I'd like to see a start date randomiser when you enter the game. I'm a bit fed up with seeing Europe in 1066. It would be more interesting for it to start on a random date.
I'd like to see a start date randomiser when you enter the game. I'm a bit fed up with seeing Europe in 1066. It would be more interesting for it to start on a random date.
That would be the best possible thing to happen to CK II ever, but sadly I just can't see it being implemented.And I still want that vasallage should be depent on the title not at the character (So... Normandy is Vasall of France and England is indepentend but both a ruled by the same king. Or Richard, 1st Earl of Cornwall. He was Holy Roman King and Earl of Cornwall at the same time... So Cornwall would be Vasall of the English Crown and the Holy Roman Empire would be indepentend.)
That would be the best possible thing to happen to CK II ever, but sadly I just can't see it being implemented.
No more Cornwall as part of the HRE...
I want co-rulers! I was really common at this time to have two or more rulers at the same time (Like in the Margraviate of Brandenburg).
And I still want that vasallage should be depent on the title not at the character (So... Normandy is Vasall of France and England is indepentend but both a ruled by the same king. Or Richard, 1st Earl of Cornwall. He was Holy Roman King and Earl of Cornwall at the same time... So Cornwall would be Vasall of the English Crown and the Holy Roman Empire would be indepentend.)
The Jure uxoris would be also nice to include someway.
By the way, I've had several ideas on the subject of co-rulers and in fact started a thread about it some time ago, though I can't find it now. Anyway, my current mindset is that it should be a unique grantable title (like Despot for the Byzantines) and give that character a major prestige boost and a strong claim to your kingdom and the equivalent of the 'Born in the Purple' trait, meaning that whoever you choose to be your co-ruler will be your heir (overriding the normal succession) -- but of course there'd have to be criteria for who you could make co-ruler, and it shouldn't normally be able to override primogeniture. Normally the eldest son or brother (if he had no or very young sons) of a monarch was made co-ruler and so it would need to avoid being 'gamey' by basically working like elective monarchy. That's not what it's about.
Incidentally, you could use a similar title to represent the King of the Romans, whereby the ruling Emperor can designate his heir as King, giving him more prestige and gold but no actual land.
I'm not sure what the exact criteria for these ought to be, though, and they wouldn't count among the regnal numberings of ruling monarchs. It's totally historical, though, and would let us represent people like Henry the Young King and other people crowned in their own lifetime (and treated as kings) in CK II.
This confused me a lot when I first played CK2. I did not get why I could not have multiple lieges. Or be a king and at the same time vassal to another King as a Duke.
Still, it would be fascinating and hopefully great if they made that work.
Though probably confusing for noobs and maybe one reason why they canceled it.
Probably they were afraid that it could be too confusing and complicated and IIRC their aim was to attract new gamers to CK2 and Paradox and not to scare them away.
On the other hand, HOI was complex as well and and scared some noobs, but rather sucked them in and quite a success nevertheless as i understand.
Likely a DLC but...an earlier start date. Lots of interesting things happened earlier in the 11th century. I know the "Crusader" part of the title suggests a start close to the Crusades but 1066 is an arbitrary 30 years early.
I want co-rulers! I was really common at this time to have two or more rulers at the same time (Like in the Margraviate of Brandenburg).
You can already change the date yourself, if you want to.
Yeah thanks... I may have worked that out already.
The reason I'd like random starting dates on the opening menu is for variety.