MID WEEK Q&A
Just came here to say that this is a truly great AAR. Fantastic job in crafting a believable yet different alternate history.
Thank you, sir! Glad to hear you like it.
I would love to see a WW1 AAR following this style, but it could be veeeeeeery slow and frustrating from time to time (just remembering this AAR Western Front gives me the creeps).
I remember this AAR was slow during the phoney war era. But I tried to add interesting political things too. To be honest lately it's felt a bit too much on the military side, but with so much happening every week I can barely keep up with just the battles. I would love to read a weekly AAR on ww1, with an in depth behind the scenes look at the political world.
I found this AAR only last week and could hardly stop reading. It's greatly narrated and such a bloody, weird, frightening, fantastic alternate history - please keep it up!
Oh, thank you!
I'm glad I'm still attracting new readers, even though this AAWWII world can seem a little heavy and complex at first. I do my best to make it as easy as possible for new readers to jump in.
I like the thing you added for new readers, summarizing some of the major events of the war.
Thank you.
Sometimes these AAR's can get so long and conplicated that it can be a bit daunting to start as a new reader. Working on the quick timeline for 1940, and people of interest too, but things take time.
I catched up yesterday and I'm curious and worried about Britain's future. But alas, we've been through some bad weeks already, and Britannia still stands.
A damned pity that Copenhagen / the Store Belt is now free for the Red Navy...
Britannia rules the North sea, and we have the Swedish Costal fleet patrolling the baltic seas making sure we've covered that side of the store belt too.
Only one question: Why do you combine CVs and BBs? Just for historical flavor or for different reasons? To me it felt at some points that the mighty Man-o-Wars could have annihilated the enemy where the CVs only drove them away...
For historical flavour. Most of our fleets are historically accurate fleets with a few add ons. Some are merged fleets. But I try to keep it as realistic as possible.
I am very glad that Britain wisely decided to halt the bloodshed on the western front! It would have been madness to stay at war with not one, but two great players in Europe, no matter how repulsive their ideology is.
I'm glad for the few weeks we've had of not seeing 30 000, 50 000 Allied casualties on my desk every week.
what is Denmark's status precisely? I understand that they are a buffer zone and neither the Allies nor the Axis can station any troops there. So are they completely neutral and independent? What if the Soviets decided to declare war on them? Whose responsibility would it be to defend the small nation?
Denmark is now an Allied friendly nation, free from British tampering. We even gave them Iceland and Greenland back. It's a good question
Also, British naval operations in the Baltic would make an amazing chapter for this AAR, especially a landing in St. Petersburg!
I would place the odds of a Soviet landing in Denmark around the same as those of us landing in Arkhangelsk - around nil. It would be a fairly ridiculous overextension of their forces, would be hard to land and even harder to keep supplied.
The Russians would have to get past the Royal and Allied navy. And we have almost full naval supremacy of the world. Only Japan and America could threaten it. But if the Soviets invaded Denmark it would be a rather awkward political problem. My guess is Germany would be fine as long as we got rid of their enemy fast as hell. But it does bring us to another problem. We can't be seen fighting a common enemy. Allied soldiers cannot aid the Nazi German soldier in any way, shape, or form. The backlash from the public would topple us. The British soldiers who have lost so many brothers would spit at our shoes.
I think we can do our best to cautiously enjoy this brief respite we've earned. Draw up plans for round two with Germany, replenish our divisions, maybe send some spare men to reinforce our Asian holdings should Japan come knocking.
Yes. We have freed up a fair amount of IC now and we should find a way to use it before the Reds breaks Germany. Also, yes, we've sent a few Commonwealth divisions to Burma.
Now that a cowardly armistice is a done deal, all we can do now is pick up the pieces. The status of Germany's post-1938 gains will have to be dealt with at some point but one day the people of Czechoslovakia will be free again.
At the end of the war, when we will have dealt with the Soviets, we shall do something.
This is predicated on the bizarre idea a lot of y'all have that the Second World War is over now. It isn't. This was an armistice, not a peace, and once we've regained our strength and the Germans have bled themselves dry against the Russians we'll be back for more. We can work out terms for a permanent peace once the Nazis are broken and Berlin burns.
Don't you think it's a bit too early to be discussing a post-war plan? We do have to beat the reds before the krauts.
humbly request that all of us here stop talking about Germany until Moscow falls.
Empires will crumble, millions will die, and the world will be on fire before this war is over. I have no plans of mapping out territorial conquest until my generals have themselves crossed that river and pierced the Union Jack through the heart of the enemy.
I wonder what turkey's politics are like? It might be a good idea to start courting them to the allies side.
Turkey is a pressure cooker. I believe Russia has to take Scandinavia before She can open up another front. But Britain's eyes are on Turkey and Iran.
Hans Lammers looks like a demon, are you sure he was the right choice?
I don't know, he reflects his government quite well.
Who in their right mind would choose him to be the face of a country? No matter what he says, he'll turn Germany into the equivalent of that one creepy uncle who everyone shuns.
Hahahaha!!
1941 will be the year of battle with the Soviets. We need to bring as many materials to Scandinavia and the Middle East to launch our own offensive against the Red Tide.
I fear the Allies do not have any offensive to launch. But I agree. The hammer is about to fall.
I'm in favor of the torch, it would be universal and still have a strong symbolic significance.
Maybe something like
this?
Thank you, good sir!
I'm terrified at the loss of three whole French air wings...
Damn French, damn Finnish. Don't put your Air force so close to the front!
What's the status of the Balkans? Any Neutrals, any Nazi/Soviet aligned powers?
Romania's gonna fall. DOOM.
Bulgaria is an interesting one. Wonder what she will do now that an alliance with the Axis seems a bit silly. Romania is about to be crumbled, and I don't think the Russians will stop there.
Your AAR literally has me checking the calendar and is the only reason why I'm remotely exited the weekend is over!
Haha!! Thanks!
I'm glad you enjoy it. It's always nice to sit down on Sunday and fill everything out.
Perhaps an investment in infrastructure, well-placed forts and airbases could lead to a significant advantage once the Reds do decide to come into direct sight!
Actually this isn't a bad idea for the British sector in Germany. Land fortification would make it problematic for the Russians. How fast can we build a new Maginot line? 2 years? 5?
The situations seems to be getting sticky, old boy. If we can hold the north, and force the soviets to hold divisions against us, that means it's campaign against Germany will be weaker, ensuring that they are slower and take even more losses.
I'm a bit worried. The time for trench war is over. French forces (and British) are not going to hold a province if it costs them 50 000 men to do so. We need to figure out something smart.
Can't those mountaineers be shipped to Narvik directly? It will defenitely help plugging the holes in the north.
Those mountain divisions should have been in Norway long time ago, sigh... well, never mind.
We are shipping them as fast as we can.
Maybe leaving Germany to their fate was a bad idea... I'm starting to think that if the Soviets keep on rolling, they won't even bleed much before they get to France.
You might be right...
I always thought that scandinavia woud have been tough to defend.
Especially in February. There's a lot of bad terrain in Norway that the Soviet union has to cover, but Sweden will be their way in.
How are we going in the Pacific? It's 1941, we must be ready for Japan's attack
We should be looking at forming a new Pacific fleet from the Mediterranean fleet, or from parts of the Fleets in the North. (Or both).
Dammit we failed to hold the line! Hopefully everything else goes better for us in Scandinavia.
Canada has been sublime until now. My hats off.
Believe it or not, this war is "only" 18 months old... I'm pretty sure Hitler and friends were not expecting it to go this way. Neither the Brits.
Wow. Crazy how much things have changed - and most of the big shifts have been recent too. This war is only speeding up from here - I really expect things to get crazy come Spring when the big offensives can start back up.
1941 will be an even more important year then 1940
Spring this year will be an interesting one. I wonder how far Russian can reach before we can strike back. My biggest fear is that by 1942, Scandinavia has fallen, France has fallen, Italy has fallen, and we are fighting a Red war in Africa.