Wow, what an insightful remark.
It's still an opportunity cost. It's time and effort that could have been spent making... literally anything else. I have every right to be upset when the product I bought, was broken, and instead of being fixed 3 years ago when it was first broken, they make... this instead.
You'd be hard-pressed to find any customer protection organisation who would agree with you.
The game wouldn't even be broken by their standards.
But seriously, that statement is accurate. If you don't believe that the new DLC is good enough? Vote with your wallet and don't buy it. If you think Paradox needs to work on bugfixes over DLC? Vote with your wallet and don't buy it and convince others to do the same.
You think the game is broken but you've clearly been buying the DLC, thus you are part of the group that is incentivising them continuing to make more DLC over focussing on bugfixes.
It really is that simple.
What you are doing here is like someone complaining about microtransactions as they buy them, or a person complaining about how Fifa is the same regurgitated shit each year but still buys it anyway.
If Paradox is doing something you don't like and they haven't fixed it to your satisfaction despite you using the proper system to file an official bug report, vote with your wallet and show them that you disapprove in a way that actually matters to them.
- 15
- 2