Mettermrck said:
When does Allenby move on Gaza?
No need to bring Sir Edmund over from France - his command of Third Army has been competent so far, and the C-in-C in Egypt has done little to justify being degummed.
Lord E said:
Hope to see the British in Baghdad next year then, and from there, will you continue north into Turkey or will you turn to Jerusalem and the areas around, anyway a strong attack is sure to push the Turks out of the war as soon as possible so just go for it
Will the loss of Jerusalem and Baghdad drive the Ottoman Empire out of the war? I'd certainly
hope so, but these campaigns against Turkey are motivated primarily by post-war imperial thinking - so would the capture of Baghdad and Jerusalem benefit the empire? Almost certainly.
JoshWeber said:
Qurna the Garden of Eden? You said that rather matter-of-factly, sir! Here's another possible spot:
The Garden of Eden being in Qurna is normally the most oft-quoted contention, so it was the one I decided to use. Not that there aren't other credible theories, though. Some have claimed that they were around the Taurus Mountains, whilst some have even said that they were situated in modern day Missouri....
Semi-Lobster said:
Oh god not Curzon, I just finished reading The General by C. S. Forester about him, and well... good luck with him.
It would seem that you are confusing George Nathaniel Curzon, the able imperial administrator and statesman with Sir Herbert Curzon, the very fictional character in C.S. Forester's very fictional book
The General. The character is a composite of various actual generals, taking their bad traits and exaggerating them. Not that this is necessarily bad - although thoroughly unrealistic, Forester's book had to have an interesting story. It's useful for entertainment, but it makes very doubtful history.
Semi-Lobster said:
You're giving Constantinople to Russian though!?! I'd like to here the logic in giving it to the Ruskies then the Greeks who actually attemped to take it and spilled Greek blood over it.
Draco Rexus said:
I completely overlooked the plan to give Constantinople and the Dardanelles to the Russkies! What's up with that? That's like a complete reversal of British policy all through the 19th Century!!
I have the feeling that there is a method to the madness and a rhyme to the reason..... but I haven't figured it out.
I can explain, gentlemen!

I refer you to Part XXIII - 'Venizelos Intervenes' - in which Britain and Greece negotiate an alliance. It was agreed that Greece would receive parts of Asia Minor in the event of victory over Turkey if they entered the war - they had no territorial ambitions regarding Constantinople. I think Britain allowing Russia control over the straits in the post-war era can be explained primarily by the Russia's hint that she might begin negotiations with Germany and Austria-Hungary, and that ultimately receiving all of Poland and Galicia would not be enough to satiate her. Additionally, Russia agreed to give Britain (and France) a free hand in all other areas of the Ottoman Empire and to make the 'neutral zone' in Persia a British sphere of influence. Therefore, for losing out on the Straits, Britain managed to gain Russian backing for running the Middle East's primary source of oil.
