[2.2.3 BETA] Is gaia terraforming still broken for anyone else?

[Azhcristokos]

From the 2.2.3 beta patch notes:

* Fixed some Planetary Features getting deleted when terraforming to Gaia World

This was one of the bugs/oversights that irked me the most so I was thrilled to a try a new Life Seeded run after the new beta dropped...but at least for me, this fix is apparently a lie because I terraformed 3 planets and almost all of their districts were destroyed as before. Has this happened to anyone else on 2.2.3?

 

[Dalwin]

Was this in a new game or one continued after being started in an earlier version?

Hopefully you are also posting this in the bug report section with a save attached.

 

[Promethian]

Confirmed in the feedback thread of the beta by a few people now.

 

[Azhcristokos]

Was this in a new game or one continued after being started in an earlier version?

It was a new game. I noticed someone (Jamor, I think?) say that the change wouldn't apply retroactively so I didn't continue my older saves.

Confirmed in the feedback thread of the beta by a few people now.

Thank you for confirming that. I'll admit it's pretty disappointing that this long-standing bug is still here after having supposedly been fixed, but ah well. That's why the patch is in beta...hopefully the next time the patch notes won't lie though.

 

[Badesumofu]

Thank you for confirming that. I'll admit it's pretty disappointing that this long-standing bug is still here after having supposedly been fixed, but ah well. That's why the patch is in beta...hopefully the next time the patch notes won't lie though.

Long standing? 3 weeks is now long-standing for a bug?

The patch notes don't lie - the patch notes state what the devs believed is fixed in the beta. They were clearly mistaken on this one but stating that they were lying is baseless.

 

[Azhcristokos]

Long standing? 3 weeks is now long-standing for a bug?

The patch notes don't lie - the patch notes state what the devs believed is fixed in the beta. They were clearly mistaken on this one but stating that they were lying is baseless.

1) For an incredibly glaringly obvious bug that has been reported very regularly, yes.

2) I suppose I should have made it clearer that I was using lie figuratively to describe a mistake or oversight, not as an accusation of deceit on the part of the devs.

 

[_Chrysippus_]

I had it work for me.