I'm not going to turn this thread into a "You're wrong, I'm right" flamewar, so we'll just agree to disagree.
0.1.5 Changelog
- Thread starter Korbah
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I'm not going to turn this thread into a "You're wrong, I'm right" flamewar, so we'll just agree to disagree.
Could you provide some detail on that "new building system" I've just checked the changelog and it seems not to be mentioned.
Well, the building list in 1.4b has been found insufficient, it had a number of issues especially regarding the fact that a vast majority of the buildings were locked behind advanced tech levels. On top of that the original building system was built for pre-Old Gods balance and it did not survive the port to Old Gods very well.
The entire building system has been revamped - New "building trees" with less generic improvements to your kingdom. And we've giving it a more lore friendly touch to match the setting where appropriate.
3..2...1... ANNNNNNNNNNND.... RELEASE PATCH GO NOW!
... anything happen yet?
Really great to see guys keep up the excellent work!
... anything happen yet?
Really great to see guys keep up the excellent work!
For now, it is a specific, necromancer-only spell with high skill requirements, extremely high mana cost, and a 50% chance of death, but if successful turns you into an immortal lich.
I'm immensely pumped up for this mod. Can't wait to crush putrid humans Camoran the Usurper style.
Is there a possibility to have hermaphrodites, because according to the lore, one of the tribunal, Vivec is said to be a hermaphrodite.
http://elderlore.wordpress.com/extended-reading/36-lessons-of-vivec/
As for the Ayleids and Chimer, well to start off... the Chimer as basically culturally similar to the Dunmer, but look like Altmer. As a result, they should have the same skin appearance as the Altmer (which you already established), but the hair should be different. The hair (color and styles) between Dunmer and Altmer is entirely different. For one, more Dunmer are born with dark hair as compared to Altmer, in which that is considerably rare. More Altmer like Elenwyn and Ancano have light hair. Both have considerable number of redheads, which appears the only actual common hair color between them. Both the Altmer Sorceress from the trailer pictures and videos of the ESO and the housecarl of the Jarl of Whiterun are both redheads. But most Dunmer like Brelyna Maryon have dark hair.
'
So Chimer as a result, should have dark hair like the Dunmer and have hairstyles more consistent with the Dunmer population. The similarity they should share with the Altmer is merely skin color.
Ayleids are difficult, because they are basically the Bosmer-Chimer of Cyrodiil. Basically, they are the Cyrodmer or Cyrodche (in their own language). By that I mean, they worship Daedra like the Chimer, but their language is identical to the Bosmer. So... logically, maybe they should appear more of a hybrid to some extent between the two. Having hair styles like the Chimer and Dunmer would have (probably even intermarrying with them, since they both worship Daedra and thereby an alliance is easier than with Daedra hating Altmer and Bosmer), while being just slightly lighter in skin color as compared to the Bosmer. Bosmer have a deep light brown skin color. Ayleids should have an olive, Italian, Imperial sort of skin color, which is highly suggested throughout the lore and by experts from uesp.
Last edited:
As the inventor of Gender Equalism, I find what you say offensive and for good cause.
Egalitarian means the French manner of Equalism, which is the ideological understanding of equality brought by those who suggest it. That is how the French styled left in Latin American forced classical liberalism onto the indigenous inhabitants. If you were a Native American, you have to subscribe to the liberal Mexican definition of liberalism, which like American liberalism of that day, meant no longer being a member of a tribe and forced to pay taxes, while only finding work at the lowest paying sector of an economy. Think of people of the fourth or fifth world being formally introduced to our society and what outcome that would mean for them. Indigenous people of Papua New Guinea who know nothing about the outside world, being introduced to it and now living in poverty, in which otherwise they would be in their own world unaware of what poverty meant.
That is Egalitarianism, because it is obviously the french way to do it. Hail Napoleon and all that Jazz. Disagree with the French Furor or you die. LMFAO!
Equalism is the conscious understanding of what is equality, but allowing mutual discussions by all people. We don't jam something down your throat and say it is equal. That is the flaw I just spoke about egalitarianism and why feminists when they have a good reason (such as abortion rights) will not subscribe to it and are even skeptical towards Equalism, because the hinted similarity suggests it might insure the same failings as egalitarianism. You know the Bolshevik outcome, do what we say or we kill you and erase you from history.
Equalism is about debate and the conscious understanding concerning different people. It forces us as individuals to let go of our prior views and the examine in the information as individuals with no moot self-derived interest before reaching a common understanding by the collective as a whole. It works on intellectual understandings that subscribe to greater open minded understanding, while limiting the indulgence of emotional and hyper emotional contamination. You know stuff like, "that man gotta die cause he killed my baby," not allowing said individual the opportunity to repent what they did. Control is not situated so strongly by the whims of the individual and our emotions, but by logic ascertained by mutual understanding by all people who take the individual effort to examine things critically without bias.
It is from Draneian philosophy, which is heavily constructed out of Buddhism, Taoism, Gnosticism, moderate Islam, Thomas Aquinas's Christianity, Classical Greek Philosophy to a degree, and hugely Native American ideologies such as Cherokee, Lakotah, Mayan, Incan, and Toltec.
The end result of Equalism is not a set in stone interpretation of equality, sometimes it never is equality, but to an extent equity. That is what Equalism is and how it differs from Egalitarianism.
iunno, at this point I think he's gone and missed trolling, going straight to comedy, intentionally or not
I don't think anyone can take that post seriously, what a trainwreck, hah
--
at least now I know who to laugh at for such a ridiculous name though
'equalism'
Vivec is a god and can do whatever he likes. We aren't planning to have bi-coloured Altmer/Dunmer either.
Shoot! And here I was hoping for rainbow elves. Slice them thin enough and there's a colour tone for everyone to enjoy.