YodaMaster said:Try to remove line:
in event 285202 in AGCEEP_Specific_Spain.eueCode:trigger = { event = 172002 }
This did the trick!!!
YodaMaster said:Try to remove line:
in event 285202 in AGCEEP_Specific_Spain.eueCode:trigger = { event = 172002 }
### 12050 Assassination of Henry III ###
## Revised by Count Six ##
event = {
id = 170111
random = no
country = FRA
name = "The Assassination of Henry III"
desc = "EVENTHIST12049"
style = 2
date = { day = 2 month = august year = 1589 }
action_a = {
name = "Assassination of Henry III"
command = { type = inherit which = FPR }
command = { type = stability value = -2 }
command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
command = { type = desertion which = -1 value = 5000 }
command = { type = trigger which = 172002 } #FUC: The Cardinal of Bourbon
}
}
First, read posts in this thread to see if this bug (CTD) wasn't already reported and post #361 just above, in particular.Fnuco said:In my current Austria GC on MyMap+AGCEEP, the game crashes when France inherits the Huguenots.
What to do?
YodaMaster said:First, read posts in this thread to see if this bug (CTD) wasn't already reported and post #361 just above, in particular.
EDIT: But this is a MyMap bug in your case, not an AGCEEP one anymore...![]()
### The Cardinal of Bourbon ###
## by Count Six ##
event = {
id = 172002
[COLOR=Red]trigger = {
event = 170111 #FRA: The Assassination of Henry III
}[/COLOR]
random = no
country = FUC
name = "EVENTNAME172002" #The Cardinal of Bourbon
desc = "EVENTHIST12049"
#-#During a siege of Paris using the combined forces of Henry III and Henry of Navarre, a Catholic monk assassinated Henry III. The King's bodyguards immediately threw themselves at Henry of Navarre's feet and swore fealty to him. The Catholic League responded by proclaiming Cardinal de Bourbon the true king of France. But Henry suprised everyone by abjuring Protestantism. Paris soon surrendered and his legitimacy soared. The Catholic League suffered continued defeats and eventually dispersed.
[COLOR=Red]date = { day = 2 month = august year = 1589 }[/COLOR]
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME172002A" #Vive Charles X
command = { type = war which = FRA }
command = { type = trigger which = 285202 } #SPA: Parma's Intervention in France
}
}
Twoflower always said it should be Wirtemberg, so I think we should use that everywhere.YodaMaster said:Not really a bug but for EU2 timeframe, should we use Wirtemberg instead of Würtemberg (or Württemberg) in all texts? Or is Württemberg accurate for some cases (and which ones)?
EDIT: I found the answer here:
Wirtemberg is accurate until 1806.
Do I have to replace Württemberg/Würtemberg (and ü or u) with Wirtemberg in all texts? I can do it with one click over all AGCEEP files but I need confirmation.
What should be done after 1806 for events: Wirtemberg for "consistency" or accurate Württemberg?
It doesn't guarantee that the province Bulgaria is a prt of it, just that Dobruja isn't a part. As long as there are several provinces in minimum, the state might appear in any of them, if it revolts.Toio said:then should we go with this:
BUL = { #Bulgaria
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
expirydate = { year = 1820 }
minimum = { 321 356 }
extra = {358 }
capital = 356
group = orthodox
}
as this gaurantees that bulgaria province will be one of the revolters
Norrefeldt said:It doesn't guarantee that the province Bulgaria is a prt of it, just that Dobruja isn't a part. As long as there are several provinces in minimum, the state might appear in any of them, if it revolts.
I see your point now. Can you test your proposal (ie. without Dobrudja) with Macedonia and Rumelia only in rebels hands and see if Bulgaria appears or not?Toio said:if you exclude Dobruja, then rumelia and macedonia can never form bulgaria as they are seperated. one has to form with bulgaria to form bulgaria.
I cannot imagine , nor ever seen a nation form with 2 provinces which are not attached.
let me know if I am incorrect.
Good point, SIL was already fixed in POL_258105 for next version but not in POL_258106.almoravid said:Polish event 285105 'Treaty of Kierzmark' triggers on a war between Hungary and Bohemia. This is from an obsolete Bohemia setup from back when we had no Hussites and Romanists as states.
- It should trigger on a war between HUN and SIL (Hussites). Currently it triggers on a war between HUN and BOH.
- In option a, it should drop relations with SIL, not with BOH. Maybe relations with ROM should be improved by 50.
- In option b, it should improve relations with SIL, not with BOH. Maybe relations with ROM should be decreased by 50.
Polish event 258106 'Edict of Wielun' is from the same outdated setup.
- it should trigger on relations with SIL, not with BOH
- option a should drop relations with SIL, not with BOH. Maybe one could also add improvement in relations with ROM
- option b should improbe relation with SIL, not with BOH. Maybe it also should drop relations with ROM.
- dito in option c.
YodaMaster said:I see your point now. Can you test your proposal (ie. without Dobrudja) with Macedonia and Rumelia only in rebels hands and see if Bulgaria appears or not?
You had a game where it formed in Rumelia and Dobruja immidiately joined, since it's a minimum province. As I understand it, in the exact same game situation, with this updated revolt file, you would get Bulgaria in Rumelia only.Toio said:if you exclude Dobruja, then rumelia and macedonia can never form bulgaria as they are seperated. one has to form with bulgaria to form bulgaria.
I cannot imagine , nor ever seen a nation form with 2 provinces which are not attached.
let me know if I am incorrect.
Already reported with bugfix here.Junker Egge said:Hello
I've just started a game and tried to create Germany as Austria. Now it's 1501 and the Diet at Augsburg event fires. When it does I recieve several error meassages regarding leaders that are already in use and will be created a second time. If I ignore these meassages save and reload more messages appear about some provinces that are owned by Spain and Denmark but have no controller. I wish I could tell the exact reason for these errors but I'm not really able to understand the leader tags and events. I could send a savegame to recreate the error if anybody finds that necessary.
Thank you in advance.
I will try it too but can you please send me corresponding savefile for your tests in zipped format at yodamaster@agceep.com? It could save me time for the setup.Toio said:Tried about 5 times, no formation of Bulgaria. when only Macedonia and Rumelia are in rebel hands.
Maybe you need to test as well.
Norrefeldt said:You had a game where it formed in Rumelia and Dobruja immidiately joined, since it's a minimum province. As I understand it, in the exact same game situation, with this updated revolt file, you would get Bulgaria in Rumelia only.
BUL = { #Bulgaria
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
expirydate = { year = 1820 }
minimum = { 321 356 }
extra = { 320 358 }
capital = 356
group = orthodox
}
BUL = { #Bulgaria
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
expirydate = { year = 1820 }
minimum = { 356 321 }
extra = { 320 358 }
capital = 356
group = orthodox
}
BUL = { #Bulgaria
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
expirydate = { year = 1820 }
minimum = { 356 321 }
extra = { 358 }
capital = 356
group = orthodox
}
Minimum was ID province that you could release when create vassal. and ID province that needed to create country via revolt. So you must need prov 356 or 321 revolt to have Bulgaria form. Meaning if only provs 356 or provs 321 revoltToio said:Code:[CODE]BUL = { #Bulgaria date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 } expirydate = { year = 1820 } minimum = { 356 321 } extra = { 358 } capital = 356 group = orthodox }
321: Rumelia
356: Bulgaria
320: Dobrudja
358: Macedonia