Historical separatism, yes; contemporary separatism, no.Originally posted by Marcus Valerius
Wouldn't it be relevant in this forum, in regard to possible alternate histories, though?![]()
People have been confusing the two in this thread.
Historical separatism, yes; contemporary separatism, no.Originally posted by Marcus Valerius
Wouldn't it be relevant in this forum, in regard to possible alternate histories, though?![]()
Originally posted by Niptium
I have to say I'm the one who wanered off a b it. But I want to hear people's opinion on the 1838 Patriots in Lower Canada (Québec). Don't forget that at the same time, Higher Canada (Ontario) rebelled against their King too.
Originally posted by Niptium
I have to say I'm the one who wanered off a b it. But I want to hear people's opinion on the 1838 Patriots in Lower Canada (Québec). Don't forget that at the same time, Higher Canada (Ontario) rebelled against their King too.
Originally posted by DonCossack
Separatism is a dead issue. Paying attention to politics here and around the world, separation was cleverly stupid, and an unneccesary goal. So please, don't try to fan the fires of hate, when the embers are dying. Quebec is part of Canada, and leave it at that.
Originally posted by Niptium
I didn't say the Brits were bad conquerers. We retained the rights of religion, of a french educational system.
The Brits wanted to assimilate us when they got New France in 1760. But they tolerated catholicism and to insure we didn't rebel, they left the french society as it was with France but with a british political head, british civil and criminal laws and only british merchants could make money in the newly acquired New France.
When the americans seceded, the English parlement gave us back the french civil laws, the Great Lakes region (wich was a Indian reserved since the conquest) and stoped campaigning (for a few years) for our assimilation.
With the americans finally being recognized as a new country and immigrants arriving in nowaday's Ontario, the british divided what was called Canada into High and Lower Canada, two distinct colonies. the Lower Canada was french and the Higher was populated with new immigrants from the UK and the fleeing Loyalists.
After the Lower (and Higher) Canada rebellions failed, Lord Druham was sent to make some report on the situation in these 2 colonies. They fused the two colonies and gave the political power to the people of Higher Canada-Ontarians (even though they were far outnumbered by Lower Canada-Québécois).
The British and then the Canadians tried and tried hard to assimilate Québec but couldn't succeed because after the 1760, Québec turned itself into a conservative, ultra-catholic and Québec-centric society. From a mere 60 k New France in 1760, we got to 7 000 000 even with a negative immigration. Families, until the 1960's were rarely smaller than 6 to 10 kids, even saw families with more than 20 kids.
Historically, that was named ''La revanche du landau''. Nowadays, people mistake the Independance movement in Québec as a rejection of Canada, a statement that we are greater than any english speaking people out there. It's not. It's an assment at our nation. There is no better ruler of a nation than itself - and this is what we are searching. Full responsability, full authority and full consequences. Being finally considered as a country, not as a province of another nation.
Originally posted by Niptium
Well if there is a winning referendum where more than 50% +1 Québécois voted ''OUI'', Canada will then have to deal with an independant nation. Most probably some countries out there will recognized Québec as a country (France will probably be the first) and start to deal with us nation to nation.
Here's a reminder, Canada was formed by the fusion of 4 ex-english owned colonies (without ANY referendum or population consultation). Some people say that Canada is more than the sum of it's 10 provinces, but let's face it, there is no national cohesion outside of Ontario.
Originally posted by KrsLascar
Canadians do like to trample the civil rights of their native baby seal population no?![]()
Originally posted by LordStark
Quebec is a founding member of the Canadian Confederation. Quebecers are Canadians. You talk as though you wish to contradict all that Canada stands for- multiculturalism, multilingualism, and an open, tolerant society.
Your hyper-nationalist opinions are thankfully in the minority in Quebec today. Polls place support for sovereignty at 30% (Niptium comment : NUH HUUUUH! IT's at 42%) support. The PQ were ousted by the Liberals. And so hyper-nationalist people such as your self come to obscure forums in hope of an open microphone. This thread is definately OT, and should be closed. Silence this propagandist.
Originally posted by Niptium
Ok can someone tell him this discussion is OVER ? We are talking about the 1838 PATRIOTS here. I won't sit around getrting myself kicked on the neck forever. Read the last messages and answer to these. My last post was good. It reflected what happened in 1838 with Papineau. This is the topic. If you'd want to, you could always go to the OT forum.