SirCliveWolfe said:
So your not going to give them darned Frenchies a good licking then? Afterall it is traditional
Friends can quickly become enemies, but if you believe in the democratic peace theory, a Anglo-French clash in the future is very unlikely, especially given the war weariness of both.
kenneththegreat said:
How many US units are in France right now? Let's hope those Marines get stationed at Belleau Wood again
Two divisions so far. Don't hold out any hope of them fighting as unified units before 1918, though.
VILenin said:
Yes, Anglo-American relations seem to be quite rosy. We'll see what happens when it coes time for the post-war settlement. And curse cliffhangers! I want to know more about the massive offensve against the German Army you so tantalizingly slipped in at the end of the update.
France may find the close nature of Anglo-American relations alarming and may feel that any peace dictated to the Central Powers will be too Anglocentric and not give sufficient attention to French interests. Nevertheless, if they still have a vast army at the end of hostilities, they would be too strong to ignore.
Sir Humphrey said:
War Plan Red. Remeber that... Great Anglo-American update.
Thanks, H!
Kurt_Steiner said:
Oh... then we are going to miss the great fun
Miss out the needless bloodshed, surely?
Lord E said:
Great to see a new update Allenby, good work. Good the see the Yankees arriving in Europe, now it is time to crush the Germans first, and then as Sir Clive says it is time to honour the proud British tradition and give the Frogs a good licking…
Thanks, E man! What is it with this unsatiable desire to fight the French?
Lord_Robertus said:
Pah you should have bled the American army on the Front then invaded the States!
lol
Lord_Robertus said:
The same question as was posed in 1914, 1915 and 1916? What might be the answer in 1917?
Aldo said:
Considering the talk/action ratio lately I seriously doubt that this war will ever end.
Aldo said:
Let's see if we are to experience some action soon or only Admirals debating back and forth.
After all this time, you haven't changed.
Cat Frightener said:
Kurt_Steiner said:
Mine too, but I guess that 1917 is a bit too early for that, as it has been stated before
'tis rather. See above.
