I personally felt the change to taking lands you can't core was the wrong solution to the problem of players and ai holding land they can't core.I think a better system would involve cores working like what they represent(you replacing old administration with your own).
1.If you don't have a core on a province the autonomy passively increases.
2. The previous owners cores don't decay until you have cored the province.If you haven't cored the province by x years the province gets negative events, until eventually it defects to the previous.
3.You lose the game if you don't have any cores and all remaining occupies territory defects to previous owner(to prevent exploit of moving capital to uncorable province)
This would mean provinces get more and more useless until you core it due to autonomy, discouraging players from taking lands for gold income or trade power.You can also prevent autonomy being decreased in uncored lands.
1.If you don't have a core on a province the autonomy passively increases.
2. The previous owners cores don't decay until you have cored the province.If you haven't cored the province by x years the province gets negative events, until eventually it defects to the previous.
3.You lose the game if you don't have any cores and all remaining occupies territory defects to previous owner(to prevent exploit of moving capital to uncorable province)
This would mean provinces get more and more useless until you core it due to autonomy, discouraging players from taking lands for gold income or trade power.You can also prevent autonomy being decreased in uncored lands.
- 1
Upvote
0
