Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

AGC & EEP: Italy

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Show only dev responses
#(1630) Zen Against the Ten Doge
event = {
id = 17011
random = no
country = VEN
name = "EVENTNAME17011" #Zen Against the Ten Doge
desc = "EVENTHIST17011"
#-#Government reform was called for by the reformer Renier Zen. Zen employed fiery oratory and railed against corruption and abuses of authority. He was an abrasive, irritating man who was at first exiled, but then recalled to the city after the recognition of his public support
In 1627, Renier Zen, a Capi of the Council of Ten, emerged as a vocal critic of the Doge, Cornaro, accusing him of running Venice for his own family's benefit by, among other things, turning a blind eye to his son Giorgio's trafficking in contraband goods. On October 27, Zen caused an uproar at a meeting of the Great Council by accusing the Cornaro family of corruption; although the elections were annulled, he was unable to obtain any further sanctions. On December 30, Renier Zen was attacked by masked assassins, who were later found to include Giorgio Cornaro, the son of the Doge. Zen grew even more outspoken in his criticism of Cornaro in the wake of Giorgio Cornaro's failed assassination attempt. Venice now became divided into two factions, a pro-Conaro faction that was pro-papal and backed by the Venetian oligarchs, and a pro-Zen faction that was anti-papal and backed by the poorer nobility. Rioting broke out between the two factions on July 23, 1628, and for the rest of Cornaro's life, Venice was locked in a civil war. The Venetian government had basically broken down by late 1628.

date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1630 1627}
offset = 360
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1631 }

action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME17011A" #Allow Minor Reforms Suppress the Doge's ambitions
command = { type = stability value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = -1 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -1 }
command = { type = revoltrisk value = 7 }
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -35 }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME17011B" #Suppress Renier Zen
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
command = { type = revoltrisk value = 7 }
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 35 }
}
}


correcting an event
 
historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 0163326 }
category = general
name = "J. Schulenberg" #Johan Schulenberg
startdate = {
year = 1715
}
deathdate = {
year = 1720 1725
}
rank = 1
movement = 3
fire = 3
shock = 4
siege = 1
dormant = no
remark = "Corfu 1716, Butrino (Albania ) 1718"
}


historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 0163327 }
category = admiral
name = "Angelo Emo"
startdate = {
year = 1768 1766
}
deathdate = {
day = 1
month = march
year = 1792
}
rank = 2 1
movement = 2
fire = 3 5
shock = 3
siege = 0
dormant = no
remark = "Algiers 1766, Tunis 1790 1784, Bizerta 1786, Last Venetian Grand-Admiral"
}
 
why was'nt post 1748, event 326082 fully included. ???
 
Toio said:
why was'nt post 1748, event 326082 fully included. ???
Click to expand...
What is missing?

I think only 0163066 was not right in beta 11 and post #1748 was amended after beta 11:
Code: 
historicalmonarch = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 0163066 }
	startdate = {
		day = [COLOR="Yellow"]19[/COLOR]
		month = may
		year = 1762
	}
	deathdate = {
		day = 29
		month = march
		year = 1765
	}
	name = "Anzolo Querini"
	DIP = 3
	MIL = 2
	ADM = 3
	dormant = yes
}

Something else? Maybe I was confused with yellow... and yellow replacing yellow. Please use YellowGreen when updating yellow then.
 
Last edited:
Bordic said:
I have never considered the influence of KoG in formation of KoI. However buffer state should be a concept used only after the Congress of Vienna. A Holy League against KoG would be more consistent in the time span in which EU2 performs.
Click to expand...

I think the KoG should not have the HAB as the german princes under the banner of the reichstag always gave the Austrians (HAB) a difficult time, be it troop supply or money.

The buffer for a strong KoG should be the HAB
 
Code: 
#(1452) The Duchy of Modena
event = {
	id = 17434
	random = no
	country = PAM
	name = "EVENTNAME17434" #The Duchy of Modena
	desc = "EVENTHIST17434"
	#-#On May 18 1452, Holy Roman Emperor Frederick III formalized the Estes' rule by investing Borso d'Este with the title 'Duke of Modena'. He later obtained [COLOR="Yellow"]the title, Duke[/COLOR] [COLOR="Red"]Duchy[/COLOR] of Ferrara from Pope Paul II (1471). [COLOR="Yellow"]Borso followed an expansionist policy for his state. He was usually allied with the Republic of Venice, and an enemy of both  Francesco  Sforza of Milan and the Medici family of Florence. These rivalries led to the indecisive Battle of Molinella.[/COLOR]

	date = { day = [COLOR="Red"]1[/COLOR] [COLOR="Yellow"]18[/COLOR] month = [COLOR="Red"]january [COLOR="Yellow"]May[/COLOR] [/COLOR] year = 1452 }
	offset = 360
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = [COLOR="Red"]1452[/COLOR] [COLOR="Yellow"]1460[/COLOR] }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME17434A" #Accept the title from the Emperor
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = 20 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -30 }
                [COLOR="Yellow"]command = { type = alliance which = VEN }
                command = { type = relation which = VEN value = 30 }[/COLOR] 
                [COLOR="Yellow"]command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -30 }
                command = { type = relation which = TOS value = -30 }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
	}
}
 
Third Angel said:
Please remember that the alliance command will not work unless PAM is leader of its own alliance and VEN is not already a member of another alliance, which is quite unlikely.
Click to expand...

thats true, but from my recent tests/games the 1447/1448 various conflicts with MLO sometimes makes PAM, stay with MLO, leave the alliance and be alone or join with another italian alliance.
Either way its the randomness of the alliance which is partly my aim similar to the PAM event for the war in ferrara.
One province minor have a mind of their own when they join an alliance
 
domestic numbers should be the same as per 228003 , but reversed and further ARISTO should be given when the Sforza's are recognised as dukes in 1494

#(1450-1466) The Sforza
#by ejs5
event = {
id = 228004
trigger = {
event = 228003 #MLO: The Ambrosian Republic
}
random = no
country = MLO
name = "EVENTNAME228004" #Francesco Sforza Takes Milan
desc = "EVENTHIST228004"
#-#On March 25, 1450 Francesco Sforza marched through the gates of Milan and established himself as Duke. Though he had spent his life as a condottiere Sforza achieved an armed peace during his reign. Sforza also abandoned his long support of the Angevin pretenders to Naples and also aimed to conquer Genoa.

date = { day = 24 month = march year = 1450 }
offset = 10
deathdate = { day = 7 month = march year = 1466 }

action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME228004A" #A Strongman can end the Chaos
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 2 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = 3 2 }
command = { type = domestic which = OFFENSIVE value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = QUALITY value = 2 }
command = { type = stability value = 3 }
command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -30 }
}
}
 
Has anyone tested my sequence in post 1782? Any report?

Sorry, but I can't test it myself, I have even and unfortunately uninstalled the game...and waiting for FTG. :)
 
Last edited:
Bordic said:
Has anyone tested my sequence in post 1782? Any report?

Sorry, but I can't test it myself, I have even and uninfortunately uninstalled the game...and waiting for FTG. :)
Click to expand...

OK, I will change and test
 
Savoy naval leaders at the time of lepanto

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 0119309 }
category = admiral
name = "Andre Provana de Leyni"
startdate = {
year = 1553
}
deathdate = {
year = 1580
}
rank = 1
movement = 4
fire = 4
shock = 3
siege = 0
dormant = no
remark = "Flanders 1553, Nice 1565, Lepanto 1571"
}


historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 0119310 }
category = admiral
name = "Ottaviano Moretto"
startdate = {
year = 1565
}
deathdate = {
month = october
year = 1571
}
rank = 2
movement = 3
fire = 2
shock = 4
siege = 0
dormant = no
remark = "Nice 1565, Lepanto 1571"
}
 
Bordic said:
About post http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9974814&postcount=1782, any report?

I am still in doubt about the last part of the trigger in NAP_239037:

FRA renouncing Lombardia core, ie renouncing Italy, independently from ownership of any Italian province such as Apulia, in case.
Click to expand...

tried some games, never seem to happen

i do not like this part, so I removed, it worked better
relation = { country = SPA data = 200 }
core = { province = 393 data = SPA } #Napoli #Spain should have shown her interest on Naples


I am working elsewhere ATM , so have little time.

I will inform you after more games
 
Toio said:
tried some games, never seem to happen

i do not like this part, so I removed, it worked better
relation = { country = SPA data = 200 }
core = { province = 393 data = SPA } #Napoli #Spain should have shown her interest on Naples


I am working elsewhere ATM , so have little time.

I will inform you after more games
Click to expand...

What have you removed from this trigger?

Code: 
	trigger = {
		ai = yes
		exists = SPA
		OR = { 
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 393 data = -1 } #Napoli 
				control = { province = 393 data = -1 } #Napoli
			}
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 394 data = -1 } #Apulia
				control = { province = 394 data = -1 } #Apulia
			}
		}
		NOT = {
			exists = ARG 
			war = { country = SPA country = NAP }
			vassal = { country = NAP country = SPA }	 
		} 	
		OR = { 
			vassal = { country = SPA country = NAP }
			dynastic = { country = SPA country = NAP }
		} 
		relation = { country = SPA data = 200 }
		core = { province = 393 data = SPA } #Napoli #Spain should have shown her interest on Naples	
		OR = { 
			AND = {
				event = 285103 #SPA: The Treaty of Granada
				NOT = {
					owned = { province = 393 data = FRA } #Napoli
					owned = { province = 394 data = FRA } #Apulia
				} 
			}
			NOT = {
				core = { province = 389 data = FRA } #Lombardia
			}
		} #France shouldn't be still engaged in the Italian Wars
	}

Could you use red/yellow amendments?

However I think Granada event should stay. The issue was with France and cores & provinces.
 
Bordic said:
What have you removed from this trigger?

Code: 
	trigger = {
		ai = yes
		exists = SPA
		OR = { 
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 393 data = -1 } #Napoli 
				control = { province = 393 data = -1 } #Napoli
			}
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 394 data = -1 } #Apulia
				control = { province = 394 data = -1 } #Apulia
			}
		}
		NOT = {
			exists = ARG 
			war = { country = SPA country = NAP }
			vassal = { country = NAP country = SPA }	 
		} 	
		OR = { 
			vassal = { country = SPA country = NAP }
			dynastic = { country = SPA country = NAP }
		} 
		relation = { country = SPA data = 200 }
		core = { province = 393 data = SPA } #Napoli #Spain should have shown her interest on Naples	
		OR = { 
			AND = {
				event = 285103 #SPA: The Treaty of Granada
				NOT = {
					owned = { province = 393 data = FRA } #Napoli
					owned = { province = 394 data = FRA } #Apulia
				} 
			}
			NOT = {
				core = { province = 389 data = FRA } #Lombardia
			}
		} #France shouldn't be still engaged in the Italian Wars
	}

Could you use red/yellow amendments?

However I think Granada event should stay. The issue was with France and cores & provinces.
Click to expand...

i never amended anything , only removed those indicated so that the event could fire,
 
THE CROWN OF NAPLES SEQUENCE, version 4 for EU2 AGCEEP 1.58, reason: "extended triggers"


SPA 285333 used, next free ID is 285334
NAP 239037 used, next free ID is 239038




Modifications to following current event:

Action B means a left out for a SPA player: Naples will ahistorically survive or be at the mercy of any other, at least until 1734.

Since SPA_285204 A gives cores to Naples and Apulia, SPA_285105 B should remove them in case of claim renounciation.

Code: 
#(1504-1598) The Trastamara inheritance of Naples
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 285105
	trigger = {
		NOT = { 
			event = 285103 #SPA: The Treaty of Granada
			[COLOR=Yellow]event = 239037 #NAP: The Crown of Naples[/COLOR]
		}
		NOT = { exists = ARG }
	}
	random = no
	country = SPA
	name = "EVENTNAME285105" #The Trastamara inheritance of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST285105"
	#-#

	date = { day = 26 month = November year = 1504 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 13 month = September year = 1598 } #Felipe II's death

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME285104A" #Naples is part of our Kingdom
		command = { type = addcore which = 393 } #napoli
		command = { type = addcore which = 394 } #apulia
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -25 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME285105B" #We shall respect Pope's suzerainty
		command = { type = vp value = -5 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = removecore which = 393 } #napoli 
		command = { type = removecore which = 394 } #apulia[/COLOR]
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 25 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = sleepevent which = 239037 } #NAP: The Crown of Naples[/COLOR]
	}
}

#-#When Isabel of Castile died, Ferdinand found himself in the position of being both King of Aragon and Sicily and regent of Castile, so that he could focus more on Aragonese ambitions in the Mediterranean and claims to Southern Italian territories as legacy of the Trastamara King Alfons V. The Pope who traditionally considered himself suzerain of all the Italian territories south of the HRE boundaries, islands of Sardinia, Corsica and Sicily included, has always reserved for himself the right to appoint Kings and Dukes whoever he decided as being trustful and deign of Papal investiture. He would have opposed any external interference in his 'sacred' decisions. After Ferdinand's death in 1516, Charles, King of Spain would continue his grand father's expansionistic policy in Italy.



Two new events, one for Neaples played by AI and one for Spain (AI or human player): being helpers I have only provided a single choice for both.

The trigger of first new event is a bit complicated as it should try to test any possible influence of either France or Spain in Italy when the event is firing... Only if Spain has some predominance over France, Naples will be annexed by event!

Code: 
#(1505-1598) The Crown of Naples (event helper for Spanish historical annexation of Naples)
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 239037
	trigger = {
		ai = yes
		exists = SPA
		core = { province = 393 data = SPA } #Napoli #Spain should hold interests on Naples
		OR = { 
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 393 data = -1 } #Napoli 
				control = { province = 393 data = -1 } #Napoli
			}
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 394 data = -1 } #Apulia
				control = { province = 394 data = -1 } #Apulia
			}
		}
		NOT = { 
			exists = ARG 
			war = { country = SPA country = NAP }
			war = { country = SPA country = FRA }
			vassal = { country = NAP country = SPA }
			vassal = { country = PAP country = SPA }
			vassal = { country = FRA country = SPA }
		}
		AND = { #Spain should own Sicily as bridgehead to Naples!
			owned = { province = 395 data = SPA } #Messina
			control = { province = 395 data = SPA } #Messina
			owned = { province = 396 data = SPA } #Sicily
			control = { province = 396 data = SPA } #Sicily
		}
		OR = { 	#strong Spanish influence in Southern Italy...
			vassal = { country = SPA country = PAP }
			vassal = { country = SPA country = FRA }
			vassal = { country = SPA country = NAP }
			dynastic = { country = SPA country = NAP }
			owned = { province = 399 data = SPA } #Roma
			owned = { province = 393 data = SPA } #Napoli
			owned = { province = 394 data = SPA } #Apulia
			OR = {
				alliance = { country = SPA country = NAP }
				alliance = { country = SPA country = PAP }
			}
			OR = {	#...or at least some Spanish influence in Northern Italy...
				AND = { 	
					OR = {  
						owned = { province = 404 data = SPA } #Piemonte
						owned = { province = 389 data = SPA } #Lombardia
						owned = { province = 390 data = SPA } #Mantua
						owned = { province = 370 data = SPA } #Veneto
						owned = { province = 403 data = SPA } #Liguria
						owned = { province = 402 data = SPA } #Emilia
						owned = { province = 391 data = SPA } #Romagna
						owned = { province = 401 data = SPA } #Firenze
						owned = { province = 400 data = SPA } #Siena
						owned = { province = 392 data = SPA } #Marche
					}
					OR = {
						vassal = { country = SPA country = TOS }
						vassal = { country = SPA country = GEN }
						vassal = { country = SPA country = MLO }
						vassal = { country = SPA country = VEN }
						vassal = { country = SPA country = SAV }
						vassal = { country = SPA country = MAN }
						vassal = { country = SPA country = PIS } #Siena
						vassal = { country = SPA country = PAM } #Modena
						vassal = { country = SPA country = PAR } #Parma
					}
					OR = {  #...and France shouldn't be engaged in the Italian Wars
						NOT = {	
							core = { province = 389 data = FRA } #Lombardia
						}	
						NOT = {	
							vassal = { country = FRA country = NAP } 
						}  
						NOT = {	neighbour = FRA } #France shouldn't border with Naples
					}
				}
			} 
		} 
	}
	random = no
	country = NAP
	name = "EVENTNAME285333" #The Crown of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST285333"
	#-#
	date = { day = 12 month = October year = 1505 } #2nd Treaty of Blois, France ceded rights to Spain
	offset = 65
	deathdate = { day = 13 month = September year = 1598 } #Felipe II's death

	action_a = {
		name = "OK" 
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 285105 } #SPA: The Trastamara inheritance of Naples
		command = { type = trigger which = 285333 } #SPA: The Crown of Naples
	}
}

#(1535-1598) The Crown of Naples (event helper for Spanish historical annexation of Naples)
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 285333 #triggered by NAP_239037
	random = no
	country = SPA
	name = "EVENTNAME285333" #The Crown of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST285333"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME285333A" #We grabbed Naples at last!
		command = { type = addcore which = 393 } #napoli
		command = { type = addcore which = 394 } #apulia
		command = { type = inherit which = NAP }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -40 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -25 }
	}
}


EVENTNAME285333;The Crown of Naples;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST285333;In 16th century the Kingdom of Naples was at its most: flourishing economy and Arts, still good trade routes between the Middle East and the rest of Europe. Unfortunately, a powerful economy is not always being represented by a powerful ruler. Expecially the throne of Naples being claimed by two of the most powerful courts in Europe of those times, Spain and France. In his very expensive rush to the leading role of Western Europe still contested by the untamed King of France, the King of Spain eventually made the decision to send troops, officers and insignia to the capital city of the Southern Italian Kingdom in order to press claims on the crown of Naples definitively. Despite Papal firm opposition but in accordance with treaties stipulated with France which stated the definitive Spanish hegemony in the Italian Peninsula, the King of Spain was certain that his move wouldn't have found any local hostility...;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME285333A;We grabbed Naples at last!;;;;;;;;;;
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back