A Suggest For Peace Conferances

[dirtyface]

TODAY A PEACE CONFERANCE RUINED MY 2ND GAME IN A WEEK.

Almost 10 hour war for NOTHING.

So i think what is wrong about these conferances. Finaly i ve found. COUNRTIES CAN INTERVENE AREAS IN PEACE CONFERANCE THAT THEY ARE NOT INVADED.

So here is solution. So simple. There should be 2 point type to decide a regions fate.

1st is the already used one. This determinetes your place in queue: Victory Point.

2nd is the Regional Victory Point. If you doesnt have enough Regional Victory Point (the places you never fight) simply regional powers decide area's fate.

So by this way USSR cannot take your territory in Pasific by occupying little a few Balkan States.

 

[Mr_Dimento]

TODAY A PEACE CONFERANCE RUINED MY 2ND GAME IN A WEEK.

Almost 10 hour war for NOTHING.

So i think what is wrong about these conferances. Finaly i ve found. COUNRTIES CAN INTERVENE AREAS IN PEACE CONFERANCE THAT THEY ARE NOT INVADED.

So here is solution. So simple. There should be 2 point type to decide a regions fate.

1st is the already used one. This determinetes your place in queue: Victory Point.

2nd is the Regional Victory Point. If you doesnt have enough Regional Victory Point (the places you never fight) simply regional powers decide area's fate.

So by this way USSR cannot take your territory in Pasific by occupying little a few Balkan States.

I've had this happen to me too, I (as Portugal attempting to conquer China)
had to deal with GREECE JOINING CHINESE UNITED FRONT
when the Allies were eliminated before 1939 and Italy ended up puppeted some Chinese Warlords.

 

[dirtyface]

I mean thats weird. Regional VP will end this stupid system. If you gain all of your VP in Europe YOU MUST SPEND THEM ONLY IN EUROPE. On the other hand if i liberate all French colonies i shall decide their fate.

 

[Vlad123]

In a my game i am Argentina (the old mod of Senor Hilter)...nothing, URSS puppet my conquered micro-state in center america...seriusly...is DUMB

 

[Zeprion]

TODAY A PEACE CONFERANCE RUINED MY 2ND GAME IN A WEEK.

Almost 10 hour war for NOTHING.

So i think what is wrong about these conferances. Finaly i ve found. COUNRTIES CAN INTERVENE AREAS IN PEACE CONFERANCE THAT THEY ARE NOT INVADED.

So here is solution. So simple. There should be 2 point type to decide a regions fate.

1st is the already used one. This determinetes your place in queue: Victory Point.

2nd is the Regional Victory Point. If you doesnt have enough Regional Victory Point (the places you never fight) simply regional powers decide area's fate.

So by this way USSR cannot take your territory in Pasific by occupying little a few Balkan States.

Your suggestion makes a lot of sense and should be implemented.

Some could argue that if the Allies are in good standing, they can negociate in good will how they want to share the won territory, this could lead to France giving England a region that the British troops never set foot on. But you already have that option in the game, as the French player you can click on England and give them a territory or extra points.

But when different nations don't trust each other or outright hate each other, such as the Allies and USSR a few days after the war, it doesn't many any sort of sense of USSR to be able to take territories that they didn't even touch.

The game already seems to have a system where the territories you have occupied are cheaper for you during peace negociations, but I don't think that is enough.

I should also add a problem: If you're playing Italy and are attacking a French province that borders a German provice, Germany will take the new provice even if they did not commit a single unit to the fight. I think this should be fixed and the nation that commited more units to the battle be given the specific province when 2 different nations attack a province that borders both of their territory. I mean province not state, I know that in the case of a state whoever controls the capital province controls the state.

 

[Vlad123]

Your suggestion makes a lot of sense and should be implemented.

Some could argue that if the Allies are in good standing, they can negociate in good will how they want to share the won territory, this could lead to France giving England a region that the British troops never set foot on. But you already have that option in the game, as the French player you can click on England and give them a territory or extra points.

But when different nations don't trust each other or outright hate each other, such as the Allies and USSR a few days after the war, it doesn't many any sort of sense of USSR to be able to take territories that they didn't even touch.

The game already seems to have a system where the territories you have occupied are cheaper for you during peace negociations, but I don't think that is enough.

I should also add a problem: If you're playing Italy and are attacking a French province that borders a German provice, Germany will take the new provice even if they did not commit a single unit to the fight. I think this should be fixed and the nation that commited more units to the battle be given the specific province when 2 different nations attack a province that borders both of their territory. I mean province not state, I know that in the case of a state whoever controls the capital province controls the state.

This problem exist from Hoi2 (and hoi1 maybay) in differente sauce