Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

1.40 BUG LIST-Please Help Make The AGCEEP Better

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Show only dev responses
New 'updated' suggestions for Napoleon in post #238 above and a possible debugging of two ( :eek: ) events about Napoleon as leader which couldn't fire ...


Code: 
#Napoleon Bonaparte#
event = {
	id = 3148
	trigger = { event = 3342 } #FRA: The French Revolution: Radical Republic
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME3148" #Napoleon Bonaparte
	desc = "EVENTHIST3148"
	#-#

	[COLOR=Yellow]date = { day = 8 month = november year = 1799 } #18 Brumaire[/COLOR]
	[COLOR=Red]#offset = 10 
	#deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1799 }[/COLOR]

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3148A" #We need Brilliant Leadership!
		[COLOR=Red]#command = { type = wakemonarch which = 049525 } #Napoléon Bonaparte[/COLOR]
		command = { type = setflag which = Napoleon_rank0 } #Empereur Napoléon#
		[COLOR=Red]#command = { type = sleepmonarch which = 049524 } #Le Consulat[/COLOR]
		command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 2 }
		command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = INNOVATIVE value = 3 }
		command = { type = domestic which = QUALITY value = 1 }
		command = { type = land value = 2000 }
		command = { type = ART which = -2 value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = -150 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = -150 }
		command = { type = relation which = SPA value = -150 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRU value = -150 }
		command = { type = relation which = RUS value = -150 }
		command = { type = relation which = SWE value = -150 }
		command = { type = stability value = 6 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 21019 } #ENG: The Rise of Napoleon
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = trigger which = 12124 } #FRA: First Consul [/COLOR] 
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3148B" #We don't want a new Caesar!
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = wakemonarch which = 049524 } #Le Consulat [/COLOR] 
		command = { type = setflag which = Napoleon_rank1 } #Général Napoléon#
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = SPA value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRU value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = RUS value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = SWE value = 100 }
		command = { type = diplomats value = 6 }
		command = { type = treasury value = 300 }
		command = { type = stability value = 3 }
		[COLOR=Red]#command = { type = trigger which = 21019 } #ENG: The Rise of Napoleon[/COLOR]
	}
}

and modification to following events:
Code: 
# First Consul #
event = {		[COLOR=Yellow]#triggered by FRA_3148 A[/COLOR]
	id = 12124	
	[COLOR=Red]trigger = { monarch = 049525 } #Napoléon Bonaparte[/COLOR]
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME12124" #First Consul
	desc = "EVENTHIST12124"
	#-#

	[COLOR=Red]#date = { day = 10 month = november year = 1799 }
	#offset = 5
	#deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1799 }[/COLOR]

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME40116A" #Excellent!
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 2 }
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = wakemonarch which = 049525 } #Napoléon Bonaparte[/COLOR]
	}
}

Code: 
#Napoleon Bonaparte#
event = {
	id = 170402	
	trigger = {
		flag = Napoleon_rank0
		[COLOR=Red]#leader = 049895 #Bonaparte (FRA)[/COLOR]
	}
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170402" #The brilliant Napoleon
	desc = "EVENTHIST170402"
	#-#

	date = { day = 8 month = november year = 1799 }
	[COLOR=Yellow]offset = 5
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1799 }[/COLOR]

	action_a = {
		name = "[COLOR=MediumTurquoise]ACTIONNAME3148A" #We need Brilliant Leadership![/COLOR]
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 049897 } #Napoleon (FRA)
	}
}

MY SUGGESTIONS about texts:

EVENTNAME170401;The brilliant Napoleon;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST170401;Once again, Napoleon Bonaparte will lead our armies.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME170401A;We need our First Consul;;;;;;;;;;


Code: 
#Napoleon Bonaparte#
event = {
	id = 170401	
	trigger = {
		flag = Napoleon_rank1
		[COLOR=Red]#leader = 049895 #Bonaparte (FRA)[/COLOR]
	}
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "EVENTNAME170401" #The brilliant Napoleon
	desc = "EVENTHIST170401"
	#-#

	date = { day = 8 month = november year = 1799 }
	[COLOR=Yellow]offset = 5
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1799 }[/COLOR]

	action_a = {
		name = "[COLOR=MediumTurquoise]ACTIONNAME3148A" #We need Brilliant Leadership![/COLOR]
		command = { type = wakeleader which = 049896 } #Bonaparte (FRA)
	}
}

MY SUGGESTIONS about texts:

EVENTNAME170401;The brilliant Bonaparte;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST170401;Once again, our 'Citoyen Bonaparte' will lead our armies.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME170401A;We need a brilliant Republican General instead;;;;;;;;;;


###################################


And about ENG events concerning Napoleon and Robespierre (here are some changes):


Code: 
#The Rise of Napoleon#
event = {		[COLOR=Yellow]#triggered by FRA_3149 A[/COLOR]
	id = 21019
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME21019" #The Rise of Napoleon
	desc = "EVENTHIST21019"
	#-#Across the Channel, Napoleon has risen to power in France, a portent to future problems with France.

	action_a = {
		[COLOR=MediumTurquoise]name = "ACTIONNAME3637A" #We are in his hands and must pay[/COLOR]
		command = { }
	}
}
What does it mean? :confused:
ACTIONNAME3637A It is the same text entry used in ENG_21016 (or 21017) Pitt (or Fox) is Prime Minister and in ENG_21125 (French revolutionary wars) and ENG_21128 (Napoleonic wars)...

Maybe something like "The Jacobins threaten the balance" or "Napoleon threatens the balance" with correspondent actionnames is better instead of using 'ubiquitous' ACTIONNAME3637A "We are in his hands and must pay" , isn't it?...




Code: 
#Reaction to the Reign of Terror#
event = {
	id = 21011
	trigger = {
		event = 21017 #ENG: Fox is Prime Minister
		[COLOR=Yellow]event = 12121 #FRA: Robespierre and the Reign of Terror (previously FRA_3145 The Massacres of September)[/COLOR]
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME21011" #Reaction to the Reign of Terror
	desc = "EVENTHIST21011"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1792 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1794 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21011A" #Fox Plays Down the Worst Excesses Across the Channel
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 50 }
		command = { type = manpower value = -15 }
	}
}


EDIT: updated continuously... :)
 
Last edited:
WAR COMMANDS IN ACTION A: Do we need them? Here are a few which could endanger England imo:

Code: 
#The Raid on Cadiz#

event = {
	id = 21119
	trigger = {
		event = 21118
		exists = SPA
		NOT = {
			war = { country = ENG country = SPA }
			alliance = { country = ENG country = SPA }
			vassal = { country = ENG country = SPA }
			vassal = { country = SPA country = ENG }
			OR = {
				religion = catholic
				religion = counterreform
			}
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME21119" #The Raid on Cadiz
	desc = "EVENTHIST21119"
	#-#With Charles I still angry over his rude treatment at the hands of the Spanish court and Buckingham eager to regain popularity after the marriage of Charles to Henrietta Maria, a decision was made to sack the city of Cadiz. The expedition was a costly failure. Although English troops made it ashore, they did little plundering and much drinking, and the Royal Navy proved to be in a state of shabby disrepair. Parliament, angry over the failed expedition, blamed Buckingham, and called for his impeachment. To save his minister, Charles dissolved the parliament in spite of not receiving the appropriations he needed. Sir John Eliot, a leader in Commons was placed in the tower, and Charles resorted to the largest forced loan in English history to finance his government. Twenty-Seven members of Commons were jailed for refusing to contribute to the loan, and the cost to Charles in terms of the goodwill of the merchants and the gentry were enormous.

	date = { day = 15 month = August year = 1625 }
	offset = 45
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = September year = 1625 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21119A" #Let us plunder the riches of Spain!
		[COLOR=MediumTurquoise]command = { type = war which = SPA }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = cash value = 150 }
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = trade value = -250 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21119B" #We cannot afford a costly war!
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = -1 }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 21120 } #ENG: Buckingham Aids the Huguenots
	}
}
Code: 
#Buckingham Aids the Huguenots#

event = {
	id = 21120
	trigger = {
		event = 21119
		NOT = {
			OR = {
				alliance = { country = ENG country = FRA }
				vassal = { country = ENG country = FRA }
				vassal = { country = FRA country = ENG }
			}
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "EVENTNAME21120" #Buckingham Aids the Huguenots
	desc = "EVENTHIST21120"
	#-#Eager to redeem himself after the failure of the attack on Cadiz, and taking advantage of existing antagonism towards France, Buckingham assembled a fleet of ninety ships and 10,000 men to relieve the besieged Huguenot city of La Rochelle. Like the Cadiz expedition, the La Rochelle adventure was ill-conceived and poorly executed. An already dangerously antagonized parliament was further outraged by Buckingham's latest blunder, and ultimately responded with the Petition of Right.

	date = { day = 15 month = March year = 1627 }
	offset = 90
	deathdate = { day = 15 month = June year = 1627 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21120A" #We trust our Chief Minister's judgement
		[COLOR=MediumTurquoise]command = { type = war which = FRA }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = INF which = 247 value = 10000 } #Anglia
		command = { type = warships which = 247 value = 10 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21120B" #Buckingham must be controlled
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 25 }
	}
}

Code: 
#Spain Tires of England's Interference#
event = {
	id = 21053
	trigger = {
		event = 21040
		event = 21042
		event = 21044
		OR = {
			event = 21046
			event = 21049
		}
		NOT = { relation = { country = ENG data = 0 } }
	}
	random = no
	country = SPA
	name = "EVENTNAME21053" #Spain Tires of England's Interference
	desc = "EVENTHIST21053"
	#-#Years of England's privateering in the Spanish Main, coupled with English support for the Dutch rebels, pushes Spain to the brink of war with England.  The Spanish people yearn for revenge against the vile Protestant heathens of England, led by their excommunicated Queen.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1603 }
	offset = 100
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1603 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21053A" #It Is Time To Exact Revenge!
		[COLOR=MediumTurquoise]command = { type = war which = ENG }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
		command = { type = warships which = 433 value = 15 }
		command = { type = INF which = 433 value = 10000 } #Galicia
		command = { type = CAV which = 433 value = 5000 } #Galicia
		command = { type = manpower value = 10 }
		command = { type = treasury value = 100 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME21053B" #The English Do Not Concern Us
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
	}
}
Couldn't we use "CB commands" instead?
I agree that France goes to war agaisnt Burgundy in 1477 and I would like to see her DOW Austria in the French Revolutionary Wars and in possible colonial wars agaisnt England or in the Italian Wars agaisnt Spain, because they were big, but not in these minor wars which provoke unwanted gains of enemy's core provinces...





And here, there is another event:

Code: 
### Events by Chanda "Phillip V" Choun ###
#Cambodia asks for aid#
event = {
	id = 65149
	random = no
	country = SPA
	name = "EVENTNAME65149" #Cambodia asks for aid
	desc = "EVENTHIST65149"
	#-#Hard-pressed by the Thai, King Sattha (1576-94) of Cambodia surrounded himself with a personal guard of Spanish and Portuguese mercenaries, and in 1593 asked the Spanish governor of the Phillipines for aid. Attracted by the prospects of establishing a Spanish protectorate in Cambodia and of converting the monarch to Christianity, the governor sent a force of 120 men.

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME65149A" #Send them aid and make them our protectorate
		[COLOR=MediumTurquoise]command = { type = war which = AYU }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = vassal which = CAM }
		command = { type = trigger which = 140009 } #CAM: Spanish Intervention
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME65149B" #We don't want to make a risky commitment
		command = { type = trigger which = 140010 } #CAM: Spanish Refusal
	}
}
Should Spain DOW Ayutthaya even if she isn't arrived in the Philippines and maybe doesn't know anything of South East Asia?
 
About SPA_285070, there is a problem with breakvassal command (always bugged...). I suggest to let SPA_285070 as it is and have a twin event with Bordic's commands but with a command in trigger to check is SPA is vassal of FRA. All events with 285070 in trigger should test 285070 OR new event (I didn't check if any event really needs 285070).

About war commands, I agree too, especially conditions for a war between SPA and AYU.

Speaking of Napoléon as WEAKMONARCH is not exactly the reality! :p :D
 
Last edited:
szmik said:
there're 2 events about moving Burgundian capital: event 1000072 in HYW_Burgundy file with no dates set and event 137000 in specific_Burgundy file which occurs between 1430 and 1440, but has no chance to fire because the other always fires first.

event 1000072 gives more cores.

Is it WAD?
Click to expand...
The event 1000072 is part of the sequence that restores France to Charles Valois and Burgundy to Mary after Charles 'the Rash' dies as King of France leaving Mary as heir in 1486.

137000 is the historical event that fires for BUR usually when BUR inherits Brabant in the 30s.

You're saying that 1000072 fires before 137000?
 
According to my previous post 241 here in this thread about Napoléon, here are the text entries of FRA_3148 and FRA_12124:

EVENTNAME3148;Napoleon Bonaparte;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST3148;Born in Corsica on 15th August 1768, Napoleon Bonaparte undertook military education at the royal military college of Brienne (graduated in 1785). A young artillery lieutenant when the French revolution erupted, he grabbed his first opportunity at the siege of Toulon in 1793 and then become the youngest general in the French revolutionary armies. A military genius, his victories in Italy in 1796 (and again 1800) and his campaign in Egypt 1798 would sharpen his thirst for power and he would become consul, then Emperor, marking the dawn of a new age.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME3148A;We need Brilliant Leadership!;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME3148B;We don't want a new Caesar!;;;;;;;;;;

EVENTNAME12124;First Consul;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST12124;In November of 1799, Napoleon took part in the coup d'Etat de Brumaire. Two members of the Directory (Sieyes and Ducos) needing a popular general to neutralize the army and inspire the people, decided to use Napoleon. Violence broke out during the council session, which was quelled by Napoleon's soldiers (some of the council fled through the windows). The remaining council members approved a provisional executive government of three consuls. Napoleon was able to in effect seize power by having himself proclaimed First Consul. His position and a new constitution were shortly confirmed by popular vote, and the coming years he was able to unify the nation and reform the finances and all levels of government.;;;;;;;;;;



But with the changes I suggested in post 238, 240 and 241 above, I would also suggest to invert EVENTHIST3148 with EVENTHIST12124 and change EVENTNAME3148 and EVENTNAME12124.


Here are my proposals:


EVENTNAME3148;The 18 Brumaire;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST3148;In November of 1799, Napoléon took part in the coup d'Etat of 18 and 19 Brumaire (9 and 10 November). Two members of the Directory (Sieyès and Ducos) needing a popular general to neutralize the army and inspire the people, decided to use Napoléon. Violence broke out during the council session, which was quelled by Napoléon's soldiers (some of the council fled through the windows). The remaining council members approved a provisional executive government of three consuls. Napoléon was able to in effect seize power by having himself proclaimed First Consul. His position and a new constitution were shortly confirmed by popular vote, and the coming years he was able to unify the nation and reform the finances and all levels of government.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME3148A;We need Brilliant Leadership!;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME3148B;We don't want a new Caesar!;;;;;;;;;;

EVENTNAME12124;General Bonaparte First Consul;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST12124;Born in Corsica on 15th August 1768, Napoléon Bonaparte undertook military education at the royal military college of Brienne (graduated in 1785). A young artillery lieutenant when the French revolution erupted, he grabbed his first opportunity at the siege of Toulon in 1793 and then become the youngest general in the French revolutionary armies. A military genius, his victories in Italy in 1796 (and again 1800) and his campaign in Egypt 1798 would sharpen his thirst for power and he would become consul, then Emperor, marking the dawn of a new age.;;;;;;;;;;

That means:

FRA_3148 is no longer called "Napoleon Bonaparte" but "The 18 Brumaire"

FRA_12124 is no longer called "First Consul" but "General Bonaparte First Consul"

All changes should be done in comments included in these two events and in comments to the monarchs Consulat et Napoléon Bonaparte...
 
Last edited:
I do not know if this is the right place to post this, but it seems habsburg and hapsburg are used interchangeably, shouldn't one spelling be chosen and used everywhere?
 
from AGCEEP_Specific_UzbekHorde.eue
event 325006 - The Formation of the Kazakh Horde
part of action_a looks like:
command = { type = secedeprovince which = U00 value = 578 } #Ichim
command = { type = secedeprovince which = U00 value = 512 } #Tenghiz
command = { type = secedeprovince which = U00 value = 513 } #Orsk
command = { type = secedeprovince which = U00 value = 514 } #Irgiz
Click to expand...

There should be SIB instead of U00 (Khiva)
 
War command

Bordic said:
Couldn't we use "CB commands" instead?
I agree that France goes to war agaisnt Burgundy in 1477 and I would like to see her DOW Austria in the French Revolutionary Wars and in possible colonial wars agaisnt England or in the Italian Wars agaisnt Spain, because they were big, but not in these minor wars which provoke unwanted gains of enemy's core provinces...
Click to expand...
It might be a useful command for truly important conflicts, but this is not the case here. A CB combined with lowered relations is better.
 
About the "Don't know what to do (bugs 1.38)" Ottomans get core on Padolia. [event 301008 for them] When you start the 1648 scenario Ottomans got core on Jedisan and they own it - they have access to Padolia + they are at war with Poland and Venice. Ukraine start this scenario in war with Poland, they ask for help from Ottomans and in return they became vassals [event UKR 25004 option C]. Ottomans fight Poland and Venice, conquer Padolia and Crete. So thats why they have that core. event 25004 should trigger 301008 ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back