YodaMaster said:@Toio: *bump*
forgot, i will work on this now and give you a reply
YodaMaster said:@Toio: *bump*
YodaMaster said:There is nothing wrong with event 159049 actions, only with description.
I'm not sure I understand the modification for SWE_291024 and added dates. Will the event not be triggered by POM_259008 and GOT_367006 anymore?
#(1419-1459) The invasion of Gotland
event = {
id = 159049 #triggered by GOT_367006 A
random = no
country = DAN
name = "EVENTNAME159049" #The invasion of Gotland
desc = "EVENTHIST159049"
#-#[COLOR=Yellow]In 1449 the Swedish forces in Gotland aided Erik in the war against the Danes. While Erik was successful in defending the island, he realised that there was no way he could win the war. Therefore he agreed to leave Gotland to the Danes for safe passage to Pomerania.
[/COLOR]
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME159049A" #Gotland is yet again under Danish rule
command = { type = stability value = 1 }
command = { type = inherit which = GOT } #Gotland
command = { type = sleepevent which = 338011 } #Random National: Merchants are being plundered
}
}
YodaMaster said:Ahistorical GOT sequence still triggers now reworked other events. it seems to me there is a consistency issue with this sequence.
In post #78 you marked triggering of GOT_367006 A in red but it is not removed in DAN_159049. Please check and post change(s) to be made to the corresponding GOT events for the whole sequence.
EDIT: EVENTHIST291024 and EVENTHIST159049 are exactly the same => EVENTHIST159049 used for both events.
YodaMaster said:If GOT events are not reworked (or at least posted here with removed trigger commands), there is still an issue for proper compiling. I have to be sure of modifications to be made.
In reworked EVENTHIST159049, shouldn't past be used in the sentences? Or is it an ahistorical event?
YodaMaster said:Good point, no idea why it was decided this way, if only for 10 years.
We have two options:
1. scrap GOT tag, but other HC members have to agree
2. rework GOT events, even if GOT will be scrapped in the future.
We can't stay with an "in between" sequence, even if ahistorical, anyway.
Ownership of the province by its right owner, I presume.mandead said:Secondly, if we are indeed to scrap GOT, with what do we intend to replace it?
No, no, sorry - I meant the tag... which country shall we have instead of Gotland?YodaMaster said:Ownership of the province by its right owner, I presume.
Ah, okay. Well, count me in then - I vote we scrap the Land of Goats.YodaMaster said:The tag will be freed for an unknown future better use. That's all.
YodaMaster said:Ok, GOT removed.
Gotland province will just be Danish at start but should events cede it to Pomerania at some point?