-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hive said:
Oh! i love those little comments you added in after our names. I was unaware the portugese king was a smurf :rofl: :rofl: ?
On a more serious note....had we always had an Inca player?
Sluthost,
Really?
Think back carefully...
Phil,
Don't listen to them.
Greed kept Burgundy in the war. The unwillingness to make a couple concessions prolonged it with England.
But in the end, the only necessary justification for greed is the ability to win.
Really?
Think back carefully...
Phil,
Don't listen to them.
Greed kept Burgundy in the war. The unwillingness to make a couple concessions prolonged it with England.
But in the end, the only necessary justification for greed is the ability to win.
HolisticGod said:Sluthost,
Really?
Think back carefully...
Phil,
Don't listen to them.
Greed kept Burgundy in the war. The unwillingness to make a couple concessions prolonged it with England.
But in the end, the only necessary justification for greed is the ability to win.
im not insulted for being called greedy, after all......i was
Bah, Hive is so evil. But hey, now i know atleast against whom to use my new "gustav" leaderPhilip II said:
What a useless session for Sweden nothing but plague and unhappy peasant one after another Iam sure Slargos is somehow behind them punishing Sweden for trying get Savolak .
.
Last edited:
Hive said:
My name is still Joohoo not Johoo, that sounds gay :rofl:
And can someone kill those Hordes? I hate them, they want Kaffa and Kerch, over my dead body
Philip II said:
Wo wo wo, just like that? Hive give Philip a capital change, not only because be nice to Philip, but also because it is good for him as Austria, it is fully in his interest to see a divided France with powers struggling against eachother while he diploannex Germany.
HolisticGod said:Sluthost,
Really?
Think back carefully...
Phil,
Don't listen to them.
Greed kept Burgundy in the war. The unwillingness to make a couple concessions prolonged it with England.
But in the end, the only necessary justification for greed is the ability to win.
That wasn't the end to me. It was a serious setback.. but not the end..
Gen. Joohoo said:
You might aswell hand them over now. I'll be coming for them eventually anyway.
World Conqueror said:
Uhm.
This attitude is not healthy.
I'd suggest you rethink what you just accused Hive of. And then think hard about wether you want to push on with that line of argumentation in the future.
World Conqueror said:
given that it supports france with APPROXIMATELY 10% extra tax income, I'm all for it. (the capital move that is)
And I doubt he's going to diplo-annex all of Germany while Brandenburg, Scandinavians are there, and Poland might at any time...
and the chance of Inca-Byng NOT being a joke is like 0.001% unless Hive had a "visit" yesterday..
World Conqueror said:
And wasnt it HoG player of England your ally who brougth up the idea to give France somewhat better situation
.
World Conqueror said:
You are wrong. I'm granting him this move because his capital is land-locked in enemy territory... I would do the same for anyone who this would happen to. And this move will make France stronger, not weaker.
And I fail to see how it benefits me that England will be even stronger, as he will probably annex Paris and Maine...
And you are also wrong on the diploannexation part, as I'll probably military annex most of them...
ForzaA said:
Indeed. I even allied Brandenburg when he was weakest, in order to protect him from potential evil-doers... might not be the smartest move for my nation, as it would have been much easier to just attack him together with my hordes of AI allies.
A good session yesterday, thanks all.
Hive, can you clarify what will happen with the leaders? A few questions for you:
- How many should we expect to receive each session? I got one general at the end of the session, and that was all.
- If we have leaders at the end of the session, can we expect them to continue into the next session?
- Can we have the rules for getting generals vs. admirals?
Hive, can you clarify what will happen with the leaders? A few questions for you:
- How many should we expect to receive each session? I got one general at the end of the session, and that was all.
- If we have leaders at the end of the session, can we expect them to continue into the next session?
- Can we have the rules for getting generals vs. admirals?
Generation of leaders used was 4 chances of generals, 2 chances of admirals. 50% likelyhood of each leader appearing.
"Mean" value was set at 4.
Leaders were set to appear between years 1419 and 1459 AFAIK. Hive will know.
All leaders that appear in the session will remain until they die by age or otherwise.
New leaders will be generated for next session.
"Mean" value was set at 4.
Leaders were set to appear between years 1419 and 1459 AFAIK. Hive will know.
All leaders that appear in the session will remain until they die by age or otherwise.
New leaders will be generated for next session.
Owen said:
Slargos explained all that, so I'll just refer to his post:
Slargos said:
Owen said:
Well... Slargos has informed me that this is really a lot of hassle to maintain, so I'll have to consider this for a few days...