Although am sure everyone was really grateful for the CTA (and so forth) being made popup-able in the previous patch, is it too much to ask that they be pause-able too?
Merci beaucoup...
Merci beaucoup...
1.3 Patch Released! [checksum 2289]
- Thread starter Johan
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
I had that issue, and fixed it after removing all my local files then reinstalling, then restarting steam. Others have posted they just restarted steam.
I think it's a steam issue.
Same for me. The icon is gone and it says the game is not ironman. But the game still behaves (with auto-saving) as would it be ironman. So maybe it is only an interface-error.
I've played dozens and in my experience the HRE getting formed or not is about split down the middle. I am typically somewhere in the region interacting with them, usually not by choice, so not sure if my presence being drawn into their wars or the center of them has greatly influenced that. I'm sure it has to an extent.
By flavor events for Kongo do they mean that they can now convert to catholic after meeting the Portuguese explorers?
Has anyone else had the "overseas" penalty while annexing a vassal that borders you on the Turkish side while playing as the ottomans?
If you attempt to play through the Steam interface, it should automatically download.
Doesn't happen any more. The game is always downloaded, and updated, through Steam. You should already have it in Steam - it was not available for download any place else; even if you bought it outside Steam, you got given a Steam key to add it to your Steam library.
I wonder if we could get some more info about the undocumented changes that were made in 1.3.
The ideas of many countries like prussia, savoie, ragusa, nepal, punjab were changed and the decision "Militia Act" was changed to require Administrative rather than Economic ideas, so I am wondering how many other changes were made to the game without us being told.
The ideas of many countries like prussia, savoie, ragusa, nepal, punjab were changed and the decision "Militia Act" was changed to require Administrative rather than Economic ideas, so I am wondering how many other changes were made to the game without us being told.
I as mentioned in an earlier post, I also noticed a potentially very significant change to Oext - I loaded up a 1.2.2 save and suddenly had 100% Oext where before I had none. Looking at the OExt screen, I saw that it was because I now had OExt from a number of Native American (Inca, Aztec, Zappotek) provinces that previously always 0% OExt. Those overseas provinces previously allowed Full Annexation with 0% OExt. Maybe they don't any more? Which is a potentially very large change that's not in the notes at all.
But I can't yet rule out that it might be an issue related to loading a 1.2 save in 1.3. So I've been waiting until I can attack the Aztecs in my new 1.3-only England 1444 game, so that I can find out for sure.
I begun versioning the game files with git (locally, of course), so I will be able to help with such matters in the future.
Well, less likely not= never. It would be nice, when this has to happen, to have some text explain why we go from bosom pals to hated enemies overnight. Playing as Shan, with Ming in RM/Alliance/Same Dynasty, Ming broke the alliance and set me as Rival. This happened when my Regency Council ended and the RM broke (why don't RMs break when the ruler dies rather than when the next one takes over?). It's not like Ming dedicated itself to my utter destruction. A little while later we re-made the RM and they'd ally with me but I dislike them so much for breaking the alliance that I can't make the offer <sigh> This sort of whipsaw in AI emotions makes them seem unserious. I don't mind conniving, backstabbing, devious scum, but psycho love-hate conversions are silly. Okay, psycho would be cool, but only if it was rare. Psycho should be a new ruler attribute, or possibly a unique NI.
I'd suggest making new claims and especially new rulers have a bigger impact, and reduce the impact of end-of-month or whatever other random calculations you're using now. I'd add flavor to Advisers by making some of them anti-Ming or anti-Shan. Then you could keep a level of uncertainty without needing to resort to "RNG says 'kill your best friend!'" I'd suggest you even consider having foreign policy National Modifiers which can crop up over allies or rivals. You
don't want the game to become fixed and predictable in alliances, fine, that makes sense, but turning every ally into a variation on Fatal Attraction is not the way to get there.
What? You say that this was one incident so maybe I should withhold judgement? Nah. I'll really really hate the new system until tomorrow when something good happens and I'll really really love it. Then I'll declare it my rival and devote myself to hating it even more than I did at first. Then, I'll visit Europe.
I think it's because the Devs like icons almost as much as we do. So he should get one of those.
The decisions changes were summed up in the change log as changing the conditions for a lot of decisions. So it wasn't secret. (Yep, I too used git by the way to look at the diff of the ruleset files)
- Status