1.0.0 (9b5a) Attacker is getting warscore without occupying anything

[Faulty]

The AI declared war on me to liberate some planets and a protectorate

I chose to take 1 planet and vassalise the attacker as my war goals

The attacker is now gaining warscore without occupying anything and has exceeded 100 with what I assume is ticking warscore time

 

[Vidkjaer]

You also gain warscore by winning Battles. But you cannot enforece taken a planet at the peace table if you dont have it occupied. Liberating a planet is different. The attacker has these wargoals and can enforce them without occupying them.
Unless i am missing something from your pictures this is not a bug IMO.

 

[Faulty]

You also gain warscore by winning Battles. But you cannot enforece taken a planet at the peace table if you dont have it occupied. Liberating a planet is different. The attacker has these wargoals and can enforce them without occupying them.
Unless i am missing something from your pictures this is not a bug IMO.

The attacker hasn't occupied the planets it is demanding from me

 

[Ramiel]

And? His war goal is Liberate, not Conquer. He doesn't have to occupy them for that war goal. Instead of getting ownership of them himself, those planets will be liberated into a new independent nation, one that'll likely be very friendly to him.

 

[Faulty]

And? His war goal is Liberate, not Conquer. He doesn't have to occupy them for that war goal. Instead of getting ownership of them himself, those planets will be liberated into a new independent nation, one that'll likely be very friendly to him.

Yes he does:

 

[Ramiel]

Well huh, I stand corrected. Thought that was one of the big differences between Liberate and Occupy.

 

[Vidkjaer]

I stand corrected also. I didnt realize you would have to occupy a planet to liberate it (or maybe that is just a typo?)

 

[MyFaceBurns]

And? His war goal is Liberate, not Conquer. He doesn't have to occupy them for that war goal. Instead of getting ownership of them himself, those planets will be liberated into a new independent nation, one that'll likely be very friendly to him.

It would make no sense to get a steady flow of war score for doing literally nothing just because you are fighting to liberate rather than conquer. How would that be countered?

 

[Faulty]

It's happening again in version 1.3.1 (f100)

The attackers are rebelling protectorates. I've taken the leader's capital world but he still gets full ticking war score against me without occupying anything of mine.

 

[The Founder]

It's happening again in version 1.3.1 (f100)

The attackers are rebelling protectorates. I've taken the leader's capital world but he still gets full ticking war score against me without occupying anything of mine.

Protectorates. Plural.

If you only took the Leaders Capitol, that means the others are still free by definition. Unless some of those are other empires just supporting thier independance, I would asume that is no bug but a simple misconception on your end. It is possible the leader Capitol wil not be freed even in case of a success, but why would the others not be free?

Btw., you can change the Thread Title via Thread tools, right next to the search box.

 

[Faulty]

Protectorates. Plural.

If you only took the Leaders Capitol, that means the others are still free by definition. Unless some of those are other empires just supporting thier independance, I would asume that is no bug but a simple misconception on your end. It is possible the leader Capitol wil not be freed even in case of a success, but why would the others not be free?

Btw., you can change the Thread Title via Thread tools, right next to the search box.

Just spent half an hour occupying all the capitals to confirm that you're wrong.