• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Leaders files

In 1.38 Deluxe, not needed files (good ones without double extension are present):
leaders.akk.akk
leaders.afg.afg
leaders.bra.bra
leaders.fra.fra
leaders.gra.gra
leaders.inc.inc
leaders.kzk.bak
leaders.per.per
leaders.rus.rus

In 1.38 Deluxe, to be renamed:
leaders.egy.txt ---> leaders.egy
 
I tried to load a game from previous version, and got message the file can't be opened (it's actually missing): AGCEEP/events/AI/BP_rag_ai_shift.txt

Is the omission of this file intentional?
 
Svantevid said:
I tried to load a game from previous version, and got message the file can't be opened (it's actually missing): AGCEEP/events/AI/BP_rag_ai_shift.txt

Is the omission of this file intentional?
Many changes between 1.37.1 and 1.38. Versions are not compatible.
You can try to fix the problem by editing your 1.37.1 savefile (and remove this entry in events section) but you could encounter other problems or conflicts.
 
WAD or BUG?

#The Quest for the New World#
event = {

id = 3152
trigger = { war = { country = SPA country = AZT } }
random = no
country = SPA
name = "EVENTNAME3152"
desc = "EVENTHIST3152"
style = 2
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1470 }
offset = 30
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1560 }
action_a ={ #A New Reconquista! A New Beginning!#
name = "ACTIONNAME3152A"
command = { type = stability value = 1 }
command = { type = treasury value = 300 }
command = { type = colonists value = 6 }
command = { type = missionaries value = 6 }
command = { type = conquistador which = -1 }
command = { type = conquistador which = -1 }
command = { type = conquistador which = -1 }
command = { type = explorer which = 902 }
command = { type = explorer which = 903 }
command = { type = explorer which = 904 }
command = { type = addcore which = 29 }
command = { type = addcore which = 27 }
}
}

EVENTHIST3152;After the Conquest of Granada, Spain was filled with veterans and warriors of the faith with nothing to do and many needs. Deeds and needs would be fulfilled as Cortez and Pizarro started out to conquer South- and Central America. All these people became the hacienda-owners and trader-barons of the New World bringing wealth both into their own pockets and the vaults of the Spanish treasury.;;;;;;;;;;7933



I would suggest a modification of commands for conquistadores and explorer (or at least only for explorers!) giving a -4 (colonies) for localization. 902, 903 and 904 are sea zones, so the command giving an explorer is always ignored, we need a province or colony with a port at least. Note that one conquistador has only 0.5 cavalry and one explorer 1 warship, maybe giving them some troops or ships with command -3 after either command for conquistador and explorer.



###################################################


#The Spanish Wedding#
event = {

id = 3179

trigger = {
exists = SPA
NOT = { war = { country = SPA country = HAB } }
}
random = no
country = HAB
name = "EVENTNAME3179"
desc = "EVENTHIST3179"
style = 1
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1519 }
offset = 5
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1520 }
action_a ={ #Let the Habsburg Empire be ruled from Vienna#
name = "ACTIONNAME3179A"
command = { type = trigger which = 3151 }
command = { type = relation which = SPA value = 50 }
command = { type = dynastic which = SPA }
command = { type = alliance which = SPA }
command = { type = treasury value = 1000 }
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 1 }
}
action_b ={ #Let the Habsburg Empire be ruled from Madrid#
name = "ACTIONNAME3179B"
command = { type = trigger which = 3731 }
command = { type = relation which = SPA value = 400 }
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = 2 }
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = -1 }
command = { type = diplomats value = -6 }
}
}

EVENTHIST3179;In 1496, when the King of Aragon Ferdinand and the Queen of Castile Isabella married their heir Joan the Mad to Habsburg heir Philip the Fair, they started the historical union between what would be called the Spanish and the Austria Habsburgs. The son from this marriage, Charles V, would become the emperor of the largest territory in Western Europe, having inherited the lands of Castile, Aragon, Burgundy and Austria. The Habsburgs would pursue this intra-family wedding policy till the end of the 17th century. From where do you want the Habsburg Empire to be ruled My Lord?;;;;;;;;;;7906



Shouldn't it be the other way around? action_A for a Spanish rule? AFAIK Charles ruled from Madrid and his brother ruled in Vienna.


###################################################

When you fire an event with the command = { type = alliance which = TAG }, the event displays a breakalliance action.
The problem seems to be in that strings:

in agceep v1.38 we have EE_ALL;Alliance with %s broken.;;;;;;;;;;9199

in vanilla 1.08 latest beta instead we have EE_ALL;Alliance with %s.;;;;;;;;;;7761



I suggest using the vanilla string... that removes the word "broken"!
 
YodaMaster said:
Not really a bug but in AGCEEP_Specific_KaraKoyunlu.eue, description for events 266011, 266012, 266013, 266015 and 266016 is only "?".

Thats something I do...when I'm lazy and didn't get around to making the descriptions (most of those events should never fire unless the player is particularly inept). Will work on.
 
Bordic said:
WAD or BUG?

#The Quest for the New World#
event = {

id = 3152


#The Spanish Wedding#
event = {

id = 3179

Actually those events are targetted for review. The cores on Aztecs have become an aberration. In my latest game with Genoa, SPA DoW the Aztecs and requested Campeche (29) despite not having discovered it! The Aztecs granted it, and somehow the province became owned by both simultaneously when the desertion of Campeche triggers upon discovering it, leading to a constant CTD until I spotted it. I am leaning more and more towards using cores only as cores, and not as AI bait.

The Spanish wedding is a curious event that is present in several forms and triggers in alternate ways in different excluding events. All the inheritance should be reviewed. As it is now, Milan rarely goes to Spain. It is the problem from having imperial lands, archdukal lands, and kingdom of Spain lands. I have to review them to see what is the best approach.
 
I have worked in the french version the last week.
Some know, for that, I used my own database. I have improved my programs, and I have checked all the files to found most of the bugs.
Well... I have founded lot of bugs ( :( )

NB : a same event can have more than one problem...



** ACTIONNAME5003 in the event 301008 in AGCEEP_Specific_Ottomans does not exist in text.csv. It should be ACTIONNAME5003A (or "Ok")

** It is not a bug but in FRA-170012 you have ACTIONAME170012A in action_a. As you have this entry in the text.csv, it works fine, but if we want to be coherent it should be ACTIONNAME170012A (with 2 'N')
You have exactly the same for SPA-285041 and SPA-285042.

** In the text.csv you have these texts in the 1.38, but there isn't any event in relation :

Code:
EVENTNAME285157;The fall of Tenochtitlan
EVENTHIST285157;When Hernando Cortes reached Tenochtitlan with 300 Spaniards and 3000 Tlaxcalans, he was received by Motehcuzoma. The Spaniards were horrified by the volume of the human sacrifices of the Aztecs, and overcome by greed over so much gold. Cortes demands on Motehcuzoma to abandon his pagan gods weakened his position as a god himself. Aware of his precarious position Cortes captured Motehcuzoma, but when news arrived that Panfilo de Narvaez had been sent by Diego Velazquez to capture him, he left Pedro de Alvarado in charge and went back with 80 men to Cempoala, where he half-defeated, half-convinced Narvaez army of 1500 men to join him, and then returned to Tenochtitlan with additional Tlaxcalan reinforcements. But in his absence Alvarado had managed to massacre half of the notables of the city, triggering a rebellion. Cortes exhorted Motehcuzoma to appease his subjects, but these killed him out of rage for being on the Spaniards side. Cortes understood that they had to retreat to Tlaxcala, but the secret nightly escape was discovered and 800 Spaniards and 5,000 Indian allies were killed, while the rest narrowly escaped, Cortes losing two fingers, in what was to be known as the Noche Triste (Sad Night), June 30, 1520. The time for diplomacy was gone. For a year Cortes sought new allies and reorganized and trained a new army, building ships to be transported and mounted in the lake, to siege and attack the water surrounded city, and in June 1521 he was back. In a month and a half the resistance was overcome, the city demolished, and the Empire won. Except for some guerrilla fighting in the mountains, the Aztecs bowed to their new master. When the Consejo de Indias learned of the conquest of the immensely rich empire, they dismissed Diego de Velazquez charges against Cortes.
ACTIONAME285157A;An Empire is won

EVENTNAME285154;Cortes disembarks in Cempoala and burns his ships
EVENTHIST285154;AI only event representing Cortes landing in Cempoala
ACTIONAME285154A;OK

EVENTNAME285155;Tlaxcala goes over to Spain
EVENTHIST285155;Hernando Cortes expedition was intended to collect tributes and gather information only, as Diego Velazquez was the -adelantado-, with a royal charter to take possession of new lands. But Cortes was going to seize his chance. In the Mexica lands, the Aztec Tlatoani, or Prime Speaker, Motehcuzoma Xocoyotzin (Angry Lord, Junior) had initiated a power concentration process, effectively becoming an emperor of the triple alliance and imposing the supremacy of Tenochtitlan over Texcoco and Tlacopan, and at the same time expanding the borders of the Aztec Empire. Due to his despotic nature he was impopular, but he was also superstitious. He identified certain signs and the presence of the strange men in the coasts, as the predicted return of the expelled god Quetzalcoatl to reclaim his kingdom. It was unthinkable to receive the mighty Plumed Serpent with hostility, and Motehcuzoma sent great presents to the conquistadores and requested them not to come to Tenochtitlan. By stimulating their greed, his effect was obviously the opposite, and Cortes skillfully obtained from his men the formal request to direct them in a quest for gold, and they promised him 20% of the benefits, after the royal 20% was deducted. Cortes founded Veracruz, sent an envoy to the king of Spain with letters, and burnt the ships to prevent the men loyal to Diego Velazquez from returning to Cuba with the news that Cortes had stepped to the other side of the law. Now only the triumph could save him. With 1300 Totonacas allies from Cempoala, the 400 Spaniards interned into the jungle, towards Tlaxcala, a nation subjugated by the Aztecs that could be gained to their side, according to the Totonacas. The Tlaxcalans were divided, but the faction hostile to the Spaniards was defeated in battle, and several thousand Tlaxcalan warriors joined Cortes side. The Spaniards were applying the tactics learned at the war of Granada, use the divisions within the enemy to their favor, and capture the enemy leader, deciding later if it was more advantageous to release him, to keep him prisoner, or simply to kill him. The Indians, weakened by the European diseases and bitterly divided, facilitated the conquest of great empires by very few men in what constitutes one of the most amazing pages of history. After a stop at the ceremonial center of Cholula, where a terrible massacre took place, because the Tlaxcalans had several accounts to settle, the capital of the Empire, bigger than any European city of the time, awaited.
ACTIONAME285155A;We have gained allies

EVENTNAME285156;More Tlaxcalans join our army
EVENTHIST285156;AI only event representing the alliance of Tlaxcala and Hernando Cortes
ACTIONAME285156A;OK


** The events 24023 and 24024 in AGCEEP_Specific_OrderStJohn.eue have no description
** The events 266011, 266012, 266013, 266014, 266015 , 266016 in AGCEEP_Specific_KaraKoyunlu.eue have no description


** The event 194015 in AGCEEP_Specific_Rajput.eue has no action_a and only an action_b. For the game, it is not a problem, this event is displayed but I don't know if you have forgotten the action_a or if you have just made a mispelling.


** You have 2 files (AGCEEP_EuropeIndia.eue, AGCEEP_Specific_Samarkand.eue) that aren't loaded by the game because they don't exist in the scenario file.


** In the AGCEEP_Specific_UzbekHorde.eue, the description for the action_a for the event 65018 is ACTIONNAME65018. It should be ACTIONNAME65018A (if we are coherent) but none of these references doesn't exist in text.csv.


** The country tag MAG refers now to Luwu, but in old version of AGCEEP, it was refering to Magdeburg that has now disappeared (included in Brandenburg). And you have lot of events that kept this tag :

132001
132003
AGCEEP_Specific_Brandenburg.eue

200005
AGCEEP_Specific_Cleves.eue

217000
217001
AGCEEP_Specific_Mainz.eue

319006
AGCEEP_Specific_Meissen.eue

273000
273007
273012
AGCEEP_Specific_Saxony.eue

322004
322014
AGCEEP_Specific_Tirol.eue

For some events, the solution is to simply delete the reference, but for some, the events could/should be adapted to BRA/Brandenburg


** All these events are triggered or sleeped by an another event, but they don't exist :

3636 (by event 3517)
AGCEEP_Specific_Prussia.eue

3718 (by event 3706)
major_mlo.txt

30328
30329
30330 (all by event 30327)
AGCEEP_Specific_Delhi.eue

62002 (by event 296693)
AGCEEP_Specific_Khorasan.eue

82003 (by event 82002)
AGCEEP_Specific_AztecEmpire.eue

88003 (by event 88000)
88004 (by event 88000 and 88020)
88006 (by event 88005)
88007 (by event 88005)
88010 (by event 88014)
AGCEEP_Specific_Holland.eue

129700
137700
159700
170700
188700
258700 (all by the "Imperial Diet at Worms" event for each german country)
AGCEEP_Specific_Austria.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Bavaria.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Berg.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Brandenburg.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Cleves.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Hannover.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Hessen.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Holstein.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Lorraine.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Mecklenburg.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Meissen.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Oldenburg.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Palatinate.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Pomerania.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Saxony.eue
AGCEEP_Specific_Wirtemberg.eue

137012 (by event 182003)
AGCEEP_Specific_Brabant.eue

137013 (by event 215015)
AGCEEP_Specific_PapalStates.eue

170403 (by event 250008)
AGCEEP_Specific_Orleans.eue

215001 (by event 234000)
Reference to in –
AGCEEP_Specific_Mataram.eue

215004 (by event 217000)
Reference to in –
AGCEEP_Specific_Mainz.eue

241006 (by event 111008)
AGCEEP_Specific_Aragon.eue

285155 (by event 82000)
285157 (by event 82004)
AGCEEP_Specific_AztecEmpire.eue

296703 (by event 296684)
296704 (by event 296684)
AGCEEP_Specific_Samarkand.eue

1000111 (by event 1000109)
AGCEEP_HYW_Dauphine.eue



** All these events can't be fired because they haven't a startdate and they aren't triggered by an another event.

10000111 in AGCEEP_HYW_Burgundy.eue

1000174 in AGCEEP_HYW_England.eue

1000034 in AGCEEP_HYW_France.eue
1000036 in AGCEEP_HYW_France.eue
1000037 in AGCEEP_HYW_France.eue

111005 in AGCEEP_Specific_Aragon.eue ==> 285040 in AGCEEP_Specific_Spain.eue

114000 in AGCEEP_Specific_Ashanti.eue

3098 in AGCEEP_Specific_Austria.eue

125017 in AGCEEP_Specific_Bavaria.eue

294000 in AGCEEP_Specific_Bayreuth.eue

3855 in AGCEEP_Specific_Brandenburg.eue
3857 in AGCEEP_Specific_Brandenburg.eue
132001 in AGCEEP_Specific_Brandenburg.eue
132003 in AGCEEP_Specific_Brandenburg.eue
132004 in AGCEEP_Specific_Brandenburg.eue

136000 in AGCEEP_Specific_Burma.eue

147005 in AGCEEP_Specific_China.eue
147006 in AGCEEP_Specific_China.eue

202010 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202011 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202012 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202013 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202014 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202015 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202016 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202017 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue
202018 in AGCEEP_Specific_Cologne.eue

3388 in AGCEEP_Specific_Ottomans.eue
3389 in AGCEEP_Specific_Ottomans.eue
3390 in AGCEEP_Specific_Ottomans.eue

3748 in AGCEEP_Specific_Spain.eue

65111 in AGCEEP_Specific_DaiViet.eue

314000 in AGCEEP_Specific_DaiShun.eue

315000 in AGCEEP_Specific_DaiXi.eue

3847 in AGCEEP_Specific_Denmark.eue
159006 in AGCEEP_Specific_Denmark.eue

20076 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
20077 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
20007 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
21125 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
21128 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue

320002 in AGCEEP_Specific_Foix.eue
320003 in AGCEEP_Specific_Foix.eue

3324 in AGCEEP_Specific_France.eue
20056 in AGCEEP_Specific_France.eue
20058 in AGCEEP_Specific_France.eue
20060 in AGCEEP_Specific_France.eue
20062 in AGCEEP_Specific_France.eue

88013 in AGCEEP_Specific_Holland.eue
88020 in AGCEEP_Specific_Holland.eue

188201 in AGCEEP_Specific_Hungary.eue
188202 in AGCEEP_Specific_Hungary.eue

20322 in AGCEEP_Specific_Lorraine.eue

216000 in AGCEEP_Specific_Mahrattis.eue

218004 in AGCEEP_Specific_Mali.eue

221000 in AGCEEP_Specific_Manchu.eue

319002 in AGCEEP_Specific_Meissen.eue

230100 in AGCEEP_Specific_Mughals.eue

186104 in AGCEEP_Specific_Netherlands.eue

244002 in AGCEEP_Specific_Norway.eue

128018 in AGCEEP_Specific_Orissa.eue

3858 in AGCEEP_Specific_Palatinate.eue
3860 in AGCEEP_Specific_Palatinate.eue

258001 in AGCEEP_Specific_Poland.eue
258004 in AGCEEP_Specific_Poland.eue
258005 in AGCEEP_Specific_Poland.eue

20321 in AGCEEP_Specific_Savoy.eue

273012 in AGCEEP_Specific_Saxony.eue

317000 in AGCEEP_Specific_SouthMing.eue

20323 in AGCEEP_Specific_Strasbourg.eue

124014 in AGCEEP_Specific_Timbuktu.eue

322011 in AGCEEP_Specific_Tirol.eue

62007 in AGCEEP_Specific_UzbekHorde.eue

3825 in major_tib.txt

316000 in AGCEEP_Specific_Zhou.eue



** All these events can't be fired because they have a trigger that needs an event that doesn't exist :

82001 (needs 285156)
AGCEEP_Specific_AztecEmpire.eue

12035 (needs 3)
AGCEEP_Specific_France.eue

6914 (needs 6922)
6953 (needs 6932)
6974 (needs 6922)
6976 (needs 6943)
6979 (needs 6922)
6980 (needs 6922)
AGCEEP_Specific_Japan.eue

40095 (needs 40001)
40096 (needs 40001)
AGCEEP_Specific_Lithuania.eue

217001 (needs 215004)
AGCEEP_Specific_Mainz.eue

234216 (needs 9215)
234217 (needs 9215)
AGCEEP_Specific_Mataram.eue

232026 (needs 232027 and 232028)
232031 (needs 232027 and 232028)
AGCEEP_Specific_Morocco.eue

258105 (needs 3801)
AGCEEP_Specific_Poland.eue

40097 (needs 40001)
AGCEEP_Specific_Ryazan.eue

40091 (needs 40001)
AGCEEP_Specific_Tver.eue



** All these events have a trigger that refers to an event that doesn't exist, but they could fired because the event isn't the only condition :

20071 (reference to 1000063)
AGCEEP_HYW_Brittany.eue

1000064 (reference to 1000063)
AGCEEP_HYW_Burgundy.eue

7120 (reference to 285501)
AGCEEP_Specific_Castille.eue

2200020 (reference to 2200050)
2200021 (reference to 2200050)
AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue

6982 (reference to 6948)
6983 (reference to 6948)
6985 (reference to 6921)
6986 (reference to 6921)
AGCEEP_Specific_Japan.eue

232024 (reference to 232027 and 232028)
232025 (reference to 232027 and 232028)
AGCEEP_Specific_Morocco.eue



** All these events have a trigger that refers to a country that can't exist (nor revoltable nor existing at the beginning of the game), but they can fired because the country isn't the only condition :

40079 (reference to SUZ - Suzdal)
40083 (reference to SUZ - Suzdal)
40087 (reference to SUZ - Suzdal)
AGCEEP_Specific_Muscovy.eue



** All these events grant independence to a country that doesn't exist in revolt.txt :

255003 (grant independance to THU/Bayreuth)
AGCEEP_Specific_Palatinate.eue

273000 (grant independance to THU/Bayreuth)
AGCEEP_Specific_Saxony.eue

261000 (grant independance to SLZ/Salzburg)
260001 (grant independance to SLZ/Salzburg)
AGCEEP_Specific_Styria.eue

209012 (grant independance to MIN/Mazovia)
AGCEEP_Specific_Teutons.eue

322012 (grant independance to THU/Bayreuth)
AGCEEP_Specific_Tirol.eue

3823 (grant independence to TAN/Travancore, FAT/Calicut and COI/Cochin)
328100 (grant independence to TAN/Travancore, FAT/Calicut and COI/Cochin)
AGCEEP_Specific_Vijayanagar.eue
 
Basrah has a badboy of 18173954 in the 1419 scenario...
 
missing submissions

I have loaded 3 versions of 1.38 ( and all worked fine), each one had the following submissions missing

posts
183
192
195
197
214
224

Are they in another file within 1.38 as I cannot find them.???
:confused:
 
As far as I can tell, none of these events made it into 1.38 as they were in a file that wasn't added to the events.txt. They should be sorted out into the France, England, and Province specific event files.

Code:
###British India sequences###

#An Opportunity in India
event = {
	id = 164600
	trigger = { 
		OR = {
			discovered = 567
			discovered = 571
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "An Opportunity in India"
	desc = "Reports have come in about a stretch of land bordering the Bay of Bengal that would be a good location for a trading venture. The money would need to be paid upfront in order to pursue the venture."
	style = 3
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1640 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1670 }
	action_a ={	
		name = "Approach the natives about purchasing the land"
		command = { type = treasury value = -200 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 338550 }
	}
	action_b ={            
		name = "Let's invest our money on something more worthwile"
		command = { type = infra value = 200 }
	}
}

#The Sale of Tondaimandalam
event = {
	id = 338550
	trigger = { 
		continent = asia
	}
	random = no
	province = 571 #Madras
	name = "The Sale of Tondaimandalam"
	desc = "In 1640, the British offered to buy a stretch of land in the Tondaimandalam region, so that they could form a trading post on the Bay of Bengal. To a nation strapped for cash, this opportunity would prove too good to pass up."
	style = 3
	action_a ={	
		name = "Sell it to them"
		command = { type = treasury value = 200 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 164601 } 
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = 100 }
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = ENG value = 571 } 
		command = { type = removecore which = 571 }
	}
	action_b ={
		name = "We do not want them as neighbors!"
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = -100 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 164602 } 
	}
}

#The Founding of Madras
event = {
	id = 164601
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "The Founding of Madras"
	desc = "In 1640, a stretch of land on the Bay of Bengal was successfully purchased, allowing for the construction of Madras which would be one of England's great toeholds in India."
	style = 3
	action_a ={	
		name = "How exciting"
		command = { type = treasury value = 25 }
		command = { type = inf which = 571 value = 2000 }		
		command = { type = provincetax which = 571 value = 2 }
	}
}

#Our Offer Was Rejected
event = {
	id = 164602
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "Our Offer Was Rejected"
	desc = "In 1640, the plan to construct a trading post on the Bay of Bengal was rejected by the owners of the land."
	style = 3
	action_a ={	
		name = "They shall pay for this insult"
		command = { type = addcore which = 571 }
	}
}

#British Traders near the Ganges
event = {
	id = 338551
	trigger = { 
		exists = ENG
		continent = asia
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 571 data = ENG } #Madras#	
			event = 164600
		}
	}
	random = no
	province = 557 #Ganges
	name = "British Traders near the Ganges"
	desc = "In August of 1690, Job Charnok, an agent of the East India Company settled in Calcutta. A few years later, the EIC would approach to purchase three outlying villages to being a settlement."
	style = 3
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1693 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1710 }
	action_a ={	
		name = "Allow them to settle in the region for a tribute"
		command = { type = trigger which = 164603 } 
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = 25 }
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = ENG value = 557 } 
	}
	action_b ={
		name = "We do not want them as neighbors!"
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = -200 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 164604 } 
	}
}

#Trade in Calcutta
event = {
	id = 164603
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "Trade in Calcutta"
	desc = "In August of 1690, Job Charnok, an agent of the East India Company settled in Calcutta. A few years later, the EIC purchased the three villages of Sutanuti, Calcutta, and Saudagar. By 1699, the East Indian Company began developing Caluctta as Presidency city."
	style = 3
	action_a ={	
		name = "How exciting"
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
		command = { type = inf which = 557 value = 2000 }		
		command = { type = provincetax which = 557 value = 2 }
	}
}

#Trade in Calcutta
event = {
	id = 164604
	random = no
	country = ENG
	name = "Trade in Calcutta"
	desc = "In August of 1690, Job Charnok, an agent of the East India Company settled in Calcutta. A few years later, the EIC attempt to purchase three outlying villages of Sutanuti, Calcutta, and Saudagar was rejected."
	style = 3
	action_a ={	
		name = "They shall pay for this insult"
		command = { type = addcore which = 557 }
	}
}

###French India sequence###

#The French and Pondicherry
event = {
	id = 338552
	trigger = { 
		exists = HOL
		exists = FRA
		continent = asia
		NOT = { 
			core = { province = 572 data = -1 } #Gingee exempt
		}
		OR = {
			discovered = 571
			discovered = 572
		}
		OR = { 
			religion = sunni
                  religion = shiite
                  religion = buddhism  
			religion = hinduism
            }
	}
	random = no
	province = 572 #Pondicherry
	name = "The French and Pondicherry"
	desc = "In 1673, the ruler of the lands around small fishing village of Pondicherry invited the French to start a trading centre, in order to compete with the Dutch."
	style = 3
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1673 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1700 }
	action_a ={	
		name = "Encourage the French to setup a trading centre"
		command = { type = trigger which = 170600 } 
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 50 }
		command = { type = secedeprovince which = FRA value = 572 } 
	}
	action_b ={
		name = "We do not need the French!"
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -50 } 
		command = { type = trade value = -400 }
	}
}

#Expansion in Pondicherry
event = {
	id = 170600
	random = no
	country = FRA
	name = "Expansion in Pondicherry"
	desc = "In 1673, the ruler of the lands around small fishing village of Pondicherry invited the French to start a trading centre, in order to compete with the Dutch."
	style = 3
	action_a ={	
		name = "We welcome the chance to expand"
		command = { type = treasury value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = HOL value = -50 }	
		command = { type = provincetax which = 572 value = 2 }
	}
}

This file should be removed from the event folder : AGCEEP_EuropeIndia.eue

As a quick fix for anyone who wants to use these events prior to a new release, just add that filename to the events.txt
 
Last edited:
Aegnor said:
** All these events are triggered or sleeped by an another event, but they don't exist :

170403 (by event 250008)
AGCEEP_Specific_Orleans.eue

Fixed with the addition of the following event into Specific France event file:

#Louis Duke of Orleans Inherits the Throne of France (triggered by 250008 ->ORL )

event = {
id = 170003
random = no
country = FRA

name = "Louis Duke of Orleans Inherits the Throne of France"
desc = "With the unexpected death of Charles VIII, the direct senior line of the Valois lineage came to an end. The line of succession was traced back to Charles VI's younger brother, Louis I, Duke of Orleans, and through his direct heir Charles I, father of Louis II, of Orleans. With Louis II's ascension, the House of Orleans now ruled the French Kingdom. Louis' ascension brought the great Duchy of Orleans to the Crown of France as a Royal demesne."

action_a = {
name = "Long Live King Louis XII !"
command = { type = stability value = 1 }
command = { type = inherit which = ORL }
}
}

1000111 (by event 1000109)
AGCEEP_HYW_Dauphine.eue

This is a bug arising out of the fact that the event # in the HYW BUR file has 1 too many '0's...

Thus, replace the old event (10000111 in HYW BUR file) with this one...(it just has one less 0 in it: line that's changed is bolded below)...

#Charles is now King of France

event = {
id = 1000111
random = no
country = BUR

name = "Charles is now King of France"
desc = "Charles, dauphin of France is now King of France, m'lord..."

action_a = {
name = "Rats !"
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
}
}


** All these events can't be fired because they haven't a startdate and they aren't triggered by an another event.

10000111 in AGCEEP_HYW_Burgundy.eue
fixed with the above fix.

1000174 in AGCEEP_HYW_England.eue
MY event doesn't have this problem...I'll post it just in case...

#Nivernais is granted to Burgundy (Before Amiens)

event = {
id = 1000174
random = no
country = ENG

trigger = {
event = 1000008 #The Treaty of Troyes ->FRA
owned = { province = 386 data = ENG }
NOT = {
OR = {
war = { country = ENG country = BUR }
event = 1000116 #Proposal at Amiens
}
}
}
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
offset = 10
deathdate = { day = 31 month = december year = 1423 }

name = "Nivernais is Granted to Burgundy"
desc = "English policy in the heart of France was to leave the Duke of Burgundy, who had the most influence in the region, as the de facto ruler. The Regency of Henry VI would now confirm his status, officially legitimizing the status quo. The English still required the Duke's support in order to preserve the Treaty of Troyes, and confirming Burgundy's role in this new era was a necessary step ."

action_a = {
name = "Hand the region to Burgundy"
command = { type = secedeprovince which = BUR value = 386 } #Nivernais
command = { type = relation which = BUR value = 15 }
}
}

1000034 in AGCEEP_HYW_France.eue
1000036 in AGCEEP_HYW_France.eue
1000037 in AGCEEP_HYW_France.eue
These are noted in the file...they're there in case anyone wants to handle Joan of Arc in a conservative way :D

20076 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
20077 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
you can delete these events.

20007 in AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
Replace ist with this event:

#The Glory of France is Reborn!#
# Created by Johnny Canuck #

event = {
id = 20007
random = no
country = FRA

trigger = {
event = 1000062
owned = { province = 385 data = -1 }
countrysize = 3
NOT = {
OR = {
vassal = { country = ENG country = FRA }
war = { country = ENG country = FRA }
}
}
}
name = "EVENTNAME20007"
desc = "EVENTHIST20007"

action_a ={
name = "ACTIONNAME20007A"
command = { type = stability value = 3 }
command = { type = vp value = 50 }
command = { type = capital which = 385 }
command = { type = INF which = 385 value = 10000 }
command = { type = CAV which = 385 value = 10000 }
command = { type = trigger which = 20008 }
}
}

It doesn't fix the issue, I'll look into this eventually. It'll take some thought to time this event properly.

** All these events have a trigger that refers to an event that doesn't exist, but they could fired because the event isn't the only condition :

20071 (reference to 1000063)
AGCEEP_HYW_Brittany.eue

1000064 (reference to 1000063)
AGCEEP_HYW_Burgundy.eue
Still working out this section. It's a harmless 'bug' anyways.

2200020 (reference to 2200050)
2200021 (reference to 2200050)
AGCEEP_Specific_England.eue
Still working on this. Harmless though.
 
TEXT CORRUPT... in event TOS17362 "The Albizzi"
here the text is wrongly written

desc = "The Albizzi were a family with a long history in Florence and in 1433 they represented the oligarchic faction in the republic. Cosimo de' Medici was becoming increasingly influential in the republic's politics - he was supported by the 'minuto populo' the ordinary workers who had no say in the government and by the lesser guilds. Rumors circulated that Cosimo was plotting to use mercenary troops to set himself up as ruler of Florence. When Rindolfo Albizzi managed to gain control of the 'signoria' the governing council he used his influence tohave Cosimo imprisoned. Rather than executing the Medici under pressure from the Medici's debtors and supporters he had the family exiled for ten years under pressure from the Medici's debtors and supporters he hadthe family exiled for ten years Cosimo complied. Though successful inthe short term, Albizzi had overreached, and his decision ultimately brought much greater powers to Cosimo de' Medici. Should we exile the Medici or overthrow Albizzi's rule ."

that should be the revised text:

desc = "The Albizzi were a family with a long history in Florence and in 1433 they represented the oligarchic faction in the republic. Cosimo de' Medici was becoming increasingly influential in the republic's politics - he was supported by the 'popolo minuto' the ordinary workers who had no say in the government and by the lesser guilds. In the city rumors were made circulate that Cosimo was wasting the public money for his personal purposes. When Rinaldo Albizzi managed to gain control of the 'signoria' , the governing council, he used his influence to have Cosimo imprisoned. Rather than executing the Medici, under pressure from the Medici's debtors and supporters he had that family exiled for ten years. Cosimo had but to comply with. Though successful in the short term, Albizzi had overreached, and his decision ultimately brought much greater powers to Cosimo de' Medici. Should we exile the Medici or overthrow Albizzi's rule ?"

some imprecisions in monarchs.tos:

06703 Rinaldo Albizzi->Rinaldo degli Albizzi
06705 Piero I Gorroso de' Medici-> Piero I il Gottoso - ( it means the Gouty)
06710 Piero Soderino-> Piero Soderini
06716 Allesandro -> Alessandro I
06723 Gian Gastone -> Gian Gastone I

need to check the others better, amongst them a Giulio de Medici that is at the same time Pope (Clement VII) and Signore of Florence... :confused:
source: http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/r/ru/rulers_of_tuscany.htm
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duke_of_Tuscany

some imprecisions also in monarchs.mlo:
06563 Galeazzo Maria Sforza->Galeazzo Maria
06564 Giovanni Galeazzo II->Gian Galeazzo II

06564 leader complete name is Gian Galeazzo Maria. Maria can be easily omitted, since the same was made for Ludovico (Maria) il Moro!

if we adopt the rule for Dukes without surnames except the first appointed (Fancesco I Sforza).
EDIT: But what about Filippo Maria Visconti? Should Visconti be omitted?
 
Last edited:
In case this hasn't been mentioned, I get reports for events without names. I wrote them down:

eventnames 241020 (Navarre), 142000 (Castille), 260000 (Portugal), 251001 (Papal states) and actionname for that event: 251001A