• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I feel a more apt comparison might, since syndicalism is the unspeakable pariah ideology of TTL, be, say, Germany's AfD or even Spain's Vox.

Sadly you're probably right. But even then, if we're going down that road then never mind opposition groups, there are numerous right-wing parties around the globe who have co-opted the codes of the far-right in order to cling onto power. The US, the UK, Hungary, Brazil, India, Turkey...

If anything, I think it would be strange if this timeline just sort of simmered down into an end-of-history liberalism-will-prevail centrist u(?)topia. A change of tack towards more radical groups, particularly given the timeframe we're now in, is maybe more representative.
 
Sadly you're probably right. But even then, if we're going down that road then never mind opposition groups, there are numerous right-wing parties around the globe who have co-opted the codes of the far-right in order to cling onto power. The US, the UK, Hungary, Brazil, India, Turkey...
Many of these I generally agree with, although in some I wonder if by 'co-opted' you mean values, practices, or both?
 
Many of these I generally agree with, although in some I wonder if by 'co-opted' you mean values, practices, or both?

Broadly speaking I’d say both apply in each case. I think so long as a group is in power, it’s difficult to draw a distinction between the two.

That being said, I don’t want to derail the thread with a discussion about our own world. Suffice to say, I’m looking forward to seeing how this debate plays out in the world of Prussia, the Junkers and the SAP.
 
Broadly speaking I’d say both apply in each case. I think so long as a group is in power, it’s difficult to draw a distinction between the two.

That being said, I don’t want to derail the thread with a discussion about our own world. Suffice to say, I’m looking forward to seeing how this debate plays out in the world of Prussia, the Junkers and the SAP.
Ah, right. :p May the second Korwin-Mikke cabinet restore order and bring about prosperity to Prussia!
 
The case of syndicalism is a difficult one in this timeline, cause all in all the ideology remained fairly limited to a few cases. While in Britain, France and Italy it may be seen as a dangerous ideology which failed to protect the interests of the workers from foreign and even nationalist threats, in India the ideology could be seen as something inherently good because of Gandhi. Then there is also the factor of propaganda, which there was probably a lot of in the Entente and the Reichspakt, to the point that some stereotypes of syndicalism might have become part of the national memory. Not to forget that syndicalism probably also has the same connotations that communism has in OTL, that the original ideals of shared ownership and egalitarian utopia have been replaced by a proletarian dictatorship and state ownership.

The legacy of syndicalism is still very much alive in former Internationale countries. Take Britain for example, it is now part of the Greater United Kingdom along with Canada as a sign of their cultural bond, but also as a result of the War of Homecoming. After the war, syndicalism in Britain wasn't rooted out with a hard fist, many were pardonned and only the ringleaders were put on trial. As a result, the Labour party today is much more to the left than in OTL, explaining partly why Dennis Skinner is British PM and not Tony Blair. Another major consequence is that this often leads to conflicts with the Conservative party, which is very much a successor to the British exiles who returned from Canada.

In France, the legacy is much more troubled, because of the purges and the political infighting between the various factions in the goverment. When National France, which became a kingdom in 1936, easily took back the mainland and even went on to push into arch-enemy Germany, nationalism in France overtook syndicalism in popularity, similar to how in the 2nd Belgian Revolution nationalism and Germanophobia brought together the syndicalists and the royalists.

This brings us to the case of Germany, and ultimately Prussia. Syndicalism was an enemy when Germany invaded the Commune of France, but it was quickly replaced by the Entente when they invaded. In addition, Germany had a relatively strong left wing movement going for it with the SPD among others. If you take into account that from 1945 to 1992 Prussia was under the nazi-esque regime of the Volkspartei and that in the 1980s there was a strong opposition movement growing in the trade unions, a strong syndicalist movement isn't actually that farfetched. It is a shame however that a strong SAP also means a weak SDP, therefore making the possibility of a Popular Front government even less likely.
 
Last edited:
Good explanation, but one question: how did islami or baathi (in many cases polar opposites) regimes turned out to be syndicalist in this AU?
 
Good explanation, but one question: how did islami or baathi (in many cases polar opposites) regimes turned out to be syndicalist in this AU?
To my understanding, Ba'athism in OTL is quite socialist. In this timeline they are more regarded as syndicalist and combined with pan-Arab and pan-Islamic nationalism you get syndical-Islamism. The ideology has its origins in anti-Ottoman movements from the 1930s and continued to distance themselves from the more moderate Egyptian variant of socialism carried by Nasser. Somewhere in the late 1960s or 1970s, the first Ba'athists regimes were set up in countries like Iraq and the Levantine Confederation, probably with influences from Iran who wants to take these countries out of the sphere of either Egypt or Arabia. At this point I'm still not sure what the Iranian regime should look like but I'm heavily leaning into some sort of syndicalist dictatorship. And thus the geopolitical situation in the Middle East is as following: a syndicalist Iran, a liberal Arabia, a military Egypt and an Islamist Turkey all competing for influence in the Levantine Confederation, Iraq, Kurdistan, Yemen and Oman, all the while the US is supporting Arabia and Russia looks to Turkey as an ally. The Iranian regime probably enjoys a relative popularity in India. Egypt is probably the most isolated, and a popular uprising is most likely underway.
 
2006-2010: Domestic Policy
2006-2010: Domestic Policy
Education Reforms

Soon after the 2nd Korwin-Mikke Cabinet was voted in, CD.P Minister of Education Kristin Neuman rolled out her plans for a modernization of Prussia’s education system. In 2006, several experts where appointed to write an education guide that would teach the youth how to work with computers. At the same time, subsidies were written out by the government to schools who wanted to buy computers in large amounts. In the meantime, Minister Neuman wanted to address the shortage of teachers in the country. Currently, around 3% of the population was employed as a teacher, Neuman aimed to increase that number to 4%. One of the methods she employed was increasing the wages of government employed teachers (in-game I shifted my national focuses from encouraging capitalists to encouraging teachers). The effects were gradually felt as more and more young people signed up for programs to become an educator. By 2008, the informatization of Prussia education system had been fully implemented, to the point that even primary schools in the countryside could rely on a minimum amount of computers.

tSj91iP.png

As soon as the informatization of the education system had gone through, Minister Neuman put her attention to Prussia’s network of universities. In countries like the US or the GUK, prestigious universities often had access to large databanks containing information. Prussia did not have such a system yet and universities often still relied on their own libraries or on basic internet pages. That’s why in 2008, Minister Neuman sat together with the rectors of the biggest universities to discuss the possibility of a very high-speed university network. The rectors agreed to investing in a network where all the scientific knowledge produced by their universities would be gathered, on the condition that the government would take part in the project and fund the actual implementation. Minister Neuman agreed, completing another step in the education reforms of the 2nd Korwin-Mikke Cabinet. By the end of 2009, the database network was complete, allowing both the government and the universities to benefit from an increase in research and education efficiency.

BnzPYo3.png

Reform of the Presidency

Under the current constitution, President von Bismarck was just a ceremonial figure who only occasionally had to receive foreign dignitaries. A joint proposal by the CD.P and LPP to change that was proposed in May of 2006 and aimed to give the President the position of Commander in Chief of the Armed forces, as well as expanding his set of diplomatic tasks to include representing Prussia abroad and signing international treaties. The reform clearly mirrored the authority of the German President and was probably intended to put Prussia and Germany on the same institutional level. The SAP, who supported the previous proposal by the LPP to turn the President into a directly elected official, now opposed the reform because it would give too much power to a non-elected President. Even though the SDP supported the amendment because it would make reunification with Germany easier, Patrick Schwarzenegger bended to the SAP to form a united front against the reform. The needed 2/3rds majority was off the table. And so President von Bismarck came into play. He approached the Chancellor and convinced him to talk to the SAP in order to come to an agreement. Chancellor Korwin-Mikke then invited Schwartzmann to his office and asked him what it would take for the SAP to approve the amendment. Schwartzmann was clear, the President should be elected by the people if he gets the power described by the amendment. The SAP’s leader went even further and demanded that presidential elections would be held the moment the amendment was ratified. Chancellor Korwin-Mikke was not amused and ended the meeting. In the meantime, Vice-Chancellor Tusk had approached the SDP to get them to support the amendment. Patrick Schwarzenegger, now torn between the Popular Front with the SAP or the prospect of German reunification, agreed to support the amendment on less demanding conditions. The SDP would support the amendment, but the president had to be elected by the people. But unlike the SAP, Schwarzenegger agreed that President von Bismarck would sit out his term. And so Josef Tusk had smelled weakness in the Popular Front and had used it to his advantage. After Korwin-Mikke confirmed his agreement with the terms laid out by the SDP, the amendment was passed with 245 votes in favour, 91 against and 15 abstained. Even though some within the SDP rebelled against the party leadership and abstained, the amendment still went through. President von Bismarck was now the Commander in Chief and held more diplomatic power than before. The question of his succession/re-election would be decided by popular vote in 2010, using the IRV system to guarantee a majority rather than a plurality of people supporting the President-elect.

Continued Army Restructuring

In April of 2006, another batch of new recruits finished their training and were ready to be deployed. A month later, when President von Bismarck became Commander in Chief, a large military parade was held in Königsberg to celebrate the occasion. It was the first time the Prussian people could admire the newly reformed army divisions in their full glory. Reminiscent of the old German imperial forces, thousands of young men marched through the streets of the capital. Following the public event, the army reported a huge increase in applications by young men and women who wanted to join the army. And so President von Bismarck ordered 9 more divisions to be recruited from these new applicants. An additional four mechanized infantry divisions, four tank divisions and one artillery division were being prepared for deployment.

lnm0VsE.png

The army reforms and expansion would prove crucial in 2008 and 2009 when Prussia joined two UN peacekeeping missions in Africa (more on that in the next chapter). Following a report that analysed Prussian involvement in the peacekeeping missions, President von Bismarck decided to invest in the areas which needed more attention. And so he sat together with Minister of Defence Alexander Stieglitzer (JP) to train a certain amount of outstanding recruits to become sharpshooters and update their equipment. Deployment in Africa had proven that large engagements were often costly, especially against guerrilla fighters who knew the terrain well. Sharpshooters and recon units would be capable of dealing with such threats from a long distance, thus protecting the main cohorts of infantry divisions.

7GTOwzV.png

Another important lesson was that on these kind of missions, speed was a very important factor. Infrastructure in African countries was often lacking and thus slowed down our tank division. While Prussia did possess a small arsenal of helicopters, investing in more of them would allow a quicker deployment of troops in combat areas in the future. And so in 2010, Minister Stieglitzer, together with the President, looked into the possibility of a special forces division which could be deployed alongside other divisions to support their operations.

iBcIw5p.png

In addition to these minor reforms, the Prussian government also made work of reinvigorating the air force. Currently, its reserve consisted of outdated Russian third-generation fighter jets which probably wouldn’t even survive take-off. And so in 2009 Minister Stieglitzer made a deal with the Russian Minister of Defence to buy some of their fourth-generation fighter jets to update the Prussian airforce. Four Sukhoi Su-27s were bought to replenish the Prussian reserves. By 2010 the update of the winged Prussians was fully completed and the fighter jets were ready to be deployed if needed.

1mrAper.png

Final infrastructure updates

By May of 2006, the second phase in Prussia’s infrastructure works were completed and so the next stage could begin. Instead of further working on the railroads, it was now the turn of Prussia’s highways. Many of the major ones had been constructed before the Second Weltkrieg and had been expanded under Volkspartei rule in the 1950s. But as they were primarily used by heavy Russian army vehicles, the highways have deteriorated incredibly over the decades. With civilian use now the primary purpose of the roads since Prussia became a democracy, the roads are up to an upgrade. And so two years of traffic jams and road works began. In 2008, the infrastructure works came to a halt however, as the global financial crisis had set in in Prussia and private investors were scared away from big investments in public property. It was only in 2010, when the crisis had already settled somewhat, that the government reinvigorated the country’s infrastructure updates by expanding the airports of Posen and Königsberg.

2008 Financial Crisis

In 2008, a failing US invasion of Afghanistan and an exploding bubble in the real estate market led to a global financial crisis. Initially, the crisis remained contained within the US, but soon the globalist links of the banks would spread the trouble to Europe. As news came to light that the Byzantine government had been forging statistics to be able to comply to Eurozone standards, insecurity spread through Southern Europe and crashed many European economies. In Prussia, the situation was even more dire than in the Eurozone. Many banks within the Eurozone were helped out relatively soon by the European Central Bank, but in Prussia the financial sector wasn’t that strong to begin with. To add oil to the fire, it turned out that many Prussian investors had relied on American banks during the second phase of the infrastructure works, banks which now found themselves in trouble. Investors who had taken the risk to put their assets into the public works, now saw their money disappear in thin air, as the works were put on halt. In addition, Russian investors pulled away en masse from their holdings in Prussia. This in turn led to a backlash where investors had to rethink their strategies in other markets, such as the car industry. As companies saw their profits turn red, factory owners had to lay off some of their workers or face bankruptcy of their own. The unemployment which the 1st Korwin-Mikke Cabinet had virtually rooted out was now back in full swing as a result of a global financial crisis.

The reaction of the government was crucial in relieving the short term effects of the crisis. The main problem for Prussia lay of course in the fact that investors who had relied on US banks, now had no other alternative to turn to as no one was willing or capable to provide credit anymore. Without money, companies lost their access to short term loans, which in turn led to wage bills not being paid. As factories began to close down, unemployment rose sharply, revealing an underlying weakness in the Prussian economy. In 2009, unemployment reached a peak at 15% of the Prussian active population. While in the US, a bipartisan effort came to the rescue of the economy, the European Central Bank did everything within its power to save the Eurozone from collapsing. In Prussia, Minister of Economy and Finances Jan Olbrycht (CD.P) initially stabilized the economy through monetary policy. By printing extra money, Prussia’s currency became cheaper, in turn making it more attractive to foreign investors. This allowed Prussian investors to find alternatives to the American banks that used to provide them with loans. By 2010, the US had begun the road to recovery and the huge EU cash infusions started to show effects in Byzantium, but things like unemployment and low purchasing power were still widespread. In Prussia in particular, renewed foreign investments had not yet fully kicked in yet and many people were still out of a job. As a result, the Prussian government eventually resorted to Keynesian measures to increase purchasing power and lower unemployment. By 2010, the unemployment rate in Prussia had dropped from 15% at its peak to 11.5% by the time of the 2010 elections.

wT5Rjep.png
Among the measures to increase trust in the Prussian mark was a new design featuring Immanuel Kant.

The War on Terror in Prussia

Against the backdrop of the 2008 global financial crisis, syndicalism as an ideology became increasingly more attractive to people who now found themselves out of a job or who opposed military intervention abroad. In Prussia, the Syndikale Aktion saw its membership grow over the course of 2008 and 2009. This caused fear among Junkerpartei-ranks that a Syndicalist uprising could topple the government. This fear was strengthened by events that shook Prussian society to its core. During the 2009 May Day Parade, while red banners waved among the crowd, a coordinated attack by syndicalists occurred throughout the country. At almost the exact same moment, a car bomb exploded in front of the Prussian Central Bank in Königsberg, a prominent factory owner and his family were shot dead in Posen and a police officer riding a horse was stabbed while trying to guide a parade safely through town in Danzig. As the news arrived on the Chancellor’s desk, he ordered all major parades to be shut down immediately to prevent further violence. The attacks were soon claimed by an organization known as the People’s Army and the Chancellor ordered Staatssicherheit to open an investigation into the terrorists. In June of 2009, the Landtag passed a law which would allow security services to share information with Interpol and allow for more data cohesion when building a case. By August of 2009, the names of several individuals had arrived on the Chancellor’s desk. Among them was a former SAP member and militant of the Red Banner, which had ties to the former Iraqi regime. As the individual was arrested, he revealed several more names, including more members of the SAP and even one parliamentarian who was regarded as Albrecht’s Schwartzmann advisor on foreign policy. Korwin-Mikke ordered the non-parliamentarians to be arrested for terrorism and put Staatssicherheit on Schartzmann’s advisor. After months of investigation, a big scandal rocked the Syndikale Aktion für Preussen. Staatssicherheit had uncovered that the SAP parliamentarian with ties to the People’s Army had been involved with a South American drug cartel and that he had been smuggling large amounts of illegal substances into Prussia via the port of Danzig, where he had been a prominent union leader. Under pressure of public outrage, Albrecht Schwartzmann was forced to expel his foreign affairs advisor from the SAP. The man was thereafter arrested by the police and charged with supporting terrorism and smuggling illegal goods into Prussia. The question however remains how widespread terrorist sympathies are within the SAP’s ranks. The voices within the Junkerpartei who called for an outright ban of the Syndicalists from the Landtag grew louder as a result of these affairs. Within the SDP doubts about the syndicalists is threatening the future of the Popular Front.

d9m7yS7.jpg
Prussian syndicalists protesting on May Day against Prussian involvement in UN Peacekeeping missions.

Unrest among Silesian minority (2009)

While syndicalists were parading through the country, Silesia was held captive by a whole other kind of protest. This time it was not the universal cause of the worker that was being shouted from the rooftops, but the ethnic cause of the Silesian minority in the south of the country. As the Bewegung für die Autonomie Schlesiens had disappeared from the Landtag, the Silesians came out onto the streets to demand their representation in the Landtag back. While the 2009 Ausgleich had seemingly solved ethnic tensions in Austria, the cause of the Silesians was threatened in its very existence. As expected, the local branch of the CD.P was willing to hear the protestors out and reported back to Vice-Chancellor Josef Tusk. A big concern for the Silesians was that their voices would slowly disappear from all branches of society. The 5% threshold had already made the BAS disintegrate, but the government’s education reforms threatened to leave the Silesian identity out of the official educational programs. Acknowledging their fears, CD.P Minister of Education Neuman added a special clause for Silesia in the updated programs. Local language and history would form a major backbone in the education of young people about society. While not all worries of the Silesians were being answered, Neuman’s openness led many to believe that the CD.P did have the Silesians close to their heart. In 2010, former BAS members again called their supporters to vote CD.P as many of their candidates in Silesia were ethnically Silesian and would represent their interests in the Landtag.

------------------
Some of you will probably notice that I took your suggestions and put them in this update. Also, I'm not that good at explaining or even understanding economy, so I relied on various YouTube videos to understand the 2008 financial crash. I apologize if things are represented inaccurately here.
 
Once again syndicalists show their true colors. Terrorists attacks during a great recession. It seems they have no shame or even regard for prussian democracy.
 
The master’s house will not be dismantled by his own tools, and thus terror will always be recuperated by the state. Frustrating to see a complete lack of any sort of worker organisation, and a jump straight to car bombings. Surely the time is ripe for a general strike, and how any vaguely orthodox syndicalist could pass up the opportunity is beyond me. (Or does the bastardisation of syndicalism in this timeline extend to a rejection of unionism?)
 
What does “The New World Order” do? :eek:
 
Ah, I see the syndies have finally begun shedding their false cloaks of socialism and instead begin shedding blood. Also, I smell potential trouble with direct presidential elections, but that's in the future.
 
surely false flag provocations by the right wing terrorists and smear jobs
 
Once again syndicalists show their true colors. Terrorists attacks during a great recession. It seems they have no shame or even regard for prussian democracy.
It's 1936 all over again!
The master’s house will not be dismantled by his own tools, and thus terror will always be recuperated by the state. Frustrating to see a complete lack of any sort of worker organisation, and a jump straight to car bombings. Surely the time is ripe for a general strike, and how any vaguely orthodox syndicalist could pass up the opportunity is beyond me. (Or does the bastardisation of syndicalism in this timeline extend to a rejection of unionism?)
Car bombings, a stabbing and a murder all at the same time, seems pretty organized to me. Maybe Schwartzmann doesn't want to damage the economy even further by striking, maybe he's afraid of military intervention and blood on his hands. Or maybe he's in cahoots with the establishment, who knows?
What does “The New World Order” do? :eek:
All the techs in the geopolitics branch just give you an extra national focus, but as you can only use them in your own country, I'm already capped at 5, so those techs are pretty useless to me.
Ah, I see the syndies have finally begun shedding their false cloaks of socialism and instead begin shedding blood. Also, I smell potential trouble with direct presidential elections, but that's in the future.
The possibility of cohabitation will certainly be a real one, but I trust that the powers of the President don't interfere too much with those of the Chancellor and his cabinet.
surely false flag provocations by the right wing terrorists and smear jobs
It seems they took inspiration from the Haymarket Affair and took matters into their own hands...
Nice 10-mark note, did you make it yourself @SibCDC ?


:rolleyes:
I did :) I used a tutorial I found online and had a lot of fun
 
Car bombings, a stabbing and a murder all at the same time, seems pretty organized to me. Maybe Schwartzmann doesn't want to damage the economy even further by striking, maybe he's afraid of military intervention and blood on his hands. Or maybe he's in cahoots with the establishment, who knows?

My apologies: no doubt the killings were organised, but that’s not what I meant by worker organisation. Broadly speaking, I would expect a syndicalist’s prime method of action to involve organising workers into unions or labour councils or something similar (this is where the “syndicate” bit comes from). Pretty much the main idea of syndicalism is organisation of local workers and the use of withheld labour power (ie strikes) to force reforms. You can go further and occupy factories to take over production for yourself (as has happened many times, particularly where workers have resisted building war machinery or when a factory was threatened with closure. Here’s a really nice contemporary example from Germany), or if you’re feeling more violent then bombing factories and production machinery would probably also work. Ultimately it disrupts the exploitation of labour power in a similar way to a strike. And no syndicalist leader would be worried about damaging the economy, unless (and tbf this would be pretty true to life) he was actually just a left-wing social democrat playing dress-up in syndicalist clothes.

What I wouldn’t expect from people who called them sees syndicalists specifically would be RAF-style terrorism against political targets – or even people at all really. Since the 1970’s it’s been pretty obvious that all this gets in response is more government crackdowns, and I’d be surprised if any major group went for it as a strategy above something more closely sticking to what syndicalism would suggest.

Of course, all of this is contingent upon just how much syndicalism has been bastardised in this timeline, which is why I was curious in my previous comment. I guess at best it’s probably a case similar to “communism=Soviet Union” as in our world, which would I’m sure lead to a load of media prejudice and bias among the wider electorate. But this bias doesn’t tend to hold over people who are actually into the ideas, so I suppose what I’m asking is whether there are people out there who still hold to the sort of pre-1914 ideal of syndicalism, or whether it’s now entirely linked with state control and violence, and the more anarchist/libertarian traditions have disappeared entirely in the mainstream?
 
My apologies: no doubt the killings were organised, but that’s not what I meant by worker organisation. Broadly speaking, I would expect a syndicalist’s prime method of action to involve organising workers into unions or labour councils or something similar (this is where the “syndicate” bit comes from). Pretty much the main idea of syndicalism is organisation of local workers and the use of withheld labour power (ie strikes) to force reforms. You can go further and occupy factories to take over production for yourself (as has happened many times, particularly where workers have resisted building war machinery or when a factory was threatened with closure. Here’s a really nice contemporary example from Germany), or if you’re feeling more violent then bombing factories and production machinery would probably also work. Ultimately it disrupts the exploitation of labour power in a similar way to a strike. And no syndicalist leader would be worried about damaging the economy, unless (and tbf this would be pretty true to life) he was actually just a left-wing social democrat playing dress-up in syndicalist clothes.

What I wouldn’t expect from people who called them sees syndicalists specifically would be RAF-style terrorism against political targets – or even people at all really. Since the 1970’s it’s been pretty obvious that all this gets in response is more government crackdowns, and I’d be surprised if any major group went for it as a strategy above something more closely sticking to what syndicalism would suggest.

Of course, all of this is contingent upon just how much syndicalism has been bastardised in this timeline, which is why I was curious in my previous comment. I guess at best it’s probably a case similar to “communism=Soviet Union” as in our world, which would I’m sure lead to a load of media prejudice and bias among the wider electorate. But this bias doesn’t tend to hold over people who are actually into the ideas, so I suppose what I’m asking is whether there are people out there who still hold to the sort of pre-1914 ideal of syndicalism, or whether it’s now entirely linked with state control and violence, and the more anarchist/libertarian traditions have disappeared entirely in the mainstream?
There are certainly unions in Prussia, many of the politicians in the SAP and SDP are in fact former union leaders, and syndical action was probably how people like Walenstadt got the former Volkspartei to hold democratic elections. But Prussia is still a democracy and I guess that there is some sort of stygmatization of syndical action by the wider public if it is used to try and undermine the democratic establishment, as a result of what happened in France, Italy and Britain in the Interwar period.

Of course there are still those who still genuinely believe in what syndicalism stands for, but in the end it comes down to convincing your coworkers to lay down their work in a time when employers are not afraid to shut down their factories. I think that when people are afraid of losing their job, they wouldn't take such risks, especially not when whatever wage you've got is barely enough to pay the bills in a time of economic crisis. Spontanious strikes or factory take-overs here and there are of course still possible on a small scale, but I don't think a general strike would occur. At least not until the government actually starts do implement a policy of austerity. But as this chapter was mainly about the government's policy, the reaction of the opposition or the unions was kinda left out. I will probably put something in the 'National News' chapter to talk about the SAP's reaction to the crisis.
 
2006-2010: Foreign Policy
2006-2010: Foreign Policy
Relations with Russia under strain

Between 2006 and 2010 there were several incidents which put the relations with the Russian State under strain. It began in November of 2006 when a pro-democracy rebellion in Aland successfully set up a liberal democracy on the island in the Baltic Sea. In Finland, which was still firmly under Russian control, similar rebellions threatened to unseat the puppet regime. And thus Putin came into action and invaded Aland to put down the insurrection. The media in Prussia was furious, how could the public desire of a nation be put down so violently, they asked. Minister of Foreign Affairs Josef Tusk (CD.P) called the Russian ambassador to his office and demanded an explanation for Russia’s belligerent behaviour. The ambassador simply responded by saying that Russia’s internal affairs are of no importance for the relation between Russia and Prussia. Tusk, bound by his coalition partner, the Junkerpartei, could not publicly denounce the Russians, leaving the matter at that. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, however, threatened to close its harbours for Russian merchants if Putin did not allow democratic elections in Aland. Putin then of course went on to hold elections on the island which saw 90% of voters choosing the pro-Russian party. Merkel stood defeated, but only because of Russian electoral engineering.

IB31Pm7.jpg
Anti-Putin protests in Helsinki. The slogan on the banner reads: “Putin, why are you afraid?” in Finnish and Russian.

In 2008, right before the financial crisis, another event occurred which drove Prussia further away from Russia. The Balkan had often been a source for destabilization in Europe and in 2008 a crisis occurred which sparked fears of another war in former Yugoslavia. Known as the Kosovo-crisis, an insurrection in southern Serbia caused Prussia and Russia to choose opposing sides. Kosovo, a region with a large majority of Albanians, rose up against the Serbian regime. After successfully overthrowing the local government, the Kosovars held a referendum on the question of annexation by Albania. By public demand, the region soon joined Albania and Albanian troops flooded into the region. Serbia called upon its traditional ally, Russia, to intervene in the region, but Putin was afraid of NATO counterreaction, as Serbia was surrounded by mostly NATO countries. And thus Putin turned to diplomatic instead of military measures and called together the Security Council of the United Nations. In the meantime, public debate in Prussia on who to support ran rampant. Traditionally an ally of the Russians, the Junkerpartei now went against Putin and supported Kosovar secession from Serbia, as they feared that going against the will of the locals would further destabilize the region to the point of war. Even though many within their ranks were jingoists, all could agree that a war between NATO and Russia, even a proxy-war, would force them in a position and would ultimately lead to their downfall. In the end, the Security Council could not agree on a compromise and the Albanian occupation of Kosovo continued.

While these previous events caused only a minor shift in Russo-Prussian relations, the financial crisis of 2008 was in many ways the nail in the coffin for widespread Russophilia within the Junkerpartei. Ever since the end of the Second Weltkrieg, Russia had invested a lot in Prussia and even after the fall of the Volkspartei regime in 1992, the Russians put a lot of money into certain corporations. The 2008 financial crisis put an end to all that. Not only did the money-flow from Russia into rural Prussia abruptly stop, causing many business to go bankrupt, Putin also withdrew from the New Hanseatic League and raised their tariffs, even for Prussian merchants. Many within the Junkerpartei felt betrayed, causing a major shift, away from general Russophilia towards a more moderate neutral stance which was already underway since 1992 in many ways. Not only that, but some marginal figures in the party even completely turned around and spoke openly about possibly joining the EU to combat the financial crisis. Chancellor Korwin-Mikke assured his followers that the Junkerpartei’s official stance on the EU had not changed and that Prussia valued its own independence very much, from Brussels but also from Berlin.

UN Peacekeeping Mission in South Africa – July 2008 – August 2009

The financial crisis had many effects on many countries, but Africa was probably one of the regions where things took a more violent turn. In South Africa, dissatisfaction with the corrupt government grew into public unrest. While the corrupt President Sithembiso Dlamini was voted out in the 2008 elections, unrest did not stop, leading to a syndicalist insurrection in the west of the country. Dlamini’s successor, President Helen Zille of the Democratic Alliance, called upon the held of the UN’s Security Council to send a peacekeeping mission to the region. Against the background of the War on Terror, the US agreed, as did several of their allies. President von Bismarck called together a core cabinet of ministers, including among others the Chancellor, the Minister for Foreign Affairs and the Minister of Defence. The President argued that the red danger should not be allowed to spread in Africa, Europe’s backyard, and Prussia should therefore send several divisions to help the South African government. In addition, partaking in a UN peacekeeping mission would grant Prussia the international prestige it so desperately needed. The Chancellor agreed and so did the Minister of Defence, but Minister Tusk had some reservations. Nevertheless, President von Bismarck managed to find a consensus, thus starting the first ‘Prussian military campaign’ since the end of the Second Weltkrieg. Syndicalist protests on the streets increased, now not only protesting against unemployment, but also against Prussian involvement in the UN’s peacekeeping mission.

42nJVXm.png
Syndicalist rebels have risen up in Western South Africa.

Under the leadership of General Gerhard von Hortstein, a considerable force departed for the Cape of Good Hope. By May, they had arrived in Port Elizabeth, not a day too late as syndicalist rebels were already on their way to take the city. The Prussian army intercepted them in Beaufort. The syndicalist army, under the leadership of Angolan freedom fighter Carlos Aragão, was crushed but almost two thousand Prussians lost their lives. Aragão took what little soldiers he had left back to Springbok, where he was finally defeated by a combined force of the South African Army and Prussian Blue Helmets.

KfvKvZu.png
Syndicalist rebels had already taken control of Cape Town, but their advance was halted by Prussian Blue Helmets in Beaufort.

Now that the syndicalists had lost their main force, the fighting mostly stopped and remained limited to occasional skirmishes with guerrilla fighters. In the meantime, the South African regime passed several emergency laws to alleviate the pressure the financial crisis had had on the poorest. The UN’s peacekeeping mission lasted until August of 2009 when things had finally calmed down enough. South African President Zille came stronger out of the conflict than when she began her term and now turned her attention on improving the international image of the African country. By the 2010 World Cup, held in South Africa, all signs that a rebellion had occurred there were already gone. For Prussia, the Peacekeeping Mission was generally seen as a success. The syndicalists were defeated, casualties remained limited and trade relations with South Africa increased substantially. It did however leave a bitter taste in the mouth of the SAP, which saw a possible ally defeated by their own countrymen.

svSHml9.png
Prussian and South African troops quelling unrest in Springbok and Cape Town. In-game, the South Africans passed a reform which took away militancy and immediately ended rebel occupation.

UN Peacekeeping Mission in Liberia – December 2009 – March 2010

In December, another African country made a request to the UN for a Peacekeeping Mission. This time it was Liberia who was dealing with syndicalist insurgents. Once again, President von Bismarck pressed for intervention to prevent syndicalism from coming closer to North Africa or even Europe proper. The situation in Liberia was even worse than earlier in South Africa. Because South Africa was a large country, the syndicalist uprising occupied a relatively small area. Liberia, however, was a small country and by the time Gerhard von Hortstein arrived in West Africa, rebels were already sieging down Monrovia. Von Hortstein was quick to act and landed in Monrovia to secure the capital against the syndicalists. In the battle that ensued, only 605 Prussians were killed and the rebel army was completely annihilated. Prussian troops stayed in Liberia until March of 2010, when the situation had calmed down again and other Blue Helmets could take over.

fRaXLGe.png
Liberian syndicalists are already sieging down the capital.

gT00EKo.png
But General von Hortstein comes to the rescue and manages to completely annihilate the rebels.

The UN Peacekeeping Missions were two major victories for the War on Terror and caused President von Bismarck’s popularity to rise within Junkerpartei ranks. In syndicalist environments, however, the awful effects of the war were blown out of proportions and pictures of coffins returning to Prussia were widespread in syndicalist media. Supporters of Chancellor Korwin-Mikke and President von Bismarck generally spoke about the contribution Prussia was making to the global War on Terror and that the next step would be to end syndicalist terrorism in Europe.