Did I get it right, that there's another trailer and some screens coming up even before the release? I found this tweet on their twitter page which was posted yesterday :happy:

We all now this video, but the tweet says something about a new trailer being released before the release.Here's a direct insert of the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3jl3uxBmIQ
Code:[video=youtube;H3jl3uxBmIQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3jl3uxBmIQ[/video]
[/noparse] Tag is in use here? Why does vB parse its content?
We all now this video, but the tweet says something about a new trailer being released before the release.
€dit: What kind of stupid [noparse]If that hadn't been in code tags, it would have turned out like this:Code:[/noparse] Tag is in use here? Why does vB parse its content?[/QUOTE] [noparse][code][/noparse] tags are used to make boxes that you can put code in, which will keep proper indentation and use a monospaced font. They're usually used in mod forums to make code easier to read. For example: [code] aristocracy_ideas = { category = MIL bonus = { cavalry_power = 0.1 } trigger = { OR = { government = monarchy government = noble_republic } } }
aristocracy_ideas = {
category = MIL
bonus = {
cavalry_power = 0.1
}
trigger = {
OR = {
government = monarchy
government = noble_republic
}
}
}
is. He's asking, why does the video appear in that stupid code box, instead of just an URL.
Anyway, doesn't seem like the right place to discuss it. EOT :P
Erm. You don't have to give him a lesson about whatCode:is. He's asking, why does the video appear in that stupid code box, instead of just an URL. Anyway, doesn't seem like the right place to discuss it. EOT :P[/QUOTE] Really? It seems to me like he's asking why the stuff within the [noparse][code][/noparse] tag is being parsed by the forum. But yes, this probably isn't the right place for this.
[/noparse] tag "includes" a no-parsing function, and now I was surprised. Guess I have to use [noparse][noparse][/noparse] for stuff like this. Anyway...
[/offtopic]