Apr 6, 2006
450
0
There is mess in Bahmanids empire event file. Look on commands which change monarchs stats. Also Bahamnids and Orissa has those province based events with problem. Bahamnids in Bastam province has event in which:
-1 fortress
+1 fortress

The same with Orissa event "Assiamilation of the Reddy".
Fortress -1
Fortress + 1.

And if it is agceep interest then Curland had different flag with cancer not used one...
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
2
For Bahmanids, bugfix for monarch stats:
Code:
event = {
	id = 190104
	random = no
	country = THE
	name = "EVENTNAME190104" #Famine in the Deccan
	desc = "EVENTHIST190104"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1423 }
	offset = 180
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1424 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME190104A" #Take advantage of the dry season to attack our foes
		command = { type = stability value = -2 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 6 }
		[COLOR=gold]command = { type = ADM which = -2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = MIL which = 1 value = 24 }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = casusbelli which = VIJ value = 24 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = ORI value = 24 }
		command = { type = population which = -2 value = -2000 }
		command = { type = population which = -1 value = -2000 }
		command = { type = population which = -1 value = -2000 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME190104B" #Do what we can for the people
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 18 value = 4 }
		command = { type = treasury value = -25 }
		[COLOR=gold]command = { type = ADM which = 1 value = 24 }
		command = { type = MIL which = -2 value = 12 }[/COLOR]
		command = { type = population which = -2 value = -1000 }
		command = { type = population which = -1 value = -1000 }
		command = { type = population which = -1 value = -1000 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 190105 } #THE: Conquest of Warangal
	}
}
EVENTHIST190104:The two years following the ascession of Ahmad Shah to the throne were ones of no rain and poor harvests. The terrible conditions drove the people to sedition, but the Sultan actually took advantage of the abnormally dry conditions to traverse the cotton plains lying between Vijayanagar and Kulbarga, normally impassable for troops in wet weather.

Problem with -1 not displayed (bug) => -2 and halfened duration

Code:
event = {
	id = 190105
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 563 data = -1 } #Bastar
	}
	random = no
	country = THE
	name = "EVENTNAME190105" #Conquest of Warangal
	desc = "EVENTHIST190105"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1425 }
	offset = 180
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1427 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME190105A" #It is ours!
		command = { type = provincetax which = 563 value = 1 } #Bastar
		command = { type = relation which = ORI value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = VIJ value = -25 }
		[COLOR=DeepSkyBlue]command = { type = fortress which = 563 value = -1 } #Bastar
		command = { type = fortress which = 563 value = 1 } #Bastar[/COLOR]
		command = { type = addcore which = 563 } #Bastar
	}
}
EVENTHIST190105:Although the Hindu empires of Vijayanagar and Orissa bordered the Bahmani Sultanate, they were not the only enemies of the Sultan. Ahmad Shah captured the Hindu kingdom of Warangal in 1425 in a lightning campaign that lasted only a few short months, completely wiping out the Hindu kingdom.

According to description, I understand fortress should be decreased but confirmation is needed.

For Orissa:
Code:
event = {
	id = 249040
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 565 data = -1 } #Yanam
	}
	random = no
	province = 565 #Yanam
	name = "EVENTNAME249040" #Assimilation of the Reddy
	desc = "EVENTHIST249040"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1425 }
	offset = 1000
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1450 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME249040A" #Their lands are ours
		command = { type = provincetax which = 565 value = 2 } #Yanam
		command = { type = provincemanpower which = 565 value = 1 } #Yanam
		[COLOR=DeepSkyBlue]command = { type = fortress which = 565 value = -1 } #Yanam
		command = { type = fortress which = 565 value = 1 } #Yanam[/COLOR]
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 249001 } #ORI: Bhanudeva's Expedition against the Reddy
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 328051 } #VIJ: The Reddy invade Orissa
	}
}
EVENTHIST249040:After the breakup of the Kakatiya empire several of its feudatory states remained independent against the pressure of Muslim invasions from the north and west and Hindu expansion from the south and east. The Reddy kingdoms of Kondavidu and Rajahmundry defended themselves fiercely, but eventually both were conquered during the wars between Orissa and Vijayanagar. Once conquered, these lands proved relatively easy to govern.

Same problem as above.
 

Khephren

Watery Tart
23 Badges
Mar 29, 2003
1.285
2
  • Victoria 2
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • 500k Club
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • March of the Eagles
  • Iron Cross
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II
Ahmed AA said:
And if it is agceep interest then Curland had different flag with cancer not used one...

This was the naval flag..not the state flag
 
Apr 6, 2006
450
0
For those frotreses. In secenario it gives these provinces without any fortress...


Is this right?
command = { type = ADM which = 24 value = 1 }
command = { type = MIL which = 24 value = -1 }
Example:
event = {
id = 190104
random = no
country = THE
name = "EVENTNAME190104" #Famine in the Deccan
desc = "EVENTHIST190104"
#-#The two years following the ascession of Ahmad Shah to the throne were ones of no rain and poor harvests. The terrible conditions drove the people to sedition, but the Sultan actually took advantage of the abnormally dry conditions to traverse the cotton plains lying between Vijayanagar and Kulbarga, normally impassable for troops in wet weather.

date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1423 }
offset = 180
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1424 }

action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME190104A" #Take advantage of the dry season to attack our foes
command = { type = stability value = -2 }
command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 6 }
command = { type = ADM which = 24 value = -1 }
command = { type = MIL which = 24 value = 1 }
command = { type = casusbelli which = VIJ value = 24 }
command = { type = casusbelli which = ORI value = 24 }
command = { type = population which = -2 value = -2000 }
command = { type = population which = -1 value = -2000 }
command = { type = population which = -1 value = -2000 }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME190104B" #Do what we can for the people
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = revoltrisk which = 18 value = 4 }
command = { type = treasury value = -25 }
command = { type = ADM which = 24 value = 1 }
command = { type = MIL which = 24 value = -1 }
command = { type = population which = -2 value = -1000 }
command = { type = population which = -1 value = -1000 }
command = { type = population which = -1 value = -1000 }
command = { type = sleepevent which = 190105 } #THE: Conquest of Warangal
 

Garbon

Sultan d'Afrique
73 Badges
Feb 1, 2002
9.750
189
www.crystalempiregames.com
  • For The Glory
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Deus Vult
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Divine Wind
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
YodaMaster said:
According to description, I understand fortress should be decreased but confirmation is needed.

Not a bug for either event. Those two provinces don't start off in 1419 with forts as part of a way to intimate that they parts of them were actually independent. After the conquests though, they get forts to simulate their complete incorporation. However, as we didn't want to give a fort upgrade, if those nations happened to build a fort prior to the conquest events, there is first the lose fort command (which won't do anything if there isn't a fort there - thuse serves as a check) and then the addition of the fort.
 

Bordic

Magister Militum
4 Badges
May 29, 2004
4.482
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Deus Vult
  • For The Glory
  • 500k Club
In testing some suggested events with 1419 scenario (without hotfix) around 1530s two messages appeared:

Attempt to create a leader with existing leader id# 8800
Attempt to create a monarch with existing leader id# 7301

I have checked the sav file, either seem to refer to some leaders/monarchs of Mughal empire (MOG and U01).

#--------------------------#


A little typo here in monarchs.nap: (24 january instead of previous 19 november)

Code:
historicalmonarch = {
	id = { type = 6 id = 06735 }
	startdate = {
		day = [COLOR=Yellow]24 [/COLOR] 
		month = [COLOR=Yellow]january [/COLOR] 
		year = 1495
	}
	deathdate = {
		day = 7
		month = october
		year = 1496
	}
	name = "Ferdinando II" #changed from Ferrante II
	DIP = 5
	MIL = 4
	ADM = 4
	remark = "Ferrandino, he retook the Kingdom after the French Invasion"
}
 

Bordic

Magister Militum
4 Badges
May 29, 2004
4.482
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Deus Vult
  • For The Glory
  • 500k Club
szmik said:
there're 2 events about moving Burgundian capital: event 1000072 in HYW_Burgundy file with no dates set and event 137000 in specific_Burgundy file which occurs between 1430 and 1440, but has no chance to fire because the other always fires first.

event 1000072 gives more cores.

Is it WAD?
Reading through events folder:
HYW_BUR_1000072 is triggered by HYW_FRA_1000071 which is triggered by HYW_FRA_1000081 action A in year 1486!

Only BUR_137000 can fire as for now.

Maybe it is there if Brabant (378) is not under Burgundian rule in 1430s... :confused:
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
2
Garbon said:
Not a bug for either event. Those two provinces don't start off in 1419 with forts as part of a way to intimate that they parts of them were actually independent. After the conquests though, they get forts to simulate their complete incorporation. However, as we didn't want to give a fort upgrade, if those nations happened to build a fort prior to the conquest events, there is first the lose fort command (which won't do anything if there isn't a fort there - thuse serves as a check) and then the addition of the fort.
Understood. I add "only +1 if no fortress before" comment for the two involved events.
 

Norrefeldt

Porphyrogenitus
Aug 1, 2001
7.433
0
Visit site
Garbon said:
However, as we didn't want to give a fort upgrade, if those nations happened to build a fort prior to the conquest events, there is first the lose fort command (which won't do anything if there isn't a fort there - thuse serves as a check) and then the addition of the fort.
Is it really possible to reduce a fort level 1 to 0 by event? I have never seen it happen.
 
Apr 6, 2006
450
0
I do not know much about event writing but is this OK:

command = { type = ADM which = 24 value = -1 }
command = { type = MIL which = 24 value = 1 }

Or should be:

command = { type = ADM which = -1 value = 24 }
command = { type = MIL which = 1 value = 24 }

?????????
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
2
Remaining bugs in AGCEEP_Specific_Japan.eue

6953 in AGCEEP_Specific_Japan.eue needs 6932

Code:
#War against the Yuki#
event = {
	id = 6953
	[COLOR=DeepSkyBlue]trigger = { event = 6932 }[/COLOR]
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME6953" #War against the Yuki
	desc = "EVENTHIST6953"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1441 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1441 }

	action_a = {
		name = "OK"
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 685 } #Kanto
	}
}
EVENTHIST6953: Yuki Ujitomo has raised the remnants of Ashikaga Mochiuji's army against the Kyoto Bakufu. The army had been hidden from the Bakufu by Isshiki Yoshitsura in the Kanto area and marches against Edo.

This event can't fire because vanilla major_nip.txt 6932 is not included in AGCEEP. 6932 is about the start of the Eikyo war (reworked in AGCEEP with 242000). Since AGCEEP Eikyo war seems to include effects of 6953 in reworked 6933 and 6934 "The final act in the Eikyo war":
EVENTHIST6933: Tashikaga Mochiuji`s sons Haruo and Yasuo have joined their father`s cause. They now defy our government by gathering armies in Kanto and marching against us.

I suggest to simply delete 6953. If not a good idea, just remove the trigger in 6953.

Since texts for 6933 and 6934 are exactly the same, I suggest simplifying text.csv, only keeping 6933 texts and using them for 6934.


6976 in AGCEEP_Specific_Japan.eue needs 6943

Code:
#Assassination of Hosokawa Masamoto#
event = {
	id = 6976
	[COLOR=DeepSkyBlue]trigger = { event = 6943 }[/COLOR]
	random = no
	country = NIP
	name = "EVENTNAME6976" #Assasination of Hosokawa Masamoto
	desc = "EVENTHIST6976"
	#-#

	date = { day = 15 month = june year = 1507 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1507 }

	action_a = { name = "OK"
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = -1 }
	}
}
EVENTHIST6976: The assassination of Kanrei Hosokawa Masamoto by his adopted son Sumiyuki lead to a bitter fight between two factions, lead by Hosokawa Takakuni and Hosokawa Sumimoto, in the Hosokawa family over the position of Kanrei. It mirrored the earlier conflict within the Hatakeyama family. The ultimate result was an almost complete destruction of the Hosokawa family. They became vassals to earlier Hosokawa vassals.

This event can't fire because vanilla major_nip.txt 6943 is not included in AGCEEP. 6943 is about the end of the Onin War (reworked in AGCEEP) and is never slept in vanilla.

I suggest to remove the trigger in 6976. Better idea?
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
2
Ahmed AA said:
This I wanted to point in Bahmanid empire event file. There is lot of this kind.
I checked, only those mentioned in post #182 were wrong. All other DIP/MIL/ADM commands in this file are right.
 

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
2
There is a problem with 1648 scenario: Events ENG_3026 and ENG_3771 fire the same day in 1649. One of them should be slept by ENG_3025 (before the start of the scenario).
Putting 3771 (ahistorical) in sleepevent section of 1648.inc doesn't work and I don't know how to declare Prince Ruppert (two leaders, General and Admiral) slept for this scenario. Both leaders are not dormant in leaders.eng. :confused:

I posted related questions here.

For the events, a solution can be having 3026 firing the day before 3771 and add a condition in 3771 for 3026 to not have fired before but maybe there is a more elegant way...
 
Last edited:

Bordic

Magister Militum
4 Badges
May 29, 2004
4.482
0
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Deus Vult
  • For The Glory
  • 500k Club
I don't know if we can call it a bug but,

couldn't we better fix the position of the port of Constantinople by putting it in the sea of Marmara? That is because the graphics of the fleets fighting each other in the Black Sea will cover the graphics for the port...