Would 100 Stat Man run make any actual difference to how the campaign goes?
Well CK2 absolutely tears itself apart if you ever managed to get someone above status 30. And that was very difficult to achieve with a much more restricted character editor. You had to really cheat or get lucky with character rolls (which ultimately I think explains Galahad's reign).
I mean Ged breezed through basically everything that was thrown at him, as do the characters in most CK3 AARs to be fair, so with perfect stats surely he'd just have more success but faster.
If there is one huge problem with CK3, it's that there is no hard mode. Only normal, easy, and
very easy.
I've set mongol invasions to random and viking invasions to apocalyptic, which is about as hard as it gets right now.
Because we're going Hellenic, we'll also be fighting every great power on the map to reform it.
I mean if I wanted to read about someone with every possible advantage easily smashing the AI then I'd re-read Der Adler, der Wolf, und die Sonne (sorry @Wraith11B )
At the very least, it won't be Nazis being pushed to victory.
Unless the game breaks if values get too high and it all goes mad like Nuclear Gandhi in the original Civ. If that happens then I would of course support this plan.
Oh...it breaks. Quite frankly, if you give someone all the 'good' personality traits, they have a heart attack every time they do anything remotely 'bad'. Including fabricating claims, plotting to murder someone, being unkind to a criminal etc...
And chaste means you get stressed every time you have anything to do with sex. And hellensim allows a wife and three concubines, who will be constantly all over a 100 stat god...