1.10 - are there any undocumented changes or unexpected side effects?
- Thread starter Krajzen
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Yeah, I recall with my last Brandenburg game I had the same thing happen. I sort of shrugged it off since I still had Poland and Bohemia to help me roll Pomerania. But this -1000 emperor modifier is not new to this patch.
No, it WAS changed for Conquistadors (at least) in TI; I think balmung60 is right about it being for everyone in TI, but I'm 100% on Conquistadors. They'd still get exiled (even with Conquistadors) if they were in a nation via access, but not if they were in TI.
But, semi-related maybe, I'm now seeing people loaded on boats getting exiled upon war declaration (both Conquistador led and not). Anyone know if THAT is WAD or an "oops"?
Seems alliances no longer break automaticaly from reaching negative relations anymore, and can even offer alliances to nations that has negative relations with you, doesn't get blocked till some -30. Still can't offer an alliance to someone you have a negative opinion of though, even if they may be able to offer one to you.
Yeah, I just saw a change in the defines.lua file that's probably related: they changed an alliance minimum relations threshold from 0 relations to -25 relations. From the file I'd've thought it would've allowed you to ally if your opinion was as low as -25, too, but your observations suggest not.
Fish have had their base value upped to 2.5, so they are no longer completely terrible.
Nope, I invaded India as ryuku declared the day before they arrived in viyainagar land ( millitary acces) and they did not get exiled.
Also not sure if this was in 1.9 aswell but giving a non-claim non-core province to a country you are allied in a war with says it gives +10 given provinces in the peacedeal screen tooltip.
If they have occupied claims this +10 will not apply and you will get a -80 instead ( depending on the amount of claimed provinces.
Pretty sure that's just a tooltip error though, nonetheless pretty annoying
Heh, that's actually good.
I was thinking about Fish the other day and it struck me that it should indeed be priced higher initially, not just because it was crap until now, but because Fish was one of the few big business before the Reformation. It was worth a lot.
10/10
I hope one more will appear in a new patch until it becomes another Paradoxian running gag, like Jan Mayen or Ulm
10/10
I hope one more will appear in a new patch until it becomes another Paradoxian running gag, like Jan Mayen or Ulm
I miss "Stop looking at the sky". That was my favorite, I allways picked it.
I hope one more will appear in a new patch until it becomes another Paradoxian running gag, like Jan Mayen or Ulm
New EU expansion -> new comet option has been a running gag for at least 6 years
How do you do this?The whole "releasing UPCA as a Mayan reformer" thing happens even with the regular countries:
Started as Xiu.
When you reform Maya, you spit out cores of countries. If for some reason you had colonies they may go to adgacent nation or you lose cores (hello 80% overextension!).
For some reason the game treats UPCA as a central american country but western and castillian. So sometimes it spits it out as a very confused OPM if you held guatamala.
For some reason the game treats UPCA as a central american country but western and castillian. So sometimes it spits it out as a very confused OPM if you held guatamala.
The comet is already a running gag and was one even before EU4. Even the other games get in on it, with both CK2 and Vicky 2 having comet-related events that respond with something to the effect of "thank [insert deity here] we live in such enlightened times".10/10
I hope one more will appear in a new patch until it becomes another Paradoxian running gag, like Jan Mayen or Ulm
Well, the UPCA is a Central American country (it's even in its name (United Provinces of Central America)) and it is considered both western and Castilian because it's a product of Spanish colonialism. That said, Maya reforms probably shouldn't be allowed to create new countries in non-primitive tech groups unless the Maya country passing the reform is already non-primitive.
Conquered new world provinces and colonies (for example taking provinces from CNs) give no OE anymore? I didn't get OE when i played with Inca.
That's in the 1.10 patchnotes:
"- Your own claims on your own provinces no longer expires until you have cored the province.
- Centralisation and Decentralisation modifiers from events now affect autonomy instead of income.
- Conquering primitives no longer gives nationalism for non-primitives.
- Colonized provinces no longer contribute to overextension even after they finish.
- Non-core provinces no longer contribute forcelimits."
