1.50 BUG LIST-Please Help Make The AGCEEP Better

[unmerged(40707)]

Report all bugs/typos/broken events etc here. Do not make general suggestions, that should be done in the appropriate thread on the topic. Technical support issues should not be posted here, but go into that thread.

We do not help out with issues connected to MyMap, please use their threads.

 

[unmerged(40707)]

ToDo list

PLEASE HELP OUT WITH THINGS HERE:

..or tell us if something is obsolete and should be removed from the list.

Remove from the list in RED.
Solved problem in GREEN, with link.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bugs to Fix List:

-I think that some of the Ottoman-Persia wars events should have a trigger about them not being Shiite. In the same game as above, the Ottos chose to convert in an event possibly involving a son or something. Can't remember specifically. Was kinda weird for the two major Shiite powers to keep trying to destroy each other. OTOH, it did make their conquests of the Muslim world a little easier.
-There seems to be a problem with the event sequence playing Hungary and electing (unhistorically) János I Corvin after the death of Matthias. After János I Corvin dies in 1504, Zápolya becomes the next king (as János II Zápolya) until 1540. However, the (historical) events concerning king Lajos and Sulejman kick in around 1526 (Lajos insults Sulejman, Death of Lajos - election of Zápolya or Ferdinand etc.) - see here.
-some remaining errors and questions in http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5808880&postcount=402
-income = 0 (or negative for Mossi) in historical path events for some provinces
-Interregnum so why not 2 leaders for Edward IV (046311) in leaders.eng
-Leader F Sforza (089302) and monarch Francesco Sforza (089002) for Milan: The discrepancy in the start date is due to events. There ought to be two Sforza monarchs, one who starts in 1447 and one who starts in 1450. Event 228003 would then need to sleep and wake leaders in addition to monarchs. Death date for all monarchs and leaders should be 8 March 1466. For ITA I think the plan would be to use the 1447 version of Sforza - see post #24


Incoherencies in 1.50 events

Missing descriptions:
107003 and 107004 in AGCEEP_Specific_Annam.eue
157001 and 157004 in AGCEEP_Specific_DaiViet.eue
266011 to 266016 in AGCEEP_Specific_KaraKoyunlu.eue
325007 in AGCEEP_Specific_UzbekHorde.eue

Slept or triggered non existing events:
30322 slept by 30323 in AGCEEP_Specific_Bengal.eue - see http://www.europa-universalis.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4131291&postcount=58
2200030 slept by 2200028 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue - commented out
2200032 slept by 2200023 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue - commented out

Non triggered events without date:
62001 in AGCEEP_Specific_Safavids.eue (U01_296693 is commented out in AGCEEP_Specific_Khorasan.eue)
62002 in AGCEEP_Specific_Mughals.eue (U01_296693 is commented out in AGCEEP_Specific_Khorasan.eue)
62003 in AGCEEP_Specific_UzbekHorde.eue (U01_296693 is commented out in AGCEEP_Specific_Khorasan.eue)
65111 in AGCEEP_Specific_DaiViet.eue

Events with non existing event in trigger:
2200020 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue needs 2200050 - commented out
2200021 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue needs 2200050 - commented out


Empty monarchs files:
monarchs.naf
monarchs.nog

Events with commands for non existing leaders:
328056 in AGCEEP_Specific_Vijayanagar.eue awakes 133001 - commented out

Dormant and never awakened monarchs:
'Davit X.' (Id = 018003) in monarchs.bae
''Ali Jarad' (Id = 039511) in monarchs.cyr
'Ahmad' (Id = 039523) in monarchs.cyr
''Umar Din' (Id = 039526) in monarchs.cyr - see submission #572
'Ismail Adil Shah' (Id = 041502) in monarchs.dam
'Richard III' (Id = 046007) in monarchs.eng
'Paullu' (Id = 063015) in monarchs.inc
'Haydar `Alî' (Id = 095022) in monarchs.mys
'Tîpû Sâhib' (Id = 095023) in monarchs.mys
'Qara Iskandar' (Id = 0114002) in monarchs.qar
'Abu Sa'id' (Id = 0114003) in monarchs.qar
'Sayyid Ahmad I' (Id = 0128504) in monarchs.ste - see post #161
'Karl Knutsson Bonde' (Id = 0131508) in monarchs.swe

Dormant and never awakened leaders:
'Hou Xian' (Id = 032303) in leaders.chi
'Yongle' (Id = 032304) in leaders.chi
'Xuan Zong' (Id = 032305) in leaders.chi
'Berwick' (Id = 046394) in leaders.eng
'Henri de Guise' (Id = 049821) in leaders.fra
'Sri Vijay Singh' (Id = 065306) in leaders.jai
'Nuno Tristão' (Id = 0110827) in leaders.por
'Rui de Sequeira' (Id = 0110831) in leaders.por
'A. Gonçalves Baldaia' (Id = 0110833) in leaders.por
'Antão Gonçalves' (Id = 0110837) in leaders.por
'Gonçalo Velho' (Id = 0110845) in leaders.por
'Juan de Salcedo' (Id = 0127903) in leaders.spa
'Andrés de Urdaneta' (Id = 0127908) in leaders.spa - see post #52

Bugs in 1.42:
List of bugs
bug #520 http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5823609&postcount=520 WAD
bug #558 http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5886189&postcount=558 - CTD in september 1629 with Netherlands (Felagund's savefile) - See post #19

Don't know what to do (bugs 1.39):
bug #268 http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4958398&postcount=268 - See post #162

Some remaining questions here:
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5444552&postcount=75


Don't know what to do (bugs 1.38):
Ottoman Cores: I don't know if it's intentional, but when the Ottomans get a core on Podolia, they don't have cores on any province touching Podolia - neither Moldovia or Wallachia are ever considered Ottoman cores. This makes it hard for them to conquer Podolia, since keeping Moldovia as a one-province vassal usually means Poland adds it to their holdings.
Ottoman Rule is Returned: This event happens even if Smyrna is conquered by a third nation (Byzantium, Karaman, the Knights, et cetera). The event text doesn't make any sense in that case and it triggers an event for the Ottomans that won't have any effect. We should add the trigger that Ghazi (or the Ottomans?) own Smyrna to this event - See post #163
bug #108 and #110 event 65111 (concerns Vientiane and Luang Prabang)
bug #124 and #125 "Suleyman demands the keys to Hungary" if Hungary doesn't exist - See post #165

WAD or Bugs?:

-Does the Incan event that gives them an explorer need to remove and then recreate their Incan COT to ensure that it doesn't dissapear ?
-Possible Alternate line of Kongo kings if no European contact.


Bugs that are in the process of getting fixed:
-Setup and events for Butung, Kutei and U04-Sirvan are all messed up.-Khephren in process of fixing


Bugs complained of that I could find nothing wrong with or don't know how to fix yet.
-CTD when Hungary annexed Austria in the early 1430s and then Styria became Austria.
-Old Munster Events fire for Berg (MUN).
-Hormouz doesn't revolt away, which looks odd. In my game they're owned by Rajputana, and they've been under the rebels for some 60 years now. They're bordered by Persia, Afghanistan and Gujarat.


Dormant and never awakened monarchs (future use):
'Zhi Chen Hao' (Id = 032040) in monarchs.chi
'Zhi Zhi Pan' (Id = 032041) in monarchs.chi
'Sigurd III Jonsson *' (Id = 098519) in monarchs.nor
'Hans I *' (Id = 098520) in monarchs.nor
'Fryderyk August I' (Id = 0109535) in monarchs.pol
'Aleksander Romanow' (Id = 0109539) in monarchs.pol
'Li Jin' (Id = 0146002) in monarchs.u11
'Zhang Ke Wang' (Id = 0146501) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Zheng Qi' (Id = 0146502) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Zheng Chun' (Id = 0146503) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Zheng Hao' (Id = 0146504) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Ding Guo' (Id = 0146505) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Si Xing' (Id = 0146506) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Si Xing descendants' (Id = 0146508) in monarchs.u12
'Wu Ying Xiong' (Id = 0147001) in monarchs.u13
'Wu Shi Lin' (Id = 0147002) in monarchs.u13

 

[unmerged(37697)]

BUG: In the 1648 scenario, Poland has Courland vassalised twice, ID's 14 and 28. I've hashed out 28 for a temp fix

 

[zdlugasz]

I have still 1.50 beta, but nevertheless
- BRA will get cores on Prussia and Memel in 1657, right now they seem to appear without event
- Khmelnytsky uprising events 25001 - 25005 were not removed from 1648 scenario "history" section
- alliance CRI and UKR is leftover from previous version (now UKR was removed)
-knowledge and colonization of Carribean (e.g. Prussia had knowledge of e.g. Les-Cayes); in 1648 Les-Cayes and Tobago are not colonized, in my game England and Netherlands were first. I suspect that England is not supposed to colonize Les-Cayes

who and when should colonize them? I propose to remove knowledge about these two provinces from countries which are not supposed to colonize it

 

[unmerged(40707)]

Mistake in randomleaders.csv:

POL:Budzillo entry should be POL;Budzillo

 

[unmerged(40707)]

- BRA will get cores on Prussia and Memel in 1657, right now they seem to appear without event

I don't understand what you mean. What is to be done? Be precise...

- Khmelnytsky uprising events 25001 - 25005 were not removed from 1648 scenario "history" section

25001 until 25005 or 25001 and 25005 only?

- alliance CRI and UKR is leftover from previous version (now UKR was removed)

ok

- -knowledge and colonization of Carribean (e.g. Prussia had knowledge of e.g. Les-Cayes); in 1648 Les-Cayes and Tobago are not colonized, in my game England and Netherlands were first. I suspect that England is not supposed to colonize Les-Cayes

who and when should colonize them? I propose to remove knowledge about these two provinces from countries which are not supposed to colonize it

Which ones?

 

[unmerged(37697)]

BUG: In the 1648 scenario, Ducal Prussia is a vassal of both Poland & Brandenburg. Presumably, it should have but one master?

 

[unmerged(40707)]

BUG: In the 1648 scenario, Ducal Prussia is a vassal of both Poland & Brandenburg. Presumably, it should have but one master?

No, this one is wad.

 

[Herr Doctor]

BUG: In the 1648 scenario, Ducal Prussia is a vassal of both Poland & Brandenburg. Presumably, it should have but one master?

It represents the personal union between Brandenburg and Prussia and the fact that Prussia stayed vassal of Poland (until 1657).

 

[zdlugasz]

I don't understand what you mean. What is to be done? Be precise...

Yeah, known problem
remove BRA core on 289 and 290 in 1648, they will get it in 1657 because they have flag "Claims on Prussia"

25001 until 25005 or 25001 and 25005 only?

all between 25001 and 25005 (including 25001 and 25005)

Additionaly I have noticed that POL starts with -1 stab (which is effect of 25001) so Poland should start with +3 stab

Which ones?

provinces: Les Cayes (141) and Tobago (151), but I have found that also Dominica (148) and Caribe (178)

I do not know who should colonize them but all other countries should not have knowledge about province ready for colonization.
Countries knowing:
141: FRA, HOL, BRA, PRU, SPA, SWE, DAN, SCO .... too many
148: similarly as above
151: ENG, FRA, BRA, PRU, HOL, SWE, DAN, SCO, KUR too many
151 is national province for Courland so maybe only Courland should know its location (Tobago) and SPA (Trinidad), for sure Danmark, Scotland, Brandenburg etc. did not colonize this area
178: ENG, HOL, POR, DAN, SPA also too many

if it is supposed to be uncolonized only country which has to colonize should "know" it, otherwise let us put level 1 TPs there to "make reservation" or rightful owner



EDIt : I meant Tobago not Tortuga o

 

[zdlugasz]

IMO province 269 (Arkhangielsk) should have russian culture in 1648 (in earlier scenarios it is colony).

 

[unmerged(58610)]

AGCEEP150Deluxe[1].rar: CRC failed in AGCEEP\Gfx\Interface\frontend\bg_valkyrienet.bmp. The file is corrupt
AGCEEP150Deluxe[1].rar: Unexpected end of archive

 

[unmerged(40707)]

AGCEEP150Deluxe[1].rar: CRC failed in AGCEEP\Gfx\Interface\frontend\bg_valkyrienet.bmp. The file is corrupt
AGCEEP150Deluxe[1].rar: Unexpected end of archive

There is no error with this RAR achive. Your downloaded file was corrupted during the process. Download it again (save as...), don't try to execute the file instead.

 

[Bordic]

Bugs complained of that I could find nothing wrong with or don't know how to fix yet.
-CTD when Hungary annexed Austria in the early 1430s and then Styria became Austria.

That should probably be set in red as it was seemingly solved in 1.42 bugfixes...

 

[Bordic]

-some remaining errors and questions in http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5808880&postcount=402

* HLL_88011 and HOL_88015: could be replaced by a single province specific for Holland province and only for the two involved countries. Maybe to be discussed in regional thread

Have a look at here

Which is th first province specific event available? Still 338230?

 

[unmerged(40707)]

* HLL_88011 and HOL_88015: could be replaced by a single province specific for Holland province and only for the two involved countries. Maybe to be discussed in regional thread

Have a look at here

Which is th first province specific event available? Still 338230?

This was not included in 1.50. Since there is a problem with submission #573 with ProvinceSpec (not other events), 338230 is still free. Hurry up!

Turned to green in post #402.

 

[zdlugasz]

IMO you could delete from that initial list both Polish monarchs. Both are correct and historical and only events which will wake them are still missing

So it is not bug but feature under development

 

[unmerged(40707)]

Moved to future use... as reminder.

 

[unmerged(40707)]

bug #558 http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum...9&postcount=558 - CTD in september 1629 with Netherlands (Felagund's savefile)

This one is a wonderful EU2 bug...

In this event:

#(1629) The Michau code
event = {
	id = 170094
	trigger = { flag = richelieu }
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170094" #The Michau code
	desc = "EVENTHIST170094"
	#-#

	date = { day = 0 month = january year = 1629 }
	offset = 360
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1629 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME170094A" #Accept the new code
		command = { type = infra value = 2000 } #taxes and legal reforms
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = -1 value = 1 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = -1 value = 1 }
		command = { type = trade value = 1000 } #economical reforms
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 2 }
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = warships which = -1 value = 2 }
		command = { type = galleys which = -3 value = 3 }
		command = { type = merchants value = 5 }
		command = { type = land value = 1500 } #military reforms
		command = { type = treasury value = -250 }
		command = { type = fortress which = -1 value = -1 }
		command = { type = fortress which = -1 value = -1 }
		command = { type = fortress which = -1 value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 } #censorship
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME170094B" #Reject the code
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -2 }
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = treasury value = 150 }
	}
}

Everything seems ok, isn't it? No syntax error, all commands are fine... You're wrong! There is a big problem.

If France doesn't own a port at this time, warship command won't apply (obvious) but galley command (-3) will... according to last provincetax command (-1 is defined) just before! => CTD

Bugfix:

#(1629) The Michau code
event = {
	id = 170094
	trigger = { flag = richelieu }
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170094" #The Michau code
	desc = "EVENTHIST170094"
	#-#

	date = { day = 0 month = january year = 1629 }
	offset = 360
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1629 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME170094A" #Accept the new code
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = warships which = -1 value = 2 }
		command = { type = galleys which = -3 value = 3 } #first to avoid CTD if no port[/COLOR]
		command = { type = infra value = 2000 } #taxes and legal reforms
[COLOR=Yellow]		command = { type = land value = 1500 } #military reforms[/COLOR]
[COLOR=Red]		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = -1 value = 1 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = -1 value = 1 }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = trade value = 1000 } #economical reforms
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 2 }
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 } #censorship[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = warships which = -1 value = 2 }
		command = { type = galleys which = -3 value = 3 }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = merchants value = 5 }
[COLOR=Red]		command = { type = land value = 1500 } #military reforms[/COLOR]
		command = { type = treasury value = -250 }
[COLOR=Yellow]		command = { type = provincetax which = -1 value = 1 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = -1 value = 1 }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = fortress which = -1 value = -1 }
		command = { type = fortress which = -1 value = -1 }
		command = { type = fortress which = -1 value = -1 }
		[COLOR=Red]command = { type = domestic which = serfdom value = 1 } #censorship[/COLOR]
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME170094B" #Reject the code
		command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -2 }
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = treasury value = 150 }
	}
}

Warship and galley must be the first commands involving provinces.
And some other changes only for presentation.

I love this game!

 

[unmerged(40707)]

* U23_423000 (Ormuz): misuse of discovered condition in trigger => POR event needed to trigger this event

New event:

#(1507-1515) Portuguese force-vassalization of Ormuz
event = {
	id = 260033
	trigger = {
		exists = U23
		discovered = 505
		NOT = { vassal = { country = POR country = U23 } }
	}
	random = no
	country = POR
	name = "EVENTNAME260033" #Ormuz engaged in large naval battle
	desc = "EVENTHIST260033"
	#-#

	date = { month = october year = 1507 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1515 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME260033A" #Ormuz shall submit
		command = { type = trigger which = 423000 } #U23: Ormuz submits to Portugal
	}
}

EVENTNAME260033;Ormuz engaged in large naval battle;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST260033;In October of 1507 Ormuz submitted to Portugal after losing to them in a large naval battle. In this battle Afonso Albuquerque captured the famous ship the Meri.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME260033A;Ormuz shall submit;;;;;;;;;;

Modified events:

#(1507-1515) Portuguese force-vassalization of Ormuz
event = {
	id = 423000 [COLOR=Yellow]#triggered by POR_260033[/COLOR]
[COLOR=Red]	trigger = {
		exists = POR
		discovered = 505
	}[/COLOR]
	random = no
	country = U23
	name = "EVENTNAME423000" #Ormuz submits to Portugal
	desc = "EVENTHIST423000"
	#-#

[COLOR=Red]	date = { month = october year = 1507 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1515 }[/COLOR]

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME423000A" #Damn Portuguese!
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = trade value = -50 }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = PER }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = TUR }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = MAM }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = GUJ }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = QAR }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = ADE }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = AKA }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = TIM }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = AKK }
		command = { type = trigger which = 260008 } #POR: Ormuz submits to Portugal
	}
}

#(1507-1515) Portuguese force-vassalization of Ormuz
event = {
	id = 260008 #triggered by U23_423000
	random = no
	country = POR
	name = "EVENTNAME260008" #Ormuz submits to Portugal
	desc = "EVENTHIST260008"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME260008A" #Great
		command = { type = vassal which = U23 }
		command = { type = warships which = 505 value = 1 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { }[/COLOR]
	}
}

EVENTHIST260008;Shortly after the submission of Ormuz, Albuquerque's plans to build a fortress were cut short when Ormuz under the guidance of Cogeatar broke it's vassalage to Portugal and three of Albuquerque's captains deserted him and sailed off to India.;;;;;;;;;;