also funny when you start a romance with your spouse, leave a letter and they say they "can't encourage you" like it's somehow inappropriate for someone to love their spouse and leave letters for them. what if you get caught!
- 6
- 1
That actually makes sense lol.
The first guy that throws corpses is just an asshole. But two guys throwing them at each other? now that's a rivalry.
Oh. That is actually quite realistic judging from personal experience.Outcome of event: "You lose 40 Opinion of you for 5 years"
(If someone can throw it first... why can't I throw my plague stained courtier at them FIRST?)
So, naturally I've gotten some weird events where I have a rival competitor for my own wife's attentions even though in the actual middle ages pursuing another man's wife would essentially be adultery and a crime! Why are you even allowed to use the romance scheme on your own wife? It's not like she had the opportunity to romantically rebuff you like an unmarried maiden would
Maybe getting married is too easy. Maybe the women should be much more resistant to marrying someone they don't love by having negative modifiers, countered by the positive modifiers of "my dad, the king, wants me to do this" and "well, you are a king..."
If you manage to get a marriage of convenience, that the woman didn't want - you could probably expect her to cheat on you, unless she's scared of you. You probably wouldn't even mind, because it's a marriage of convenience.
He is in alexandria? When I conquered Rome as Sabians, the coptic pope suddenly started crashing all my parties as il-tempered drunk hobo, and he was apparently in my court, dispite not being coptic or controlling any coptic provinces.Not an event, but when I double click my Pope's title I do find it somewhat immersion breaking that his 'duchy' doesn't exist on the map, and to be shown that he lives on a deserted strip of coastal sand:
He is in alexandria? When I conquered Rome as Sabians, the coptic pope suddenly started crashing all my parties as il-tempered drunk hobo, and he was apparently in my court, dispite not being coptic or controlling any coptic provinces.
You're actually confusing medieval standards with Victorian standards. We have quite a lot of information about the medieval era written during Victorian times which mostly project Victorian ethics and/or misconceptions, and occasionally then-relevant cultural debates (this is where the idea that people before Columbus thought the world was flat came from; people were trying to paint the Church as ignoramuses because of a then-relevant debate over evolution and archaeology).This is the middle ages, society was incredibly patriarchal and female self-determination was basically a minor concern to the power structure at the time. Women didnt have a choice in who they married
The Coptics in Egypt were actually relatively tolerated in real history - unlike in the game, a popular revolt caused by religious persecution was a real and scary threat, far better to leave the Copts alone as long as they pay their taxes (Jizya included)He is yeah. Although it's controlled by Muslims, so guess he must have dug himself a hole in the sand somewhere to hide, as it's the only logical reason I can think of that they haven't kicked him out or even killed him.
The Coptics in Egypt were actually relatively tolerated in real history - unlike in the game, a popular revolt caused by religious persecution was a real and scary threat, far better to leave the Copts alone as long as they pay their taxes (Jizya included)
Oh there were plenlty of "so unimportant the game does not simulate them" courtiers that got infected and died to it, making a Infection chain to you and your daughter.What got me about this one is that I was the King of England, seated in the North Riding. One of my Dukes from Dover comes up, throws a corpse at me - and that's about personal rivalry? Fuck that, I should have had legal basis to revoke his title and probably execute him for treason.
And then, the infection killed ONLY my daughter, and then me. Why did we even go outside? What were the peasants doing?
You are mixing up sex, marriage and romance.There's a lot of issues with the romance scheme. As I understood it, this scheme is basically meant to emulate how chivalrous knights would court damsels and the like. But for some reason, you can use it on your own wife.
So, naturally I've gotten some weird events where I have a rival competitor for my own wife's attentions even though in the actual middle ages pursuing another man's wife would essentially be adultery and a crime! Why are you even allowed to use the romance scheme on your own wife? It's not like she had the opportunity to romantically rebuff you like an unmarried maiden would
Oh there were plenlty of "so unimportant the game does not simulate them" courtiers that got infected and died to it, making a Infection chain to you and your daughter.
there is a chance you're the most powerful man in the world but apparently any rando can just waltz into your wife's bedroom and try to murder her since the concept of guards is unheard of
I was about to make a post about this yesterday.
If I'm in a civil war with my vassal who is trying to put himself on the throne, I shouldn't get an event where I am visiting his castle and can help him reorganize his library or dining hall. Tons of stupid events like this.
Or I'm in a war with a vassal and I get an event where he's at my tourney and I can put him to some unwanted task to mess with him- uh, buddy we're at war. You can capture and ransom him FFS
A quick filter in the game code could disable this but , it seems like a really bad oversight.