We need a lot more plots anyway, implicating someone for murder is a good start.
1.09 Wish list
- Thread starter Jia Xu
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Thats indeed true. I have never wanted on ly Stem Duchies. Historically, these large Duchies were splitted into smaller duchies. Only the Duchy of Bavaria managed to survive the Middle Ages, after being splitted a few times, too. I think, in the beginning, there should be these Duchies: Bavaria, Svabia, Saxonia as Stem Duchies and perhaps Frankonia, too. But Frankonia was under control of the Emperor himself at this time. Later in the game, there would be the possibilityy, that the Duchies split into the other Duchies like Meissen, Brunswick, etc. etc.
Most important in my opinion are different German cultures, similar to the Stem Duchies.
Also, the Archbishoprics of Cologne and Mainz are unhistorically weak. In RL, they ofte were the initiators of the opposition against the Emperor.
Same thing with the Italian cities in North Italy.
I see a lot of other possibilities to weaken the HRE without the game becoming historically unadequate.
Last edited:
Saxons should be a different culture from the rest of the Germans. This should make the Saxon revolts possible and model that the Saxons had a separate language.
Last edited:
It was probaly a bit more about the different culture in ruling, being opposed to feudalism than the language.
It was probaly a bit more about the different culture in ruling, being opposed to feudalism than the language.
Hence the "and".
The republic DLC will likely fix the city states since at the duchy level they get five more full holdings. For the issue with the cities, one mod has duchy titles for the three archbishop electors (and Reims, which was a very powerful archbishop in France), I personally also tweak a lot of provinces to have more holdings (I have Cologne, Mainz and Reims at 6 or 7 slots) but I play with a lot more holdings across the board (most of the increases are in Africa and Lithuania, but small powerful regions do get significant increases, especially when a lot of provinces represent enormous regions compared to tiny Middlesex or Byzantium).
Please please Paradox.
De jure or normal vassals should provide either full levies when their territory is specifically declared for in a foreign war or they should raise their troops to join the Kingdom doomstack.
De jure or normal vassals should provide either full levies when their territory is specifically declared for in a foreign war or they should raise their troops to join the Kingdom doomstack.
Vassals that would prefer to be under the invading liege (same religion when current liege does not, for example) when their primary title is declared for in a foreign war should be able to offer to join the invading kingdom in the war.
Fix the other scenarios. I know I'm the black sheep here but I like to start at different points for a different experience than the usual grand campaign start. But as of now in The Hundred Years war start I have never seen it happen. England and France should actually start at war, rather than England occasionally pressing a De-jure claim on France. Also, The Third Crusade Start......wow this never happens at this start. The text tells it like Jerusalem has already fallen to Saladin, while it is clearly still in control. If anything this is more like a Andalusian Crusade scenario than a third crusade one, since the pope is rabid to call a crusade rather than saving it for when Jerusalem will inevitably fall. But no, the pope just can't wait which makes it so another crusade won't be called in a very long time.
Pretty please Johan, if it is put in I will personally fly to Stockholm, go to Paradox HQ, and hug your beard.
Pretty please Johan, if it is put in I will personally fly to Stockholm, go to Paradox HQ, and hug your beard.
I wonder if anyone's going to read my suggestion, but what the heck.
I'd like to see a new empire - The Commonwealth, which would fill in the void between the HRE and Russia. Possible kingdoms to be included would be: Poland and Lithuania (naturally,although the actual Grand Duchy of Lithuania was already kind of union of Lithuania and Ruthenia), Ruthenia, and possibly Bohemia and Hungary.
And then there's another suggestion: replace the "Russian" nationality with "Ruthenian", for obvious historical reasons.
I'd like to see a new empire - The Commonwealth, which would fill in the void between the HRE and Russia. Possible kingdoms to be included would be: Poland and Lithuania (naturally,although the actual Grand Duchy of Lithuania was already kind of union of Lithuania and Ruthenia), Ruthenia, and possibly Bohemia and Hungary.
And then there's another suggestion: replace the "Russian" nationality with "Ruthenian", for obvious historical reasons.
Allow Liege's to join their vassal's internal wars (or at least try to, the vassal can always refuse)...
Let the liege help support their vassals against revolting sub-vassals if they choose to...
Let the liege help support their vassals against revolting sub-vassals if they choose to...
Though only at absolute crown authority , which should be a possibility after a certain date only by event in my humble opinion.
No need to respond/argue , just my 2 cent.
My own wish, bring back economy like in CK1, please. It made wars and plundering actually have an impact even after the war.
Right now theres nothing that at least lets me dispute a war and no damage left. Makes no sense and is definitely missing !!!
...besides the fact that war is too cheap as well.
Man, i suddenly realise that CK1 had much some mechanics that were much deeper/had a bigger impact than now in CK2.
Seems you dumbed it down quite succesfully, though sadly.
PS: Does anyone know the name of the original russian designer of CK1 ?
Yeah, especially that with implicating someone for murder
... it suits the whole Republic DLC so nicely...
The problem with that is, that it could make waging wars as a count impossible and therefore ruin the game, if you're not a king or emperor.
But I agree they need to tune down those claim wars as well, as the plots. When you rule a larger empire, ending plots seems to be all you do for about 80% of the time.
They also have to block the ability for a vassal to press claims against his liege for a noble OUTSIDE of the realm. I had situations, when counts pressed the claim of a duke from the outside, so the duchy was lost to the king and the only thing, the king could do, was to assassinate the guy, who's claims are pressed. It really makes NO sense, that a liege can't interfere in those situations.
I cannot agree more, this makes no sense to me currently. If you vassal like the invader better than he likes you, he should have the option of rebelling.
Yes please, especially historically themed ones, which I know in a game like this can be hard, but it would be cool to witness and to integrate yourself into the game, by being immersed in the history.
Also Absolute Monarchy should mean something more, not just more taxes or levies. Also playing as a Muslim Sultan, when I'm had maximum crown authority, my vassals can still declare war on one another, and change around my carefully built duchies!!
I wish for Pagan DLC so i could play as norse or baltic pagans.I know that theyre probably comming since even republics are getting put in game so in 2.0 pagans please .
.