No you don't. Nobody has to overreact. Overreacting doesn't actually help anything.I HAVE to OVERREACT Bc NO ONE ELSE WILL. THis WAS the MOSt expensive DLC yet and the worst!!!!
And while I won't argue "most expensive", I'm sure many would argue that CoP was worse, and many, many more would argue that CK2's Sunset Invasion was worse.
Me? I'd argue that they're all worse, simply because I think this is the best DLC so far, and honestly, one of the least buggy DLC launches. I mean, there were a few bugs, but at least for me, there have been no showstoppers like how in 1.2.X, my game would crash literally every time a triggered modifier message came up. Or like how a while back, annexing a vassal also annexed the overlord.
Just because you aren't dropping F-bombs doesn't mean that you're being civil or automatically shielded from banning. Excessive rudeness, disrespect, or other general incivility can still count as bannable rule violations.OH yeah, EXCEPT I DIDNT talk like i do in real life, I subjected myself to THEIR RULES, and guess what.... they still BANNED ME! Even tho, there are people swearing on this forum WORSE THAN I WAS. and they are not being banned.
ALL i have to say is u guys have a lot of Love for takin the big P, and saying that they can do no wrong.
ATLEAST u have me as a good scapegoat
And I've said that they've done wrong in the past and I've done so with this patch. I'm with the guys who oppose the constant nerfing of hordes. I'm in the group that opposes the new rules that make colonial nations (and any nation that ever was a colonial nation) permanently better than any native inhabitant of a given continent. I've opposed almost everything that nerfs the not-Europe parts of the world, really.
I'm also not using as a scapegoat, I'm saying that you're going about this wrong and that you break the rules, then complain when you get banned for breaking the rules.
Last edited: