My understanding is it is like the Rise of the Shia event, in that it will keep happening until there is a Caliph (Or holder of the National Mall)Also: how often does the Prophet event happen? Only once?
My understanding is it is like the Rise of the Shia event, in that it will keep happening until there is a Caliph (Or holder of the National Mall)Also: how often does the Prophet event happen? Only once?
Spent fuel rods are stored underwater and will kill you dead if you try to take them out, so probably not unless a really long time has passed. Fortunately, they're also not very dangerous if there is water (relatively speaking, given that these will be very old fuel rods that are probably corroded to hell and gone), as that provides good radiation shielding; you can even go swimming in a spent fuel rod pool, if you're careful.American utilities tend to store nuclear waste on site. Given how nuclear power plants are built like fortresses, they will have probably been repurposed as castles and scavenged already- uranium can be used for glass production.
Spent fuel pools would still be quite dangerous after hundreds of years. Without maintenance or electricity to run water pumps, the water would evaporate. The corroded fuel rods at the bottom of an empty pool would be both radioactive and chemically poisonous, though the most radioactive isotopes have short half-lives and would therefore be mostly decayed. If the pool and rod containment vessels were well designed, the risk for a meltdown would be low unless some sort of calamity struck the facility...Spent fuel rods are stored underwater and will kill you dead if you try to take them out, so probably not unless a really long time has passed. Fortunately, they're also not very dangerous if there is water (relatively speaking, given that these will be very old fuel rods that are probably corroded to hell and gone), as that provides good radiation shielding; you can even go swimming in a spent fuel rod pool, if you're careful.
That usage actually has less in common with your usage (which is neither from alta california (the problem I brought up in the first place) nor from that time period) than it does with the common usage of the term in modern times, which applies to people from alta who are not necessarily from the time period.
Are we to take this term to its literal definition? Because... Well, it would be inaccurate.
A better term to use would probably be Californianos. Spanish for "Californians" literally. Would be a better term to use for the larger Spanish Californian culture group. Might be better as a culture in a few provinces.
This might be a regional/local thing, but "Californios" is generally seen as the more appropriate or normal of the two terms. "Californianos" is weird because it sticks together suffixes from two different languages. I've heard it used but not that much.Well, is Californio a common term used by such people to describe themselves? Or is Californianos more common? If Californio is, there is no real reason to chance it to something a little longer and chunkier. And, it would be more accurate then simply than simply changing the name for convenience.
In the game have the plants been picked clean?
Spent fuel pools would still be quite dangerous after hundreds of years. Without maintenance or electricity to run water pumps, the water would evaporate. The corroded fuel rods at the bottom of an empty pool would be both radioactive and chemically poisonous, though the most radioactive isotopes have short half-lives and would therefore be mostly decayed. If the pool and rod containment vessels were well designed, the risk for a meltdown would be low unless some sort of calamity struck the facility...
Well, California IS Spanish linguistically (though the origin of it etymologically is complicated). So its Spanish through and through. Though, I'm not from California, so you are probably right. I just proposed because California is misleading. Californios sounds better TBH.That usage actually has less in common with your usage (which is neither from alta california (the problem I brought up in the first place) nor from that time period) than it does with the common usage of the term in modern times, which applies to people from alta who are not necessarily from the time period.This might be a regional/local thing, but "Californios" is generally seen as the more appropriate or normal of the two terms. "Californianos" is weird because it sticks together suffixes from two different languages. I've heard it used but not that much.
There's loads of cultural retinues! They're all listed in this file on the github.
Mexican (Mexican culture group, except Tejano, Norteno, and Neomexicano): Longbows [Archers 250]
Rustbelt (Rostmann, Motowner, Chicagoan, Deitsch): Shieldwall [Pikemen 400]
Native Americans: Horse Archers [Light Cav 130, Horse Archers 120]
Southern (Dixie, Tuskegean, Southron, Riverlander): Knights [Heavy Cav 150, Light Cav 100]
Gulf (Gulfard, Cajun): Caballeros [Light Cav 400]
Appalachian (Appalachian, Melungeon): Pike [Pikemen 400]
Northmen (Northlander, Yooper, Dellsman): Housecarls [Heavy Infantry 400]
Texan (Tejano, Norteno, Neomexicano, West Anglo culture group): Cowboys [Light Cav 400]
Delawarean (Delawarean, Beltway): Dragoon [Heavy Cav 150, Horse Archers 150]
Caribbean (Caribbanglo, Antillais, Caribeno): Machetero [Light Infantry 400]
Canadian (First Nations culture group, Quebecois, Acadien, Ontarian, Lacustrine): Mounties [Heavy Cav 100, Light Cav 150]
New York (Gothamite, Hudsonian): New Yorker Militia [Light Infantry 300, Pikemen 100]
Louisianan (Creole, Cajun): Wildmen [Light Infantry 200, Pikemen 150]
"Irish" (Maritimer, Yankee): Gallowglass [Heavy Infantry 200]
Nahua (Mesoamerican culture group): Jaguar Warrior [Light Infantry 375, Heavy Infantry 125]
There's several others that are just left over from vanilla, including the Israelite, Indian, Frankish, etc. I think I got all the ones that the game uses, though.