[2.1.5] County Kalat still missing two further holding names to be creatable

[Aardvark Bellay]

[2.1.5] County Kalat still missing names for two further holdings to be creatable

edit: Sorry for the thread title being slightly incorrect.

The subholdings are not creatable.


There have been reports by others that this problem applies to other new counties that got added with RoI,
but i only know of this one and can't check for others, as i don't have RoI. I probably could create a workaround for this regarding not owning RoI , but i won't.

Here we go:

Kalat has no holdings than the capital specified in landed_titles

[B]c_kalat = {
                color={ 152 185 96 }
                color2={ 255 255 255 }
                
                b_kalat = {
                }
            }[/B]
            c_armail = {
                color={ 152 185 96 }
                color2={ 255 255 255 }
                
                b_armail = {
                }
                b_hingula = {
                }
                b_kambali = {
                }
                b_yusli = {
                }
            }
        }

Kalat in history /provinces has 3 holdings potential but only one name

[B]# 1184 - Kalat

# County Title
title = c_kalat

# Settlements
max_settlements = 3
b_kalat = castle

# Misc
culture = baloch
religion = sunni

# History[/B]

As i can't know what the other potential holding names would be, i can't find them in localisations.

Took me a short time to create a mod. Please add it or scrap the 3 holdings potential, as the other two are visible on the map , but uncreatable.





edit :

Regarding other counties i quote a thread (26th march) i found again:

In my current playthrough I've noticed two bugged holding slots. In the provinces Dhamalpur and Kota the last holding slot is unclickable and can not be build into.
It is also greyed out as if I haven't reached it yet. Can provide savegame if needed.

Edit: Same goes for Barasura and Laksmanavati; Kalat has two broken slots.

From a quick look in 2.1.5:

Dhamalpur has a holding name in history/provinces (b_halvad) that is not in landed_titles and one in landed_titles not in 'provinces' (b_dhrol).
Kota has a holding name in 'provinces' (b_taragarh) that is not in landed_titles
Laksmanavati Can't find anything
Barasuru Seems alright as well