Carewolf2 said:
What about "Sir, we have suffered xxxx casualties" ?
That way, you needn't specify whether these troops are dead or simply wounded - sounds better than killed anyway
A Weekend Teaser - New Screenshot (11th Aug)
- Thread starter Johan
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
What about "Sir, we have suffered xxxx casualties" ?
That way, you needn't specify whether these troops are dead or simply wounded - sounds better than killed anyway
Nice screenie, but why is Viken referred to as 'Bohuslen'?
[/obligatory silly nitpick]
[/obligatory silly nitpick]
Please! This is supposed to be a happy occassion; let's not bicker and argue over who killed who!Nikolai said:OH NOES!!!!!!!
Odd to see rivers flowing through provinces, and a little disappointing to see thousands of troops. But definately nice to see the 3D map improving; poo-poo to those who claimed PI would never bother to do so!
-Pat
mandead said:
That "Sir", though, makes assumptions about gender
I really like the new outlook of the map. Keep up the good work! Maybe Crete will be a continuous island now
The forests are good looking, their blending and shadows too, but it leaves me wondering if Akerhus is a forested province or not? On the other hand a partially forested province should be regarded forested province and it's more realistic that forests don't follow province borders necessarily. If that's the intention I like it.
It's not the coding, it's the player.Joohoo said:
-Pat
(ps - Johan, can I get a discount now?
)
Only one thing, it should say "were killed", not was killed.
Also it would be better if you changed killed to causalities, killed means dead, causalities can mean lost, injured, captured, killed.
Anyways great job
Also it would be better if you changed killed to causalities, killed means dead, causalities can mean lost, injured, captured, killed.
Anyways great job
pjcrowe said:
I suspect that was bit of modding magic, since the game date is early 1453.
cwhomer said:
NOOOOO! We musts haves the Precious back! WE MUSTS! gollum The precious is ours! We loves its! gollum We hates nasty masters that tempts us withs the Precious! No! No! We loves the masters for the games! Yes the games! We loves them and gollum hates the nasty masters for trying to destroys the Precious! gollum We musts haves it! The Precious is ous!
Last edited:
Why, are you incapable of taking notes or using memory?MrT said:AAR writers will be delighted to know that all of those battle details are also written to the history log.
"Norway have lost the battle"
The verb "have" in the given statement should be changed to "has" because the subject "Norway" acts as one single unit.
If, as I suspect, this error is due to a formula that goes something like '(losingcountry) have lost the battle' I would recommend changing it to (losingcountry) has lost the battle. Norway, as well as the vast majority of states in this game, is a collective group acting as one. Therefore, treat them as singular.
The verb "have" in the given statement should be changed to "has" because the subject "Norway" acts as one single unit.
If, as I suspect, this error is due to a formula that goes something like '(losingcountry) have lost the battle' I would recommend changing it to (losingcountry) has lost the battle. Norway, as well as the vast majority of states in this game, is a collective group acting as one. Therefore, treat them as singular.
Can't say I care for all those giants striding around the landscape.
As for the province borders ... check out the following for a really nice area-based map...
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/9/8C5FB99D11714598A0AB6A2DE2965536.jpg
As for the province borders ... check out the following for a really nice area-based map...
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/9/8C5FB99D11714598A0AB6A2DE2965536.jpg
Chuckie said:
That sort of map (the boundaries, etc.) would look good on the political mapmode...