AGC & EEP: Far East

unmerged(40707) · Aug 9, 2008

Fine!

You see what I have to do when modders forget scenarios in their proposals.

unmerged(72200) · Aug 9, 2008

YodaMaster said:
You see what I have to do when modders forget scenarios in their proposals.

All right, I mind it from now on

Well, I'm also going to check the 1648 scenario, in particular about Japan's closure sequence. Maybe I'll do it after when I post additional proposals about the Sengoku sequence because they may affect the scenario.

unmerged(72200) · Aug 11, 2008

About leaders.nip

Hearing the view of my Japanese friends who testplayed recent beta, I suggest to rework some Japanese leaders duration within suitable scopes and to fix simple mistakes. I'm sorry, but maybe they're final suggestions about NIP leaders for 1.57.

- I want to detail Hosokawa Katsumoto's deathdate.

Code:

historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 097801 }
	category = general
	name = "Hosokawa Katsumoto"
	startdate = {
		year = 1467
	}
	deathdate = {[color=yellow]
		day = 5
		month = june[/color]
		year = 1473
	}
	...

- Akamatsu and Ouchi joined some big wars even after the end of Onin war in 1477. Thus I suggest reflecting the fact in their deathdates.

Code:

historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 097803 }
	category = general
	name = "Akamatsu Masanori"
	startdate = {
		year = 1467
	}
	deathdate = { [color=yellow]# When he finally managed to pacify his domain
		year = 1488[/color]
		[color=red]day = 24
		month = december
		year = 1477[/color]
	}
	...

Code:

historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 097804 }
	category = general
	name = "Ouchi Masahiro"
	startdate = {
		year = 1467
	}
	deathdate = { [color=yellow]#The last time when he joind a war against Rokkaku clan
		year = 1491[/color]
		[color=red]day = 24
		month = december
		year = 1477[/color]
	}
	...

- Takeda and Uesugi conflicted each other as local autonomous lords, then maybe we should regard them as an alternative option: In other words, I want to change their 'dormant' to 'yes'. Within a day or two, I'm going to post the event on which you can make a choice between (or both of) them in 1553, when they began their famous battles.
Also, I want to change the 'location' of Uesugi from Kanto to Tohoku. Maybe it's more suitable for the current map.

Code:

historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 097806 }
	category = general
	name = "Takeda Shingen"
	startdate = {
		[color=lime]month = september[/color]
		[color=yellow]year = 1553[/color]
		[color=red]year = 1561[/color]
	}
	deathdate = {
		day = 12
		month = may
		year = 1573
	}
	location = 685 #Kantou (Kai or Shinano)
	rank = 2
	movement = 3
	fire = 3
	shock = 4
	siege = 0
	[color=lime]dormant = no[/color]
	[color=red]remark = "1521-73: The startyear is when he fought the most fierce battle with Uesugi kensin."[/color]
}
historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 097807 }
	category = general
	name = "Uesugi Kenshin"
	startdate = {
		[color=lime]month = september[/color]
		[color=yellow]year = 1553[/color]
		[color=red]year = 1561[/color]
	}
	deathdate = {
		day = 12
		month = march
		year = 1578
	}
	[color=yellow]location = 684 #Tohoku (Echigo)[/color]
	[color=red]location = 685 #Kantou (Echigo)[/color]
	rank = 2
	movement = 4
	fire = 2
	shock = 4
	siege = 0
	[color=lime]dormant = no[/color]
	[color=red]remark = "1530-78: The startyear is when he fought the most fierce battle with Takeda Shingen."[/color]
}

- Shimazu's location may be a simple mistake:

Code:

historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 097810 }
	category = general
	name = "Shimazu Yoshihiro"
	startdate = {
		year = 1587 #inherited the family estate
	}
	deathdate = {
		year = 1602 #retired
	}
	[color=yellow]location = 688 #Kyushu (Higo)[/color]
	[color=red]location = 687 #Kyushu (Higo)[/color]
	...

- Maybe we should bring Tokugawa Ieyasu's startdate and rank back to the values of 1.56 while conform his deathdate to the final day of his last battle, the Siege of Osaka in 1614-15.

Code:

historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 097808 }
	[color=yellow]category = general[/color]
	[color=red]category = monarch[/color]
	name = "Tokugawa Ieyasu"
	startdate = { [color=yellow]#just after NIP_6988, Nobunaga's death
		day = 21
		month = june
		year = 1582[/color]
		[color=red]day = 16
		month = september
		year = 1600[/color]
	}
	deathdate = { [color=yellow]#just after Siege of Osaka in 1614-1615
		day = 3
		month = june
		year = 1615[/color]
		[color=red]day = 22
		month = may
		year = 1616[/color]
	}
	location = 685 #Kanto (Owari)
	[color=yellow]rank = 1[/color]
	[color=red]rank = 0[/color]
	...

unmerged(40707) · Aug 11, 2008

waishi said:
- Takeda and Uesugi conflicted each other as local autonomous lords, then maybe we should regard them as an alternative option: In other words, I want to change their 'dormant' to 'yes'. Within a day or two, I'm going to post the event on which you can make a choice between (or both of) them in 1553, when they began their famous battles.

Don't forget that if Japan appears as a revolter at this time (always possible...), both of them could be not woken if it is too late for suggested event(s).

unmerged(72200) · Aug 11, 2008

YodaMaster said:
Don't forget that if Japan appears as a revolter at this time (always possible...), both of them could be not woken if it is too late for suggested event(s).

o I'm sorry, I inadvertently set them. Well, now I amend the previous my post in lime color as follows:
- Now both of them is brought back to "dormant = no".
- you'll be able to choose which leader to be asleep in the preannounced event, which is single one.
- I add start months of them to make sure that the event happens before their start dates.

unmerged(40707) · Aug 11, 2008

You can't escape my "wrath" and "lightnings".

unmerged(72200) · Aug 11, 2008

YodaMaster said:
You can't escape my "wrath" and "lightnings".

That's it and I have to be more careful about such a consistency problem

o

unmerged(72200) · Aug 12, 2008

New events for Japan's Sengoku sequence

Now I post the rest of suggestions for the Sengoku sequence, mainly for the 1540-70s.
I hope I didn't make any careless mistake this time...

------------------------------------------------------------
New events for Kanto Province
------------------------------------------------------------

Code:

#(1546-1548) Great victory of Hojo clan in central Kanto
event = {
	id = 242074
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto (Sagami)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242074" #Great victory of Hojo clan in central Kanto
	desc = "EVENTHIST242074"
	#-#

	date = { day = 18 month = may year = 1546 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = november year = 1548 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242065A" #Let them be
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto (Sagami)
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = INF which = 685 value = 8000 }
		command = { type = population which = 685 value = 3000 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 685 value = -4 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242074;Great victory of Hojo clan in central Kanto;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242074;By the middle of 16th century, Hojo clan steadily extended power over central Kanto while other local lords wasted time on their disputes. Having just realized the fact, almost all lords in Kanto joined together against Hojo. In 1545, 70,000 allied troops besieged Kawagoe Castle which was a Hojo's strategic stronghold in central Kanto. In response, Hojo's generals worked out a surprise attack plan. On the night of 19 May 1546, 8,000 soldiers assaulted the besieging army. The attack was so unexpected that the allied force had to be collapsed once and for all. There were few casualties on Hojo side while 13,000 allied soldiers were killed in action. As a result, the alliance had to dissolve while Hojo ensured future hegemony in Kanto. \n Also, Uesugi Norimasa, the head of a defeated clan which was once prominent in the region, was forced to take refuge with Nagao clan which was a branch of him in Echigo. In 1561, he ceded his title of 'Kanto Kanrei' or Shogun's Deputy of Kanto and his family name to Nagao Kagetora, the clan's head. Later he became well known as Uesugi Kenshin.;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1553) Conflicts between Takeda and Uesugi
event = {
	id = 242075
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto (Shinano)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242075" #Conflicts between Takeda and Uesugi
	desc = "EVENTHIST242075"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = february year = 1553 }
	offset = 20
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = august year = 1553 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242065A" #Let them be
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -1 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto (Shinano)
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 685 value = 2 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242075B" #Support Takeda
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = CAV which = 685 value = 5000 } #Kanto (Shinano)
		command = { type = sleepleader which = 097807 } #Uesugi Kenshin (NIP)
		command = { type = revolt which = 684 } #Tohoku (Echigo)
		command = { type = revolt which = 684 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 684 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 685 value = 2 }
	}
	action_c = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242075C" #Support Uesugi
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = CAV which = 684 value = 5000 } #Tohoku (Echigo)
		command = { type = sleepleader which = 097806 } #Takeda Shingen (NIP)
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto (Shinano)
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 685 value = 2 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242075;Conflicts between Takeda and Uesugi;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242075;Takeda Shingen, who ruled from Kai (today's Yamanashi) to southern Shinano (today's Nagano), began fierce conflicts with Uesugi Kenshin, who based on Echigo (today's Niigata), over northern Shinano from 1553. Many Japanese writers have been inspired by their fights, called the Battles of Kawanakajima.\n \n However, if either of them had focused on advancing on Kyoto instead of wasting his precious time on such regional conflicts until 1564, he might have become able to prevent Oda Nobunaga from his rise...;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME242075B;Support Takeda;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME242075C;Support Uesugi;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1560-1562) Battle of Okehazama
event = {
	id = 242076
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto (Owari)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242076" #Battle of Okehazama
	desc = "EVENTHIST242076"
	#-#

	date = { day = 11 month = june year = 1560 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 20 month = july year = 1562 }

	action_a = {
		name = "MARVELLOUS"
		command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = 1 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto (Owari)
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = INF which = 685 value = 5000 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242076;Battle of Okehazama;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242076;This is the most famous, successful surprise attack in Japan, which was fought on 12 June 1560. Imagawa Yoshimoto, who based on Suruga (Today's eastern Shizuoka), focused on westward since he allied with northern Takeda and eastern Hojo clan in 1554. Also, he was the most powerful daimyo in the region while Oda clan was minor one which had just managed to pacify family infighting. Thus, no one doubted Imagawa's victory when he advanced on the west with 10,000-25,000 soldiers in 1560. However, on hearing about the enemy troops rested throughout a narrow valley near Okehazama, Oda Nobunaga decided to make a sortie with only 2,500 soldiers, rejecting common reactions like taking a strategy of exhaustion or making a humiliating peace. Arriving at the head of the valley, he ordered to assault just the heart of enemy's headquarters. This attack achieved stunning success: He succeeded to kill Imagawa Yoshimoto himself and miraculously won the battle! As a result, the situation completely reversed and Oda began to expand rapidly his influence. Another important effect was about Tokugawa Ieyasu, who based on Mikawa (today's eastern Aichi). He became independent from Imagawa, and then allied with Oda.;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1570-1574) Nagashima Ikko-ikki
event = {
	id = 242077
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto (Owari)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242077" #Nagashima Ikko-ikki
	desc = "EVENTHIST242077"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = september year = 1570 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 28 month = september year = 1574 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME6944B" #Crush the Ikko-ikki
		command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = 1 }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = trade value = -200 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242077;Nagashima Ikko-ikki;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242077;Japanese 'Ikki' meant not only just an uprising but also a league or bond among a certain social classes. During the Sengoku Period, farmers and local feudal lords often formed such Ikki to defend what they thought of as their rights. Sometimes they went so far as to expel their helpless lord and to achieve self-governance. Among these Ikki, 'Ikko-ikki' or Single-minded Leagues which gathered around Ikko sect, a popular militant Buddhist order centered on Hongan-ji temple much annoyed almost all daimyos because of its fearless fighting style and good organizational skills. \n \n In 1570, an Ikko-ikki rose a revolt against Oda in Ise-Nagashima (today's northern Mie). Cooperating with some clans which had been expelled from its domain by Oda, they made a strong stand against Oda's invasion and governed themselves until finally Oda managed to exterminate them without mercy in 1574.;;;;;;;;;;

------------------------------------------------------------
New events for Shikoku Province
------------------------------------------------------------

Code:

#(1574-1576) Regional unification of southern Shikoku
event = {
	id = 242078
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 687 data = -1 } #Shikoku (Tosa)
		control = { province = 687 data = -1 }
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242078" #Regional unification of southern Shikoku
	desc = "EVENTHIST242078"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = february year = 1574 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = november year = 1576 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242065A" #Let them be
		command = { type = population which = 687 value = 2000 } #Shikoku
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 687 value = -4 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242078;Regional unification of southern Shikoku;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242078;Since the 15th century, eastern part of the island was under strong influence of central powerful clans like Hosokawa and Miyoshi, but another part of it was divided by many local feudal lords who defended his own territory. Among them there was Chosokabe clan which rooted in Tosa, today's Kochi. They managed to unite the area, and then, they sought to invade neighboring territories.;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1584-1585) Regional unification of Shikoku
event = {
	id = 242079
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 687 data = -1 } #Shikoku (Tosa or Awa)
		control = { province = 687 data = -1 }
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242079" #Regional unification of Shikoku
	desc = "EVENTHIST242079"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = february year = 1584 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = november year = 1585 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242065A" #Let them be
		command = { type = infra value = 300 }
		command = { type = population which = 687 value = 3000 } #Shikoku
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 687 value = -6 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242079;Regional unification of Shikoku;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242079;After the unification of southern Shikoku, Chosokabe clan quickened its pace to conquer the whole island, seizing the opportunity that Miyoshi clan quickly decayed in the 1570s. By 1585, Chosokabe virtually reached its goal. However, the regional unification was too late to advance to the next step as compared with the development of the central political situation.;;;;;;;;;;

------------------------------------------------------------
New events for Kansai Province (including Chugoku region)
------------------------------------------------------------

Code:

#(1542-1546) Conflicts within Chugoku
event = {
	id = 242080
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 686 data = -1 } #Kansai (Bingo)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242080" #Conflicts within Chugoku
	desc = "EVENTHIST242080"
	#-#

	date = { day = 11 month = june year = 1542 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 20 month = july year = 1546 }

	action_a = {
		name = "CURSES"
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -1 }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 686 } #Kansai
		command = { type = revolt which = 686 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 686 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242080;Conflicts within Chugoku;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242080;In the early Sengoku Period, local feudal lords in Aki (today's Hiroshima) decided to band together to survive between two regional power, eastern Amago clan and western Ouchi. The lords recognized Mori clan, the most powerful among them, as the leader. In 1542, Mori Motonari reluctantly assisted Ouchi to attack on Amago. At first they succeeded to intrude into enemy's territory, but then, they suffered defeats in a row. Finally, They managed to return safely. However, Mori decided to push their coalition up to the position on par with neighbors to defend themselves from playing into the hands of other powers.;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1566-1568) Regional unification of Chugoku
event = {
	id = 242081
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 686 data = -1 } #Kansai (Bingo)
		control = { province = 686 data = -1 }
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242081" #Regional unification of Chugoku
	desc = "EVENTHIST242081"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = november year = 1566 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = november year = 1568 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242065A" #Let them be
		command = { type = naval value = 300 }
		command = { type = population which = 686 value = 3000 } #Kansai
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -4 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242081;Regional unification of Chugoku;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242081;By the 1560s, once mighty Ouchi clan had been fully declined because of betrayals and defeats. Then, the Chugoku region had divided to two regional powers: Mori and Amago clan. When Amago Haruhisa, a capable family head of Amago, died in 1560, Mori decided to seize the opportunity to abolish them once and for all. Finally in 1566, Mori managed to capture enemy's stronghold in Iwami (today's Shimane) and force Amago into submission and united the whole Chugoku region. After that, Mori attempted to conquer northern Kyushu which once Ouchi had ruled over, but it ended up without good result.;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1570-1576) Coalition against Oda
event = {
	id = 242082
	trigger = {
		event = 6922 #NIP: Oda has taken capital
		owned = { province = 686 data = -1 } #Kansai (Yamashiro)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242082" #Coalition against Oda
	desc = "EVENTHIST242082"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = february year = 1570 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = november year = 1576 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242082A" #Side with Oda
		command = { type = stability value = -3 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = 10 } #Kansai
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 72 value = 5 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242082;Coalition against Oda;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242082;When he had taken Kyoto, Oda Nobunaga promoted Ashikaga Yoshiaki as a puppet Shogun. Thereafter the shogunate had been free from being bullied as long as it didn't argue with Oda. However, Yoshiaki began to challenge Oda's authority because he felt frustration with his position. Finally in 1570, he openly called for anti-Oda faction to unite for his cause. Responding to his call, many lords including former allies of Oda organized the alliance against him. On the verge of a great victory, Oda found himself in a difficult situation.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME242082;Side with Oda;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1578-1582) End of the Ishiyama-Hongan-ji War
event = {
	id = 242083
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 686 data = -1 } #Kansai (Yamashiro)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242083" #End of the Ishiyama-Hongan-ji War
	desc = "EVENTHIST242083"
	#-#

	date = { day = 22 month = june year = 1578 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 21 month = june year = 1582 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242083A" #Make a peace with them
		command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = -1 }
		command = { type = trade value = 300 }
		command = { type = population which = 686 value = 3000 } #Kansai
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -5 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6924 } #NIP: Ikko-ikki
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME6975A" #Burn it down
		command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = 2 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
		command = { type = trade value = -300 }
		command = { type = population which = 686 value = -3000 } #Kansai
		command = { type = revolt which = 686 } #Kansai
		command = { type = revolt which = 686 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 686 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -5 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6924 } #NIP: Ikko-ikki
	}
}

EVENTNAME242083;End of the Ishiyama-Hongan-ji War;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242083;Ikko sect was among the most powerful militant Buddhist order during this period. In 1570, they began anti-Oda action all at once and plagued the Oda-dominated region with constant social unrests, responding to their hierarch's call. To eliminate this instability factor, Oda Nobunaga attempted to capture their main stronghold, Ishiyama-Hongan-ji, a fortified temple which located in Settsu (today's Osaka). Though the conflict evolved into a war of attrition which continued until 1580, finally Hongan-ji had to seek peace after Oda succeeded to cut their maritime supply lines. Soon after the humiliating peace, Ikko sect split into two factions and rapidly declined. It also brought about a drastic fall in the frequency of religious revolts across the country.;;;;;;;;;;

unmerged(72200) · Aug 12, 2008

It's the last post which continued from the previous one.

------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement of other random events like NIP_6929
------------------------------------------------------------

Code:

#(1546-1552) Liberalization of Markets and Guilds (I)
event = {
	id = 242084
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto (Owari)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242084" #Liberalization of Markets and Guilds
	desc = "EVENTHIST242084"
	#-#

	date = { day = 21 month = january year = 1546 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 20 month = january year = 1552 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084A" #Promote economic growth
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = -1 }
		command = { type = trade value = 300 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 685 value = 1 } #Kanto
		command = { type = population which = 685 value = 2000 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084B" #Protect old rights
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 }
		command = { type = trade value = -300 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME242084;Liberalization of Markets and Guilds;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST242084;In 1549, Rokkaku clan which ruled Oumi (today's Shiga) brought in a series of economic policies, called 'Rakuichi Rakuza' or Liberalization of Markets and Guilds, for the first time in Japan. In an effort to help stimulate the local economy, it reduced taxes for merchants and deregulated its economy to attract more merchants and artisans from outside the domain. Later Oda Nobunaga and Toyotomi Hideyoshi also introduced this idea on a larger scale across their sphere of influence.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME242084A;Promote economic growth;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME242084B;Protect old rights;;;;;;;;;;

Code:

#(1576-1582) Liberalization of Markets and Guilds (II)
event = {
	id = 242085
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto (Owari)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242084" #Liberalization of Markets and Guilds
	desc = "EVENTHIST242084"
	#-#

	date = { day = 21 month = june year = 1576 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 20 month = june year = 1582 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084A" #Promote economic growth
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = -1 }
		command = { type = trade value = 300 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 685 value = 1 } #Kanto
		command = { type = population which = 685 value = 3000 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084B" #Protect old rights
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 }
		command = { type = trade value = -300 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
	}
}

Code:

#(1586-1592) Liberalization of Markets and Guilds (III)
event = {
	id = 242086
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 686 data = -1 } #Kansai (Yamashiro)
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242084" #Liberalization of Markets and Guilds
	desc = "EVENTHIST242084"
	#-#

	date = { day = 8 month = september year = 1586 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 7 month = september year = 1592 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084A" #Promote economic growth
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 }
		command = { type = trade value = 300 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 686 value = 2 } #Kansai
		command = { type = population which = 686 value = 3000 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084B" #Protect old rights
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = -1 }
		command = { type = trade value = -300 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
	}
}

------------------------------------------------------------
Modification of related existing events
------------------------------------------------------------
I think now we finished the preparation to remove these ramdom events.
- NIP_6917 'A Daimyo has attacked you'
- NIP_6918 'Daimyo alliance has formed against you'
- NIP_6919 'A Daimyo has built a manufactury'
- NIP_6925 'A daimyo demands rights and better position'
- NIP_6927 'A vassal betrays his lord and takes over his lands'
- NIP_6928 'Daimyo are fighting in a province destroying it in the process'
- NIP_6929 'A Daimyo has made agricultural reforms in his domain'

Also, these events seem a bit strange because anyone couldn't drive all daimyos into submission in 1573 even if he was Oda Nobunaga. Then, at least we need to amend their duration but I suggest just removing all of them.
- NIP_6982 'Shimazu Status'
- NIP_6983 'Mori Status'
- NIP_6984 'Chosokabe Status'
- NIP_6985 'Date Status'
- NIP_6986 'Uesugi Status'
- #NIP_6987 'Oda Status'

----------
It's a little adjustment of the trigger and dates.

Code:

[color=red]#(1568)[/color][color=yellow]#(1568-1569)[/color] Oda has taken Capital
event = {
	id = 6922
	trigger = {
		[color=yellow]owned = { province = 686 data = -1 } #Kansai (Yamashiro)[/color]
		[color=red]event = 6945 #NIP: Ise Shinkuro takes Odawara Castle[/color]
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME6922" #Oda has taken capital
	desc = "EVENTHIST6922"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = march year = 1568 }
	[color=yellow]offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1569 }[/color]
	[color=red]offset = 90
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1568 }[/color]

	action_a = {
		name = "OK"
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -10 } #Kansai
		command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = -1 }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 685 value = 2 } #Kanto
	}
}

#-#Oda has taken capital and now seems to have assumed control over the Kansai area.

----------
As its desc mentioned, Enryaku-ji was a powerful militant Buddhist order but it didn't belong to Ikko sect. Also, because I suggested adding another event related to Hongan-ji which was the headquarters of Ikko sect, we can amend the event.

Code:

#(1571) [color=yellow]The fate of [/color]Enryakuji
event = {
	id = 6975
	[color=yellow]trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto
	}[/color]
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME6975" #The fate of Enryakuji
	desc = "EVENTHIST6975"
	#-#

	date = { day = 12 month = september year = 1571 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME6975A" #Burn it down
		command = { type = domestic which = Innovative value = 2 }
		command = { type = infra value = -100 }
		command = { type = stability value = 2 }
		command = { type = losemanufactory which = 686 } #Kansai
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -3 }
		[color=red]command = { type = sleepevent which = 6924 } #NIP: Ikko-ikki[/color]
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME6975B" #Cooperate
		[color=yellow]command = { type = domestic which = innovative value = -2 }[/color]
		[color=red]command = { type = domestic which = Innovative value = -4 }[/color]
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -3 }
		command = { type = INF which = 686 value = 15000 } #Kansai
	}
}

#-#Oda Nobunaga wishes to end the influence and the power of the militant Buddhist orders once and for all. The Tendai sect with its centre in Enryakuji complex of about 3000 buildings was originally charged with protecting Kyoto from evil sprits. It has however built up a formidable army that it uses to raid Kyoto with or to attack rival sects. Nobunaga proposes to burn down the entire temple complex and kill anyone that opposes him within. An alternative action would be to cooperate with them in exchange for religious concessions.

----------
We need to fix the desc of NIP_6980 for consistency with new events.

EVENTNAME6980;The last Ashikaga Shogun Deposed by Oda;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST6980;Even though Ashikaga Yoshiaki had established an extensive alliance against him, Oda Nobunaga managed to defeat members of it one by one. When Yoshiaki lost most of his allies, Oda decided to expel him and to end the Ashikaga Shogunate. However, Oda still had much more formidable enemies like Uesugi in Echigo and Mori in Chugoku. To reunify the country, Oda had to bring them to his knees.;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST6980;Oda had when he had taken Kyoto promoted Ashikaga Yoshiaki as puppet shogun. The Shogunate had therafter been free from being bullied as long as it did not argue with Oda. Yoshiaki however started to challange Oda's authority and this lead Oda to force him out and to end the Ashikaga Shogunate. ;;;;;;;;;;

----------
We need to add another option on 'Keicho Embassy' to awake Hasekura Tsunenaga if we remove the trigger event, NIP_6985 'Date Status'.

Code:

#(1613) Keicho Embassy
#by waishi
event = {
	id = 242040
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 684 data = -1 } #Tohoku
		control = { province = 684 data = -1 }
	}
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME242040" #Keicho Embassy
	desc = "EVENTHIST242040"
	#-#

	date = { day = 14 month = september year = 1613 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242040A" #Send them [color=yellow]only as diplomats[/color]
		command = { type = warships which = 684 value = 2 } #Tohoku
		command = { type = transports which = 684 value = 2 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = SPA value = 50 }
		[color=red]command = { type = wakeleader which = 097813 } #Hasekura Tsunenaga (NIP)[/color]
	}
	[color=yellow]action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242040B" #Send them also as explorers
		command = { type = warships which = 684 value = 2 } #Tohoku
		command = { type = transports which = 684 value = 2 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = SPA value = 50 }
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 097813 } #Hasekura Tsunenaga (NIP)
	}[/color]
}

ACTIONNAME242040A;Send them;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME242040A;Send them only as diplomats;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME242040B;Send them also as explorers;;;;;;;;;;

------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes
------------------------------------------------------------
- There is no change in initial province RRs of the 1520 scenario from my previous post #739.
- If any one of above events doesn't happen, all province RRs will be reduced to 0 by 'Toyotomi carries out the great Sword Hunt' in 1588.

References
<Kanto Province>
- 242074: Battle of Kawagoe
- 242075: Battles of Kawanakajima
- 242076-77: Oda Nobunaga

<Shikoku Province>
- 242078-79: Chosokabe_Motochika

<Kansai Province>
- 242080-81: Mori Motonari
- 242082-83: Oda Nobunaga

<Others>
- 242084-86: Rakuichi Rakuza (Liberalization of Markets and Guilds)

unmerged(40707) · Aug 12, 2008

Not sure but for NIP_242074, shouldn't province be controlled too? Or at least controlled by rebels but not a foreign country?
Same question for other events (including already included in betas if necessary) where control is not already mentioned.

If corrections are necessary, just put the id of the event and control condition(s) (no need to post entire events again).

Typo in NIP_242081 and population command: 687 => 686
EVENTNAME242082: Coaliation => Coalition

About "Liberalization of Markets and Guilds" events, even if description remains the same for all avents, is it possible to find a different name for each event?

About previous posts, there is a problem with dates in NIP_242071. First line says 1578 but dates in the event don't match and don't match 242069 and 242070 neither. I figured it out while including NIP_242083.

unmerged(40707) · Aug 12, 2008

To go with modifications in post #749:

Code:

#(1600) Sekigahara
event = {
	id = 6981
	[COLOR=Yellow]trigger = {
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto
		control = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto
	}[/COLOR]
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME6981" #Sekigahara
	desc = "EVENTHIST6981"
	#-#

	date = { day = 15 month = september year = 1600 }

	action_a = {
		name = "OK"
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = sleepevent which = 6917 } #NIP: A Daimyo has attacked you
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6918 } #NIP: Daimyo alliance has formed against you
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6919 } #NIP: A Daimyo has built a manufactury
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6927 } #NIP: A vassal betrays his lord and takes over his lands
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6928 } #NIP: Daimyo are fighting in a province destroying it in the process
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6929 } #NIP: A Daimyo has made agricultural reforms in his domain
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 6925 } #NIP: A daimyo demands rights and better position[/COLOR]
	}
}

#-#Tokugawa Ieyasu has successfully challenged the previous ruling lords and defeated them in a huge battle. This has removed all real threats to the power of the new Tokugawa Bakufu. The destruction of the petty peasant rebellions against the new Bakufu is all that remain before the new order is imposed.

But trigger can be amended too.

unmerged(72200) · Aug 12, 2008

Thank you for your quick, accurate response, Yoda

At first, I fixed typos which you pointed out.

Or at least controlled by rebels but not a foreign country?

It sounds like a better solution which I sought to because I've thought that such regional conflicts don't always need a control of Japan's central government. So it may be good idea to add or to amend 'control' conditions of some events as below:

- 242063-64, 242066-67 (Tohoku Province)

Code:

[color=yellow]		OR = {
			control = { province = 684 data = -1 } #Tohoku
			control = { province = 684 data = REB }
		}[/color]

- 242068, 242071 (Kyushu Province)

Code:

[color=yellow]		OR = {
			control = { province = 688 data = -1 } #Kyushu
			control = { province = 688 data = REB }
		}[/color]

- 6981, 242074, 242076-77, 242084-85 (Kanto Province)

Code:

[color=yellow]		OR = {
			control = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto
			control = { province = 685 data = REB }
		}[/color]

- 242075 (Tohoku and Kanto Province) *Maybe we should replace all triggers of it.

Code:

[color=yellow]	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 684 data = -1 } #Tohoku (Echigo)
		owned = { province = 685 data = -1 } #Kanto (Shinano)
		OR = {
			control = { province = 684 data = -1 }
			control = { province = 684 data = REB }
		}
		OR = {
			control = { province = 685 data = -1 }
			control = { province = 685 data = REB }
		}
	}[/color]

- 242062, 242080, 242082, 242086 (Kansai Province)

Code:

[color=yellow]		OR = {
			control = { province = 686 data = -1 } #Kansai
			control = { province = 686 data = REB }
		}[/color]

About "Liberalization of Markets and Guilds" events, even if description remains the same for all avents, is it possible to find a different name for each event?

Maybe we should simply add place names or rulers one in them as below:
EVENTNAME242084 -> 'Liberalization of Markets and Guilds in Kannonji' or 'Rokkaku's Liberalization of...'
EVENTNAME242085 -> '...in Azuchi' or 'Oda's Liberalization of...'
EVENTNAME242086 -> '...in Kinki region' or 'Toyotomi's Liberalization of...'

About previous posts, there is a problem with dates in NIP_242071. First line says 1578 but dates in the event don't match and don't match 242069 and 242070 neither.

I'm sorry, it was a mistake because I wrote it based on other event. 1578 is the correct year for NIP_242071, then, it may a good idea to fix its date as below:

Code:

#[color=red](1578)[/color] [color=yellow](1576-1580)[/color] Decisive battle over the hegemony of Kyushu
event = {
	id = 242071
	...
	[color=yellow]date = { day = 9 month = december year = 1576 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 13 month = november year = 1580 }[/color]
	[color=red]date = { day = 1 month = june year = 1542 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = september year = 1548 }[/color]
	...

unmerged(40707) · Aug 12, 2008

waishi said:
Thank you for your quick, accurate response, Yoda At first, I fixed typos which you pointed out.

This is my "job".

waishi said:
Maybe we should simply add place names or rulers one in them as below:
EVENTNAME242084 -> 'Liberalization of Markets and Guilds in Kannonji' or 'Rokkaku's Liberalization of...'
EVENTNAME242085 -> '...in Azuchi' or 'Oda's Liberalization of...'
EVENTNAME242086 -> '...in Kinki region' or 'Toyotomi's Liberalization of...'

Ok for places then.

unmerged(72200) · Aug 13, 2008

YodaMaster said:
Ok for places then.

Just now I remember that 'Kinki', which indicates the area around Kyoto, may sound 'kinky' for a native English speaker. Though it isn't a serious problem, we can simply replace the name with 'Kinai region' or 'Kansai' if you feel depayse about the name...
Oh, we already had the latest beta 12 including it! You do pretty much 'lightning' works, Yoda

Well, then I'm going to back to check the 1648 scenario about the part of Japan.

unmerged(72200) · Aug 13, 2008

I've tested the beta 12 and found my mistake

o
Kansai can have eternal province RR since the 'The great sword hunt' event in 1588 doesn't affect it. Then, as a tentative solution, I want to amend 'The great sword hunt' event to reduce the province RR as below:

Code:

#(1588) [COLOR=Yellow]The great sword hunt[/COLOR]	[COLOR=Red]Toyotomi carries out the great Sword Hunt [/COLOR]
event = {
	id = 6914
	...

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME6914A" #Split the groups
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 684 value = -10 } #Tohoku
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 685 value = -10 } #Kanto
		[color=yellow]command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -10 } #Kansai[/color]
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 687 value = -10 } #Shikoku
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 688 value = -10 } #Kyushu
		command = { type = domestic which = Quality value = 3 }
		command = { type = domestic which = Serfdom value = 3 }
		command = { type = stability value = 3 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME6914B" #Don't split
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 684 value = -10 } #Tohoku
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 685 value = -10 } #Kanto
		[color=yellow]command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 686 value = -10 } #Kansai[/color]
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 687 value = -10 } #Shikoku
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 688 value = -10 } #Kyushu
		command = { type = domestic which = Quality value = -3 }
		command = { type = domestic which = Serfdom value = -3 }
		command = { type = stability value = 3 }
	}
}

#-#Toyotomi Hideyoshi wishes to split the warriors from the peasants to prevent rebellions. He wants to force the peasants and warriors to choose between the two. Samurai are to be prohibited from farming and forced to move into the castle towns. Peasants and religious orders are to be prohibited from owning weapons. Toyotomi says that the pretext is that all weapons are to be collected to make a statue of buddha. Should the groups be split?

unmerged(40707) · Aug 13, 2008

waishi said:
Just now I remember that 'Kinki', which indicates the area around Kyoto, may sound 'kinky' for a native English speaker. Though it isn't a serious problem, we can simply replace the name with 'Kinai region' or 'Kansai' if you feel depayse about the name...

Do you know we use ASS as tag for Mongolia? No need to change the name if it is accurate.

waishi said:
Oh, we already had the latest beta 12 including it! You do pretty much 'lightning' works, Yoda

waishi said:
Well, then I'm going to back to check the 1648 scenario about the part of Japan.

It could be a good idea to check DP sliders changes too and amend 1520 and 1648 scenarios accordingly too.

I already included provincetax changes for 1648 scenario.

unmerged(72200) · Aug 13, 2008

YodaMaster said:
Do you know we use ASS as tag for Mongolia?

I forgot it. Well, how should I say... In a weird way, I feel sorry for them

o Anyway, I understand.

YodaMaster said:
It could be a good idea to check DP sliders changes too and amend 1520 and 1648 scenarios accordingly too.

All right, I also try to do it

unmerged(72200) · Aug 13, 2008

DP slider setting of Japan

First, I'm sorry I've found three mistakes of mine as below:

Code:

#(1522-1527) Decline of Oushu Tandai in Tohoku
event = {
	id = 242063
	...
	action_a = {
		name = "OH_NO"
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -1 }
		[color=yellow]command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }[/color]
		[color=red]command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }[/color]
		command = { type = population which = 684 value = -1000 } #Tohoku
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 684 value = 5 }
	}
}

Code:

#(1550-1552) Otomo clan's internal feud in Kyushu
event = {
	id = 242068
	...
	action_a = {
		name = "OH_NO"
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -1 }
		[color=yellow]command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }[/color]
		[color=red]command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }[/color]
		command = { type = revolt which = 688 } #Kyushu
		command = { type = revolt which = 688 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 688 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 688 value = 2 } #Kyushu
	}
}

Code:

#(1586-1592) Liberalization of Markets and Guilds in Kinki region
event = {
	id = 242086
	...
	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084A" #Promote economic growth
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
		[color=yellow]command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = -1 }[/color]
		[color=red]command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 }[/color]
		command = { type = trade value = 300 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 686 value = 2 } #Kansai
		command = { type = population which = 686 value = 3000 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME242084B" #Protect old rights
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 1 }
		[color=yellow]command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 }[/color]
		[color=red]command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = -1 }[/color]
		command = { type = trade value = -300 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
	}
}

Second, I've counted up the sum of DP slider changes including above corrections. According to the result, we can amend the initial setting of each scenario as below:

Code:

#1520_NIP_Japan.inc:
	[COLOR=Yellow]policy = {
		aristocracy = 7
		centralization = 0
		innovative = 4
		mercantilism = 7
		offensive = 6
		land = 5
		quality = 8
		serfdom = 8
	}[/COLOR]

#1648_NIP_Japan.inc:
	[COLOR=Yellow]policy = {
		aristocracy = 4
		centralization = 4
		innovative = 0
		mercantilism = 10
		offensive = 7
		land = 10
		quality = 10
		serfdom = 10
	}[/COLOR]

unmerged(72200) · Aug 14, 2008

Markable events of Japan in the 1648 scenario

I've checked the event file and we can regard these events as happened between 1520 and 1648.
(Do I need to remove flavor events like NIP_6959-6961 from them? I want to know our standards and I shuold ask it sooner, sorry.)

Code:

	3877 #NIP: Hideyoshi's Anti-Christian Edict
	3878 #NIP: Tokugawa's Edict of Expulsion
	3880 #NIP: Policy of Sakoku implemented
	3881 #NIP: Toyotomi Hideyoshi Plans to Invade Korea
	6914 #NIP: The great sword hunt
	6922 #NIP: Oda has taken capital
	6959 #NIP: Sen no Rikyu perfects Tea Ceremony
	6960 #NIP: Okuni creates Kabuki
	6961 #NIP: Musashi Miyamoto writes the Book of Five Rings
	6968 #NIP: Francis Xavier arrives in Japan
	6974 #NIP: Toyotomi carries out the Taikokenchi
	6975 #NIP: The fate of Enryakuji
	6979 #NIP: Assassination of Shogun Ashikaga Yoshiteru
	6980 #NIP: Last Ashikaga Shogun deposed by Oda
	6981 #NIP: Sekigahara
	6988 #NIP: Akechi Mitsuhide kills Oda
	242032 #NIP: Firearms production comes to Japan
	242036 #NIP: Appeal for redress in Taiwan
	242037 #NIP: Allow the Dutch to trade again
	242038 #NIP: Laws for Temples and Shrines
	242039 #NIP: Magistrate of Temples and Shrines
	242040 #NIP: Keicho Embassy
	242041 #NIP: Tensho Boys Mission
	242042 #NIP: Restoring relations with Korea
	242046 #NIP: William Adams and Jan Joosten
	242048 #NIP: Reductions in foreign trade
	242049 #NIP: The Sakoku Edict of 1635
	242050 #NIP: The Shimabara Rebellion
	242051 #NIP: The conquest of Ryukyu
	242056 #NIP: Luzon Sukezaemon, a Red seal ship trader
	242057 #NIP: Araki Soutarou, a Red seal ship trader
	242062 #NIP: Siege of Osaka
	242063 #NIP: Decline of Oushu Tandai in Tohoku
	242064 #NIP: Date clan's great internal feud in Tohoku
	242065 #NIP: Regional unification of northern Tohoku
	242066 #NIP: Betrayal of Nanbu clan's vassal in northern Tohoku
	242067 #NIP: Decisive battle over the hegemony of southern Tohoku
	242068 #NIP: Otomo clan's internal feud in Kyushu
	242069 #NIP: Regional unification of northern Kyushu
	242070 #NIP: Regional unification of northern Kyushu
	242071 #NIP: Decisive battle over the hegemony of Kyushu
	242072 #NIP: Regional unification of Kyushu
	242074 #NIP: Great victory of Hojo clan in central Kanto
	242075 #NIP: Conflicts between Takeda and Uesugi
	242076 #NIP: Battle of Okehazama
	242077 #NIP: Nagashima Ikko-ikki
	242078 #NIP: Regional unification of southern Shikoku
	242079 #NIP: Regional unification of Shikoku
	242080 #NIP: Conflicts within Chugoku
	242081 #NIP: Regional unification of Chugoku
	242082 #NIP: Coalition against Oda
	242083 #NIP: End of the Ishiyama-Hongan-ji War
	242084 #NIP: Liberalization of Markets and Guilds in Kannonji
	242085 #NIP: Liberalization of Markets and Guilds in Azuchi
	242086 #NIP: Liberalization of Markets and Guilds in Kinki region

Also, we can regard these events as asleep even though we already made them asleep in the above events.

Code:

	6916 #NIP: Red seal ships trade
	6924 #NIP: Ikko-ikki
	242055 #NIP: Japan turns toward the open-door policy

unmerged(40707) · Aug 14, 2008

Great work but we "need" only events that have influence on the scenario as condition in triggers or because they should be slept.

AGC & EEP: Far East

Just call me Yoda in private!

First Lieutenant

First Lieutenant

Just call me Yoda in private!

First Lieutenant

Just call me Yoda in private!

First Lieutenant

First Lieutenant

First Lieutenant

Just call me Yoda in private!

Just call me Yoda in private!

First Lieutenant

Just call me Yoda in private!

First Lieutenant

First Lieutenant

Just call me Yoda in private!

First Lieutenant

First Lieutenant

First Lieutenant

Just call me Yoda in private!