Should we tell them the absolute mess Sweden was in in both 867 and 1066 when compared to Denmark or let them live in innocent bliss?Of course. Sweden is top priority.
Please. Don't.Will Dev Diarys take a break now?
Despite the game name, crusader kings are not a central point in the game.Oh, thats dissapointing, the Norse are already buffed, and now will be even more central for a game about CRUSADER KINGS
Why do media outlets persist with this stereotype that North Germanic people wore shaggy, untrimmed fur mantles that make Norse warriors look like Cruella de Vil? The Last Kingdom, HISTORY's Vikings and now Paradox lmao. @El Tyranos has done a better job with his mod representing medieval Norse clothing, and that's free.
[
What is the mod called?
(Sorry for the multiple post)
Crusades are quite OP and the entire fundamentals of the game are built around a caricature of High Medieval France. I'm sure the crusaders are going to do just fine. I wouldn't want a DLC focusing on major content for Catholics/Byzzies to be a Flavor Pack anyway. Means less content.Oh, thats dissapointing, the Norse are already buffed, and now will be even more central for a game about CRUSADER KINGS
It should be, but there are also many interesting cultures in this time period and they wasted the first flavor DLC in the meme that the Vikings are. Muslims, Bizantines and even the Nomadic hordes deserved priority over them.Despite the game name, crusader kings are not a central point in the game.
They could have balanced the Crusade/GHW mechanics while giving us some flavor, but i agree with you anyways... but my disappointment over having another "vIkAnG" DLC/game/whatever is more of a personal thing that a real issue for me. I was expecting something more interesting.Crusades are absurdly OP and the entire fundamentals of the game are built around a caricature of High Medieval France. I'm sure the crusaders are going to do just fine. I wouldn't want a DLC focusing on major content for Catholics/Byzzies to be a Flavor Pack anyway. Means less content.
You could also say that a couple of CK2 mods (GOT, HIP, CK2+) are also worth MUCH more than any CK2 dlc. And you'd be right.The stuff in the free patch and existing mods are better than the $7 flavour pack.
AAAAND
"You can decide to send your son to the Varingian guard" - Biz major update confirmed?
Question: will the flavor pack come alongside any new steam achievements?
Can't say I disagree. I vikinged myself out in CK2. They know it's an easy sell though. And besides, this is only a Flavor Pack. I wouldn't feel satisfied if they covered Western Catholics, Byzantines, or West Asian Muslims in a small thing like this. There's no way it would do them justice.It should be, but there are also many interesting cultures in this time period and they wasted the first flavor DLC in the meme that the Vikings are. Muslims, Bizantines and even the Nomadic hordes deserved priority over them.
They could have balanced the Crusade/GHW mechanics while giving us some flavor, but i agree with you anyways... but my disappointment over having another "vIkAnG" DLC/game/whatever is more of a personal thing that a real issue for me. I was expecting something more interesting.
I'm fine with this. I'm still bitter i was forced to buy Jade Dragon just for the very neat ducal conquest casus belli unlocked to everyoneYou could also say that a couple of CK2 mods (GOT, HIP, CK2+) are also worth MUCH more than any CK2 dlc. And you'd be right.
Good thing is how this is completely optional. Even better thing is how Paradox apparently learned from mistakes from CK2 dlc. As in, they are not making full features and releasing them alongside regional content. You had to buy Legacy of Rome, if you wanted retinues. LoR was a minor dlc, focused around a very specific region, but it had a feature which was very impactful for everyone on the map. Meaning, you absolutely had to buy LoR.
With Northern Lords, you can just say: "meh, I don't care about Vikings." and simply not purchase it.