They did they promise us to make inland republics playable.
One pixel of water is enough to make Switzerland a merchant republic.
If they keep they promises there will be no need to create fake rivers to make Switzerland a playable Republic we can create governments as in EU3 / EU4 could be done.
I've discussed this in this thread already: In my opinion CK2 works best if it is feudal.
In this I concord it was never thought to represent Republics or other forms of governments (Byzantium yet with the addictions of Viceroy does not feel to be the real thing!) in some way they should simulate to have a feudal / dynastic substrarte or the thing fall part... for "The Republic" for example there is the "kludge" of Patricians (that is some form should be presetn for other type of Republic if they realy permit to mod them: to avoid Game Over if unlanded).
I think Republics and other forms of government will work well only in CKIII in which all will be present for the start and probably rewritten (as "The Republic" is not acceptable code as any little modification to the code breaks the game!)
I am deeply committed to a modern world map where the feudal system is alive and well.
Making "weak" feudal rulers incapable all the time with a regent that represents the prime minister would make sense to me.
If they permits to create a true Constitutional Monarchy with a specif job "First Minister" it will be perfect.
The only issue is that someone would have to craft a system of getting out of that. "Break free of chains" of sorts" ^^
Yes if you want to make the King playable this should be his objective (the difficult part will be to give something else to do to him before he could take this decision... a problem tat I imagine any Constitutional Monarch have
).
Technically the Constitutional Monarchy exists always for the
grace of the Monarch he could abrogate in any time... what would happen if the Queen of Great Britain will ask to the military to abolish the Parliament? Do you know that this will be a perfect lawful act? Probably this will trigger a civil war between Monarchists and Republicans... an interesting scenario, right?
The only time it happened historically (at least that I know) was in Romania during the II World Wide War it was called "Dictatorship of the King" (!) the result was a Fascist Republic (the Legionary State) and the King exiliated...
To decide in base at which conditions the King could take the decision to restore the "Absolute Monarchy" (ambitious, lunatic, corrupted government, special emergency status as losing a war?).