1.53 BUG LIST-Please Help Make The AGCEEP Better

unmerged(40707) · Aug 21, 2007

De-VILLARS said:

Code:

#(1687-1690) Denonville's Parley
event = {
	id = 170078
	trigger = {
		#war = { country = FRA country = OHI }
		OR = {
			AND = {
				discovered = 89
				provincereligion = { province = 89 data = pagan }
			}
			AND = {
				discovered = 90
				provincereligion = { province = 90 data = pagan }
			}
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170078" #Denonville's Parley
	desc = "EVENTHIST170078"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = february year = 1687 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 28 month = december year = 1690 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME170078A" #Seize them
		command = { type = population which = 110 value = 500 } #Stadacone
		#command = { type = relation which = OHI value = -200 }
		command = { type = treasury value = 50 }
		#command = { type = trigger which = 246001 } #OHI: de Denonville's Parley
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME170078B" #We need peace
		#command = { type = relation which = OHI value = 50 }
		#command = { type = dynastic which = OHI }
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
		command = { type = badboy value = -1 } #for balance without OHI tag
	}
}

this event is still in 1.53 but since OHI has been deleted it is useless.

I didn't want to remove it since I found out it was involved with OHI just before Norrefeldt made the 1.53 installers and I was knowing he won't be available for the next three weeks... That's why I just removed the OHI involved commands and added one for balance but I must have forgotten to post it in NA thread.

o

It has only little impact now but we can discuss if it is really useless.

jayswimmer · Aug 21, 2007

Bug Playing Germany

I am playing Germany in 1.53 originating from Brandenburg. It is April 1681, and I just received the following:

Attempting to create a monarch with a leader in (32024) that is already used.

It looks like I can just hit ignore, but wanted to pass this along.

unmerged(40707) · Aug 22, 2007

jayswimmer said:
I am playing Germany in 1.53 originating from Brandenburg. It is April 1681, and I just received the following:

Attempting to create a monarch with a leader in (32024) that is already used.

It looks like I can just hit ignore, but wanted to pass this along.

Not a bug. It is tied to China becoming Manchus and becoming China again.

De-VILLARS · Aug 22, 2007

YodaMaster said:
It has only little impact now but we can discuss if it is really useless.

i can edit the event by deleting OHI commands

Same problem with this event :

Code:

#(1605-1611) Samuel de Champlain and the Hurons
event = {
	id = 3115
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 110 data = -1 } #Stadacone
			owned = { province = 62 data = -1 } #Carolina
			owned = { province = 86 data = -1 } #Delaware
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME3115" #Samuel de Champlain and the Hurons
	desc = "EVENTHIST3115"

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1605 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1611 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3115A" #Let us befriend the Hurons
		command = { type = domestic which = land value = -1 }
		#command = { type = relation which = HUR value = 150 }
		command = { type = merchants value = 3 }
		command = { type = conquistador which = 110 } #Stadacone
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3115B" #Let us befriend the Cherokee
		command = { type = domestic which = land value = -1 }
		#command = { type = relation which = CHE value = 150 }
		command = { type = merchants value = 3 }
		command = { type = conquistador which = 62 } #Carolina
	}
	action_c = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3115C" #Let us befriend the Iroquois
		command = { type = domestic which = land value = -1 }
		#command = { type = relation which = OHI value = 150 }
		command = { type = merchants value = 3 }
		command = { type = conquistador which = 86 } #Delaware
	}
}

unmerged(40707) · Aug 22, 2007

@De-Villars: commands are already commented (#) and are not taken in account in the code. I just wanted to not remove them completely if NA tribes are reintroduced.

Bordic · Aug 22, 2007

A bug here (of mine!) , since these events should be the same except for the trigger, well...

Code:

#(1733) The Polish Succession of 1733
event = {
	id = 3628 #triggered by POL_3495 A
	trigger = {
		NOT = {
			vassal = { country = POL country = SAC }
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = SAC
	name = "EVENTNAME3495" #The Polish Succession of 1733
	desc = "EVENTHIST3628"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3628A" #Risk Major War to get you Kingdom
		command = { type = dynastic which = POL }
		command = { type = alliance which = POL }
		command = { type = vassal which = POL }
		command = { type = relation which = POL value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = RUS value = 200 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = 150 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -150 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRU value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = SWE value = -100 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3628B" #Back down
		command = { type = trigger which = 3487 } #POL: Friedrich Augustus Wettin backs down!
		command = { type = relation which = POL value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = RUS value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 150 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRU value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = SWE value = 100 }
		command = { type = stability value = -2 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3136 } #FRA: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3429 } #RUS: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3204 } #HAB: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 285271 } #SPA: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 275025 } #SAV: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 390029 } #PAR: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 390025 } #PAR: Regno delle Due Sicilie
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3625 } #SAC: The Effects of the Pragmatic Sanction
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 285096 } #SPA: The Kingdom of Naples and Sicily
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 239025 } #NAP: The Bourbon Dynasty in Naples
	}
}

#-#In 1733, the death of August II prompted a new election for the Polish monarch. Due to the permanent practice of Liberum Veto and the ensuing constant bribery, the Polish Sejm was unable to agree between the French Candidate, Stanislaw Leszczynski and his opponent, August III of Saxony, supported by Austria and Russia. The Sejm finally agreed on Stanislaw, but this was rejected by Austria and Russia starting the war of Polish Succession. The war ended with August III on the Polish throne. My Lord you have been elected!

Code:

#(1733) The Polish Succession of 1733
event = {
	id = 273017 #triggered by POL_3495 A
	trigger = {
		vassal = { country = POL country = SAC }
	}
	random = no
	country = SAC
	name = "EVENTNAME3495" #The Polish Succession of 1733
	desc = "EVENTHIST3628"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3628A" #Risk Major War to get you Kingdom
		command = { type = breakvassal which = POL }
		command = { type = stability value = 4 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = POL }
		command = { type = alliance which = POL }
		command = { type = relation which = POL value = 200 }
		command = { type = relation which = RUS value = 200 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = 200 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRU value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = SWE value = -100 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3628B" #Back down
		command = { type = relation which = POL value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = RUS value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 150 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRU value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = SWE value = 100 }
		command = { type = stability value = -2 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 3487 } #POL: Friedrich Augustus Wettin backs down!
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3136 } #FRA: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3429 } #RUS: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3204 } #HAB: The Polish Succession of 1733
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = sleepevent which = 285271 } #SPA: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 275025 } #SAV: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 390029 } #PAR: The Polish Succession of 1733
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 390025 } #PAR: Regno delle Due Sicilie[/COLOR]
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3625 } #SAC: The Effects of the Pragmatic Sanction
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = sleepevent which = 285096 } #SPA: The Kingdom of Naples and Sicily
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 239025 } #NAP: The Bourbon Dynasty in Naples[/COLOR]
	}
}

#-#In 1733, the death of August II prompted a new election for the Polish monarch. Due to the permanent practice of Liberum Veto and the ensuing constant bribery, the Polish Sejm was unable to agree between the French Candidate, Stanislaw Leszczynski and his opponent, August III of Saxony, supported by Austria and Russia. The Sejm finally agreed on Stanislaw, but this was rejected by Austria and Russia starting the war of Polish Succession. The war ended with August III on the Polish throne. My Lord you have been elected!

and

Code:

#(1733) Friedrich Augustus Wettin backs down!
event = {
	id = 3487 #triggered by SAC_3628 B [COLOR=Yellow]and SAC_273017 B[/COLOR]
	random = no
	country = POL
	name = "EVENTNAME3487" #Friedrich Augustus Wettin backs down!
	desc = "EVENTHIST3487"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3487A" #Elect Stanislaw Leszczynski
		command = { type = trigger which = 3632 } #LOR: Habsburg Inheritance of Lothringen
		command = { type = sleepmonarch which = 0109517 } #August III Sas
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 0109516 } #Stanislaw I Leszczynski
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 2 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = sleepevent which = 170202 } #FRA: The claim to Lorraine[/COLOR]
	}
}

#-#The political sickness of the Polish body manifested itself fully after the death of Jan III Sobieski in 1696. The election that followed was one of the most dismal episodes in Polish parliamentary history. The primary candidates were the King's son Jakub Sobieski.

the sleepevent 170202 command is already in 1.54beta4

Bordic · Aug 23, 2007

YodaMaster said:
Only problem is last event can run until 1820 and we have only this last monarch for Bijapur:

Code:

historicalmonarch = { id = { type = 6 id = 041509 } startdate = { year = 1673 } deathdate = { year = 1686 } name = "Sikandar Adil Shah" DIP = 5 ADM = 5 MIL = 3 dormant = no }

Eternal monarch after 1686...

Apparently. Couldn't we use the Mahrattis monarchs for that purpose?

These events are the result of the action of the Mughals (and not Mughal Empire, but this is a little confusing, at least for me...) but this is not to be found in the triggers...

You mean the Bahamids with event THE_30332!?
I have seen that no THE TAG entry was in revolt.txt, well we could have it for 550 551 565 566 but with deathdate on 29 dec 1488 so that DAM would start after it on 1 jan 1489 instead of 1419 as it is for U02. But this is only a suggestion of mine without knowing in depth the Indian area:

Code:

U02 = { #Ahmadnagar
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1488 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 551 }
	extra = { 548 }
	capital = 551
	group = muslim
	culture = cambodian
	#ai = "hyd.ai"
	ai = "SmallTrade1.ai"
}

as its inclusion in revolt.txt could bring the same problem for

Code:

HYD = { #Golconda
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 566 }
	extra = { 565 567 571 }
	capital = 566
	group = muslim
	culture = cambodian
	#ai = "hyd.ai"
	ai = "HYD_1419_Golconda.ai"
}

so maybe it is better to leave things as they are now.

Yodamaster said:

In revolt.txt:

Code:

DAM = { #Bijapur
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 550 }
	extra = { 549 567 568 }
	capital = 550
	group = muslim
	culture = cambodian
	#ai = "hyd.ai"
	ai = "DAM_1419_Bijapur.ai"
}

Is year 1820 correct then?

Code:

MAH = { #Mahrattis
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1647 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 550 548 549 }
	extra = { 551 }
	capital = 550
	group = muslim
	religion = hinduism
	culture = marathi
	ai = "MAH_1650_Shivaji.ai"
}

Possible CTD because of 550 for sure and 549 under conditions..?

Shouldn't we tweak both entries?

If not changing THE set up I think we should at least tweak both revolt entries for DAM and MAH.

Am I telling the truth by saying that MAH is the evolution of DAM in history?

Is it is correct, apart from using the same monarchs we could also change start- and expirydates according to revolt.txt in this way:

Code:

DAM = { #Bijapur
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	[COLOR=Red]expirydate = { year = 1820 }[/COLOR]
	[COLOR=Yellow]expirydate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1646 }[/COLOR]
	minimum = { 550 }
	extra = { 549 567 568 }
	capital = 550
	group = muslim
	culture = cambodian
	#ai = "hyd.ai"
	ai = "DAM_1419_Bijapur.ai"
}

Is year 1820 correct then?

Code:

MAH = { #Mahrattis
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1647 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 550 548 549 }
	extra = { 551 }
	capital = 550
	group = muslim
	religion = hinduism
	culture = marathi
	ai = "MAH_1650_Shivaji.ai"
}

We could even have a problem here:

Code:

#(1514-1820) The Battle of Panipat
event = {
	id = 3919
	trigger = {
		control = { province = 543 data = MOG }
	}
	random = no
	country = DLH
	name = "EVENTNAME3919" #The Battle of Panipat
	desc = "EVENTHIST3919"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = march year = 1514 }
	offset = 0
	deathdate = { year = 1820 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3919A" #We surrender to their forces! (End Game)
		command = { type = independence which = BGL }
		command = { type = independence which = HYD }
		command = { type = independence which = GUJ }
		command = { type = independence which = MLW }
		command = { type = independence which = JAI }
		command = { type = independence which = NAF }
		command = { type = independence which = U02 }
		command = { type = independence which = SYR }
		command = { type = independence which = ORI }
		command = { type = independence which = DAM }
		command = { type = independence which = MES }
		command = { type = trigger which = 3921 } #MOG: The Battle of Panipat
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3919B" #We will fight on to the death!
		command = { type = stability value = -5 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 36 value = 4 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 3000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 3000 }
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 1520 } #Chandigahr
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 1521 } #Panjab
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 1522 } #Bikaner
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 1523 } #Thar
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 1524 } #Quetta
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 540 } #Sindh
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 541 } #Kutch
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 542 } #Rajputana
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 546 } #Malwa
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = MOG value = 547 } #Gujarat
	}
}

#-#The Mughals have defeated us on the field of battle at Panipat. They now occupy our capital and have virtually overrun our nation. We are virtually helpless against them! What shall we do?.

Shouldn't we add independence MAH too in this event in action A?

Bordic · Aug 23, 2007

I think I have spotted some potential CTD bugs here:

Code:

#(1538-1556) Sher Khan's Victory
event = {
	id = 230016
	trigger = {
		event = 128014 #BGL: Sher Khan becomes Sher Shah
		OR = {
			AND = {
				control = { province = 553 data = BGL } #Raipur
				owned = { province = 553 data = MOG }
			}
			AND = {
				control = { province = 545 data = BGL } #Bundelkhand
				owned = { province = 545 data = MOG }
			}
			AND = {
				control = { province = 553 data = BGL } #Awadh
				owned = { province = 553 data = MOG }
			}
			AND = {
				control = { province = 543 data = BGL } #Delhi
				owned = { province = 543 data = MOG }
			}
			AND = {
				control = { province = 554 data = BGL } #Tirhut, owned by Delhi in 1520 scenario
				owned = { province = 554 data = MOG }
			}
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = MOG
	name = "EVENTNAME230016" #Sher Khan's Victory
	desc = "EVENTHIST230016"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1538 }
	offset = 1
	deathdate = { day = 13 month = february year = 1556 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME230016A" #Retreat and live to fight another day
		command = { type = stability value = -3 }
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = BGL value = 545 } #Bundelkhand
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = BGL value = 544 } #Awadh
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = BGL value = 553 } #Raipur
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = BGL value = 554 } #Tirhut, owned by Delhi in 1520 scenario
		command = { type = domestic which = quality value = -2 }
		command = { type = domestic which = offensive value = -1 }
		command = { type = treasury value = -100 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
	}
}

#-#On the way home from Gaur in June 1539, Humayun's forces entered battle against Sher Khan and his Afghan followers. Sher Shah proved victorious and the Mughal forces were massacred, drowned or captured. Humayun himself was saved by a water-carrier who carried him across the Ganges, into which he had recklessly jumped. This stunning victory over the Great Mughal was a tremendous success for Sher Khan and made him the de facto ruler of the Mughal lands from Kanauj in the west to the hills of Assam and Cittagong in the south.

As to be sure I would add this line in yellow:

Code:

#(1538-1556) The Battle of Kanauj
event = {
	id = 230017
	trigger = {
		[COLOR=Yellow]NOT = { exists = DHL }[/COLOR]
		event = 230016 #MOG: Sher Khan's Victory
		control = { province = 543 data = BGL } #Delhi (Kanauj is just east of Agra, in Delhi province)
	}
	random = no
	country = MOG
	name = "EVENTNAME230017" #The Battle of Kanauj
	desc = "EVENTHIST230017"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1538 }
	offset = 1
	deathdate = { day = 13 month = february year = 1556 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME230017A" #We have lost Hindustan but kept our life
		#command = { type = AI which = peaceful.ai }
		command = { type = stability value = -3 }
		command = { type = capital which = 1523 } #(Lahore?) #Thar
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = BGL value = 543 } #Delhi
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = BGL value = 1520 } #Chandigarh
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = BGL value = 1521 } #Panjab
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
		command = { type = treasury value = -100 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 128015 } #BGL: Hindustan returns to Afghan rule
	}
}

#-#The year after his disastrous defeat against Sher Shah, Humayun made another attempt to regain his empire and put down the rebellion. His brothers refused to cooperate with him in this, despite Humayun personally travelling to Lahore to convince them. Nevertheless, he quickly raised an army and faced the Afghans in battle on May 17, 1540 opposite Kanauj. Hopelessly demoralized and badly managed, Humayun's forces were soundly defeated and Humayun only just managed to escape. The great conquests of Babur had been lost and once more Hindustan returned to Afghan rule. Humayun was forced into exile for the next fifteen years.

Code:

#(1538-1556) Hindustan returns to Afghan rule
event = {
	id = 128015 #triggered by MOG_230017
	random = no
	country = BGL
	name = "EVENTNAME128015" #Hindustan returns to Afghan rule
	desc = "EVENTHIST128015"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME128015A" #We have forced the Mughals out of India
		command = { type = flagname which = "" }
		command = { type = country which = DLH }
		command = { type = capital which = 543 } #Delhi
		command = { type = stability value = 3 }
		command = { type = addcore which = 543 } #Delhi
		command = { type = DIP which = 1 value = 120 }
		command = { type = treasury value = 200 }
		command = { type = vp value = 50 }
	}
}

#-#The year after his disastrous defeat against Sher Shah, Humayun made another attempt to regain his empire and put down the rebellion. His brothers refused to cooperate with him in this, despite Humayun personally travelling to Lahore to convince them. Nevertheless, he quickly raised an army and faced the Afghans in battle on May 17, 1540 opposite Kanauj. Hopelessly demoralized and badly managed, Humayun's forces were soundly defeated and Humayun only just managed to escape. The great conquests of Babur had been lost and once more Hindustan returned to Afghan rule. Humayun was forced into exile for the next fifteen years while Sher Shah extended his rule all the way to the Punjab, where he marched to subdue the hill tribes of Gakkar without much success.

Here we have the potential CTD problem too with 543 (Delhi):

Code:

DLH = { #Delhi
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	expirydate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1545 }
	minimum = { 543 545 }
	extra = { 553 }
	capital = 543
	group = muslim
	religion = sunni
	ai = "SmallTrade1.ai"
}
MOG = { #Mughal Empire
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1527 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 543 }
	extra = { 544 545 553 554 1520 1521 1523 1524 1525 1527 }
	capital = 543
	group = muslim
	religion = sunni
	ai = "MOG_PostDelhi.ai"
}
BGL = { #Bengal
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	expirydate = { year = 1820 }
	minimum = { 559 558 }
	extra = { 555 557 }
	capital = 559
	group = muslim
	ai = "SmallTrade1.ai"
}

Another question is: can BGL change into DHL in the time span 1545-1556 even if DHL is releasable until 1545 only?

In event MOG_230017 we have a capital move before ceding Delhi to BGL. Since Delhi shoud (I repeat, should) be current Mughal capital, according to revolt.txt and event MOG_3805, shouldn't we use at least a flag to test where current capital is, if possible?

unmerged(40707) · Aug 23, 2007

About post #147, let's Garbon answer to your questions.

About post #148 and MOG_230017, Delhi province should be owned by MOG in this case too, shouldn't it?

And what happens with capital move to Thar (1523)..?

And we could have a big problem with this event if Mughal Empire only owns Delhi, Chandigarh and Panjab... Same problem in MOG_230016 with corresponding provinces.

Garbon · Aug 23, 2007

As to 147, no Marathas are not an evolution of Bijapur. We only have the ability for Bijapur to become the Marathas as when the last Bijapur monarch died, the Marathas quickly took over the former lands (and since they have revolt entries that sort of conflict). No real continuity however. That said, having the revolter end in 1646 could make since as there was no real attempted Bijapur revolt once it was annexed.

THE shouldn't have a revolt entry.

The Battle of Panipat should not include the Marathas. In fact, that event only goes to 1820 in the off chance that the Mughals are really slow. Ideally, it should actually occur sometime between 1514-1530.

Garbon · Aug 23, 2007

YodaMaster said:
About post #148 and MOG_230017, Delhi province should be owned by MOG in this case too, shouldn't it?

And what happens with capital move to Thar (1523)..?

And we could have a big problem with this event if Mughal Empire only owns Delhi, Chandigarh and Panjab... Same problem in MOG_230016 with corresponding provinces.

With regards to this, the whole sequence is pretty messed up. It was never completely finished as historically, the Mughals should cease to exist for a period of time. Dharper and to some extent I, never completely figured out what we should do, so we've just left what he had made. It has never been much of an issue as the chances of the Mughals actually being in India and of Bengal actually taking down the Mughals is so small that the sequence has no chance of firing.

unmerged(40707) · Aug 23, 2007

Garbon said:
That said, having the revolter end in 1646 could make since as there was no real attempted Bijapur revolt once it was annexed.

THE shouldn't have a revolt entry.

Ok for these two changes then?

Garbon · Aug 23, 2007

YodaMaster said:
Ok for these two changes then?

Well THE doesn't have a revolt entry. I thought one was being proposed.

unmerged(40707) · Aug 23, 2007

Oups... Change for DAM entry in revolt.txt only then.

Bordic · Aug 23, 2007

IMO there is a consistency bug here, Cologne has automatically Napoleonic Rulers on the throne, starting from 1806.

Wouldn't we need an event to check current French situation and if a sort of vassalization is currently between Napoleonic France and Cologne?

But checking in internet I haven't found any clue to the use of these two French rulers as France directly administered the territories of the Left Rhine Bank afaik. I would prefer to lenghten the life of Anton Viktor until 1820 even if in 1815 Cologne passed under Prussian administration.

We can keep the other two monarchs if we want but set to dormant = yes or we can simply remove them (as I suggest).

Code:

historicalmonarch = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 070018 }
	startdate = {
		day = 27
		month = july
		year = 1801
	}
	deathdate = {
		[COLOR=Red]day = 15
		month = march
		year = 1806[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Yellow]year = 1820[/COLOR]
	}
	name = "Anton Viktor"
	DIP = 3
	ADM = 3
	MIL = 3
	dormant = no
	remark = "IRL, in charge until 15 march 1806"
}

[COLOR=Red]
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#Napoleonic rulers

historicalmonarch = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 070019 }
	startdate = {
		day = 15
		month = march
		year = 1806
	}
	deathdate = {
		day = 3
		month = march
		year = 1809
	}
	name = "Joachim Murat"
	DIP = 5
	ADM = 5
	MIL = 8
	dormant = no
}
historicalmonarch = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 070020 }
	startdate = {
		day = 3
		month = march
		year = 1809
	}
	deathdate = {
		year = 1813
	}
	name = "Ludwig Bonaparte"
	DIP = 4
	ADM = 6
	MIL = 4
	dormant = no
}[/COLOR]

The Archbishopric of Cologne was occupied by Revolutionary France and annexed by First Consul Napoléon in 1801 and then ceded to Prussia in 1815 in the congress of Vienna.

Some links refer to this Anton Viktor, some other as the German one of Wikipedia to a certain "Johann Hermann Joseph Freiherr von Caspars zu Weiss als Kapitularvikar" from 1801 to 1822.

Maybe we can use this as name of monarch #070018.

Here is the link .

Garbon · Aug 23, 2007

Garbon said:
With regards to this, the whole sequence is pretty messed up. It was never completely finished as historically, the Mughals should cease to exist for a period of time. Dharper and to some extent I, never completely figured out what we should do, so we've just left what he had made. It has never been much of an issue as the chances of the Mughals actually being in India and of Bengal actually taking down the Mughals is so small that the sequence has no chance of firing.

The last answer on this bit is that I haven't really wanted to put much work into this destruction of the Mughals sequence as we already have so much trouble getting the Mughals to grow at all.

Bordic · Aug 23, 2007

In bugfixing the events for Siena and the Habsburgs I spotted a potential bug here:

Code:

#(1559-1569) The fate of the Sienese Republic
event = {
	id = 257006
	trigger = {
		event = 285112 #SPA: The Treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis
		event = 17357 #TOS: Revolt in Siena
		atwar = no
		exists = TOS
	}
	random = no
	country = PIS
	name = "EVENTNAME257006" #The fate of the Sienese Republic
	desc = "EVENTHIST257006"
	#-#

	date = { day = 2 month = April year = 1559 }
	offset = 60
	deathdate = { day = 20 month = April year = 1574 } #Cosimo's death

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME257006A" #Submit to Cosimo de' Medici (End Game)
		command = { type = trigger which = 297023 } #TOS: The Grand Duchy of Tuscany
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME257006B" #Reject any foreign rule
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = trigger which = 297033 } #TOS: The defiance of Siena[/COLOR]
		command = { type = breakvassal which = FRA }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = SPA }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = breakvassal which = HAB }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = TOS }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = SPA value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = TOS value = -200 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = trigger which = 297033 } #TOS: The defiance of Siena[/COLOR]
	}
}

#-#In 1552 Siena rebelled to Emperor Charles V. As answer he sent troops to besiege the city as to inflict an exemplary punishment upon it. After long siege the city of Siena eventually surrendered on 17 April 1555 and was forced to renew her allegiance to the Emperor. The Emperor, in return, granted the Republican liberty of the Sienese state and confirmed her magistrates. He also abandoned the project to build a new fortress offering a garrison at his expenses and conceded the general pardon to the citizenship. The Sienese republic would remain under imperial protection until 1557, when Felipe II king of Spain assigned the administration of the Sienese territory to Duke Cosimo I de' Medici with the exception of the Sienese coastal cities which constituted the Spanish State of Presidi. The fate of Siena was confirmed by the treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis in 1559.

Also TOS (neighbouring!) and most of all HAB (by event!) can still be liege of Siena (PIS) even if action B is taken.

Comments to eventdescriptions are to be tweaked also in TOS events with id# 297023 and 297033.

Since English is not my language I would appreciate any corrections of names and descriptions.

unmerged(40707) · Aug 24, 2007

Garbon said:
The last answer on this bit is that I haven't really wanted to put much work into this destruction of the Mughals sequence as we already have so much trouble getting the Mughals to grow at all.

Yes, at least we can add two conditions in MOG_230017 "The Battle of Kanauj"

Code:

	trigger = {
		[COLOR=Yellow]NOT = { exists = DHL }[/COLOR]
		event = 230016 #MOG: Sher Khan's Victory
		[COLOR=Yellow]owned = { province = 543 data = -1 } #Delhi[/COLOR]
		control = { province = 543 data = BGL } #Delhi (Kanauj is just east of Agra, in Delhi province)
	}

It will be fine for now...

unmerged(40707) · Aug 24, 2007

Bordic said:
The Archbishopric of Cologne was occupied by Revolutionary France in 1790 and annexed by Napoléon in 1801 and then ceded to Prussia in 1815 in the congress of Vienna.

Some links refer to this Anton Viktor, some other as the German one of Wikipedia to a certain "Johann Hermann Joseph Freiherr von Caspars zu Weiss als Kapitularvikar" from 1801 to 1822.

Maybe we can use this as name of monarch #070018.

Here is the link .

IMHO, extending Anton Viktor and removing suggested ones should be sufficient.

Bordic · Aug 24, 2007

YodaMaster said:
IMHO, extending Anton Viktor and removing suggested ones should be sufficient.

Ok then! But, should we mark him in doubt with the * as some links don't recall him?
Or better have him as it is now after the bugfix...

1.53 BUG LIST-Please Help Make The AGCEEP Better

Just call me Yoda in private!

First Lieutenant

Just call me Yoda in private!

Le diable blanc

Just call me Yoda in private!

Magister Militum

Magister Militum

Magister Militum

Just call me Yoda in private!

Sultan d'Afrique

Sultan d'Afrique

Just call me Yoda in private!

Sultan d'Afrique

Just call me Yoda in private!

Magister Militum

Sultan d'Afrique

Magister Militum

Just call me Yoda in private!

Just call me Yoda in private!

Magister Militum