• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Stellaris Dev Diary #205: Announcing the 3.0 ‘Dick’ Update

Hello everyone!

I hope the word about the release date for Nemesis has already reached you, but in case it has somewhat eluded your perception, here is a refresher:

Nemesis will release on April 15th, and here is the second story trailer:

As per usual, our expansions are released together with a significant free update, and this time is no different!

We’re happy to announce that Nemesis will release together with the 3.0 ‘Dick’ Update on April 15th! The update is of course named after author Philip K. Dick, famous for works which inspired, among other things, movies like Blade Runner and Total Recall (which also happens to be one of my favorite movies!).

Why 3.0?
We felt that the changes introduced with the new Intel system and the reworked First Contact system has enough impact on how different the game feels to warrant the change. Early- and mid game feel quite different now, in a very positive manner. Alien empires feel so much more mysterious, and charting the entire galaxy is no longer so easy. Changes like the pop growth system and the addition of industrial districts also felt impactful enough to want us to make the change.

Going forwards, we’re also gearing up to be able to be a bit more agile and deliver updates to the game a bit more frequently. I don’t want to make any grand promises quite yet, but 2021 is looking to be a very good year for Stellaris!

3.0 ‘Dick’ Features:
  • New Intel system
  • Reworked First Contact
  • Reworked Pop Growth
  • New Industrial Districts & some changes to production of Alloys/Consumer Goods
  • New Espionage system & Gather Intelligence Operation (other Operations will be a part of Nemesis)
  • Numerous bug fixes & improvements

Espionage Update
The Espionage system has undergone some changes since the Dev Diaries that previewed them. Based on playtesting and qualitative feedback, we simplified a few of the systems that seemed to be adding unnecessary complexity or were difficult or awkward to understand. The way Encryption, Decryption, and Counter-Espionage all interacted were one of these points of frequent confusion, so we decided to scrap Counter-Espionage entirely, renamed Decryption to Codebreaking, and apply standardized rules when using them:

Encryption is always used as "Espionage Defense"
Codebreaking is always used as "Espionage Offense"

In earlier iterations, which modifier was being referenced varied based on the exact circumstances, which muddled the stats a bit and made it difficult to tell which one would help you more when you're attempting to infiltrate an empire. We renamed Decryption in order to further reduce confusion. Relative Encryption is used often in the system, and will now always compare the "offensive" Empire's Codebreaking with the "defending" Empire's Encryption.

1616066569235.png

Relative Encryption tooltip. In this example, our Codebreaking is lower than their Encryption and their Codebreaking is higher than our Encryption.

1616066587607.png

The refined Operations UI. Envoy on the top left, Infiltration Level (current/max) as progress bar & value. Intel categories in the top-right.

We've streamlined the Operations UI significantly, reducing the sheer amount of numbers associated with a network and the Operations themselves. As part of this streamlining, we've removed the concept of spy power and bandwidth, so it's no longer possible to run multiple simultaneous Operations on a single Empire simultaneously - you'll have to run them one at a time. This change also alleviates a problem we had where it wouldn't always be immediately perfectly clear which mission random events were affecting, so the "mental burden" of running Operations is lower.

Upon completion, Operations will now almost always cause a significant hit to Infiltration to represent lost contacts and heightened security. Operations also used to have varying difficulty per chapter - we've standardized them so we can now list the Operation difficulty on the UI, and let you know if you have an Asset that is especially good at this one.

First Contact Update
Although not much has changed with the system itself since we first showcased it in dev diary #193, there’s still some changes that can be interesting to see.

1616066605514.png

The finished first contact UI. The silhouette in the bottom-right is supposed to be generic, and will reveal a portrait once you’ve progressed far enough into the first contact chain.

Early hostilities can now lead to pre-contact conflicts as well. If you anger a neighboring alien civilization, there’s the chance that they will come and visit you.

More aggressive empires like fanatic purifiers or devouring swarms are also less likely to take your encroachment into their lands very kindly early on.

1616066627081.png

Abducting aliens is no longer a risk-free undertaking.

1616066643790.png

It seems like they weren’t too happy about our abductions…

Outliner Update
We’ve added some small quality-of-life improvement to the outliner. One of these improvements lets you reorder planets in the outliner.

1616066662736.png

Planets will be reordered within the sector listing or planet listing, depending on which option is active.

1616066679716.png

The outliner can also be toggled to show the icons for the designations instead of the icon for the planet class.

With these two options it's now possible to list all your planets as you wish, and to show the designation icons. Our product manager, Simon, can now finally list his Mining 01, Mining 02, Mining 03 etc. planets in the correct, and fanatically organized, order.

---------

That’s all for this week folks! I hope you’re as excited for the upcoming Nemesis release as we are!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • 152Like
  • 85Love
  • 20Haha
  • 7
  • 5
  • 4
Reactions:
Hello everyone!

I hope the word about the release date for Nemesis has already reached you, but in case it has somewhat eluded your perception, here is a refresher:

Nemesis will release on April 15th, and here is the second story trailer:

As per usual, our expansions are released together with a significant free update, and this time is no different!

We’re happy to announce that Nemesis will release together with the 3.0 ‘Dick’ Update on April 15th! The update is of course named after author Philip K. Dick, famous for works which inspired, among other things, movies like Blade Runner and Total Recall (which also happens to be one of my favorite movies!).

Why 3.0?
We felt that the changes introduced with the new Intel system and the reworked First Contact system has enough impact on how different the game feels to warrant the change. Early- and mid game feel quite different now, in a very positive manner. Alien empires feel so much more mysterious, and charting the entire galaxy is no longer so easy. Changes like the pop growth system and the addition of industrial districts also felt impactful enough to want us to make the change.

Going forwards, we’re also gearing up to be able to be a bit more agile and deliver updates to the game a bit more frequently. I don’t want to make any grand promises quite yet, but 2021 is looking to be a very good year for Stellaris!

3.0 ‘Dick’ Features:
  • New Intel system
  • Reworked First Contact
  • Reworked Pop Growth
  • New Industrial Districts & some changes to production of Alloys/Consumer Goods
  • New Espionage system & Gather Intelligence Operation (other Operations will be a part of Nemesis)
  • Numerous bug fixes & improvements

Espionage Update
The Espionage system has undergone some changes since the Dev Diaries that previewed them. Based on playtesting and qualitative feedback, we simplified a few of the systems that seemed to be adding unnecessary complexity or were difficult or awkward to understand. The way Encryption, Decryption, and Counter-Espionage all interacted were one of these points of frequent confusion, so we decided to scrap Counter-Espionage entirely, renamed Decryption to Codebreaking, and apply standardized rules when using them:

Encryption is always used as "Espionage Defense"
Codebreaking is always used as "Espionage Offense"

In earlier iterations, which modifier was being referenced varied based on the exact circumstances, which muddled the stats a bit and made it difficult to tell which one would help you more when you're attempting to infiltrate an empire. We renamed Decryption in order to further reduce confusion. Relative Encryption is used often in the system, and will now always compare the "offensive" Empire's Codebreaking with the "defending" Empire's Encryption.

View attachment 694377
Relative Encryption tooltip. In this example, our Codebreaking is lower than their Encryption and their Codebreaking is higher than our Encryption.

View attachment 694378
The refined Operations UI. Envoy on the top left, Infiltration Level (current/max) as progress bar & value. Intel categories in the top-right.

We've streamlined the Operations UI significantly, reducing the sheer amount of numbers associated with a network and the Operations themselves. As part of this streamlining, we've removed the concept of spy power and bandwidth, so it's no longer possible to run multiple simultaneous Operations on a single Empire simultaneously - you'll have to run them one at a time. This change also alleviates a problem we had where it wouldn't always be immediately perfectly clear which mission random events were affecting, so the "mental burden" of running Operations is lower.

Upon completion, Operations will now almost always cause a significant hit to Infiltration to represent lost contacts and heightened security. Operations also used to have varying difficulty per chapter - we've standardized them so we can now list the Operation difficulty on the UI, and let you know if you have an Asset that is especially good at this one.

First Contact Update
Although not much has changed with the system itself since we first showcased it in dev diary #193, there’s still some changes that can be interesting to see.

View attachment 694379
The finished first contact UI. The silhouette in the bottom-right is supposed to be generic, and will reveal a portrait once you’ve progressed far enough into the first contact chain.

Early hostilities can now lead to pre-contact conflicts as well. If you anger a neighboring alien civilization, there’s the chance that they will come and visit you.

More aggressive empires like fanatic purifiers or devouring swarms are also less likely to take your encroachment into their lands very kindly early on.

View attachment 694380
Abducting aliens is no longer a risk-free undertaking.

View attachment 694381
It seems like they weren’t too happy about our abductions…

Outliner Update
We’ve added some small quality-of-life improvement to the outliner. One of these improvements lets you reorder planets in the outliner.

View attachment 694382
Planets will be reordered within the sector listing or planet listing, depending on which option is active.

View attachment 694383
The outliner can also be toggled to show the icons for the designations instead of the icon for the planet class.

With these two options it's now possible to list all your planets as you wish, and to show the designation icons. Our product manager, Simon, can now finally list his Mining 01, Mining 02, Mining 03 etc. planets in the correct, and fanatically organized, order.

---------

That’s all for this week folks! I hope you’re as excited for the upcoming Nemesis release as we are!
Give me the dick. Update. I can't wait.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I'm not a fan of the change to make it only possible to have one operation against a particular empire at a time. It feels completely arbitrary and gamey.
Perhaps something where you start with only 1 operation, but then policies, traits, civics, techs, could increase this to 2, 3, 4, 5 etc.

I understand the need to reduce the immediate strain a large and open system might present but I think there's a great amount of potential here for civilisations to spec into being a 'spy' race, full of intrigue and infiltration
 
  • 6
  • 2Like
Reactions:
You guys had to have know there would be a bunch of dick jokes when you named 3.0 dick, even if your studio is a Swedish company you have been shown on numerous occasions to speak English with no issues.

That means you knew this was going to happen and allowed it to, the only question is why?
 
  • 4
Reactions:
he's just be a dick (update) party pooper
oh no, i fully approve of the dick jokes, i was simply wondering why a company would do something so unprofessional.
 
  • 14
  • 1
Reactions:
oh no, i fully approve of the dick jokes, i was simply wondering why a company would do something so unprofessional.
It's just a fun silly joke that also genuinely fits their naming convention, I wouldn't call it unprofessionalism. It's got a lot of people's attention drawn to the update too, I don't think it's done any harm.
 
  • 10
Reactions:
It's just a fun silly joke that also genuinely fits their naming convention, I wouldn't call it unprofessionalism. It's got a lot of people's attention drawn to the update too, I don't think it's done any harm.
fair enough, I never meant it in a negative way, just in the sense that i have a hard time imaging a corporate board meeting where somebody proposes that something should be named dick
 
fair enough, I never meant it in a negative way, just in the sense that i have a hard time imaging a corporate board meeting where somebody proposes that something should be named dick

Imagine saying that to Mister Dick, Philip's father.

In any case it is indeed a badly named DLC, as it has little to do with PKD's main fiction themes and subjects.
 
  • 8
Reactions:
fair enough, I never meant it in a negative way, just in the sense that i have a hard time imaging a corporate board meeting where somebody proposes that something should be named dick


The PDS board definitely had balls to go with Dick.
 
  • 8Haha
Reactions:
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with renaming decryption to codebreaking.
codebreaking as counter part to encryption sounds stupid. Might as well called it "codification and codebreaking"

Why take away the ability to learn new words anyways
 
  • 5
  • 1
Reactions:
Hey guys, this prominent science fiction authors name (which has been the naming convention for all Stellaris patches) is also a colloquial word for male genitalia! Drop everything to make ""hilarious"" jokes about this!!!
 
  • 3Like
  • 1
Reactions:
All about the update has sounded very interesting - except this last change about espionage. It sounded they are simplifying it possibly too much, making it something that is in theory nice, but in practice ignored like the galactic community for me. (I pay no attention to galactic community anymore, even if Im part of it)

I don't think counter-espionage should be removed at least. There should be some kind of back-and-forth between two empires that are doing espionage work against each other. There should be some way to counter enemy espionage. Empires should have different level of defenses against espionage, as there are vastly different kinds of empires and species. How will espionage work on an empire who have enigmatic engineering and their tech is too arcane to decipher for example?

Codebreaking vs encryption sounds.... very boring.
 
  • 4
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with renaming decryption to codebreaking.
codebreaking as counter part to encryption sounds stupid. Might as well called it "codification and codebreaking"

Why take away the ability to learn new words anyways

To simplify words to the masses.
 
  • 5
  • 1
Reactions:
Empires should have different level of defenses against espionage, as there are vastly different kinds of empires and species. How will espionage work on an empire who have enigmatic engineering and their tech is too arcane to decipher for example?
That is literally what encryption does... Enigmatic Engineering DOES give you bonuses to encryption as well. The problem isn't mechanical, it's just that the chosen terminology is really, really bad since it implies the only thing that decides how hard it is to spy on another empire is how good their VPN is.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
We all knew that this name will come some day as a version name, they simply can't 'forget' one of the greatest scifi - author.

So, humor doesn't hurt Dick any more...
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: