Rulers just ignore the requirements for being commanders. Ai will also love leading their retinues, making events that require them to not be leading troops near impossible.
Upvote
0
2.4.4 Rulers ignore commander requirements.
- Thread starter Lady_Sinful
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
That is intended, even women can lead their troops. Unless you are saying there is something else at work, in which case you should provide more details.
Theres no way to prevent a ruler from being able to lead troops, pretty sure you use to be able to set it from marshall. Makes some events that require the ruler not to be leading troops not work. Ai will almost always be leading any troops it has even at peace.
You are going to need to give more detail as to why you think there is a bug here.
If you mean that female rulers can lead troops, you've confused 'can lead troops' with 'being a commander' - the ruler (subject to not being in a regency), their marshall, and people with the commander minor title can lead troops.
I think paradox are aware of this and have started replacing that requirement.
You can click the sword icon above your character portrait on your character sheet.
More generally, read this sticky: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...idelines-on-how-to-write-a-bug-report.818887/ - idea is that you need to write a report clear enough that QA can replicate it, otherwise its not much help.
I know about the shield. # NOTE: The allow trigger for this job also determines who can command armies!
Thats what it had for marshal, seems that doesn't matter anymore seeing as theres 3 ways, ruler, marshal and commander.
Thats what it had for marshal, seems that doesn't matter anymore seeing as theres 3 ways, ruler, marshal and commander.
That comment actually isn't in the files anymore.
Rulers, Marshals, and vassals with the Commander title all can lead armies.