The USSR did not intend to 'vassalize' anyone in the 1920s.There is as far as I can tell very little institutional continuity. Czarist Russia was a mess and just awful in so many ways. By nature of geography the Soviets inherited certain imperial ambitions, but that is a different type of continuity. Had the revolutions spread we might have seen a number of Soviet vassal states (which is what was created when revolution succeeded outside Russia proper).
The Black Hundreds were clearly A-OK? Nah. Mark Twain put it eloquently, as I posted above. the Czarist regime was the worst in Europe, and up there for the worst on Earth barring Europe's colonial empires. It's horrors led to countless unremembered deaths and lives lived in constant fear of privation, random terror, and the lord knows what else. The USSR, for all its many, many, many crimes, was a far superior government than the terror-idiocracy which preceded it.Imperial Russia was a disaster of a society, but the ineptitude also meant that it was less brutal than the more efficient USSR. The heavy handed methods employed by the communists improved many metrics for the population (literacy etc) but the human cost was at times horrific. And the planned economy caused problems both short- (shortages, general failure to meet demands and famines) and long term (stagnation and lack of innovation).
Western Europe is fortunate that reformists rather than revolutionaries won out on the left side of the political spectrum. The revolutionary vanguard parties created prison states whenever they got the chance.
The 'revolutionary vanguard' was also a) invaded by foreign powers b) had to fight civil wars backed by foreign powers and c) was invaded by the host of Gog and Magog then d) was threatened with nuclear destruction, whilst all the while e) was mostly cut off from international markets & investment.
It might make a country's power structure a bit paranoid.
- 3
- 1