• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
5
Andrelious said:
Whilst we're talking about a Welsh ruled England, I think we need to have Welsh monarchs available for England.

We could merge back into the historical monarchs at some point, how about Henry VII?
Maybe, but we need to be sure consistency in English events for same period will be preserved.
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
5
CoA and flag for Wales becoming England:

shieldengwalesqf1.png

smallshieldengwalesnw6.png


shieldengwalesfm3.png

smallshieldengwalesib7.png



flagengwalesec4.png
 

De-VILLARS

Le diable blanc
7 Badges
Feb 7, 2006
3.228
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • For The Glory
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
a little sequence for France and Savoie

Code:
event = {
	id = 170229 
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 405 data = SAV } #Savoie
		control = { province = 405 data = SAV }
		owned = { province = 407 data = -1 } #Dauphiné
		control = { province = 407 data = -1 }
	}
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170229" #Mandrin
	desc = "EVENTHIST170229"

	date = { day = 27 month = july year = 1753 }
	offset = 100
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1755 }

	action_a = {				
		name = "ACTIONNAME170229A" #C'en est assez !
		command = { type = treasury value = 20 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 407 value = 2 } 
		command = { type = trigger which = 275029 } #SAV : Mandrin
	}
	action_b = {				
		name = "ACTIONNAME170229B" #La savoie est un Etat souverain...
		command = { type = provincetax which = 407 value = -1 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 40 } 
		command = { type = population which = 407 value = 300 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 170230 } #FRA : End of troubles in Dauphine
	}
}
EVENTNAME170229;Mandrin;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST170229;Mandrin was a french bandit who fought the tax inspector by smuggling with Savoy and Geneva. After one year of activity, he was pursued by royal troops which arrested him in Savoy's territory causing a diplomatic unrest.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME170229A;It's enough !;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME170229B;Savoy is a sovereign State...;;;;;;;;;;

Code:
event = {
	id =  275029 #triggered by Fra : 170229 Mandrin
	random = no
	country = SAV
	name = "EVENTNAME170229" #Mandrin
	desc = "EVENTHIST170229"

	action_a = {				
		name = "ACTIONNAME275029A" 
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -20 }
	}
	action_b = {				
		name = "ACTIONNAME275029B" 
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 40 }
}

EVENTNAME170229;Mandrin;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST170229;Mandrin was a french bandit who fought the tax inspector by smuggling with Savoy and Geneva. After one year of activity, he was pursued by royal troops which arrested him in Savoy's territory causing a diplomatic unrest.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME275029A;We want him;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME275029B;If we were them we would make similar;;;;;;;;;;

Code:
event = {
	id = 170230
	trigger = {
		event = 170229 #FRA : Mandrin
		owned = { province = 407 data = -1 } #Dauphine
	}
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170230" #End of troubles in Dauphine
	desc = "EVENTHIST170230"

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1756 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1760 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME170230A"
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 407 value = -2 }
	}
}

EVENTNAME170230;End of troubles in Dauphine;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST170230;After Mandrin's elimination, peasants caused troubles in Dauphine;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME170230A;At last !;;;;;;;;;;
 

unmerged(81352)

Recruit
Jul 31, 2007
2
0
England - Glouster's wife's witch trial

1.52 England mid 1400s (took Henry end mad French adventure).

I was rather annoyed by the event handling of Glouchester's wife's (Elanora?) witch trial.
The event give you two choices -
1) Have the charges investigated by the council, or
2) let the whole thing drop.

It gives consequences -
1) -10 gp
2) -Stab

Been sensible you take the -10gp only to find that the real consequence is that she gets convicted with all sorts of consequences with no choice!

My understanding is that "event consequences aren't supposed to be "sucker punches".
I'd suggest that the consequences for having her investigated be -
1) -10gp, Elanora? found guilty event triggered.

Stephen
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
5
I will investigate ASAP.

EDIT: where is the problem with this sequence? It takes two days for the consequence of the trial. No way to have it triggered by the first event and happen the same day. And the result of the trial is positive for the country... what do you want for other balanced choice in the second event?

You have to make a choice in first event: stab or treasury (and remember first choice is the historical one). That's all but the description of the first event suggests something will happen because of the trial. You have to face the consequences of your choices. It takes only two days for consequence and there is no bad effect here.

Be aware some complex events chains in AGCEEP have bigger (bad or good) consequences and these consequences can arise many years later...
 
Last edited:

Taijian

Skeptic
97 Badges
Dec 30, 2006
428
34
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Rome Gold
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • 200k Club
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Pride of Nations
  • Rise of Prussia
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Imperator: Rome - Magna Graecia
  • Divine Wind
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Cities in Motion
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Deus Vult
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • For the Motherland
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Heir to the Throne
Problem with War of the Roses and SCO276018B

Hi there,

a problem and some questions to those here, who are more knowledgeable with English history than myself (shouldn't be too hard to find those...):

Playing as England in my current game, I was in the middle of the WotR when SCO276018 happend (Margaret seeks our Aid - SCO supports the Lancastrians or abstains). SCO went with choice B, thus sleeping ENG164074 (Scottish Intervention) - seemingly good for England, as this means less trouble in the north.

However, no ENG164074 also means no ENG164076 (Disaster at St. Albans) which in turn means no ENG21105 (Battle of Towton) - and thus, that there is no chance of deposing Henry VI.

First problem: Not being an expert on English history I can not really make an informed decision on this, but shouldn't the lack of Scottish support make it more likely for Henry VI to be deposed rather than make it impossible?

Second problem: Even if this is WAD, there still is the problem that Henry VI stays around without ENG21105B being triggered - thus all the Civil War events that assume that Edward IV is king still fire (21107: The Readeption, 21108: Battle of Tewkesbury, 21109: Trial of George Duke of Clarence, 21110: Usurpation of Richard Duke of Gloucester, 21112: Bosworth Field, 2111: Battle of Stoke) which is rather weird, since they keep referring to Yorkist Kings being in power, rather than Henry VI, who is still around in my game, even after ENG21108 (Battle of Tewkesbury), which mentions him being killed... :wacko:

Maybe someone can help me sort this out?
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
5
Taijian said:
First problem: Not being an expert on English history I can not really make an informed decision on this, but shouldn't the lack of Scottish support make it more likely for Henry VI to be deposed rather than make it impossible?
You're right.

Reworked sequence:
Code:
#(1458-1460) Margaret seeks our Aid
event = {
	id = 276018
	trigger = {
		event = 164073 #ENG: The Act of Accord
	}
	random = no
	country = SCO
	name = "EVENTNAME276018" #Margaret seeks our Aid
	desc = "EVENTHIST276018"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1458 }
	offset = 15
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = december year = 1460 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME276018A" #Give the Lancastrians our support
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = ENG }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME276018B" #Refuse to take part in the English affair
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = trigger which = 164118 } #ENG: Scottish Refusal[/COLOR]
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 164074 } #ENG: Scottish Intervention
		[COLOR=Red]command = { }[/COLOR]
	}
}
#-#Queen Margaret left England sailing for Berwick intending to seek refuge in Scotland where James II, whose mother had been a Beaufort, was a friend to the Lancastrians. The Scottish Queen, Mary of Guelders sent an envoy to escort Margaret to Dumfries where she and her son were warmly received. Although James II had recently deceased, his son James III, then only a boy, was to govern with the aid of a Regency council. The widowed Queen and the Bishop of St. Andrews headed the Regency council and thus Lancastrian sympathy had remained strong. After a lengthy meeting at Lincluden, the two Queens came to an agreement. Scotland would loan Margaret money and men for Margarets campaign against the Yorkists. In return, Margaret agreed to surrender Berwick Castle, and promised an unguarded and rich southern England which the Scottish troops could plunder mercilessly. In response, thousands of Scottish men-at-arms volunteered for the campaign. Needless to say, Margaret's deal with the Scottish would not be received well in England.

And same typo (remianed => remained) in EVENTHIST164074

New event:
Code:
#(1458-1460) Scottish Refusal
event = {
	id = 164118 #triggered by SCO_276018 B
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME164118" #Scottish Refusal
	desc = "EVENTHIST164118"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "OH_NO"
		command = { type = stability value = -3 }
		command = { type = relation which = SCO value = -100 }
	}
}
EVENTNAME164118;Scottish Refusal;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST164118;Queen Margaret left England sailing for Berwick intending to seek refuge in Scotland where James II, whose mother had been a Beaufort, was a friend to the Lancastrians. The Scottish Queen, Mary of Guelders sent an envoy to escort Margaret to Dumfries where she and her son were warmly received. Although James II had recently deceased, his son James III, then only a boy, was to govern with the aid of a Regency council. The widowed Queen and the Bishop of St. Andrews headed the Regency council and thus Lancastrian sympathy had remained strong. However, after a lengthy meeting at Lincluden, the two Queens never came to an agreement...;;;;;;;;;;

And last change:
Code:
#(1461) Battle of Towton
#by Count Six - modified by ribbon22
event = {
	id = 21105
	trigger = {
		[COLOR=Yellow]OR = {[/COLOR]
			event = 164076 #ENG: Disaster at St. Albans
			[COLOR=Yellow]event = 164118 #ENG: Scottish Refusal
		}[/COLOR]
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME21105" #Battle of Towton
	desc = "EVENTHIST21105"
	#-#

	date = { day = 4 month = march year = 1461 }
	offset = 5
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1461 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21105A" #God Save King Edward!
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 240 value = -4 } #Northumberland
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 241 value = -2 } #Yorkshire
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 242 value = -4 } #Lancashire
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 243 value = -4 } #Wales
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 244 value = -4 } #Midlands
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 250 value = -4 } #Cornwall
		command = { type = independence which = SCO }
		command = { type = independence which = CON }
		command = { type = independence which = LEI }
		command = { type = independence which = MST }
		command = { type = independence which = ULS }
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 046002 } #Edward IV
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 046003 } #Henry VI
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 046004 } #Edward IV
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 046005 } #Edward V
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 046006 } #Richard III
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 046311 } #Edward IV (ENG)
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 046312 } #Warwick (ENG)
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 046313 } #Gloucester (ENG)
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 046314 } #Richard III (ENG)
		command = { type = sleepleader which = 046310 } #Northumberland (ENG)
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21111 } #ENG: The Lancastrian Succession
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21105B" #Long Live King Henry!
		command = { type = stability value = -2 }
		command = { type = treasury value = -100 } #courtiers exploiting Henry's generosity
		command = { type = infra value = -300 } #courtiers exploiting Henry's generosity
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 240 value = -8 } #Northumberland
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 241 value = -4 } #Yorkshire
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 242 value = -8 } #Lancashire
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 243 value = -8 } #Wales
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 244 value = -8 } #Midlands
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 250 value = -8 } #Cornwall
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 245 value = 4 } #Lincoln
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 246 value = 4 } #Bristol
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 247 value = 4 } #Anglia
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 248 value = 4 } #Kent
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 249 value = 4 } #Wessex
		command = { type = independence which = SCO }
		command = { type = independence which = CON }
		command = { type = independence which = LEI }
		command = { type = independence which = MST }
		command = { type = independence which = ULS }
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 164077 } #ENG: King Edward's Coronation
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21107 } #ENG: The Readeption
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21108 } #ENG: Battle of Tewkesbury
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21109 } #ENG: Trial of George Duke of Clarence
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21110 } #ENG: Usurpation of Richard Duke of Gloucester
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21112 } #ENG: Bosworth Field
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21113 } #ENG: Battle of Stoke
	}
}
#-#The fighting at St. Albans had destroyed any possibility for political harmony between Yorkist and Lancastrian factions. York found himself outmaneuvered, with no options except once again to resort to force. In a series of brief and rapid campaigns, open warfare broke out once more in England. York himself was killed in the battle of Wakefield in December 1460, but his son and heir Edward earl of March gained a victory at Mortimer's Cross in February the following year. Soon afterwards, the rival armies approached each other at the village of Towton, where in the midst of a blinding snowstorm they fought the largest and most brutal battle of the era. When the bloody day was done, the throne of England was the victor's prize.

With Scottish refusal, result is a desaster for English stability, St. Alban is not represented as an event (and no bonus cash + INF + CAV for England) but battle of Towton is still here for the choice between kings.

Taijian said:
Second problem: Even if this is WAD, there still is the problem that Henry VI stays around without ENG21105B being triggered - thus all the Civil War events that assume that Edward IV is king still fire (21107: The Readeption, 21108: Battle of Tewkesbury, 21109: Trial of George Duke of Clarence, 21110: Usurpation of Richard Duke of Gloucester, 21112: Bosworth Field, 2111: Battle of Stoke) which is rather weird, since they keep referring to Yorkist Kings being in power, rather than Henry VI, who is still around in my game, even after ENG21108 (Battle of Tewkesbury), which mentions him being killed... :wacko:

Maybe someone can help me sort this out?
I don't understand, Edward IV is woken in ENG_21105 A... Henry VI should "die" when it happens. There is no problem here.

EDIT: btw, King Edward's Coronation description is too long.

EVENTHIST164077;The coronations of England's Kings had always been splendid affairs, and Edward, with his sense of showmanship, was resolved that nothing should be missing to give the populace the spectacle that it expected.Edward rode from Lambeth to the Tower to begin the customary Vigil before a coronation. At the gates of the City, he was received by the Lord Mayor and the Aldermen, clad in scarlet robes, accompanied by 400 from the Court of Common Council and the most prominent of the citizens. Edward looked every inch a King, and a King who would give them a lasting peace. In him they saw an end to the troubles that had afflicted the Realm in recent years. The Yorkists had always enjoyed a strong following in London, and they had loyally supported Edward's House with men and money. Once in the Tower, Edward began the process of rewarding his followers. There had been no time to dub more than six men knights, William Hastings and John Howard among them, later to become the first Howard Duke of Norfolk. Now, Edward dubbed no less than 32 of his followers Knights of the Bath. These new knights, wearing the blue gowns of their Order, made a brave sight riding through the City at the head of the procession which brought Edward to his Coronation on Sunday 28th June 1461. T\n \nOn Sunday 28th June 1461, the solemn and splendid ceremony was conducted in Westminster Abbey, the cradle of the English Monarchy, by Thomas Bourchier, Archbishop of Canterbury, who now placed the crown on the first of the three Monarchs whom, in the course of his long life, he was to crown. The Archbishop of York, William Booth assisted him. \n \nAfterwards, there was the usual coronation banquet when Sir Thomas Dymoke, the hereditary King's champion, rode into the hall in full armour, flung down his mail gauntlet, and challenged anyone who disputed Edward's right to do battle with him. On Tuesday 30th June, he was due to attend a pageant before St Pauls Cathedral where a descending angel blessed him. It was a happy and joyful occasion on a fine summer's day. \n \nEdward now completed process of rewarding his faithful followers with titles, although in some cases they would have to wait until Parliament had completed the Attainder processes against the defeated Lancastrian Lords before they could receive grants of land to support their new dignities. His 12-year old brother George, newly returned from his refuge in Burgundy, was created Duke of Clarence. His 9-year old brother Richard, who had also come back from Burgundy, became Duke of Gloucester. Henry, Lord Bourchier, the Treasurer, was created Earl of Essex, and particularly bidden to keep a close eye on the Lancastrians of the Earl of Oxford's affinity in the eastern counties. William, Lord Fauconberge was rewarded for his outstanding loyalty to the House of York, and for his valour on the battlefield with the Earldom of Kent. Sir William Hastings, the knight who had been dubbed on the same battle-field, became Lord Hastings of Hastings in Sussex. Sir William Herbert received the first of his promotions as Lord Herbert.;;;;;;;;;;


EDIT2: for safety, I suggest to add:
Code:
monarch = 046002 #Edward IV
in trigger of all events following ENG_164077 if Edward IV is king and remove:
Code:
event = 164077 #ENG: King Edward's Coronation
in corresponding events.

Same for following historical monarchs (slept by default).

All proposed changes for monarchs, in chronological order of events:

046002 #Edward IV in 164078, 164079, 164080, 164081, 164078, 164082, 164089, 164090, 164091, 164092, 164083, 164084, 164085, 164086, 164087 and 164088 (and deathdate of this event should be in september and not december).
046003 #Henry VI in 21107
046004 #Edward IV in 21108 and 21109
046006 #Richard III in 21110
046001 #Henry VI in 21111

Following event ENG_3005 is for Henry VII and trigger is correct afterwards.
 
Last edited:

Taijian

Skeptic
97 Badges
Dec 30, 2006
428
34
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Rome Gold
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • 200k Club
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Pride of Nations
  • Rise of Prussia
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Imperator: Rome - Magna Graecia
  • Divine Wind
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Cities in Motion
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Deus Vult
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • For the Motherland
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Heir to the Throne
YodaMaster said:
I don't understand here, Edward IV is woken in ENG_21105 A... Henry VI should "die" when it happens.

Yes, *if* ENG_21105 A happens... which it did not in my game, thus never sleeping Henry IV. However, the other events still fired, referring to Edward IV being king - but since he was never woken, Henry IV never "died"...
But with your changes, this situation should not arise any more!
Thank you very much!!!

Gunnar
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
5
Taijian said:
Yes, *if* ENG_21105 A happens... which it did not in my game, thus never sleeping Henry IV. However, the other events still fired, referring to Edward IV being king - but since he was never woken, Henry IV never "died"...
I understand now. :)
Taijian said:
But with your changes, this situation should not arise any more!
Always possible if England disappears and then reappears... See EDIT2 in post above.
Taijian said:
Thank you very much!!!
I enjoy bugfixing. :D
 

De-VILLARS

Le diable blanc
7 Badges
Feb 7, 2006
3.228
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • For The Glory
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
I propose these changes about bernard de Saxe-Weimar

actual leader for sweden :

Code:
historicalleader = {
	category = general
	id = { type = 6 id = 0131827 }
	name = "Bernhard"
	startdate = {
		year = 1631
	}
	deathdate = {
[COLOR=Yellow]		day = 4
		month = september[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Yellow]year = 1635[/COLOR]
	}
	rank = 1
	movement = 3
	fire = 4
	shock = 4
	siege = 1
	dormant = no
	remark = "...of Saxe-Weimar. Actually became a French general in 1635. "
}

second leader for sweden if france refuse to hire him (dates are those of the current french leader) :

Code:
historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 013847 }
	category = general
	name = "Bernhard"
	startdate = {
		day = 5
		month september
		year = 1635
	}
	deathdate = {
		day = 19
		month = july
		year = 1639
	}
	rank = 0
	movement = 3
	fire = 4
	shock = 4
	siege = 1
	[COLOR=Yellow]dormant = yes[/COLOR]
}

french event to hire Saxe Weimar :

Code:
event = {
	id = 170231 
	trigger = {
		event = 12062 #FRA : French Encirclement by the Habsburgs
		event = 3754 #SWE : The Threat to Protestantism in Germany
	}
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170231" #Bernard de Saxe-Weimar
	desc = "EVENTHIST170231"

	startdate = { day = 5 month = september year = 1635 }

	action_a = {				
		name = "ACTIONNAME170231A" #Il est le bienvenu !
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 049861 } #FRA  
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
	}
	action_b = {				
		name = "ACTIONNAME170231B" #Non, c'est trop cher
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 013847 } #SWE
	}
}

EVENTNAME170231;Bernard de Saxe-Weimar;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST170231;Protestant General during the Thirty Years War, Bernard de Saxe-Weimar was one of the best captains of his time but also one of the cruellest. After his defeat at Nordlingen (1634) France proposed him, against a strong remuneration, to fight for her. He did it with talent in seizing Alsace among other actions.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME170231A;He is welcome!;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME170231B;No, we are not interested in his services;;;;;;;;;;

new french leader :

Code:
historicalleader = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 049861 }
	category = general
	name = "B. de Saxe-Weimar" #Bernhard de Saxe-Weimar
	startdate = {
		year = 1635
	}
	deathdate = {
		day = 19
		month = july
		year = 1639
	}
	rank = 0
	movement = 3
	fire = 4
	shock = 4
	siege = 1
	[COLOR=Yellow]dormant = yes[/COLOR]
}
 
Last edited:

Bordic

Magister Militum
4 Badges
May 29, 2004
4.482
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Deus Vult
  • For The Glory
  • 500k Club
About post #2312

In the trigger 1206 should be 12062.

I would suggest to use as event to be tested, not the FRA_12062 but both SPA and HAB events as answer to Richelieu involvement in the TYW. They are SPA_12067 and HAB_12066. It is also indeed strange that Saxe-Weimar could fight against Sweden, (FRA_12062 B).

Alternatively, if we want Saxe-Weimar to fight with the Catholics against the Protestants, I would simply recommend to add a sleepevent 170231 command in FRA_12062 action C as this option avoids any French involvement in the TYW.

EDIT: the SPA and HAB events are to be checked alternatively, not both at the same time, of course! ;)
 
Last edited:

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
5
Good point. Agreed.

Shouldn't we consider a separate Swedish event to wake up duplicate Saxe-Weimar in 1635 if FRA_170231 never fired and other TYW Swedish conditions are true?
 
Last edited:

Bordic

Magister Militum
4 Badges
May 29, 2004
4.482
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Deus Vult
  • For The Glory
  • 500k Club
YodaMaster said:
Good point. Agreed.

Shouldn't we consider a separate Swedish event to wake up duplicate Saxe-Weimar in 1635 if FRA_170231 never fired and other TYW Swedish conditions are true?
Yes, but it would be ahistorical. As for now I cannot say about Swedish perfomances in the final phase of the TYW. Maybe, since we know that the game always reacts late in time after any command is made work, a leader such this (with a longer life expectancy) could be better to win a couple of sieges in Germany? ;)
 

De-VILLARS

Le diable blanc
7 Badges
Feb 7, 2006
3.228
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • For The Glory
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
Bordic said:
In the trigger 1206 should be 12062.
edited

Bordic said:
I would suggest to use as event to be tested, not the FRA_12062 but both SPA and HAB events as answer to Richelieu involvement in the TYW. They are SPA_12067 and HAB_12066.
good idea :)

Bordic said:
It is also indeed strange that Saxe-Weimar could fight against Sweden, (FRA_12062 B).
yes but it's the game :( And Saxe Weimar was a mercenary (money :p )

Bordic said:
Alternatively, if we want Saxe-Weimar to fight with the Catholics against the Protestants, I would simply recommend to add a sleepevent 170231 command in FRA_12062 action C as this option avoids any French involvement in the TYW.
i agree with the sleepevent but for a different reason : if france support nobody she has no reason to hire Saxe-Weimar (no war actually).
 

Bordic

Magister Militum
4 Badges
May 29, 2004
4.482
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Deus Vult
  • For The Glory
  • 500k Club
YodaMaster said:
Ok.

SPA_12067 and HAB_12066 to replace FRA_12062 in trigger of FRA_170231. No change in FRA_12062 B and sleepevent added in FRA_12062 C. Right?
OR = { SPA_12067 HAB_12066 } to replace FRA_12062 in trigger of FRA_170231. ;)
Ok, for the "mercenary feature" of Saxe-Weimar. It is appropriate for the last phase of TYW, not so religious indeed if it ever was actually... :(