This is great news!Johan said:
It has allways annoyed me that one can unproptionate amount of warscore on blocades.Other news look good too, great work.
3.1 Teaser #5 - 10th of September 2008
- Thread starter Johan
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It has allways annoyed me that one can unproptionate amount of warscore on blocades.Other news look good too, great work.
You can actually sponsor rebels uprisings in other coountries whether they be patriot, nationalist or pretender uprisings. In the case of nationalist rebels the new country would be guaranteed by you.
Markusw7 said:
Can you choose to sponsor specific types of rebels, or is that the same as before?
I take it the effects of 'support for rebels' last a bit longer then. I never used to bother as the increase in RR passed in the blink of an eye. (The same could be said for many espionage missions: even if successful the effects are either too weak or fleeting to be worth the money and diplomatic penalties.)
Johan said:
I'm intrigued what the rationale was for that change.
A historical change?
Or a game mechanics tweak?
Just wondering really ... it strikes me that the Italian peninsula is already the most desired piece of real estate in the game.
*Warning: Rampant Speculation*
Or has that rumor about all buildings taken in peace settlements, being auto destroy (including manufactory's), coming true.
Asymmetric said:*Warning: Rampant Speculation*
Or has that rumor about all buildings taken in peace settlements, being auto destroy (including manufactory's), coming true.
Dear lord, I hope not. That would defeat three-quarters of the point of trying to unite Italy.
Cheers.
Landwalker said:Dear lord, I hope not. That would defeat three-quarters of the point of trying to unite Italy.
Cheers.
Agreed. Besides, it really doesn't make much sense. I can understand if these buildings have a chance to be destroyed during a siege, but destroying them as a result of a peace settlement? That's just bizarre.
Earl Uhtred said:
Yes. I don't think that the new change would be very useful without the RR lasting a lot longer. Right now, I think it lasts something ridiculously low, like a month. It's a spy mission I would use a lot more often if it actually stuck around for awhile. Even a year would seem reasonable. As it is, the only two spy missions I ever bother to use are "sow discontent" and "fabricate claims." The rest are just far too short term to be of much use.
Landwalker said:Dear lord, I hope not. That would defeat three-quarters of the point of trying to unite Italy.
Cheers.
Well it would probably make Italy just like every other cultural group trying to unite.
I wouldn't worry, my wild stab in the dark guess is probably complete and total bollocks.
Theirs always been concerns in the EU-series about making people pay the full scaling cost for manufactory's. For instance nation A) has tonnes of manufactory's and chooses to trade land to nation B) (which has none) then gets nation B) to build a manufactory for its base cost and trade it back ... and so on, until nation A) litteraly can't move for manufactory's. Of course recent patches/expansion's have made this kind of thing difficult (like losing cores on traded provinces) but not impossible.
Destroying all building taken from other nations would kill it off entirely. Extreme, but it would stop it. Not really saying I'm for or against the idea, merely stating the idea has been voiced before.
Landwalker said:Dear lord, I hope not. That would defeat three-quarters of the point of trying to unite Italy.
Cheers.
Always found it a bit stupid, to "go for the northern Itlaian universities..." , verny gamey in my opinion. There should only be one reaon to unite Italy, the Garibaldi one: "For the sake of it." "For Italy"
There were a lot of wars fought over Italy between France, HRE, Austria, Italian States, Spain etc, so this country must be something very desirable.
Doesn't seem gamey at all to me. "I want to bring all of the best minds in Europe under my regime" doesn't seem like an outrageous objective. The north-Italian universities are one of the biggest boons to playing as, say, Milan -- yeah, you don't start with a center of trade, but you have some universities, and you can get a lot more and establish yourself as the technological and cultural leader of the peninsula -- perfect justification for uniting it.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Have you guys at Paradox added some of our Missions and Events?? or maybe considered it.. thanks for your info anyway.
thanks for your info anyway.
Willem IV said:
Maybe, but that seems like a very easy 'CB', doesn't it? Maybe if it costs one stability, if we assume the people wouldn't be too happy that the state is going to war over another country's independence. Then again that wouldn't always make sense, so I don't know.
Pioniere said:Have you guys at Paradox added some of our Missions and Events?? or maybe considered it..
I definitely hope so, there were some very good suggestions back in the thread Johan posted.
Zeval31 said:
Hopefully not to resurrect some utterly beaten dead horses, but no.... when comparing to historical numbers, Italy was the most obviously defecient. (not even bringing up France here
) As far as manpower anyway. The base tax is actually minimal in the grand scheme, if one can safely assume they don't mean doubling it or something silly .Madmonkey24 said:
50 virtual bucks says it's not in the teaser because the bug is a misunderstood rumor. Like I keep beating on a different drum
. Although perhaps they are saving that for last, you'd sure think it'd be in the first teaser with how many people seem to think they are fighting latin tech.
