1.04 Patch Graphicsl Survey

[dannyboy2016]

As per Limith's request in this thread, I've started working on making a few surveys related to what people want most in the 1.04 patch. Unfortunately, Survey Monkey's free account only allows ten questions (and one survey) at a time. This first survey focuses on some graphical changes requested by people. Please, help show the DH team what is most important to you.

Take the survey here.

I don't suppose there is anyway to edit thread titles is there?

 

[Marshall18]

Nice initiative

are you going to make more of these (for the rest of the requests?)

 

[dannyboy2016]

Yes sir.
I've got stuff from that huge thread and the last few pages of topics in this forum. I'm trying to get them all organized into categories and looking for other free survey sites.

 

[ynvaser]

Nice work! Thanks for making this.

 

[Limith]

You can use Google Doc to make forms I think...

Also, in order to prevent multiple voting, please include a section asking for their paradox interactive forum name. In addition, it will allow us to identify preferences of modders vs players.

Regarding mentioning what a feature is useful for regarding to a mod, that was a nice touch I think.

 

[dannyboy2016]

You can use Google Doc to make forms I think...

Also, in order to prevent multiple voting, please include a section asking for their paradox interactive forum name. In addition, it will allow us to identify preferences of modders vs players.

Regarding mentioning what a feature is useful for regarding to a mod, that was a nice touch I think.

I'll include forum name in future surveys.

 

[Limith]

I'll include forum name in future surveys.

Sent you a pmail. Please don't share the link until the entire survey is done yet, as half completed surveys aren't useful.

PS: about the edit thing, you CAN edit it yourself if no replies have been made yet. It will actually modify. If someone has replied though, you can't. Just for future reference.

 

[lanodaka]

I like the idea of the survey and i filled it in!
but I didn't feel like the questions we're asked right, so the outcome for most is: "we dont really care, but you can put it in" but this should not be the answer you want, that we want to give and not an answer that would change the minds of the dev's or paradox. these dev's might know what we mean


besides that, I was missing some ideas to suggest for adaptation (althought some of them are mine), like:
- a techteam-overhaul,
- ability to build division at low(er) strength, equipment selectable per division,
- beta-patches that install as a mod and not in the darkest hour full map,
- splitting mobilisation into manpower and weapons sliders,
- food as resource
- strategic bombing that has changed alot,
- more diplomatic options and improved AI responses,
- local/limited wars,
- implementing AOD-features like: infrastructure adding % to effective ic
- capturing equiment in battle
- selecting different upgrade paths for groups
- selecting where finished division should go per production path, selecting what armies should get specific brigades

perhaps some can be in the next survey?

 

[dannyboy2016]

I like the idea of the survey and i filled it in!
but I didn't feel like the questions we're asked right, so the outcome for most is: "we dont really care, but you can put it in" but this should not be the answer you want, that we want to give and not an answer that would change the minds of the dev's or paradox. these dev's might know what we mean


besides that, I was missing some ideas to suggest for adaptation (althought some of them are mine), like:
- a techteam-overhaul,
- ability to build division at low(er) strength, equipment selectable per division,
- beta-patches that install as a mod and not in the darkest hour full map,
- splitting mobilisation into manpower and weapons sliders,
- food as resource
- strategic bombing that has changed alot,
- more diplomatic options and improved AI responses,
- local/limited wars,
- implementing AOD-features like: infrastructure adding % to effective ic
- capturing equiment in battle
- selecting different upgrade paths for groups
- selecting where finished division should go per production path, selecting what armies should get specific brigades

perhaps some can be in the next survey?

Yeah I was limited to ten questions. I think everything you mentioned was essentially planned for future surveys

 

[lanodaka]

Yeah I was limited to ten questions. I think everything you mentioned was essentially planned for future surveys

cool

 

[Fernando Torres]

So what are the results? Survey is closed.

 

[dannyboy2016]

82.9% Majority interest in Multilayered tech trees but 37.1% don't see it as a priority

A couple people suggested the ability to add more tech tree panels rather than use the multilayered tech trees.

New Map question
38% support for eventual adapting the dec map
41.2% for eventual adaptation of E3 map

85.7 support for adding extra colors to the infrastructure/supply map to designate infrastructure level (45.7% saw this as very important)

When it came to extra map mode suggestions- the most wanted a Convoy routes map mode

Other popular suggestions were for some sort of political map mode showing each country's ideology and relations with major alliances and a "better" economic map mode to help them determine want needs to be nuked/protected

82.4% wanted to see the inclusion of heavy urban and light urban terrain types (38.2% saw this as very important)

62.9% wanted the ability to change province pics via event but this wasn't a priority for 40%

One person lamented the lack of unique pictures for a few urban provinces

50% didn't want new sprites. Of those who wanted sprites- Bebro's sprites were twice as popular as the Puma sprites.

80% supported DarkArk's suggestion to add shield tags to icons. 60% didn't see this as a priority.

Super Majority disinterest in

a larger interface for higher resolutions
multiple monitor support