But They Weren't In The War and The Collab Govs Can Be Called to wars so that takes away the historical sideBut they were de facto puppets. Basically make them collaboration regimes. Would be the est solution in my view.
But They Weren't In The War and The Collab Govs Can Be Called to wars so that takes away the historical sideBut they were de facto puppets. Basically make them collaboration regimes. Would be the est solution in my view.
They also didn't have any armies to speak of. The problem is that if independent UK wouldn't get the resources. Plus wouldn't be able to station troops there. Also they were bombed by Italy so it would make things less historical.But They Weren't In The War and The Collab Govs Can Be Called to wars so that takes away the historical side
They Can Give UK Military Access And They Can Sell Britain More Oil By Having Better Trade Relation With The Countries.They also didn't have any armies to speak of. The problem is that if independent UK wouldn't get the resources. Plus wouldn't be able to station troops there. Also they were bombed by Italy so it would make things less historical.
Yes All Small Arabian Peninsula States (Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Qatar, Oman And Yemen) Should Have A Shared Focus Tree, While Saudi Arabia And Iraq And Afghanistan And Iran Should Have Special Trees.I believe that both Saudi Arabia and Oman, Bahrain as a small regional shared tree in the Chinese warlords style is more than enough
Egypt at the very least absolutely needs to be remodeled to reflect its actual status within the Empire, and it was a battleground during the war.I honor you invested work, but even with the capacity split of country content designers and main team, there are still hot spots.
Indeed it is called WW2, but the main conflicts took place in Europe and Pacific Theatre, China, South East Asia and of course North Africa for 3 years.
Everything you try to model in detail may not disbalance the entire game play.
After each update, the game should run in historical mode as in the update before.
Every nation pack just adds ahistorical game options, for the achievement hunters interesting, for some locals of patriotic importance, but for 95% of the players another investment for few benefit.
Scandinavian countries are missing and also Switzerland and Belgium could be focused soon.
This is my exact sentiment. Don't wanna get flamed, but I like the stupid off-the-rails ahistorical stuff because it feels more engaging than just playing through the exact same story I've seen and played through in a million movies and games a million times. WW2 is probably the most popular historical subject in pop culture by far, and as such it's really oversaturated in the media.Well, I assume the biggest reason people enjoy the Ahistorical/Alt-history/Fantasy parts of the game is that, historical games play out the exact same way every time if you actually follow the historical side. The game gets boring after a while. Plus, if they truly made this a historical game, it would have even less players playing it. You know why? Because historically, the axis lost. If you play the game and it ends the EXACT SAME WAY, every time then whats the point of playing the Axis? It'll just be boring being forced to lose. No one wants to lose.
That being said, the Axis wins generally most of the time from what I've seen and that really has to deal with the AI not doing well over all. America not doing very well with Naval invasions, no one giving USSR supplies, USSR crumbling way too easily. Etc etc.
This is my exact sentiment. Don't wanna get flamed, but I like the stupid off-the-rails ahistorical stuff because it feels more engaging than just playing through the exact same story I've seen and played through in a million movies and games a million times. WW2 is probably the most popular historical subject in pop culture by far, and as such it's really oversaturated in the media.
Not that I don't like WW2, otherwise I wouldn't play the game, lol. I just wouldn't feel the need to play through the same scenario 500 times.
And The Arabian countries of Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain and Qatar were never in the British Empire, They were protectorates, so why don't you make them independent but guaranteed by the UK!
Seems more like another rework of the French and British colonial empires is in order rather than a country pack focusing on the middle east for the time being.I find it funny that you ask for the small states in the Persian Gulf to be properly represented as protectorates, but nothing about the Kingdom of Egypt, the French Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon, British Palestine and Emirate of Transjordan, not mentioning Morocco and Tunisia, all of whom would be way more relevant in my opinion than even the Trucial States.
Seems more like another rework of the French and British colonial empires is in order rather than a country pack focusing on the middle east for the time being.
Yeah, I think they missed the opportunity with La Résistance. Managing your puppet colonies should be a big part of French focus tree, but they have direct control on everything.
This is my exact sentiment. Don't wanna get flamed, but I like the stupid off-the-rails ahistorical stuff because it feels more engaging than just playing through the exact same story I've seen and played through in a million movies and games a million times. WW2 is probably the most popular historical subject in pop culture by far, and as such it's really oversaturated in the media.
I Just Like Them Because I Lived Thier For Several Years + I kind of Forgot About Egypt And SyriaI find it funny that you ask for the small states in the Persian Gulf to be properly represented as protectorates, but nothing about the Kingdom of Egypt, the French Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon, British Palestine and Emirate of Transjordan, not mentioning Morocco and Tunisia, all of whom would be way more relevant in my opinion than even the Trucial States.
Hey, you seriously just don't understand what I was saying at all. I'm saying PLAYING HISTORICALLY is just the same stuff you've seen 500 times in a million different pieces of media. Your alternatives are nice, and I like those too, but wacky ahistorical paths are also fine in my opinion.That's false dichotomy, though. The alternative to the second American civil war and CSA winning, communist Japan or fascist UK installing Edward's wife as the queen of the US is not "the exact same story you have to play again and again". The alternative is plausible alt-history, like Japan focusing on the USSR instead of the allies, or democratic/neutral Germany unlocked if the allies intervene during the Rheinland crisis, and Soviet Union will become the aggressor in Europe in that case, etc... Tons of plausible and interesting alternatives for WW2 exist, we don't need "EPIC" wacky memey paths to have alternatives to "the same story repeated again and again".
I enjoy alternatives, I just think that the ridiculous ones belong in mods, not in the base game.
Hey, you seriously just don't understand what I was saying at all. I'm saying PLAYING HISTORICALLY is just the same stuff you've seen 500 times in a million different pieces of media. Your alternatives are nice, and I like those too, but wacky ahistorical paths are also fine in my opinion.