1.20 Map teasers

[sr999]

In order to file your complaint you'll need to submit a request for access to the pre-complaint complaint non-complaint complaint form, submitting proof of identity, circumstances, a professional referral, and evidence that you have no current or prior mental or physical health issues. Assuming the official you speak to agrees that you would like to make a complete, and assuming that you are at least 18, you'll then be put on a waiting-list for counselling to assess if this is might not be related to other issues, to confirm that you understand what it would mean to make the complaint, that you understand what you are complaining about, and to gather evidence that you want to make the complaint. You will also need to spend at least a year publicly making the complaint. Once this is done, you can be referred to a specialist who will evaluate the counsellor's report, and decide whether or not to refer you to a complaints centre. Should they choose, you will be put on the waiting list for your nearest centre. The centre will likely be no more than 200 miles away from you, and the waiting list should not be longer than 3 years, although neither of these can be guaranteed. Upon your first appointment, where you will need to bring proof of identity, circumstances, a professional referral and evidence that you have no current or prior mental or physical health issues, the official will evaluate you, confirm that you understand what it means to make the complaint, that you understand what you are complaining about, and gather evidence that you want to make the complaint. You will be scheduled a second appointment with a second official, where you will need to bring proof of identity, circumstances, a professional referral and evidence that you have no current or prior mental or physical health issues. The second official will evaluate you, confirm that you understand what it means to make the complaint, that you understand what you are complaining about, and gather evidence that you want to make the complaint. You will then be scheduled an appointment with both officials at once, where you will need to bring proof of identity, circumstances, a professional referral and evidence that you have no current or prior mental or physical health issues, and someone who has known you since childhood (usually a parent). The officials will discuss with you, and the person you bring, the details of making the complaint. They will speak with the person you bring for an outside perspective on your formative years, and to see if they agree that it would be best for you to make the complaint, and that you understand what it will mean to make the complaint, and that you understand what you are complaint, and that you want to make the complaint. Each appointment will likely be approximately 3 months apart. Afterwards, the two officials will have a meeting to discuss your case. If they both agree that it would be best to make a complaint, you will be contacted and and appointment made to begin the first stage of the beginning of one half of the pre-requisites of the complaint process. The official at the centre will, via periodic appointments every 3 months, establish how you are currently the current-stage of the complaint-making process, and whether it's best for you to continue, and will contact your local offices to decide which sections of the pre-complaint complaint non-complaint complaint form they should fill out with you. This will usually take between 3 to 4 years. Once completed, you can be referred for counselling to determine whether or not you should start the process for referral to a pre-complaint complaint non-complaint complaint form submission-centre.

Yes yes, of course I know the basic formalities.

But what happens after we get that and all the other preliminaries over? Can I get to channel Kafka before I die?

 

[Republic of Mercury]

Yes yes, of course I know the basic formalities.

But what happens after we get that and all the other preliminaries over? Can I get to channel Kafka before I die?

For information requests, please contact the information requests department. For details on how to contact the information requests department, please contact the information requests department.

 

[Grand Historian]

Mm. Rule one of internet irony: never go less than 110%. For example:

"Ryukyu needs more provinces, more development, more DHE's, a unique government, a unique religion, and a 'restore the theme system'-like decision that gives permanent claims on the Japan region and cores on the China region, available once you've united the entire Ryukyu area."

Or as we like to call it, DDRJake's personal mod.

(How's that?)

M&T

Yeah, Korea could definitely use more development - 311 total might be overkill, but I don't think another 20/30 or so would hurt?

(M&T only gave it three more provinces than vanilla? Interesting.)

For sure, but by pretty much whatever measure you wanna give it, Korea was dramatically more developed than Manchuria, even during the Qing dynasty. At least until Han settlers started arriving in large numbers, but I think that was more during the Vicky period.

While in this instance I most definitely agree with you, we have to be careful to not directly conflate population with development; it's not just a gamebalance decision on Paradox's part (though the exact numbers are), but it's a historical trend that population =/= development. Especially as population can't really tell us anything other than itself - were the people conquered, did they emigrate, were they forcibly relocated, how well did they live, how much did they produce, etc.[/QUOTE]

 

[Grand Historian]

For information requests, please contact the information requests department. For details on how to contact the information requests department, please contact the information requests department.

 

[Metz]

Very disappointing that Korea has gotten nothing. WTH?

Maybe they are testing the game play and balance in certain areas to see how its working out before focusing on new areas.

When they showed us the Scandinavia map, it had a couple of new provinces. It then had a lot more provinces in the next showing.

Hopefully Korea and Philippines get more provinces. They also need to add the different people that lived in the Philippines.

 

[Metz]

Would it be more accurate to leave Japan as Japan or have that "central" government be called Ashikaga? It would be interesting then to have Japan be a game on its own terms: which Daimyo can take power and unify the islands.

 

[DàbiànLājīdàrén]

Japan should be changed to Nippon. Japan is the bastardized southern Chinese pronunciation of 日本 and doesn't accurately represent the country at all.

 

[thedarkendstar]

13 new provinces in Japan does that mean that Japan a nation the that stretches from the bottom of Spain to norther Germany will finally have more development than England(Also the population of France but development isnt just population).....

 

[Republic of Mercury]

Japan should be changed to Nippon. Japan is the bastardized southern Chinese pronunciation of 日本 and doesn't accurately represent the country at all.

We should also include Deutschland, Eire, Norge, Sverige, Espana, Osterreich etc.
(*I'm aware how many umlauts and accents are missing)

 

[Pintu]

We should also include Deutschland, Eire, Norge, Sverige, Espana, Osterreich etc.
(*I'm aware how many umlauts and accents are missing)

a "Magyarország" TAG would be nice

 

[DàbiànLājīdàrén]

We should also include Deutschland, Eire, Norge, Sverige, Espana, Osterreich etc.
(*I'm aware how many umlauts and accents are missing)

Ya but those are just European. Normal English names for those are fine.

 

[Warial]

Ya but those are just European. Normal English names for those are fine.

That's a very arbitrary reasoning. Why normal English names for European nations are fine, but normal English names for non-European nations are not?

 

[DàbiànLājīdàrén]

That's a very arbitrary reasoning. Why normal English names for European nations are fine, but normal English names for non-European nations are not?

Idk. I didn't make the rules. Why is China called Ming and Mongolia not Northern Yuan? Why is Vietnam called Dai Viet and Korea not Joseon? It seems all really arbitrary already so I'm just contributing to a pre-existing non-sense-making system.

 

[Warial]

Idk. I didn't make the rules. Why is China called Ming and Mongolia not Northern Yuan? Why is Vietnam called Dai Viet and Korea not Joseon? It seems all really arbitrary already so I'm just contributing to a pre-existing non-sense-making system.

Northern Yuan was a political fiction. The name was sparingly used in Mongolia itself and the cuurent representation of Mongolia leaves much to be desired.

Vietnam can be called Dai Viet because during Ly, Tran, Le and Mac dynasties it was called so, the name being changed to Viet Nam only with Nguyen Dynasty.

Korea, unlike Vietnam, did change state names with dynasty change. Having Joseon being ruled not by Yi dynasty is simply ridiculous. Keeping Korea on the other hand allows the dynasty to change freely.

China doesn't have one problem of Korea, it's not a small state and so a number of tags can be spared to account for dynasty change.

 

[moyang]

Japan should be changed to Nippon. Japan is the bastardized southern Chinese pronunciation of 日本 and doesn't accurately represent the country at all.

Come on, that's not really funny. You could have suggested Yamato for some nice giggles.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Ya but those are just European. Normal English names for those are fine.

I really don't see why non Europeans should have local names, but not European nations.

 

[DàbiànLājīdàrén]

Come on, that's not really funny. You could have suggested Yamato for some nice giggles.

Idk, personally Kami no Teikoku sounds way more boss to me.

 

[Homusubi]

MATSUMAE! FINALLY!

I'd have liked to see more provinces in outer Hokkaido, but Oshima is more than I expected, so thank you Paradox!

On the subject of Ryukyu: my (now defunct) Hi wa Mata Noboru mod split Ryukyu into two provinces with a strait between them, and they weren't particularly hard to click on. I'd definitely support an extra province in Ryukyu due to the handing over of Amami (the islands north of Okinawa, excluding the ones already in EUIV Satsuma province), but NOT Okinawa, to direct Shimazu control about halfway through the EUIV timeframe (I think it was 1644?).

 

[Grand Historian]

MATSUMAE! FINALLY!

It'd actually be the Kakizaki; the name change didn't come until 1590.

 

[Homusubi]

It'd actually be the Kakizaki; the name change didn't come until 1590.

Yeah, I know, but they were more famous under the Matsumae name, so that's what I instinctively think of that clan as...