic in 1648 , thats 80 years of warfare. maybe the -400 relation is too much , but we can test on this.