I was exceedingly unhappy with the hunting arrangement. We were the weaker side, so doing the dirty work for you was not going to happen indefinitely.
I backstabbed you, because our only chance was to hit one of you who we did not know about at the moment. You would've been happy to hit me, just as well.
I suspected aedan would use his power on Arkasas that night, so the pack balance switched..
I wouldn't say you necessarily were the weaker side.
You actually had useful traits. You had a clairvoyance and the cub. Perhaps more, in case you had some.
We had a grand total of a single trait. Arky's brutal, whihc, while not useless, isn't that valuable as you always lose a mate if you get to use a brutal. At least with the cub you get a double hunt whihc can be used at any time.
The offset we got was that we started with two cuiltists, whereas you started with one and the sorc. But given that cultists WILL switch side if beneficial, then that's not really any kind of real offset.
I figured you'd want your cultists to win in your severely disadvantaged situation, but I figured wrongly.
Normally I would, but you literally stabbed me in the back and then taunted me about it.
And with Chieron confirming that you did go for our last mate's neck, rather than the Panzer hunt being random, then it's clear now that you did stab us in the back.
Once again, as I also wrote int he PM. It's not the truce being called off that's the problem for me. It was never going to last. It's the way it was done in. Given that you yourself literally had said to have a truce until the major goodies were dead, whihc they weren't yet, then you deciding to outright fun for Panzer, as opposed to randomly hitting him, defintely is a stab in the back. You hunted that night so you could easily have told us that day, possibly even just before deadline, that the truce was up.
But doing it after the fact, and especially being taunting too, just didn't sit right with me, so I decided to play every single chance I had, no matter how unlikely.
Thanks to alxeu's contact with Wagon that chance was basically zero, but he might have managed to trick some people.
I'm a man of my word. If I give my word that I won't hunt somebody, then I'll keep it. I gave Alxeu my word. Wombat can confirm that I refused to tell him alxeu's name.
hope that Chieron would hunt two villagers
There's no chance of that, espceially not as I voted Sleepy at deadline. Had I sniped off Sleepy then perhaps, though I'd still doubt it.
I still don't know the entirety of his plan. I just don't believe Alxeu would have done anything to help him win either. I still don't see how the self outing could have won him the game.
I do thing
@alxeu was legit, but I cuold be wrong.
In any case then my plan basically was to force the village to lynch the other wolf and to then hope I didn't hit the target alxeu had set. (I fully expected he'd make me the patsy meaning I'd hunt myself in that case.)
Not great chances of succeeding, but there was a chance, and with Sleepy's backstabbing then that was enouhg for me to go on.
I literally almost blew the beans the night Arky was shot due to how it said hunted, and not shot. Had aedan not posted a few minute earlier, saying he'd shot Arky, then I would have outed Sleepy then and there as the way Yakman wrote it made it sound like it was two hunts.