A very healthy emperor?

[Powerbean]

I'm playing as Byzantinium and the year is 1682. But I have a problem, my emperor is over 240 years old.

Any idea what the problem is, and how I can solve it?

 

[Hidden Legend]

Have you been reloading a lot?

Try making him a general and sending him in a boat to sink.

 

[6354201]

Are you playing with historical rulers?

 

[Chamboozer]

You're playing with historical rulers. since constantine XI was the last byzantine emperor, you're keeping him for the rest of the game.

 

[Hidden Legend]

He cant be as he has a royal marriage and there are no Royal marriages with historic rulers.

 

[Pitt The Elder]

He cant be as he has a royal marriage and there are no Royal marriages with historic rulers.

The RM might well have existed since game start, with some minor who likewise was supposed to be wiped out.

This is a historical monarchs problem, guaranteed.

 

[Eskrogh]

i dont know im pretty new to this game to.. but i experienced the same probleme.. where i had a 120 year old emperor too..

he could have put "Event" on where ruleres should be, before he startes the game in the options menu... it dident act normal so i endend up with a europe standing still.. rulerwise

 

[unmerged(90861)]

I'm playing as Byzantinium and the year is 1682. But I have a problem, my emperor is over 240 years old.

Any idea what the problem is, and how I can solve it?

that's soooo hardcore He's a good ruler so it's a win-win situation.

 

[unmerged(148296)]

there is always the console, do you have an heir?

 

[exenter]

One of your advisors has been active for 191 years. Are the advisors historical too?

 

[Palaiologos]

There is something certainly amiss here...
He is playing HTTT, where historical rulers are disabled as an option.

 

[icon41gimp]

There is something certainly amiss here...
He is playing HTTT, where historical rulers are disabled as an option.

Only in the 4.1b version I believe.

 

[unmerged(195684)]

Well It's my game he's playing on and I put on historical leaders and all, however what does that has to do with 200 years emperors and advisor's?

 

[GamerKG]

I'm playing as Byzantinium and the year is 1682. But I have a problem, my emperor is over 240 years old.

Any idea what the problem is, and how I can solve it?

To all those saying its Historical rulers, it can't be. That was my thought at first too, but then I noticed he's playing HttT (see the inheritance tooltip?), and historical rulers was removed with HttT. Must be a bug that somehow allowed historical rulers. Check the other countries.

Edit: I saw that he said it was historical. But it was disabled in my 4.0 games too...so I don't know anymore. Sorry bout that

 

[GamerKG]

Well It's my game he's playing on and I put on historical leaders and all, however what does that has to do with 200 years emperors and advisor's?

This means that there is no new historical ruler to take his place (as with advisors) because historically the Byzantines DIED!

Edit: It looks like he CAN change advisors though! Otherwise they'd be greyed out wouldn't they? So that doesn't explain the super-advisor

 

[ulrichomega]

Well It's my game he's playing on and I put on historical leaders and all, however what does that has to do with 200 years emperors and advisor's?

Because with historical rulers, each nation has the ruler it had at that time in history. Since the Byzantines didn't change rulers after your guy, they keep him for the rest of the game.

In general, you don't want to play with Historical Rulers.

 

[Pitt The Elder]

To all those saying its Historical rulers, it can't be. That was my thought at first too, but then I noticed he's playing HttT (see the inheritance tooltip?), and historical rulers was removed with HttT. Must be a bug that somehow allowed historical rulers. Check the other countries.

Edit: I saw that he said it was historical. But it was disabled in my 4.0 games too...so I don't know anymore. Sorry bout that

Historical Leaders are not disabled in HTTT 4.0. I just checked, and my checksum is correct.

 

[King_Richard_XI]

Save that file, use whatever method to do away with him, leave that one run as long as you can until he dies, and when he does, put it in the EU3 Hall of Fame.

EDIT: Yes, you seem to have one 3 and a half times more long-lived than the current record-holder.

 

[Ashantai]

So...I think it's rather ironic that a vampire is ruling the Roman Empire. Maybe Dracula came down to Constantinople for a visit!

He's a good Emperor too...but yeah, turn the historical rulers off unless you're playing a 10 year block say 1805-1815 and recreating something specific.

 

[unmerged(195684)]

Because with historical rulers, each nation has the ruler it had at that time in history. Since the Byzantines didn't change rulers after your guy, they keep him for the rest of the game.

In general, you don't want to play with Historical Rulers.

Well, I kinda see this game as a way to play as your favourite kings, I love playing as Charles XII for instance. What I meant was though, why should one mode exclude the other? Seeing how you can alter history and make empires thrive on when they should have fallen? It should switch that nations leaders to unhistorical ones really then, I mean when the historical ones has come to an end?