I'm not Mam, I'm Ormuz. Mam was my ally
Well what can I say, both are very yellow
- 1
I'm not Mam, I'm Ormuz. Mam was my ally
Court historians attributing the siege solely to the might of the ruler? I'll be dammedUrban was just a gun casting master. Ottoman historians say that the drawings of these balls belong to the Mehmed the Conqueror. By calculating for guns with insufficient range. It is said that he made shots by bouncing off the water surface. One of the genius names of her time.
What do you mean? I've wrecked the Mamluks before 1500. I take one province from AQ to release Syria then reconquest + take Palestine in every first war vs Mamluks as the Ottomans. Yeah it's not a total conquering but EU4 doesn't allow for those kind of mechanics.
There is a way, but you need to attack Cyprus and White peace between wars.
Egypt revolted as soon as suleiman rose to the throne, so we don't exactly want the historical outcome
I also recently used the trade policy available when having more than 50% trade power. It gives an additional 10% and increase by one the maximum canons impact leading to having +6 instead and +5 before revolution age bonus!
It is more situational though, as it works only in that trade area and if you have already 50% there is no much fort left here.
This 100%.Few people seem to mention spy networks when talking about sieges. 100% spy network gets you 20% siege ability against a particular Kingdom's forts.
Every little bit helps.